and i encouraged a resolution between claimants in these areas. we are not a claimant.road are upheld. i reiterated my strong commitment as well to our one china policy based on the three joint communiques and the taiwan relations act. fourth, we have agreed to do more to promote international security. the united nations in the coming days, the u.s. and china will bring countries together to promote development in afghanistan and we'll work with our many partners to strengthen international peacekeeping. we agree that all parties, including iran, need to fully implement the nuclear deal, and that u.n. security council resolutions need to be fully enforced. for the first time the u.s. and china will also formally partner to promote global development. we'll expand our joint efforts on humanitarian assistance, agricultural development and food security. and given china's success in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, which is one of the most remarkable achievements in human history, we'll help rally the world this weekend around other goals including t

i encouraged a resolution between claimants in the area.rk with many partners to strengthen international peace keeping. all parties including iran need to implement nuclear deal and need to be fully enforced. for the first time u.s. and china will formally partner to promote global development. building our efforts against ebola will work to strengthen security and expand join efforts on humanitarian assistance and food security and given china's success, we will help rally this weekend around new development in our goal to eliminate extreme poverty. i affirm america support for all people including freedom of assembly and expression, freedom of the press and freedom of religion and i expressed in views to prevent journalists lawyers and civil society groups from operating freely or denying ethic minority equal treatment are problematic in our view and prevent china and its people from realizing it's full potential. obviously we recognize that there are real differences and president xi shared his views in terms of how can he can move forw

and i encouraged a resolution between claimants in these areas. we are not a claimant. we just want to make sure that the rules of the road are upheld. i reiterated my strong commitment as well to our one china policy based on the three joint communiques and the taiwan relations act. fourth, we've agreed to do more to promote international security. u.s. and china will bring countries together to promote afghanistan, and we will work with partners to strengthen international peacekeeping. we agree that all parties, including iran, need to fully imflemt the nuclear deal and that u.n. security council resolutions need to be fully enforced. for the first time the u.s. and china will also formally partner to promote global development. building on our efforts against ebola. we'll expand on humanitarian assist wrans, disaster response, agricultural development, and food security and given china's success in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, which is one of the most remarkable achievements in human history, we will help rally the world this weekend around

so we will defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differences peacefully. i say this recognizing that diplomacy is hard, that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying, that it's rarely politically popular, but i believe that leaders of large nations in particular have an obligation to take these risks precisely because we're strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we'll continue to stand up for human rights, but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people-to-people ties. if these contacts yield progress, then i believe that we'll be able to lift an embargo tha that is not in place any more. [applause] change won't come overnight to cuba. but i'm confident that openn

about the landd reclamation and construction activities and other claimants in the region.hose comments coming as china started this grand parade -- a military parade to mark 70 years since the end of world war ii. maybe a bit more impetus to push his message of the chinese dream to people in china. let's get more and join john. thank you so much for joining us, 84% of the weaponry on display in this military parade will be brand-new and not seen before. what message is that sending out to the world? john: good morning. first of all, i'm not so sure about that claim. it won't be too many surprises about the military equipment being on display. the message, what is, there are two major messages, one internally to the domestic population in china. the communist party of china is in control, that the president is in control, and his ability to project power is still very strong. that is an important message within china. externally, the message to its neighbors internationally is artainly that china is now serious force to be reckoned with. the military systems that will be di

while land reclamation is not new and china is not the only claimant to have conducted reclamation, ashe chart to my right shows, china's recent activities far outweigh over efforts in size, pace and effort. we are concerned about china's long-term intentions for these features and the potential for further militarization of the south china sea. as we stated clearly to the chinese, these actions are not only unilaterally altering the status quo, they are complicated the lowering of tensions and the peaceful resolution of disputes. let me be clear. the defense department is not standing still in the face of these challenges. we're systematically implementing a long-term strategy aimed at preserving u.s. interests and military access, building the capability of our allies and partners and preserving the stability of the asia pacific domain. the department's strategy comprises four lines of effort. first, we're strengthening our military capacity to ensure the united states can successfully deter conflict and coercion and respond when needed. d dod is investing, applying forward and distr

