the with the needs and and concerns of the citizenry are no long. are addressed in the wall in argues that in inverted totalitarianism un like classical totalitarianism economics trumps politics whereas in classical totalitarian regimes economics politics always took precedent over economic cause and politics of. a tool to facilitate policy politics and a hold it ruled by virtue of multi-generational but all as it was and for instance if you take the decision to destroy european jewry it from an economic standpoint it was an irrational decision where is in inverted totalitarianism of the primacy of the market everything is placed before the altar of the market all human behavior has to conform to the needs of the market now there's nothing in three thousand years of economic history to justify this utopian vision that the market always iran snubs and had read their god well greenspan favorite book. said that we should all sacrifice human behavior to the it's an absurdity and it's utopianism you know which francis fukuyama and larry summers and thoma

built what is now mexico city, in the middle of a lake they call texcoco, and in those times the citizenry travelled from place to place by boat. and now with the lake long ago dried out the only vestiges of the past are the canals of xochimocho, a tourist destination and a cruel reminder for the locals that there was once another way to go about town. mexico city traffic is said by many to be the worst in the world. 20 million residents constantly jockeying for limited road space, and fruitlessly lamenting the consequences. >> in recent years the government has established a restriction program to combat smog and congestion and permitting only certain cars to travel on certain days. juan manuel marquez however has plenty to go around. >> while he has lived and trained in mexico city his entire life, his opponent was 1 years old. >> my first time in the united states, we came to san francisco and decided to ride bus to la. my manager is looking for a gym that we can work out. after that, that's a beginning. they said tuesdays, thursdays and saturdays aside for sparring here. by camps' end,

a south carolina sheriff thinks so calling for the citizenry. that's a tough word to say. why did i use it? calling for the citizenry to carry more weaponry after a female was attacked in a public park. the law men whose name is chuck wright, there he is, looks like chuck wright would, seen here with the official department mental mustache. a guy choked a woman and tried to rape her before fleeing in her car. the suspect, walter lance had been arrested over 20 times and the sheriff started his press conference by saying this. oh, i have to say it "our form of justice is not making a concealed weapon, that will fix it." and his message for women? >> i want these people to stop forever doing this. i am tired of looking at these victims. >> wright tells fox news .com that there is nothing political about what he is saying. we are not trying to raise up a militia. we are sending a message to the bad guys that we are tired of it. how should the attempted rapist be punish ?ed perhaps a date with snappy. >>> that scares me. >> that would take care of the problem. >> common sense

in those times, citizenry traveled from place it place by boat.day with the lake long ago dried out, the only vestages of the past are the canals of sochimilco. a cruel reminder to locals that there once was another way it move about town. mexico city traffic is said by many to be the worst in the world. with 20 million residents constantly jockeying for limited road space. and fruitlessly lamenting the consequences. >> they combat smog and congesting, permitting certain cars to travel on certain days. manuel marchionnk marcas, howevs plenty to go around. while juan has lived and trained in mexico city his entire life, his opponent was 22 years old, when his first journey across the pacific ocean changed everything. >> my first time in the united states, we came to san francisco and we decided to ride greyhound going to l.a. when we get to l.a., my manager looking for a gym we can work out. and somebody told us, oh, there's a gym there, wild card gym. we went to the gym that day and after that, that's the beginning. >> since that meeting a decade

we encourage open government, because democracies depend on an informed and active citizenry. we help strengthen civil societies, because they empower our citizens to hold their governments accountable. and we advance the rights of all people -- women, minorities and indigenous cultures -- because when societies harness the potential of all their citizens, these societies are more successful, they are more prosperous and they are more just. these principles have guided our approach to burma, with a combination of sanctions and engagement. and today, aung san suu kyi is free from house arrest. some political prisoners have been released, and the government has begun a dialogue. still, violations of human rights persist. so we will continue to speak clearly about the steps that must be taken for the government of burma to have a better relationship with the united states. this is the future we seek in the asia pacific -- security, prosperity and dignity for all. that's what we stand for. that's who we are. that's the future we will pursue, in partnership with allies and friends,

and demanding that our politicians and most importantly our media treat us like the well informed citizenry that thomas jefferson patient. as the big picture for tonight for more information on the stories we covered visit our website to thom hartmann dot com free speech dot org and. you can also check out our two you tube channel through and so it's all part of our entire show is also available as a free video podcast on i tunes and we have a free time our but i phone and i pad app the app store it also sends feedback and twitter atomosphere are on facebook a tom underscore a watch message boards telephone line over the phone. and no forget democracy begins with you get out there and get active tag your it occupies something you see in the. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you hear or see some other part of it and realized everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm sorry welcome to the big picture.

