no special interests had that kind of political artillery before citizens united opened it up. and much of the post-citizens united effort has been using dark money to hide the fossil fuel industry's hand. so since citizens united, there has been no bipartisan climate action, but that doesn't mean there aren't still republicans willing to work with us. i know this firsthand. there are republicans willing to work with us. they just need to know that somebody will give them safe passage through the political kill zone that citizens united has let the fossil fuel industry create. well, with the trump administration now all the way over in the fossil fuel brightbart, koch brothers, climate deniers corner, it now rests on the shoulders of the legitimate business community to come off the sidelines. they can't count on this administration. they now have to come off the sidelines themselves and do so in strength commensurate with the seriousness of the problem. if as a country we pitch ourselves and the world into the present worst case climate change scenarios, billions of people wil

so citizens united is not about to be overturned, which means that we in the united states -- it can be overturned, but it is not about to in the sort of next few years, given the state of the supreme court. it's important to be realistic about that. and it means that more is required of us. you this think of this as a kind of battlefield, the last several years have transformed politics. i talked to you about my race, but basically super pacs played checkers in the first year, they're playing chess now, they're about to play go. they're deeply involved in data. super pacs are frequently doing the canvassing that parties used to do. it's a quick takeover of our political system. i believe, and sorry to say this to you, adam, but one of the things that we have to do is take on -- is say, okay, we have to change the way campaigns are funded -- i'm not sorry to say that to you, move to a publicly financed system in the united states, and model that for other systems. in new york city, it has transformed new york city politics, led to a lot more competitive raises, fewer incumbents. and

citizens united is not about to be overturned which means we in the united states, it can be overturned but it's not about to in the next few years given the state of the supreme court. it's important to be realistic about that. it means that more is required of us. if you think of this as a kind of battlefield, we just lost a lot in the last seven years and they have transformed politics. i talked to you about my race but basically a super pacs played checkers in the first year and they're playing now and they're about to play go. they're deeply involved in data. super pacs are increasingly doing that canvassing that parties used to do which is very quick takeovers of our political system. i believe and sorry to say this to you, adam but one of the things we have to do is take on, is a we've changed the way the campaigns are funded. and model that for other systems. in new york city, it's transformed new york city politics led to a lot more competitive races, fewer and comments, and then we also need to bring about anti- enough anti-monopoly laws. i would say that google and facebook h

very different than before the citizens united decision in january of 2010. that changed everything. when those five republican justices opened up unlimited political spending to the big republican special interests, that unlimited political spending was inevitably going to find dark money channels. dark money channels hide the identity of the political donor. so big special interests can pollute our politics with their money with seemingly clean hands the climate denial scheme of the fossil fuel cartel is powered politically by dark money, whether through the lure of dark money coming in for you in a political race or the threat of dark money coming in against you in a political race, dark money powers climate denial. well, we just learned something new about dark money. chairman graham and i held hearings in our judiciary subcommittee on crime and terrorism to look at russia's interference in the recent 2016 election and what it portends for elections to come. our witnesses warned us that russia has strategically manipulated politics in europe for decades.

citizens united is not about to be overturned, which means that we, in the united states, it can be overturnedut it is not about to until the next few years given the state of the supreme court. it is important to be realistic of that. more is required of us. if you think of this as kind of a battlefield, we just lost a lot. the last seven years have transformed politics. i talked to you about my race. superpacs played checkers in the first year. they are playing chess now. they are about to play go. they are deeply involved in data. superpacs are increasingly doing the canvassing that parties used to do. it is a very quick takeover. i believe, and sorry to say this to you, adam, that one of the things we have to do is take on -- say, okay, we have changed the way that campaigns are funded. moved to a publicly financed system in the united states and model that for other systems. in new york city, it has transformed new york city politics, led to a lot more competitive races, fewer incumbents, being able to sit pretty. we also need to bring about anti-monopoly laws. i would say that google and