the claimant this legislation seeks to protect women cannot be further from the truth. another attempt for republicans to erode the fundamental constitutionally protected right for safe and legal abortion. this legislation which would a womane the rights for to choose from provider of the right of a provider to support provide access to safe and legal abortion should be rejected and i yield back. rep. sessions: thank you very much. this is an issue back home for me also. i have -- i'm sure everyone of members, whether you're from new york or from dallas, texas has to a policeons state legislatures know a lot about this issue. they know a lot that i learned the other day that there is no planned parenthood organization in the country that has a mammogram available to it. i thought that was women's health care. we have isolated it down. a. kautsky, i believe you adeptly said this is about abortion services. i believe the state should be given that latitude here and. i respect you being here and miss blackburn, i thank you for bringing the bill and i like to say thank you

the national government could apologetically claimant powerlessness over this extensive arms trade, even though its own policies encouraged and protected it. all of this helps accelerate the trade to haiti late in the decade. they imported something on the order of 30,000 muskets just for his own forces in haiti. by the time napoleon sent a french army of tens of thousands of veterans to regain control of the island in 1802, they understood that acquiring these arms was the number one imported job. they estimated there were probably about 110,000 muskets in the hands of former slaves. yellow fever famously devastated the planes army. but guns and in emissions enabled black insurgents to drive them out of the country altogether. the leader of the french expedition, right at the moment of his defeat, he says "it is the americans who brought the muskets, the canons, the gunpowder, all of these munitions. i am entirely convinced that americans formed the plane to promote the independence of the antilles s they can monopoly to the trade." all the while, anxious spanish administrators are watc

we are not a claimant. we just want to make sure the rules of the road are just held. i reiterate owrd strong commit to the our one china policy and the stay juan relations act. weave agreed to do more to promote international security. the united nations in the coming days, the u.s. and china will bring countries together to promote development in afghanistan and we'll work with our many partners to strengthen international peacekeeping. all parties including iran need to fully implement the united nations temperature. we'll build on our efforts against ebola we'll work to strean then global health security, expand our efforts on humanitarian assistance and food security. and given china's success in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty which is one of the most remarkable achievements in human history. we'll help rally the world in our goal to ends poverty. we had a discussion about human rights. i confirmed america's support for the fundamental rieflts all people including freedom of assembly, expression, freedom of the press and religion. i expresse

so we will defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differenceseacefully. i say this recognizing that diplomacy is hard. sometimesutcomes are unsatisfying, that it is rarely politically popular. i believe the leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. that, to move forward in this new era, we have to be strong enough to a knowledge when what you are doing is not working. for 50 years, the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we will continue to stand up for human rights. but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people to people ties. progresscontacts yield , i'm confident that our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [applause] president obama: change won't come overnight to cuba, but i'm confident that opennes

eleanor: actually, the weight of scientific opinion is that the claimant is changing and that man's activities has a lot to do with it. the pope brought some moral clarity to that. he's not just speaking to americans. he's speaking around the world and people, especially poor people are already feeling the impact of climate change. and the pope is not changing church doctrine. he is changing the tone of how the church -- he's brought the church past the scandals. he's opened the minds of blessed catholics and noncatholics to look at this church anew. he is the best apostle of the catholic church, and the way he went over and shook john kerry's hand. the senate who ran for president in 2004 that the church wanted to deny communion. that was a wonderful grace note. and the republican contenders can learn you don't have to change your core beliefs but you can sure change the way you address people and go to the world in a much more welcoming way. three cities, because philadelphia is next, basically stopped and listened to this pope and it was a much welcomed message. john: that has little to do

. >> the trip comes as the land and sea of alaska are threatened by claimant change.laska warmed twice as fast as the rest of the country and sea ice is shedding and glaciers shrinking leading to wild pyres and rising ocean temperatures are altering pitching in the state. joining me now is nbc news senior white house correspondent chris jansing. chris, let me start with the continue rers si controversy over the name. i get it, john boehner from ohio, kasich from ohio, this is their guy mckinley, they want to see him honored but i didn't know until today mckinley never went to alaska and the mountain was named after him until after he was president. >> he never stepped foot in alaska and they say this is what it's always been here, by the way, i asked a triable chief whose native language its in, because we say denali, he says denali, anyway, whatever you call it, the point is that this is what the native alaskans called it and when i spoke to native alaskans today including a triable chief, he said to me, this is really about our cultural identity. this is about ameri