and demanding that our politicians and most importantly our media treat us like the well informed citizenry the thomas jefferson patient. of next what makes you a part of the one percent it would make sure a part of the ninety nine percent of the answer in tonight's deleted. drives the world of the year mongering used by politicians who made the decision to break through to the maid who can you trust no one who is in view with that noble mission to receive where we had a state controlled capitalism and school factions when nobody dares to ask we do you are t. question more. the good the bad and the very very good to simply ugly the good. lansing mayor virg bernero as mayors from around america dispatching their police forces to a baker occupy movements mayor but narrow in lansing michigan is doing things a bit differently he's welcoming the occupy the last month mayor bernero spoke at an occupy lansing rally and has continued cordial and cooperative relations with the occupiers ever since and his staff thinks that the rest of the country should follow their example. i think that our occupy

and demanding that our politicians and most importantly our media treat us like the well informed citizenry that thomas jefferson. as the big picture for tonight for more information on the stories we've covered visit our website to tom hartman dot com free speech or an r t dot com you can also check out our two you tube channel there of them so retarded dot com entire show is also available for free video podcast on i tunes and we have a free time on our but i phone and i pad app store it also sends feedback a twitter account others who are on facebook tom underscore a blog message was told from comment line over the top. and no forget democracy begins with you get out there and get active tag your it occupies something to see that no. more news today violence has once again flared up. these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada after. the giant corporations rule today . you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so for like sleep you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you hear or see some other part of it and realized everyth

that's what informed citizenry is. and think of it as an insurance policy. here's the deal-- if we are completely wrong on this, we've lost some money and we've lost some economic steam. but if we are right and climate change is happening as the most august body of scientists, like the national academy of scientists, is telling us, we don't have another planet to have a do-over again. and that's where it becomes really serious. you know, you don't really have another chance at this. so you... you know, the cost of dealing with it today is about the equivalent of one latte a week from starbucks. if you wait 50 years from now... >> hinojosa: for everybody in the united states, or for everyone... >> yeah, every person in the western world. and it just gives you a sense of how much. it isn't a huge amount of money. it's significant, but it's not huge. you wait 20 years, you wait 30 years, the cost rises dramatically-- by an order of magnitude. so deal with the problem now when you can still actually deal with it, or deal with it later. either way it's going to h

government brutality or regulation or there's always been some kind of problem that have annoyed with the citizenry so in some ways this is not necessarily a news story and only becomes a new and important story if it looks like it is a national expression as opposed as opposed to an extreme outlier so we could look for example to nine hundred sixty eight riots in chicago and say ok that was an outlier it was a riot and we didn't express the the government. the government power coast to coast it was just an outlier but now it looks like you're saying in a in a variety of agencies f.b.i. cia i.r.s. t.s.a. ogg on the line down to the local police force a a kind of. brute force militarization. again we no past policy that has become almost an shrine so what that means is that for the guy who's just trying to make a buck who's just trying to operate a business he doesn't know what the real law is he doesn't know if the real law is the one that is written in the missile codes or the real law is what some government agency feels is the law of the moment right and so we've seen over and over and over is g

in addition, democracy depends on an educated citizenry. so how are we doing? let's take a rough look. 100 representative american kids entering high school. what does fate have in store for them? 25 out of that 100 won't graduate from high school. a total of 50 won't go to college. that's half the class that won't go on to higher education. 50 will attend college, but only 22 will graduate within six years meanwhile, other countries are outstarting us. on a recent international test, u.s. students ranked only 15th in the world in reading, 23rd in science and 31st in math. overall, the world economic forum ranks the quality of our education at 26th. what's odd is that we've been outspending most developed countries by a long shot. in 2007, we spent over $10,000 per student versus the $7,400 average for rich countries. how can we spend so much money and have so little to show for it? we'll ask that question and others to some of the leading figures in american education here on this special essay. we'll examine the role of teachers, testing ands technology. and

