additionally, by looking at expenditures, there's some major hindrances by the citywide cost. first, as you can see, outlined here for employee benefits are extremely high, with 19% average growth for pension contributions, 6% average for retirement, retired and current employee health care. and then, like the city, the port is actually following assumptions or c.p.i. growth for personnel and nonpersonnel costs. but at the citywide level, unfortunately, the expenditure growth is significantly higher than -- than revenue generation, so for the general funds, there is forecasted shortfalls for each fiscal year. keeping this in mind, the mayor's really wanted to keep a focus on equity and accountability for current focus. the effort to try to address these structural issues is being addressed through a variety of things, from generating for revenues, looking at citywide costs and departmental costs and a very fund amountal element of this piece is looking at employee costs, so trying to figure out how to address the growth in pension and health care. so for the port's financial o

. >> and then lastly, staff has requested a couple liaisons for the citywide survey and i would liketo appoint commissioner black as one, myself as another, and if -- do we need an alternate to that? >> it would be myself -- >> very good. >> okay and then we do need one further agenda item that we skipped over, and that is the future meetings and agendas. >> that is folding in with the commission comments. >> we do need to talk a little bit about the future hearing for the joint preservation and planning commission. >> as much as you would like to. we will be issuing the agenda tomorrow. >> we wanted to ask our commission is -- if there are any questions we want to pose to the planning commission ahead of our joint hearing. the purpose of the joint hearing is there will be two agenda items. one is to discuss how we can communicate better between two commissions, and then the second agenda item will be the update of all the various programs that our commission is doing, and the cultural heritage districts and tim? >> the second item will be more broadly, as president highland just men

we negotiated a citywide m.c.o. agreement. that was a commitment on the magnitude of millions of dollars. we have negotiated the framework now for a citywide p.l.a. larry, sr. told me on the way in that he's been talking about this for 20 year. this mayor, and her leadership on the board of supervisors, we got this done in the first six months of her being in office. [applause] >> supervisor safai: so yes, there were a lot of people that were under the radar. i want to give a big shout out to massoud from the p.u.c. the p.u.c. also helped in these negotiations. the city administrator, we had negotiations, i was sitting in my robe in front of the fireplace at 1:00 in the morning on the phone with these folks. i'm sure on the other end of the line, they're thinking how are we up at 1:00 in the morning, trying to get this done? but in the end, it was a unanimous vote by the board of supervisors, a unanimous vote, larry, and we did it, and we did it for every single one of these workers that are sitting here, the one that will fol

continue to push forward with citywide enrolment and clean power s.f. we have been preparing to complete citywide enrolment with the last major phase to occur in april of next year. this phase will include the rest of the residential accounts, bringing our total account serve to about 365,000, and our total program demand to approximately 350 megawatts. when clean power s.f. launched, the commission adopted a phasing policy for the program with specific rates related provisions. the phasing policy requires that prior to commencing a new auto enrolment phase b. determines that program rates are sufficient to recover program costs, and rates for the next phase are projected to be at or below pg anti- rates. you will recall this year when we enrolled commercial accounts where we were able to deliver a 2% savings on enrolled customers ' generation accounts. clean power s.f. rates are set consistent with the charter, and with other s.f. p.u.c. ratesetting policies, including the right insurance policy. consistent with those policies, they presented this righ

you, i engage a synopsis of the mirror 's budget and constructions where he asked the department citywide to cut 2% from each of the next two years budgets. as you know, due to the recreation and park department, it is not requiring you to make those cuts a, and we do receive a general fund subsidy of $3 million, and we will continue to support a general fund support for capital and deferred maintenance, as well as we will continue to look to raising new revenue to support and cover our costs going forward. with prompt be, we are required to cover all of our cost increases. we get $3 million of general fund subsidy. and next year, in the budget, we are looking at a potential two-point 5% increase per salaries, and a potential 6% increase in mandatory benefits. it will probably cover that $3 million subsidy that we get. to give you a sense of the framework, our current year budget is just over $230 million the operating budget is just under $174 million, and our capital budget is just over $57 million. you have -- we have a budget of 947 budgeted and funding positions. our three main sourc

