money in politics because increasinglt are becoming what he called a plutocracy because the citizensg united when you can't get something simple something simple but my fact that 99.9% of americans would agree with and only benefits .001% of the wealthiest among us because of the way thee countess, that shows you difficult it would be to makenge major changes unless we first address the problem. >> host: barbara, and nick penniman. >> caller: since the supreme court has said that money is speech, instead of trying to regulate how much money people can give, what about an idea of regulating, saying that donors can only give to people who would represent them? in other words, you could only give to the senators are your state or whoever is running for that position. as far as presidential, everybody could give two presidential because the president represents everybody. as far as corporations and unions, they would only be abler to give, for instance, the location where their headquarters was established. with something like that help? is that possible? and p >> guest: that's an interesting id