adjusted jobless claimants coming in. it was forecast at 2.3%. let's just find a couple of these other numbers. unemployment rate stable at 5.5%. it was 5.6% last month so that has slightly ticked down while wage growth has come in at 2.9 and sterling performing well off the back of the session high. it's off a quarter of a percent. >> let's check in on european benchmarks and how they're perform ago head of that decision. gains across the board after the rally on wall street. up three quarters of 1% on the ftse and the german dax higher. let's take a look at the 50 biggest companies around the euro stocks 50 and this chart is telling us we're in rally mode today on this wednesday. >> let's have a look at bonds as well. we've seen them extend losses after that positive response in the wage data which put the sterling higher as we just discussed. the ten year note 2.26% we saw yields rise in the u.s. yesterday ahead of the fed meeting but also off the back of strong consumer data. let's look at forex rates as well. the story of the last month has

needs to change because claimant change refugees are basically economic refugees. >> carabeth is onee world's lowesting nations. global warming is very real here most of the land is less than two meters above sea level. some scientistsists believe it could be completely uninhabitable by 2013. >> they find it difficult to grow crops, difficult to get fresh water and one day, when the water comes through too high and there is no adult around to grab a little kid, possible death a 4-year legal battle to stay was quashed buy new zealand supreme court who said climate change was not a reason to give the family refugee status. it says there was no evidence that at a time government wasn't trying to minimize the dangers of global warming and there was no evidence that the they were facing immediate persecution or serious harm. it will could be a lengthy process i want so to stay with my family. >> the court will hear a final plea on monday. if that fails, it's likely the entire city will be deport deported back to carabeth on the next available plane. arizona, talk land, new zealand. >> new

claimant change. look. the fact is that the u.n. is not going to ever function right without u.s.dership. we cannot have a u.s. policy that samantha powers tweeting and susan rise tweeting her way into talking about these issues. this is the most political foreign policy team i've ever seen and their political priorities are somewhere else. they don't want to get involved because they told us the rest of world should be on their own. i think it's atrocious watching this humanitarian crisis. i'm not saying bring these people here. i'm saying we're general warehouse, we have the programs set up. let's start using them. we're paying for them anyway. let's push these people into action. >> hopefully we'll get some answers in a week. the administration said they're going to increase to 65,000 -- >> that's the wrong attitude. >> at least it's something. but at the same time -- >> feed the people there. we don't need to bring them here. they don't speak the language. >> it's a huge problem that is just astounding and continuing. always good to see you. thank you. >> thanks, eric. >>> bom

on the contrary the only time we removed to desmond had clearly bogus claimants refused and they do notffer them a better health care plan than -- >> that is not true, mr. harper. >> -- canadians agree with. this remains one of the largest countries in the world. i is that we will bring in more. these guys would've had in the last debate during open borders and hundreds of thousands of people coming without any security document. that would have been an enormous mistake. >> fears of others, fears of communities. we have a prime minister who -- >> let's go to mr. mulcair. canadians want a prime minister who understand the sense of urgency we all feel when we see syria. unfortunately they fear mongering. any of the parties opened the door without any regard. rick hillier who is no less an authority, former chief of defense staff last week said we've got to stop using security concerns as an excuse to do nothing. mr. harper, what do you stop using security excuse as a pretense to do not mean. >> nobody wants to let anybody in. >> we are bringing in more quickly. we are providing support be

and i encouraged a resolution between claimants in these areas, we are not a claimant, we want to make sure the rules of the road are upheld. i reiterated my strong commitment as well to our one china policy based on the three joint communiques and the taiwan communications act. fourth, we do more to promote international security. at the united nations in the coming days, the u.s. and china will bring countries together to promote development in afghanistan, and we'll work with our many partners to strengthen international peacekeeping. we agree all parties including iran need to fully implement the nuclear deal and u.n. resolutions need to be fully enforced. for the first time, the u.s. and china will formally partner to promote global development. building on our efforts against ebola, we'll work to strengthen global health security, and expand our joint efforts on humanitarian assistance, disaster response, agricultural development and food security, and given china's success in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, which is one of the most remarkable achievements

