to many of our citizenry are oblivious to this agenda of b.c.. so why worry about the impact it has on them and not so much the impact they have on their own people. >> do you see the current race impacting the 2016 national elections and would you suggest or have any ideas or media strategies for those political opponents of anthony wiener, his wife and those in their political orbits? >> must i? [laughter] this points to that triteness of journalism today, how embarrassing. how embarrassing they have to report it the way they are reporting. the people of new york deserve when they allow someone like anthony wiener or anthony to -- eliot spitzer back and. but for the news media to cover that with nonstop shock ideal ignoring everything i just talked about, that would be 193 stories. i think it is 93 stories. less than that on the birth of the beebee in england -- baby in england. god love the baby but after one story i was done. and they say wiretapping? what is it, too difficult? so when the to the anthony wiener cream that stuff, i don't know.

too many of our citizenry are oblivious to this. they are o belief yous to the agenda of bbc, and so i worry about the impact it has on them. i don't worry so much about the impact these outlets have on their people. i think they have an understanding of where they are coming from. yes, sir? >> am media. do you see the current new york city mayor race impacting the 2016 national elections, and would you suggest or have any ideas for media strategies for those political opponents of anthony wiener, his wife, and those in the political orbits? >> must i? [laughter] well, this really just points to the triteness of the journalism today. how embarrassing. how embarrassing that they have to report it the way they are reporting. the people of new york deserve what they get when they allow someone like weiner or spitzer back into the public arena, but for the news media to cover that with nonstop shock-and-awe, while ignoring everything i just talked about for them to do 193 stories, i could be wrong, but i think it's 193 stories in one we

. >>> why would you give the criminals an advantage over an unarmed citizenry?et out of your elitist egg head tower. put on your big boy pants. >> it's fundamental contract law. every first year law student knows it. something must be given for something in return. it's call consideration. example. you have a house for sale. i give

. >>> why would you give the criminal the advantage over the citizenry?ut on your big boy pants. >>> there's a saying fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. hello and welcome to "justice." thanks for being with us tonight. it starts with the nsa does not collect any type of data at all on millions of americans

honored as much of the promises to them ~ because they work so well on behalf of the rest of the citizenry of san francisco. and, so, i suggest to you that the emerald park as it is announced today in a public-private and semi-private partnership that is occurring will be, i think, the signalling of a new model going forward for the rest of the city. that as we proceed with this incredible investor confidence that the emerald fund has that the housing and development has, we'll also be asking for new types of partnerships to be created because it is no longer just the city that has to run the park system. we have to run it in a better and smarter way. and what can be better is that alliance that we have with the parks alliance. i think -- and i want to thank again the leadership and the private sector oz and alastair, and to your particularly spouses today, that you signal that this means so much to the city and to the families that we want to invite and the increasing populations to want to enjoy our city, that it is led by the park system. the parks are so valuable to the world class sta

give the citizenry the power to set controls on corporations and companies who collect their data, whether and with whom it can be shared, and whether or not it should be destroyed permanently. people won't have access to their digital data trails in a way similar to an e-mail in- box, so that people can monitor who views their data and who uses it. question. which entity has more personal information about you, the nsa, the national security agency, or google? >> well, the nsa has almost everything that google has and that's part of the problem here, that they're harvesting this data on everyone, even people who aren't suspected. but they're not looking at it until you're somehow close to a suspect. here's a big difference. i choose to give information to google. i choose to use gmail and to use google searches. i did not choose to hand my information over to the nsa. so the nsa is taking it without my permission. google is taking it because that's my price for doing business with them. >> they had 134,000 e-mails, data about his 2,000-plus contacts, knew what he searched for and what he

only one year to do our work and our charge under the code is to be the eyes and the ears of the citizenry, to be a watch dog, to examine the county departments to see if they are operating efficiently and effectively. we interviewed over 50 people and a number of them multiple times and we reviewed documents many, many times taller than i am. >> i believe that our analysis, methodology is solid. as set forth in the report and has been heard today, the themes that we have been heard was the need for transparency and efficiency and leadership. and we believe that the citizens of san francisco want a department with those qualities, we believe, and we note that the current acting director has been acting director for more than a year, putting him in a genuinely difficult position to implement needed changes with his long term tenure in question. in addition, two of the deputy directors are still acting, and we are obviously aware as you are, of the increasing demands on the department, in the light of the building boom. we have seen the press, of course, and we can understand that the depart