how can we put up with at this, as a citizenry? how can we?- how can we put up with this, as a citizenry? how can we? yesterday became flat out and said that the election is the big thing -- yesterday, they came out and said that the election is the big thing. and that it would be business as usual until then. how can we put out -- how can we put up with that? otherlet's look at some news stories. "terror suspects arrested in new york city." host: other stories in the news. "usa today," saying that some stocks saw big gains. they did an analysis showing that a series of public companies that were soundly beat in the stock market, as we see here an image of the ceo of tesla motors, there is information on the effect of the stimulus program. this is international news. spain alexei conservative but in the debt crisis. "-- spain elects a conservative in the debt crisis. open quote boaters a clear no margin for a mediocre government." -- "voters declare it no margin for a mediocre government." host: also, this bit of international news, looking at

i also hope police officers, well-trained police officers would be barack ained to deal w the citizenry and not arrest people simply because a citous for the sake of argument was being arrogan's and any effect the officer arrests henry louis gates even though the pan wfeareor showed s this becomes a firestorm. the president is asjrd his views of this. the president, barack obama says -- i don'tighbnow all the fac, but given what i do know am i going to say this is racial discrimination? he does not accuse the police officer of engammng in racial discriminatioc what he does say is it does aesear this was a stupid action in so g tr as the professor had given prove this was his house. he says this was std. not racial discriminatory. merely that it is s alpi is there are people who iwayediatey went on the attack and accused the president of engaginlaiin a plane of the race card. to mention one person, glen beck, welppbores en pp>>t tv personality. he said -- it shes eed barack obama has a pan wblem with whit culture. this shows he is a racis's the president will say anything about race with

in addition, democracy depends on an educated citizenry. so how are we doing? let's take a rough look. 100 representative american kids entering high school. what does fate have in store for them? 25 out of that 100 won't graduate from high school. a total of 50 won't go to college. that's half the class that won't go on to higher education. 50 will attend college, but only 22 will graduate within six years. meanwhile, other countries are outsmarting us. on a recent international test, u.s. students ranked only 15th in the world in reading, 23rd in science and 31st in math. overall, the world economic forum ranks the quality of our education at 26th. what's odd is that we've been outspending most developed countries by a long shot. in 2007, we spent over $10,000 per student versus the $7,400 average for rich countries. how can we spend so much money and have so little to show for it? we'll ask that question and others to some of the leading figures in american education here on this special essay. we'll examine the role of teachers, testing and technology. and

citizenry and voting collect the rent. secondly women have slightly higher registration rates than men and women turn out slightly higher percentages than men. larger numbers absolute number of women combined with women heightened turnout makes for a big electoral impact. women also are disproportionately democratic. this is true across all age groups and also true or cross all racial groups. racial and ethnic groups women have a slight preference for the democratic party compared to men. women are more likely than men to vote for the democratic presidential candidate. that has been the case in 1992. that gap has been between two percentage points to five the percentage points the pentagon the polls you look at. there's a democratic advantage in the electorate for the democratic party. in general because of women. the absolute numbers that turn out in preference of the democratic party. the issues that seem to mobilize women and attract their vote have to do with social welfare issues and foreign policy issues and to a cer

would also hope the police officers, well trained police officers would be trained to deal with the citizenryand not arrest people simply because the citizen was for the sake of argument being arrogant. in any event the officer arrests henry gates even though the professor, it showed that this was his house. this becomes something of a firestorm. a press conference. the president has asked. the president, barack obama says, first of all, i don't know the facts, but given what i do know, am i going to say this was racial discrimination? no peace treaty does not accuse the police officer of engaging in racial discrimination. what he does say, it does appear that this was a stupid action insofar as the professor had given proof that this was his house. he said this is stupid. he did not say it was racially discriminatory. he said it was stupid. there are people who immediately went on the attack and accused the president of engaging in a playing of the race card. to mention one person, glenn back, well-known tv personality, he says to my plan beck said it showed that barack obama has a problem w