in that claimant.harlie: should we create that kind of urgency again for something like going to the moon? neil: i joke about it, i say, let me go to china and with to -- whisper to the head of china, can you leak a memo that says you want to put military bases on mars, but don't tell anybody. that memo shows up in the pentagon, and we will be on mars in 10 months. one month to design, build, and fund a spacecraft and nine-month , to get there. that is how motivated i think he will be because that's how motivated we were back in the 1960's. i don't want to go to mars for military reasons. i think there's a strong economic reason one can make or. for it. it's a little more subtle. i think it takes slightly longer than the proverbial elevator ride you have to save up for your member of congress. this takes maybe twice as long as an elevator ride. i'm thinking i voted for my , representation in congress. i want them to listen to me for longer than an elevator ride. it is simple. if you're going into space

encouraged a resolution between claimants in these areas. we are not a claimant.to make sure that the rules of the rotor upheld i reiterated my comment to one china policy. we have agreed to do more to promote international security. will bring it countries together toward development in afghanistan. we will work with our many partners to strengthen international peacekeeping. partners that all including iran it needs to implement the deal. the deal lease to be fully enforced. for the first time, we will partner to promote global development. we will build on our efforts against ebola. efforts onand humanitarian assistance. given china's success in lifting millions of people out of we will help rally the world this week around new development goals. we hope to end extreme poverty. we had a discussion about human rights. i affirmed america's unwavering support for human rights and fundamental freedoms of all people. i expressed our view that preveg journalists, lawyers, and society groups from operating freely and closing churches and denying ethnic white or equal

and i encouraged a resolution between claimants in these areas.claimant, we just want to make sure that the rules of the road are upheld. i reiterated my strong commitment as well to our one china policy, based on the three joint communiques and the taiwan relations act. fourth we have agreed to do more to promote international security. at the united nations in the coming days the u.s. and china will bring countries together to promote development in afghanistan and work with our partners to strengthen international peace keeping. we believe all parties including iran need to implement the nuclear deal and security council resolutions need to be enforced. the u.s. and china will also partn partner on in addition development. disaster response, agricultural development and food security, and given china's success in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty which is one of the most remarkable achievements in human history, we'll help rally the world this weekend, including our goal to end extreme poverty. fifth we had a frank discussio

the claimant needs to actually sign off. it was an ability to get started. it was not a final document in any way. >> thank you for that, administrator mccarthy. i would like to switch gears and focus on the extent of the problem of acid mine drainage around the country. it is a problem that my constituents know only too well. there are 65 million gallons of acid mine run justify every day. here we are talking about 3 million gallon spill. 65 millions of acid mine run-off every day flowing into the lackawanna river compared to the 3 million in the animas river spill. in case you don't believe it, i'm going to show you pictures of the lackawanna river on a typical day. this is the old forge bore hole which emits 65 million gallons of acid mine drainage into the susquehanna river, which finds its way down to the chesapeake bay. any spill in our rivers is is important and needs to be addressed. here, however, what my local paper published after the animas spill received so much congressional and media attention was a cartoon, the political cartoonist from scran

they are cutting costs, they are saving rate payers money and helping to stabilize the claimant and reduce air around water pollution. what is not to like about that? we can build an economy on clean energy. we should not be investing in dirty oil particularly from the arctic. >> ifill: do i see agreement coming from the other side there in. >> well, look, there is no question i'm adamantly favor in natural gas. it's been a key factor in the u.s. reducing co2 emissions. but the hard reality is what the president said, we need oil and gas. globally, there are 1 billion automobiles, we have roughly 400,000 airplanes, tens of thousands of boats, all run on oil. the idea we'll quit using oil is simply not true. the sierra club has been spinning the idea we can run the world on renewables, it hasn't and won't be true. we need oil and gas. >> ifill: i don't think that's initially what the president is saying which is what we are talking about today. we'll leave it there now, michael brune of the sierra club and robert bryce of the manhattan institute. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> woodru