[applause] result of the disastrous citizens united supreme court corporations and billionaires are ableo spend unlimited sums of money on elections and the result is today that a handful, a small number of billionaires are spending hundreds of millions of dollars every single year, often ads hopingsecond tv to elect candidates who represent the wealthy and the powerful. we are seeing the results of how oligarchy functions right now. right now in congress, where the republican leadership wants to americans offon of health insurance, cut --icaid by over 800 billion $800 billion, defund planned parenthood, cut food stamps and other nutrition programs by over $200 billion, cut head starts an afterschool programs and by the way, make drastic cuts in pell grants and other programs that help working-class kids be able to go to college. unbelievably, at exactly the same time as they are throwing people off of health care, making it harder for kids to go putsllege, they have the the -- they have the -- to provide a hundred million dollars in tax breaks to the top 1%. [booing] words, the very ver

he wrote citizens united, a case that liberals -- he is a crucial, crucial figure.nald trump has promised during the campaign, given neil gorsuch it seems likely that trump would appoint a strongly conservative candidate, which would really throw all the cards up in the air in the court. >> it would be his legacy. >> it would be a big one. >> thank you. >> keep an eye on your watch. >> don't go too far. i think we have a lot maybe ahead from the supreme court this hour. >> all right. >>> battle lines are drawn over the slashing of medicaid in washington. there is one town that has a little dividing line as to who gets medicaid and who does not. you'll hear from the residents of texarkana next. oscar mayer is making changes so big... hot dogs will never be the same again. we went back to the drawing board. and the cutting board. we never stopped tasting... and tinkering. until we had... a line of the world's best hot dogs. we removed the added nitrates and nitrites waved goodbye to by-products. and got rid of the artificial preservatives in all of our meat. every. si

trump: in order to fulfill my solemn d duty to protect america and its citizens, the united states will withdraw from the paris climate accord. [applause] pres. trump: thank you. thank you. but begin n negotiations to reenter either the paris accord or a really entirely new trtransaction with terms that ae fair to the united states, its businesses, it's workers, it's people, it's taxpayers. we are getting out but we will start to negotiate and we will see if we can make a deal that's fair. ifif we can, that'ss greatat. we can't, that's fine. as president, i can put no other consideration -- anchor: as you can imagine, there has been quite a bit of social media reaction to that announcement from u.s. president donald trump. most of the tweets are being seen as critical. at the moment, german politician martin schultz writes, "you can with draw from a climate agreement, not climate change. reality is not another statesman you show away." -- statesman you shove away." in the u.s., dan pfeiffer tweeted this -- a twitter user said that the fact that this was a zero-sum game between economic

citizens than a child born outside the united states would be a citizen of the united states as long as one of the parents had resided in the united states for any time. congress seem that to be a sufficient connection given that both parents are citizens. if one was a u.s. citizen and one was an alien, congress had a different approach. the u.s. citizen parent had to have resided in the united states for ten years, five of which after the age of 14. congress determined that because such a child would have competing claims of allegiance that a greater residency was required for the pair. >> is the argument we heard much about in the floors case? >> it was made at the oral argument. but we think it's also evident of the states of face of the statute in respect to another argument that the court address there, it's important for the court itself to look at the structure, text and operation of the statute. >> talking about the differential treatment of statelessness, and hear your argument is that we need to serve have sufficient ties. >> were making both arguments. and we did argue tha

citizens united has expanded and given life to predatory capitalism. so we can put regulations in place but really the root cause is the amount of money if we look at other first world countries, and compare those countries to how we operate as a so-called democracy, we have unfettered access to money in our so-called democracy. i believe the root cause and also the fact that the right have coopted narrative and have equated democracy with capitalism. and so our constituency, our citizenship has we no longer understand civic, our civic adult and we actually believe that had democracy equals predatory capitalism. so i would like to hear your take on that. >> well thanks, thanks for the question. we have become more predatory even prior to citizens united if you look at the cycle of recession and recovery. one of the things that you'll find is that let's say 1973 recovery. about -- and by number manies are rough because i don't have them in front of me but u roughly 60% of the -- benefit of the economic recovery wngt to the bottom 90%. while the other 40