emerging democracies, doing what we well in the united states, which is try to create an informed citizenryer to do that well, we have to have university partners. we've had conversations with them about partnering with commissions to basically export education and civil dialogue in the process of creating a democratic system. >> so that's the project that we're invited to do. we're very excited about it. we need to put finishing touches on it before we can do more formal announcements, but it seems to me a perfect fit. we're really pleased. >>> how do you think your students will benefit from something like this? >> the great thing about an institution like dominican and one of the things that really attracted me, we're small enough to have that very personal engagement you need in college when you first start out. at the same time, we're large enough to literally open the world. this will very specifically allow us to do that. i see our students talking to students in universities in emerging democracies about major issues in this country, major issues in that country, and the presidentia

they want to be better informed citizenry with choices. >> i am not quite so optimistic. >> that's because you lived next to sarah palin for a year. >> i learned to keep my head down. people have the right to choose and there is so much more to choose from and they tend to choose what reinforces with the already believe. people do not seek out. when sarah palin was elected mayor she presided over first city council meeting and a friend of hers, somebody who voted for her, gave her a book at the end of the meeting because she was worried that she was ignorant in so many ways. he gave her the book called " worldly philosophers" to teach her something about economics. she would not even take a book out of his hands. she put her own hand out and said no. i never read anything that might challenge my beliefs. [laughter] i am afraid that palinization is spreading through technology. people watch fox news because that reinforces what they believe or msnbc, they will carry that mind set over to the internet and all the wonderful opportunities that are available. who seeks out typical the informati

gingrich got into it about the patriot act and we know paul's position, big government coming in on the citizenry. let's take a listen to that exchange. >> i think the patriot act is unpatriotic. i'm concerned as everyone is about the terrorist attack. timothy mcveigh was a vicious terrorist. >> timothy mcveigh succeeded. that's the whole point. timothy mcveigh killed a lot of americans. i don't want a law that says after we lose a major american city, we're sure going to come and find you. i want to law that says you try to take out an american city, we're going to stop you. >> so, newt showing there that he is fairly hawkish. >> oh, yeah, and most of the republicans on the stage disagreed with ron paul there. but that exchange really does kind of show the conflict in the republican party, particularly has the tea party and libertarian streak in the tea party is gained whole. what ron paul is talking about, look, the government shouldn't be doing these things, but the conservative we saw in the bush years, we need strong security to prevent attacks. >> i thought it was interesting that after the

issue is training up the afghan security forces so that we're comfortable that they can protect that citizenry and continue to take the war to the terrorists that are using afghanistan and pakistan, i might add. it's a very complex part of the world. but i think that our military is doing the best job that they c can, considering the lack of support that they're getting for this administration and telegraphing to the enemy when we're going to pull out. >> garrett: senator santorum i know you want to jump in on iran and i will let you do that nisecond. the taliban said the afghans have an endless stamina for war. if you were commandinger in chief would you have endless stamina for victory in afghanistan. >> thank you, major, i appreciate that. victory against the taliban in afghanistan is the taliban is a neutered force. they are no longer a security threat to the afghan people or to our country. that would be victory. it doesn't mean wipe them out. you wipe them out but they're no longer a security threat. the bigger issue-- and i know there are those of us at the end that don't get a lot of q

so we need to have devices on the state and federal level that permit us, given what citizenry wants to have diverse programs funded, do that, but not tap into federal funds that have been paid, for example, by the trucking industry. even if the economy grows a little bit over the next decade, we've err we're going to have 30 missouri more freight to move in this country. railroads do not go to 80% of our communities. intermodalism is a concept we're all familiar with, where you put the trucks take the freight to the trains and the trains take it halfway or all the way across the country, and then they unlead it the last few miles, and that's the concept that's very efficient and works very well. it's going to take highways. when you say to the trucking industry, oh, but you have to have enhancements and flexibility, i say, wait a minute, we got to move freight across this country. and there's going to be a lot more of it. and i think, governor, that's exactly the concept that we've lost that we have to re-establish. we do have to narrow cast. you want me to pay a tax in the transpor

citizenry in voting electorate. secondly, women have slightly higher registration rates than do men, and women turn out at slightly higher percentages than do men. the larger number, absolute number of women combined with women heightened turn out makes for a big electoral impact. women are so are disproportionately to defend democratic. this is true across all age groups, and it is also true across all racial groups. racial and ethnic groups, women have a slight preference for the democratic party. so women come into an election, things like turnout and the range of issues that might attract women are important. women are more likely than men to vote for the democratic presidential candidate. that has been the case since 1992. that gap has been between two to five percentage points depending upon the polls you look at. nonetheless, there is a democratic advantage in the electorate for the democratic party in general because of women. the absolute numbers that turn out and preference of the democratic party. no, the