this was citywide. so basically, that 4.27 million that he sue on the first page, those were invoices to c.b.o.s. it was also payments to other city departments for work order service of other departments. so although they look like savings, you can't include them as actual savings because they were already committed, so we carried them forward to this current year and we paid them. that's why when you look at that column, you see that there, because our savings would be overstated if we didn't do that because it would look like a lot more money that we had uncommitted that we actually have. so that's on 17-18. any questions on that one? okay. and then, our next report is monthly report for december 2018, and it basically gives the revenues and expenditures for july 2018 through december 2018. this one, basically, we're about -- at about the same place as we are last year. so we've made some preliminary estimates based on year-to-date, and it reflected some slowing from prior year, but still better than

we can do citywide outreach in a couple of different ways. we did public availability sessions, where the public could come and speak with technical staff about the map in an ad hoc manner, meaning they would drive the conversation, ask the questions they wanted to ask in an informal setting? we also did formal presentations in five public neighborhood where people could come and listen to a for more formal presentation and ask their questions there, as well. when we went to the commission, we did acknowledge the need for a parcel review process? so we now have created that. what we understand is that all of this information is based on our -- our model, which is very, very accurate and state of the art. however, as we all know, things may differ on the ground, there may be a wall, there may be a difference in elevation, so we did want to provide a parcel review process when one or more of the following applies. if a parcel's ground elevation is entirely above the flood risk elevation and if that can be shown or if there is a barrier on the p

problem and a citywide issue. >> supervisor fewer? >> thank you. i wanted to mention and piggyback onto the discussion again. it is that in my district, of course, i may negative 70-point 9%, and then also i have had 527 units removed from protected status. i just want to say that when we depend on developers to build our affordable housing, we will see a greater imbalance and we continually will be imbalanced. when 70% of what we built is not affordable, than it is trying to -- trying for the city to build affordable housing. we cannot depend on developers to build affordable housing. we will be even more in balance and the imbalance will grow greater and greater. as we see our protected status, meeting our rent-controlled buildings, actually that stock diminishing, and without our ability to actually expand the stock of rent-controlled, i think that we are in a really bad place here, and i just want to mention this housing and balance shouldn't be so informal people should take this very, very seriously. this is what the voters pass

and they removed their apartment ban citywide. for a city like san francisco, to let other cities beat us to that punch, i particularly find disappointing. it's not easy and there are a lot of difficult situations. if we're serious about the scale and mass of this problem, we need to take radical solutions and putting things on the table like, it's okay to build 4- to 6-story apartment buildings. it's okay to build low- to middle-income buildings, will get us to a fair and equitable city. it's not easy and we look forward to continuing the conversation. >> supervisor tang: thank you. next speaker. >> thank you. i'm fernando marte, community of housing organizations. as the previous speaker stated, we have a long ways to go and this report makes it clear. not only are we not producing enough affordable housing is for every two new affordable housing units we produce, we lose an affordable unit. two steps forward, one step back. and i think it leads to several directions that the city could go in. what the previous speaker said and

it was refer to self to go back to citywide case management. not refer to self and go figure out what you need to do. we have process now that we contact the provider saying your client is at p.e.s. and we want to notify you. when the referral goes back we can track to see where that linkage continues. we believe that this was a category checking as well as misinformation and that how it was documented. if you pull actual record it's a check box. it's refer to self to go back. not they were referred to self to go out with nothing. we have specific come up with performance objectives to making sure no one leaves without a referral. we have a plan to make sure when somebody is given a referral, we can track to make sure that linkage happens and whether they received services. there's a lot of things we started doing. we agreed with scenarios that we ned to -- need to improve on. >> that's reassuring. the idea is it wouldn't be just referral. people don't leave with a referral. >> a referral is made. a goal is to make sure that linkage happens. we

citywide.ause] >> and we have more work to do, and we need strong, bold, fearless, incredible leaders like shamann walton on the board of supervisors. people who will focus on the people of san francisco, and not on the politics that sadly have torn our city apart for far too long. [applause] >> it is a new day in san francisco. [cheers and applause] >> it is a new day of hope and excitement for the bayview's hunter's point community. [applause] and before i swear in your courageous leader, i just want to make sure that you know he will not be doing this job alone he will need each and every one of you, as supervisor maxwell has said, to be there for him, to support him, to advocate for the work he is pushing for the community. to show up at the board of supervisors meeting to make sure that your voices are heard and that you have his back when he is fighting for your community. and you can have no fears of an advocate, for all things related to changing our city for the better and making sure