caller: i believe all this on citizens united ruling that people could donate all the money. the reason the republicans and democrats can't get along is because they have to stand up for their donors. as long as you put that much money in politics you won't have anybody on either side getting along because if they don't go along with what the money people want them to do, you're never going to change it because if they try to close over the other side they'll lose their funding. i don't know why anybody thought that was a good law but i believe that's 90% makes everything so divisive in congress and it won't change as long as that law is in effect. host: donna is in chicago, illinois. line for democrats. good morning. caller: good morning. host: go ahead. caller: first of all, this planet belongs to our lord and savior. that's what man seems to forget. until we denounce satan in our hearts and minds and accept jesus christ as our lord and savior starting with the 10 commandments, then nothing on this planet is ever going to change. ever. so that's the first step. host: donna,

and unlike what happened in citizens united, i actually built a record. i got testimony from democrats and republicans talking about the corrupting influence of independent expenditures. in a decision that is forever captioned american tradition partnership versus bullock, the u.s. supreme court disposed of our 100 year old law if a 5-4 decision. 59-4 decision that was the first significant case after citizens united. as governor i didn't give up. i took a different tact. i worked with democrats and republicans, again my legislature is almost two-thirds republican. i have to do that. but i work with them to pass one of the most progressive disclosure laws in the country. so the dark money groups, no matter what part of the federal tax code that they try to hide behind if, they're going to spend or contribute in our elections or state elections, they have to disclose their spending and who's giving them money. now it took a number of different attempts to get there to get that passed. but as a result, even the coke brothers stayed out of our election cycle

mitch nice to have you with us tonight first of all what do you make of the money is this the new citizens united world we're live in and on steroids what do you make of it unfortunately it is this is the most expensive race in congress in the history of the world and frankly i think both sides got carried away specifically it's one seat will give us indicators yes is this the six most educated district congressional district in the country yes is this one for the democrats to lose yes but i think the money is have seen in the average voter obviously is not happy about this everybody every political analyst out there is saying that this is going to mean something for the president if the democrat wins do you believe out. i think it really will and i'll tell you why mitt romney in two thousand and twelve won this district by twenty three points trump won it by a point clearly there's a gap in his likability meaning trump if the democrats are able to grab this sea it's going to set a new playbook but even if the republicans win this seat i think it may do away with the myth of the swing voter that

we were objecting to gun control, environmental stuff, health care, and especially citizens united. we really need to get rid of that. our congressmen are being bought by these big corporations. you can pray all you want but if we don't do something about the big corporations running our country, lobbyists running it, we're lost. thank you so much. host: abigail, maryland, line for republicans. good morning. caller: yeah, hi. all the things that's been happening, you know, this shooting, it shows that our country is literally falling apart. you know, we have people running cars into times square. we have shootings all across our country. it's just -- it's ridiculous. and nobody's doing anything about it. we're just -- you know, we're just sitting around making press conferences but nobody's actually taking action. and it bothers me so much. i'm 15 and i watch this show every morning and it just bothers me that nobody's doing anything. and trump is making orders and all these things that aren't helpful, you know. it's just hurting us even more. and our country needs to be united righ

thomas: we need to overturn citizens united. the role of money in politics has become obscene. corporations are citizens, too. i fundamentally disagree with that. when we take money out of politics, we put the voice of ordinary people back into politics, and that is the reality. we are going to overturn fightns united, but also to win seats. the virginia and new jersey governor races, i feel confident moving forward. we have good candidates, united parties, and a message that resonates with people. you look ahead to those events, do you think that senator pelosi is saved to continue doing the job she is doing given the losses you suffered any special elections, the psychological hits? thomas: i look at nancy pelosi as leadership, and she is all most singularly responsible for the passage of the affordable care act. that bill was on life support, and there were some who said we should just give up. she said no, we will soldier through and get this past. millions of americans have a benefited from that dogged and courageous leadership. about isre talking what our values are, and

you have citizens united come to full true 'tis.ast majority of the news items that were posted were fake. they were connected to, as we know the 1,000 russian agents that were involved in delivering those messages and connected to the box that were just out-of-control. i inherited nothing from the democratic party. >> what do you mean? >> it was bankrupt and the data was mediocre to poor. the russians ran an extensive media relations campaign against my campaign to influence voters in the election. i certainly never said i ran a perfect campaign, but who did? and at some point, it bleeds over to massachusetts s&l any. >> sean: could it be that the american people saw who is the chronic: call liar. could that be the reason? >> it is very 1i6r78 and she wants to continue to campaign and raise money in california and massachusetts and vermont. good for her. that's not how you win an election. the reality is that her friend, barack obama over saw the democratic committee for eight years and raised a lot of money and they blamed mitt ro