citizenry and the voting electorate. secondly, women have slightly higher registration rates than men and women turn out at her slightly higher percentage than men, and the larger number absolute number of women combined with women - turnout makes for a big electoral impact. women also are disproportionately democratic. this is true across all age groups and it's also true across all racial groups so racial and ethnic groups women still have a slight preference for the democratic party compared to men. when we come into an election things like turnout and the range of issues that attract women are very important. women are more likely than men to vote for the democratic presidential candidate. that's been the case since 1992. that gap has been between two percentage points to five percentage points, depending upon the polls that you look at. but nonetheless there is a space and vintage in the electorate for the democratic party in general because of women. the absolute numbers that turnout in the democratic party. now th

a well educated citizenry is clearly in the national interest. the central federal role is to ensure all americans regardless of race, gender, and disability have the same equal opportunity as any other other american citizen. likewise the constitution spreasly states our national government was formed specifically to promote the general welfare and to secure the blessings of liberty. the general welfare, i submit, is greatly endangered when the populace is not adequately educated and education is critical to little bit. as frederick dug last noted, it it -- frederick douglass means, emancipation means liberty, end quote. it is no surprise that the northwest ordinance of 1787 spreasly stated that the means of education shall be forever encouraged. that law encouraged new territories to establish schools. the federal government also encouraged states to establish public colleges and universities through the morell act of 1862. that started the whole land-grant college movement. moving into the 21st century, the -- the 20th century, the g.i. bill p

citizenry about intellect.condly, women are slightly higher for legislation rates than men and women turn out a slightly higher percentages than do men. the larger absolute number of women combined with finance heightened turnout makes for a big electoral impact. women also are disproportionately democratic. this is true across all age groups and is also true across all racial groups. so racial and ethnic groups. women still have a slight preference for the democratic party compared to men. so when we come into an election, things like turnout in the range of issues that attract women are very important. women are more likely than men to vote for the presidential candidate and that's been the case since 1992. the gap has been between two percentage points to five percentage points depending on the polls you look at. nonetheless, there's a democratic advantage in the light nonetheless, there's a democratic advantage in the light nonetheless, there's a democratic advantage in the light nonetheless, there's a demo

citizenry and women have slightly registration rates than do men and women turn out at slightly higherpercentages than do men. and the larger number -- absolute number of women combined with women heightened turnout makes for a big electoral impact. .. that gap has been between two percentage points to five percentage points depending upon the polls and you looked at. but nonetheless there is a democratic advantage in the electorate for the democratic party. in general because of women. the absolute numbers that turn that in the preface to the democratic party. now, the ec's this seemed to mobilize women and attract their votes have to do with social welfare issues, have to do with foreign policy issues and also to a certain extent morality issues, but on these issues they go in different directions. issues like same-sex marriages. women are much more succumb to that demand. not by a huge margin, but nonetheless. women are more concerned with foreign policy security issues, and that can have an impact on women's boat. finally, women are more concerned about social welfare issues, inclu

it doesn't look like the citizenry planned to join them either. and last night on the late night comedy show jimmy kimmel live. cain described what it was like to say what it was like to watch bialek's press conference. >> the feelings that you have when you know that all of this is totally fabricated, you go from anger, then you get disgusted. because there's not an ounce of truth in all these accusations. >> reporter: now bialek said she told her boyfriend and another friend about the incident but didn't complain to the restaurant association at the time because she didn't work there. as for cain, he will face the media later today, jeff. he is holding a press conference to respond to these accusations. >> jan crawford, thank you. >>> joining us now, sharon bialek and her attorney, gloria allred. why did you decide to come out now? what's in it for you? >> absolutely nothing. i have so much to lose, but really nuthing to gain. it was a very tough decision for me to make and i know i'm doing the right thing. >> but, again, why? why did you decide