while assuring the citizenry that. they won't be affected. and then once you have the legal mechanism to engage in this kind of behavior it's too late and that's that's i mean history has just borne that out that's how it works i think the other thing is that we have especially a commercial electronic media that really doesn't do journalism anymore it is either obsessed with celebrity gossip and trivia and info entertainment or if it purports to do news the way fox news does or m s n b c and so partisan in his coverage that it will harm the power interests that it serves so the n.d.a. case was never mentioned. because the primary purpose of m s n b c was to reelect barack obama and the n.b.a. case would not make obama look good it wasn't mentioned on fox because fox. you know this section of the n.b.a. has bipartisan support and it's interesting i worked for the new york times for fifteen years that the only established news organization that responsibly covered the case was the new york times and when judge forrest issued a ruling the new yo

don't even have the in the american polling data there's very little support among the american citizenry for any attack on syria i don't quite understand. bamma thinks he has really solid grounds for this outside of the fact that he feels he has to you know validate his red line that you know he is in this is amazing thing somebody has to do something somebody has to do something that's what it gets down to pepe go ahead because obama's credibility is on the line right now and he's looking like a complete buffoon foreign policy wise. his credibility is already gone come a look at the n.s.a. scandal and by the way have you heard anything about the n.s.a. scandal these past week or so of course not it's in terms of wag the dog you know deviate attention the problem is not the v.a. the v.a. pension from obama shortcomings himself you know he doesn't know what to do he blocks himself in and he blocks he scanned through his foreign policy in what kind of lead there are all of the free world is this it's ridiculous and there's a constitutional lawyer he's trying to find a way out to dribble no

concerned with maintaining a well oiled corporatocracy than it is with the financial well being of its citizenry but it's not just the corporate sponsors of the government favors over its people it's form.

don't even have the in the american polling data there's very little support among the american citizenry for any attack on syria i don't quite understand nine i thinks he has really solid grounds for this outside of the fact that he feels he has to you know validate his red line that he you know he is this is amazing thing somebody has to do something somebody has to do something that's when it gets down to pepe go ahead because obama's credibility is on the line right now and he's looking like a complete buffoon foreign policy wise. his credibility is already gone come a look at the n.s.a. scandal and by the way have you heard anything about the n.s.a. scandal this best week or so of course not it's in terms of wag the dog you know deviate. the problem is not the v.a. the v.a. pension from obama's shortcomings himself you know he doesn't know what to do he blocks himself in and he blocks he scanned through his foreign policy in what kind of lead there are all of the free world is this it's ridiculous and as a constitutional lawyer he's trying to find a way out to dribble not only the co

concerned with maintaining a well oiled corporatocracy than it is with the financial well being of its citizenry but it's not just the corporate sponsors that the government favors over its people its foreign governments to take a look at how much money the top five of us foreign aid received last year one and a half billion dollars went to egypt iraq one point six pakistan over two billion two point three for afghanistan and the closest ally to the us israel receives more than three billion dollars in aid every year but some of the funding to other foreign militaries might surprise you in the opiah takes in a half a billion of us taxpayer dollars every year in exchange for the ability to launch drones from the country but what about honduras which rakes in thirty million dollars specifically to fund a police force that acts more like a death squad and all this propping up of foreign governments militaries doesn't even include the heavy cost of maintaining the us empire's nine hundred military bases worldwide just think about these numbers the next time you hear the media or the government repor

. >>> why would you give the criminals an advantage over an unarmed citizenry?et out of your elitist egg head tower. put on your big boy pants. >> it's fundamental contract law. every first year law student knows it. something must be given for something in return. it's call consideration. example. you have a house for sale. i giv