tonight, the united states has turned its back on the world, but france will not turn its back on its citizensed by we are joined by kevin we arejoined by kevin rudd. we are joined by kevin rudd. what do you think of all this? i think it is a disaster feared the united states and for the planet. i think where we go now is the rural question. i can go now is the rural question. i can go global leadership, we'll be looking to see this new triumvirate, i hope, between a man u macron of france, angela merkel of germany, and xijinping of china. and this will have to be leadership to action. but apart from that, i think also here in the united states, which is the world's second largest emitter of greenhouse gases, responsibility will now fall to state governors, municipal governments, and here is the interesting one: to corporations as well. and shareholders are saying to these corporate leaders that they will not invest if your company is engaged in climate damaging babies in the future. irrespective of what us government policy might be. in the future. irrespective of what us government policy mi

united states is the affordable care act. i think the government is terrorizing the citizens of the united states. they do not want to make payments for health care. we are talking about specifically foreign actors potentially coming into the united states. keep your thoughts to that and the potential of that happening. caller: i think the money that you spend trying to protect america -- you really cannot stop these lone wolf things. host: ok. that was sam up from nashville, tennessee offering his thoughts this morning. the will be a hearing today on the topic of foreign surveillance. the director of national intelligence, the acting director of the fbi, and others will be involved in this hearing. you can watch that on c-span at 3:00. we have an op-ed about the hearing and also the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it reads that the most important part of the act allows the federal government to scrutinize under specific conditions information about persons in four countries who happen to use american medication services and internet technology. congress created the authority to address an

in order to fulfil my solemn duty to protect america and its citizens, the united states will withdrawrom the paris climate accord. —— environmentalists. will withdraw from the paris climate accord. -- environmentalists. he slammed the global agreement, a legacy of his predecessor, barack obama, claiming that it gave china and other countries and unfair competitive advantage and penalise broken workers. from its first word to its last, this was an america first address. this agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the united states. the rest of the world applauded when we signed the paris agreement. they went wild. they were so agreement. they went wild. they were so happy. for the simple reason that it put our country, the united states of america, which we all love, a very, very big economic disadvantage. at what point does america get demeaned? at what point do they start laughing at us as a country? we want fair treatment for its citizens and we want fair treatment for our taxpayers. we don't want other leaders and other

board of education, "new york times," citizens united. i can't fool this crowd.t, "new york times" versus sullivan, brown v. board of education, roe v. wade, lawrence v. texas, none of them is a bill of rights case. why not tax because the bill of rights originally applied only against the federal government. it's about states rights and in between the celebration of the local juries and bill of rights was anti-federalist teen party suspicion of local government. and that's important. but that isn't the power bill of rights today because you believe some of the most fundamental rights need to be protected against states and localities. brown v. topeka and kansas, gideon versus wainwright in florida, roe v. wade and texas, lawrence versus texas, sullivan was an effort by alabama to shut down free speech. miranda v. arizona, griswold versus connecticut. most of the cases that ordinary people think of as bill of rights cases are not bill of rights cases because the amendments are only about limiting the federal government. so, what kind of cases are gideon versus wa

in order to for furl my solemn duty to protect america and its citizens, the united states will withdrawe paris climate accord. but, begin negotiations to re—enter either the paris accord, oi’, re—enter either the paris accord, or, in entirely new transaction. in terms that are fed to the us, its businesses, workers, people, taxpayers. so, we are getting out, but we will start to negotiate and see if we can make a deal that is fair. if we can, that is great. if we can't, that is fine. past us presidents, including bill clinton and barack obama, as well as many american allies expressed disappointment. some bosses took exception to the decision, including the head of tesla and on musk and the head of tesla and on musk and the disney chief executive bob eiger, they have both quit president trump's councils. it is there to say that corporate america certainly does not share the president's view which was a dark and pessimistic vision of the economy, had america stuck with the deal. he even had major oil companies standing out in favour of the paris accord, names like exxon mobil, chevron, b