there are 28 claimants that might be effective should they not be successful in negotiating a contract, but maybe they're not sending anything appear they're not required by law to. we don't have a managed care plan there. i've added some items of note. let me just go back for a moment to data analytics. it actually entered our first set of data. after you know, it was this time last year you were approving the abcd and we now have data and we are actually -it's exciting to have entered data. that's from marina was also at that time. >> if i might, in terms of a telephone number for the hss board. i like to at least have that part of this broadcast. >> absolutely part of this broadcast. >> absolutely part of this broadcast. >> absolutely >> 415-554-0662. the e-mail is health.service.board. at sf dog.org. >> thank you. i just added some items of note. you referred to them earlier to my commissioner scott. the mergers and it positions continue both at the insurer level and at the provider level. the largest ever is the anthem is acquiring cigna. it's still being contested in terms of mon

now, this man, this false claimant to religious stature has thwarted the legal execution of an adultress him. >> yes, that of course would be my first thought. but with shame even among us, even among the sanhedrin he has -- >> he rails against roman taxes. >> if i ever crucified every jew who railed against our taxes, i would have to level the seat of lebanon -- >> his crime must be an attack against our emperor, our rules. >> he attacks those who support your rules. doesn't that inspire concern? >> concern but nothing that validates action. >> make a case with evidence. learn where he speaks and with whom. prove he is a threat to roman rule. and i will have him crucified. >> each day i hear a certain speaking. what is the message of this? >> oh, many things. nothing that concerns us. >> what? >> it involves the slaves. >> half of being a slave borders on what we do. >> not all we do. >> enough. what does he preach? >> that god wants the meek to inherit the earth. the poor to be rich, the weak to be strong. platitudes of popular appeal. >> none of it to be believed. >> in the face of hi

defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differences peacefully. i say this, recognizing the diplomacy is hard. outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying. that it is really politically popular. -- rarely politically popular. i believe that leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks. precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. that to movee forward in this new era, we have to be strong have to acknowledge when what you are doing is not working. years, the united states pursued a cuban policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government, we will continue to stand up for human rights, but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce. and people to people ties. as these contacts yield progress i am confident that our congress will inevitably left an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [applause] change won't come overnight to cuba, but i am confident

so we will defend these principles, while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differences peacefully. i say this, recognizing that diplomacy is hard; that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying, that it's rarely politically popular. but i believe that leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks, precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if, and when, diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era, we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years, the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we will continue to stand up for human rights. but we address these issues through diplomatic relations, and increased commerce, and people-to-people ties. as these contacts yield progress, i'm confident that our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [applause] change won't come overnight to cuba, bu

so we will defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differencesy. i say this recognizing that diplomacy is hard, that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying, that it's rarely politically popular. but i believe that leaders of large nations in particular have an obligation to take these risks precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government, we will continue to stand up for human rights, but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people-to-people ties. as these contacts yield progress, i'm confident that our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [applause] change won't come overnight to cuba, but i'm confident that

equipment to iraqi officials working with us there almost two airbases airbases to distribute the claimant to fighters. we are overseeing the distribution of the government of iraq equipment from these spaces. through these efforts we have more than 4000 sunni fighters. we are also in the early stages of our train and equip program. this effort is just one elements of what we're trying to do in the larger campaign and syria. this includes the increasing airstrikes and supporting partner forces on the ground like the searing kurds, sunni arabs and other forces to try to put pressure on isil. these efforts have substantially ruled isil back in this area. it has had significant impacts on their freedom of movement and supply line. as of september 15, our train and equip program, we are now currently training more than 100 fighters and have additional recruits in the pipeline. this number is smaller than we had hoped for, and part, we put our trainees through a very rigorous training process to meet standards that are laid out in u.s. law. we we closely aligned all of our efforts in these area

so we will defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differences eacefully. i say this recognizing that diplomacy is hard, that the outcomes are sometimes unsaving, that it's rarely politically popular, but i believe that leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years, the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we will continue to stand up for human rights, but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people-to-people ties. as these contacts yield progress, i'm confident that our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [applause] change won't come overnight to cuba but i'm confide