>>> why would you give the criminals an advantage over an unarmed citizenry? get out of your elitist egg head tower. put on your big boy pants. >> it's fundamental contract law. every first year law student knows it. something must be given for something in return. it's call consideration. example. you have a house for sale. i give you money, you give me the house. apparently president obama was playing golf when they taught that class in law school. hello and welcome to justice. i'm judge jeanine. thanks for being with us tonight. do you remember right after he was elected, president obama ran to cairo to give his first foreign policy speech where he proclaimed that he wanted to seek common ground with the muslim world. that his was a new presidency. that he was no george bush. >> there must be a sustained effort to listen to each other. to learn from each other. to respect one another. and to seek common ground. as the holy koran tells us, be conscious of god and speak always the truth. that is what i will try to do today. >> mr. president, with all due resp

it turned out with a very active citizenry and a very aggressive media.andent to kansas city demanded that they identify the industry that was contaminating our water. they had been protecting that industry for six years. attempts ands investigations, they finally and in a very public announcement, identified the company. they had -- that company had to spend millions of dollars protecting des moines's water. we knew that we would no longer protect these corporations. we are not going to protect ronald reagan and the epa. we as citizens launched the investigation and right now that chemical is completely out of the des moines water supply. [applause] that is an example of citizens taking control. i heard about it by constituents. traveling the state, we hear a lot of problems with this administration. it is not something new. you know the story and the famous saying of yogi berra? he said, it is dÉjÀ vu all over again. ad was. what brandst he defeated our governor because he said he was new. experience doesn't do any good if you don't know where you're go

citizenry feel safer? no. however, it appears to be very safe for terrorists. linda says, he needs to stop already with egypt and syria. let them take care of themselves. charity starts at home, and boy, does our country need help. but a few out there think obama has made us safer. ralph says yes, more safe than that criminal bush did. yeah? three wars later and drone strikes without warnings, indictments or anything else? but i disagree. and then there was willie. you are all -- expletive deleted -- nuts. do you think republicans can do a better job besides going into wars? i just said it. willie, willie, willie. your last name isn't clinton by any chance, is it? now, i now want to pay tribute to a true american hero that we lost last week. colonel bud day served in the air force for 35 years fighting in world war ii, korea and vietnam. he spent over five years as a prisoner of war in north vietnam alongside senator john mccain. he earned the medal of honor for defiantly refusing to divulge secrets to his captors, and before his death, colonel bud day earned o

this case, but as journalists, if you read this account, and how the fbi and people we look to as citizenry to protect our rights, protect us, how that compromise, your lifely hoods, what you do, the role of journalism, and, you know, if you could comment on that a little bit, just professionally what you up covered and how you feel about that. >> i mean, that's -- i'm glad you asked that because in the sense that we're talking about whitey being a sociopathic murderer, killer, extortionist, blah, blah, blah, i expect criminals to be like that, but not expect the government to be the way they do in the book. what we wanted to show is beyond the individual corruption was the institutional corruption. there were -- when the fbi knew he was a murder, and suspected of murders, the fbi lieded to its own people in oklahoma investigating the murder to throw them off the trail. they consciously made a decision to keep bulger on rather than turn him over to other agencies. another thing i deeply resent is the way that the government has tried to -- he was only killing gangsters. >> my government doe

. >>> why would you give the criminal the advantage over the citizenry?put on your big boy pants. >>> there's a saying fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. hello and welcome to "justice." thanks for being with us tonight. it starts with the nsa does not collect any type of data at all on millions of americans to, well, sometimes we do but don't worry, we don't read e-mails or listen to phone calls of americans. to we do but only if there is a reasonable connection to terrorism. we respect the privacy of all americans. everything is supervised by the foreign intelligence surveillance court. but if incidentally collected, the agency follows, quote, minimization procedures that are approved by the u.s. attorney general and designed to protect the privacy of the united states persons. now, the operative word is not that they don't collect it but their minimalization or removal procedures are approved by the attorney general. oh, i feel better. the same attorney general who also lied in front of congress about investigating reporters? in ove