citizens united david bossie, good to be here. >> thanks for having me. keen on supporting this senate measure. by that i mean rand paul and ted cruz and some names we're showing up here? >> i really don't, actually. i think senator heller are off on their own. mike lee, they have principled positions they would like to see the president and mitch mcconnell consider. i think that they are working like the freedom caucus in the house, how to get to yes. how to pass president's repeal and replace bill. that is one part of it the other political calculation dean helloer is taking, i will be off on my own. that is situation he will be held to account. that is what katrina was talking about. she was exactly right. neil: i know what you're saying. >> we campaigned on this. neil: the situation in nevada, is a unique, situation, right. >> every senator, every senator -- neil: you want a challenge to him, right? >> no, i'm saying if we want him to vote yes. we want him to get to yes. but he needs to be part of this team because he is putting the entire republican

united states. perspective, we can share inside, not only for the benefit of the australian people and the citizens of the united states but for our region and globally. wrappedquestion time between the 22nd of may and the first of june. i am tom connell, thanks for watching. >> tomorrow, defense secretary james mattis and joseph dunford testified before the house armed services committee. pentagon's $640 billion budget request. >> monday night on the decided there-- i championing in average people who never wanted to be -- in challenging the companies and the industry to serve those people. >> the first of a two-part conversation with one of the nations best known technology watchers. here are the issues here seen over his career and his predictions of some tech developments. >> i believe we will see in the next five or 10 years, a big , virtualnew stuff reality, augmented reality, allficial intelligence, kinds of new ways of driving cars, we have a little taste of it. we will see a lot more of it. in your things going on home. >> watch the communicators monday night on c-span2. andn tuesday, chris

board of education, "new york times," citizens united. i can't fool this crowd.t, "new york times" versus sullivan, brown v. board of education, roe v. wade, lawrence v. texas, none of them is a bill of rights case. why not tax be

you had citizens united come to itsut corporation.ebook, the vast majority of the news items posted were fake. they were connected to as we now russian agents who were involved in delivering those messages. they were connected to the box were just out of control. i inherit nothing for the democratic party. it washi bankrupt, it was on the verge of insolvency its data was mediocre to poor. the russians ran an extensive information campaign against my campaign to influence voters in the election. >> i certainly never said i ran perfect campaign, but i don't know who is rooted. at some point it bleeds over into misogyny. >> sean: could it just me she was horrible candidate, with a horrible message, what the american people saw it was chronic liar. could that possibly be the real reason? >> she couldn't find ohio on a map, she could go to pennsylvania, she couldn't go to iowa. she hasn't been to michigan, she was north carolina, she lost in florida. this is very simple, she's been at geography, she wants to continue to campaign and raise

goes to all elected officials who take the extreme right or extreme left of any issue but since citizens united you have these echo chambers on social media, nonprofits or other political organization much more to the right or left to any politician who put out fake news, false articles, really trying to shoot gin up the debate, that is the kind of culture that creates what happened yesterday getting people so moved up that that is what happens. >> they use words like resist which sounds like revolt or revolution which we have seen in the past in europe can be bloodied. it can be deadly. >> the difference from people having a policy debate versus emotional arguments. calling people racist, saying xena phobic or impeach, these are all rhetoric to get people riled up. it is healthy in america, strong policy debates, we are not seeing it from the left right now. rob: such a major swing in this country from eight years of president obama to an election where everybody thought hillary clinton was going to continue moving that direction and on the same page and all of a sudden somebody like donald tr

it provided that anyone born or naturalized in america is citizen of the united states, and by doing so, it affirmed the quality of birth right and naturalized citizenship, and that was an empowerment for irish immigrants seeking broader acceptance into american society. >> how were the experiences of the irish different from other immigrants? >> that is a very important point. after all irish were regarded as , whites, and they could become american citizens through naturalization unlike some other immigrant groups such as asians, who were not eligible for naturalization until the mid-20th century. in this sense, the 14th amendment is also important for asian immigrant groups as well. the children of the asian immigrants were citizens by birth under the 14th amendment. that was also an empowerment for the families and communities of immigrants who themselves were not eligible for naturalization. >> and when do you see opinions about irish start to change? hidetaka: that is a good question. progress came really slowly. as newer immigrants arrived in the u.s., in places such as easter

