so those companies -- amazon would be an example, citrix, general motors, goldman sachs analysts haved also companies with high degrees of operating leverage. that's a strategy from now to the next six months. companies like that to take advantage of the fact that the dispersion is narrow. >> when you mention amazon, people think of anointing names with the companies like tesla, yelps. do they hold up at year end, even as the market chugs along? >> the market multiple is lifted quite a lot. obviously, there are companies who traded much higher multiples than that. on average, the market is trading around fair value. and you would think the trajectory going forward would be roughly in line with earnings growth. so companies generally with faster earnings should do better. the idea, again, is -- the idea between growth and value -- if everything is narrowly compressed, the argument would be to buy faster growth. it doesn't cost you very much. >> but you're saying the same thing, the scenario is one we'd love, growth picking up a little bit, maybe the job market is getting better, it loo