san francisco should have done a citywide project labor agreement a long time ago. there's other communities in the state that have them. contra costa, lob, los angeles, santa clara, just to kna -- lo angeles, santa clara, just to name a few. this is a few that builds on those values to protect the workers and to protect the citizens of san francisco. so i'm glad that we finally got to this point. there's a lot of work still to do. as the mayor mentioned, we have nine months or a little bit longer to negotiate and hammer out the rest of this. and i know the mayor's going to press on her staff to get that done by the deadline that we have, and we're going to get this thing done. and then, it's hopefully going to become law later this year, and it's going to be help for a lot of people, disadvantaged people. we have a great relationship with city build, and we're going to bring a lot of those people that may not have had a chance to get into the trades into the trades. it's important to all of us, and important, as well, to the city, obviously. apprenticeships have al

school with current attendance area school capacities and whereas sfusd has a significant number of citywide schools or strands obvious language based and whereas in san diego unified, lob, elk grove, capistrano, a student can enroll in their base school without a school choice process. and whereas school districts across the country have had success withdrawing intentionally diverse attendance areas zones to maximize integration within attendance zones and whereas berkeley unified school districts are drawn into three zones, and within each zones, families can make choices within that zone. and whereas bost an public schools use a home-based student assignment system where each family is offered a customized list of schools offered within

and i think a lot of those issues are citywide issues.hey touch a number of departments, so we have been in the past and we will continue to do so, and will advocate that we have resources and will continue to assist. >> president cleaveland: i know you've been a good ad covate in that regard, and i appreciate that. thank you very much. any further comments? any further comments? madam secretary? >> clerk: public comment. >> president cleaveland: is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment

an ordinance to amend the administrative code to require a citywide labor agreement applicable to public work or improvement projects with a projected cost over the threshold amount ranging from $1 million to $5 million depending on the year in which the advertisiement for business is released or $10 million if funded by a source other than a general obligation bond or delay in completing the project may interrupt or delay services or use of facilities important to the city's operation infrastructure. >> president cohen: thank you. >> supervisor safai: thank you, madam president, colleagues. i rise today on this issue that's been over two years in the making. i want to put some context into this because i think these were some very hard-fought, listened to, participated in negotiations. want to thank my colleague, supervisor peskin, as well as supervisor fewer and the mayor for her leadership on this issue. this was certainly not an easy issue to come to consensus on. there were three main points that i would like to highlight for the listening public as well as those that were involved

and i think a lot of those issues are citywide issues. they touch a number of departments, so we have been in the past and we will continue to do so, and will advocate that we have resources and will continue to assist. >> president cleaveland: i know you've been a good ad covate in that regard, and i appreciate that. thank you very much. any further comments? any further comments? madam secretary? >> clerk: public comment. >> president cleaveland: is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> clerk: item six, report on fiscal year 2019-2020 capital and information technology budget requests. >> good morning again, mark corso, finance and planning to discuss the department's tap tall and i.t. requests for submittal and requests for approval, as well. just an overview of the process. it's a little different than the general budget. there's committees established that vet all these proposals, but departments submit, january 11, is the date this year, which is friday, requests for both capital planning committee and

can see, the office of workforce development fiscal year 2018 included new funding of 1.2 for the citywide public space initiative. in june 2018, the board of supervisors release of 500,000 and placed it on committee reserves pending the final relic -- -- finalization of the business plan. as you can see from the report, they recommended approval of the release of those reserves. we can share with you briefly an overview of the public space initiative if you'd like. will show progress in our work to date and provide highlights of the business plan and previews of next steps, which you have heard about and many of the -- and many of the briefings the staff is provided to supervisors across the city. once the funds are released. >> i just want to remind you that we put this money on reserve back in june, and asked oewd to come back with the business plan for what the funding would be spent on. that is the purpose of this discussion today. thank you. >> to mirror some of your comments about the work that you see outside the front doors with civic centre, we really wanted to build upon this ne