provided that anyone born or naturalized in america is citizen of the united states, and by doing so, it affirmed the equality of earth right and naturalized citizenship, and that was an empowerment for seekingmigrants you are integration into society. >> power the experiments -- experiences of the irish different from other immigrants? regarded asish were whites, and they could become american citizens through naturalization unlike some other immigrant groups such as asians, who were not eligible for naturalization until the mid-20th century. the 14th amendment is important also for asian immigrant group as well. the children of the asian immigrants were citizens by birth. those also an empowerment for the families and communities of immigrants who themselves were not eligible for naturalization. >> and when do you see opinions about irish start to change? hidetaka: this question came really slowly. as newer immigrants arrived in the u.s., in places such as eastern and southern european comparativelysh rose, in contrast to these newcomers. and also toward the end of the was anntury,

united kingdom's prime minister in brussels to ththe eu leaders. it got lukewarm reception. know w from last thursday that any eu citizen living in the united kingdom for five years will be entitled to u.k. settled status whihich will entitle them to education, health and other benefits. we don't know who will oversee that process. may wants it to be the british courts. the other eu 27 want it to be the european court of justice. what happepens if you get divorced. to yourpens grandchildren? a lot of questions. the 15 page document that will be presented and published this afternoon. we await that statement by the prime minister. >> thank you for the update. ukraine's president was in the french capital. he met with emmanuel macron at the elysees palace. -- visagreed to visa to free travel for ukrainian citizens. his visit to paris taking place after a visit to the white house last week. at a joint press conference emmanuel macron said france didn't recognize the annexation of crimea and called for a normandy formamat of talks. herbert is here. you were listening to the press conference. do you think he will leave a hap

there should be -- you wouldn't have heard anything about election reform and citizens united. but now you'll hear that. we have to have election reform, get money out of ppolitics. >> this isn't horseshoes. is anyone surprised it was this close in the district? >> won this in november by 23 points. so it's definitely closer than it should have been. but another -- see here's another thing i think is concerning for democrats. is this is the most highly educated district in the country. so those are the voters you're most likely to pick off, most likely are going to turn against donald trump. so if you're not able to turn them -- if they dislike democrats more. i clearly let this pelosi message work and this came from paul ryan running this message and party matters. people don't cross party lines in this day and age. >> the idea that you can -- that donald trump is going to turn off republican voters to the degree they will then vote for democrats i think is a misnomer. >> she needed paul ryan and she needed the rnc, krekt? >> and paul ryan has this outside group that really ca

al: i was hoping hillary would win so we could have a supreme court that would overturn citizens unitedi think this dark money is extremely pernicious. and so unfortunately that didn't happen but this big money in politics is very corrosive. charlie: you write about the fact that when you went to the senate, you were known as a comedian, you had to hide those skills. al: i had to show the people of minnesota that i was serious about the job. charlie: that this is not a joke for you. al: so much of the campaign centered on my comedy career and again, putting it through the dehumorizer, when i got to the senate drew , whitman, my chief of staff said you're going to have a challenge here. you want to prove that you're going to be someone who is taking this job seriously. you have a lot of -- you have some celebrity, you have -- the republicans will be suspicious of you because you use your dehumorizer, humor to heap scorn and ridicule on republicans. hillary sort of had the same parallel problems. i'm going to have you meet with tamara lazado who was her chief of staff. and hillary was a v

and get the same political rights, particularly after their decision of the supreme court on citizens united. it's as -- unlimited amount of money going into campaigns. but now, even in politics, the choice of a candidate to be president all government all is notsmen or whatever, the same as rich persons. and also, what the candidate gets in office, if successful, the average person feels that they are reporting their contributions with legal bribery. system is also gone down. election,s last 101,000 people were imprisoned. no seven out of 1000 imprisoned kabul seven times as many -- seven out of 1000 are imprisoned, seven times as many. so, the feeling of the average person, by the justice system, is missing. so, you know, basic human rights, income, status in society, health care, education, participation in politics, justice, the things in which we used to have complete faith, now the rich distorted by people getting richer and the poor people getting poor were -- poor -- more poor. they commissioned a tax laws meriting us would keep them from getting richer and richer. dissatisfaction wi