path of citizenship for those that have been in the country for awhile and established a path to citizenrytion issue is four problems. secure the border for real. enforce the laws that are there. i don't believe we need another path. we he don't need any special exceptions. we need to clean up the bureaucracy that is already there. >> cain says the states should be empowered to deal with the millions of immigrants already here illegally. >> shannon: once they were on opposite ends of pennsylvania avenue but now former president bill clinton is praising former house speaker newt gingrich during an exclusive interview with news max. >> he is articulate and tries to think of a conservative version of an idea that will solve a legitimate problem. for example, last night i watched the national security debate last night and newt said two things that would make an independent voter say well, i got to consider that. he said okay, i don't want to legitimize immigrants who came here undocumented, illegally. on the other hand, a lot of those people have been here for years and worked hard and paid t

i feel that a lady that has good, up standing citizenry in the community should arm themselves if theyfications of our laws, and i certainly think they should be trained with it. i don't think everyone should have a gun. i don't think that every person, you know, should go to the store and be able to buy any kind of weapon they want but if you are a good citizen and you do not go out here and rob people and rape people and you are, an average citizen like we are, i think people of this country are tired of being victims and, our form of justice is not working. >> it is interesting that you say that about our system. and also, incredible to know this guy, that attempted this rape had been in and out of our system 20 times before now, also being behind bars. i understand he is being held without bond. going back to the point that you're making though, why do you think the fear of someone having, a victim having a gun on them why do you think the fear will be deterrent when our laws apparently according to you aren't working? >> well, i'm going to take you back about six weeks ago. we hav

innovative response at the state and local level because the more growth is sluggish, the more the citizenry expresses their levels of concern and insecurity, and more the local in the state political class have to respond. they have to respond to clean up the fiscal mess that you referred to, with regard to pension liability, but they also have to respond with a clear vision for growth going forward, job creation, a broad become more productive growth for the long haul. in some respects, the constant this function of washington is going to get the juices flowing elsewhere in the country. you cannot dismiss the kind of a cataclysmic environmental bent -- a fact in this, but it does send a signal that we are on our own and we better get control of our destiny. >> that is the silver lining to a very dark cloud. i do not think there is anything fundamentally good about 9% unemployment or the prospect of getting worse. >> absolutely. >> and i will pile on with one sequestration scenario to lancaster afghanistan. we all know even if sequestration kicks in that it will not cut more spending which

also, among the general citizenry and all over the country, wherever concerned citizens want to reflect what is meant in the preamble to the constitution, which is "we the people." secondly, i think one of the questions that are on some of our minds have come out of this debate is the balance of power between the three branches of government. the fundamental question that i took from many of the comments of the partisan fence is yet unanswered -- from the participants as yet unanswered could a that is who decides. one view is the inherent power of the president to conduct foreign and military affairs has much wider latitude than that their critics would allow. but i think we do not need to engage in back-and-forth to realize that the judiciary has limited itself in deciding that questions that are raised by the citizens are political and therefore outside the judiciary. it has limited itself in the way it interpreted the no standing to sue. some of the citizens can raise these issues in a judicial arena. i think also, members of congress having recently advocated their role under the co

we're giving back to the citizenry information about their lives and how the welfare of this society. it's with those estimates that we hope that these kinds of discussions will be formed. you don't take policy sides in this. our job is to give you the best information we can so that the debate will be informed. host: this chart, percentage of married couple and unmarried partner households by the age of householder in the year 2010. guest: this is important. this is 2010 data. look at the light blue bars first. it discards the percent of households by age where there's a unmarried partner household. you can see this is a phenomenon that's disproportionately among young people. we've labeled that the delay in the marriage decision. and then contrast that with the dark blue bars, much larger. these are the married households. and you can see how that climbs to that middle age-group of 35 to 44. then flattens out and then declines because of widowhood as the age goes on. read stories about the fact that more and more seniors might be moving in together, unmarried, because of economic re

i put a lot of trust in the american citizenry that you can only push them so far so i'm not so much worried about that particular worst case scenario. short of that, what do we see? well, we do see police forces adopting tactics from our armed forces. what we do see is more security functions fielded out to private contractors, domestic security functions. we do see more surveillance on all of us to be used in a number of ways. these are all products of the past ten years and the way security policy is developed. we also see the use or the implied use of so-called anomaly for weapons, not just tasers, but pain waves, sonic weapons, the possibility that will be used for crowd control here and tested elsewhere. there are things along those lines that i think are real. as far as the ultimate, that's when i think -- that's when i think you bring every man, woman, and child into the streets, and left and right come together, so i'm not so worried about that. internationally, i'm worried we're going to end up in the same type of situation that we had during the cold war which had so many