people on the left say citizens united as if this was some great horrible stain on american history. what it said was you can make a movie criticizing hillary clinton and you can get people to distributed. >> eboni: i am no hillary clinton fan but you are not connecting hillary clinton to what happened yesterday. >> james: i am not at all. not assigning any blame to any violence. to get back to your question about where does tolerance for the first amendment go? don't we believe in free speech anymore? >> eric: are we allowed to say, we cite an example of democrats saying the republican health care law will kill you. it will kill your children. nancy pelosi herself said it's deadly. isn't -- free speech, yes, we all agree but there's a line where free speech becomes dangerous. >> eboni: i don't like it either but when barack obama came out with the affordable care act, they thought it was socialism. they called him a socialist. people in the tea party said that type of socialism will kill us and kill america. the languages out there. >> mike: i think the reason this gets so overheate

theresa may called on citizens to unite against attacks like these.eds to be done to tackle extremism in her country saying there's far too much tolerance for it. isis a mock media claimed the terrorist group was responsible for it. has not independently verified the claim. good to talk to you once again. prime minster theresa may saying that enough is enough following this later terror attack. she says just days before voters are set to go to polls to cast their vote, how are people responding now to this. >> >> she's been criticized a little bit for politicizing the terrorist attacks. the comments supposed to be a day of suspension of campaigning for the thursday election, the june 8 election and those comments were seen as frankly campaign statements. she didn't vow to conduct a sweeping review of britain's counterterrorism strategy saying there's been far too much tolerance of extremism in the uk. she also suggested there could be an increased prison terms for terrorism offenses including relatively minor ones. another thing she called for was bas

the same thing with clarence thomas when he ruled on the citizens united about what kind of groups can buy elections. later on that day his wife went out and started such a group. that is not a crime someone can be convicted of but it is an appearance of impropriety. any other judge in the united dates would have been removed for what i just described of scalia and thomas. supreme court justices should also be removed but the senate would have to impeach them. i don't know why it hasn't happened. it should happen every time there is such an appearance of impropriety. norman, thank you. one of the decisions or at least the court watchers are looking for today is what decision will be made about the travel ban. that was desired by the trump administration, stopped in the lower court, asked for review by the supreme court. the possible options the court could apply to this request, saying that with the votes of five justices the court could agree to the administration's request to immediately reinstate the travel ban which would go into effect 72 hours after a favorable court ruling. the

buti all those eu citizens living in the united kingdom. reassurance, for uk citizens who are living in the eu. you wouldn't want me as british prime minister to say anything less. on the question of the mandate, as i have made clear to my european colleagues, if you look at what happened in the general election, over 80% of british voters voted for parties who were committed to the united kingdom leaving the european union and that is exactly what we are going to do. when you're on from the referendum, if very simple question, i wonder if you can guarantee for british people that brexit will be good for britain? that is that we are working for and i have every intention of making sure we get a good for britain and not only will would be able to see a good, new, deep and special partnership with the european union, but we will also be able to take opportunities for global britain to be held their trading across the globe and forging new trade arrangements. and i believe that we will be able to grasp those opportunities, i believe in the bri

order to fulfill my solid duty to protect america and its citizens, the united states will withdraw -- [applause] accord --aris climate [applause] thank you. thank you. but begin negotiations to reenter either the paris accord or really an entirely new terms that are fair to the united states, its businesses, it's workers, it's people, it's taxpayers. so we are getting out. but we will start to negotiate and we will see if we can make a deal that is fair. and if we can, that's great. [applause] and if we can't, that's fine. [applause] as president, i can't but no other consideration before the well-being of american citizens. paris climate accord is simple in the latest example of washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the united states to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving american workers, who i love, and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered fact -- shutteredstly factories, and vastly diminished economic production. today, the united states will cease all implementation of the nonbinding draconianrd and the finan