readiness and a capacity to use military, economic, diplomatic, informational tools to intimidate claimants to terrors to and waters in the first and second island chain. and we used to think for a long time, certainly when i was in government, of the taiwan problem as a security problem in the context of cross strait security, but i think over the last decade, basically since i left government and maybe it was because i was too dumb to think of this, but i think rather it is the nature of the problem has changed. now, increasingly, we have to think about the security of the whole first island chain which stretches from japan through taiwan straits to the philippines and the second island chain, which goes sort of straight down through guam. in the years before the nixon guam doctrine in 1969, almost every national security council document, mostly declassified now, start with some reference to the importance of the security of the first island chain. so this isn't new in our history, but it's coming back and taiwan is right in the middle of it, and it was for atchison, the importance of th

so we will defend these principles while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differences i say this recognizing diplomacy is hard. that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying. that it's rarely popular. but i believe that leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks. precisely because we're strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era, we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years the united states pursue ad cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we will continue to stand up for human rights. but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people to people ties. as these contacts yield progress i'm confident that our congress will inevitable lie lift an embargo that should not be in place any more. [ applause ] change won't come overnight to cuba. but i'm confident that openness,

have not taken health care from immigrant, on the contrary, the only time is where we have bogus claimants. we do not offer them a better health care plan than the ordinary canadian can receive. >> that's not true. >> on the issue of refugees, this remains one of the largest countries in the world in terms of refugee resettlement. i said we will bring in more. what i said we will not do -- these guys in the last two weeks open our borders and people come out security check and documentation. >> mr. harper play plays fears - >> that's not right. >> immigration and can -- canadians, mr. harper is fear rick who is no less than authority than former chief of defense staff last week said we've got to stop using the security concerns as an excuse to do nothing. mr. harper, why don't you stop using the security excuse as pretext to do nothing. nobody wants to let anybody without a security check but you are doing nothing. >> we are announcing we are bringing more refugees, we are providing a matching fund for humanitarian support. the vast majority of millions of people who will remain in those c

beijingdegree to which has demonstrated willingness to use informational tools to toimidate claimants territories and waters in the first and second island changed -- island chain. over the last decade, and may be i was too dumb to think of this, but i think it -- the nature of the problem has changed. now, we have to think of the security of the whole island chain that stretches from japan through the taiwan straits to the philippines. and the second island chain that goes straight down to guam. andhe years before the next almost all 1969, documents start to the reference of the security of the first island chain. this is not new in our history but it is coming back. taiwan was in the middle. that means we do not want taiwan to be a vulnerable flank were a vacuum in terms of maintaining stability in the first chain. taiwan's defense capability matters to us. is the third interest economic integrity and growth of taiwan. there is a tough balancing act acause growth depends on robust cross strait relationship which is in u.s. interest but also the integration of taiwan's economy into t

so we will defend these principles while encouraging klein and other claimants to resolve their differences recognizing the diplomacy is hard. that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying, that its's rarely politically popular. but i believe that leaders of large nations in particular have an obligation to take these risks, precisely because we are strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era, we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government, we will continue to stand up for human rights, but we addressed these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people to people ties. as these contacts yield progress, i'm confident that our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [ applause ] >> change won't come overnight to cuba, but i'm confident that ope

readiness and capacity to use military and economic, diplomatic informational tools to intimidate claimants to territories in waters in first and second island chain, and we used to think for a long time, certainly when i was in government, that taiwan problem is a security problem and cross state security. over the last decade, maybe it was enlisted under think of is but a think rather it's the nature of the pop has change. increasing went to think about the security of the whole first island chain which stretches from japan through taiwan strait, philippines, and the second island chain which does sort of straight down through guam. in the years before the nixon law doctrine in 1969 almost every u.s. national city council document, mostly these classified now, start with some reference in the importance of the first island chain. it's coming back. taiwan is right in the of it and it was for canned demo scratches and come the import of that offshore giant -- island chain. and we don't want i wanted and vulnerable flank or a vacuum in terms of maintaining stability the entire first island c

the overtime we removed it is are we had clearly bogus refugee claimants that have been turned down.e do not offer them a better health care plan than the ordinary canadian can receive. on the issue of refugees, this remains one of the largest countries in the world in terms of refugee resettlement. i have said we will bring in more. these guys would have had in the last two weeks, throwing open our borders and literally hundreds of thousands of people coming without any kind of security check or documentation. >> that is not true, mr. harper. m.p. mulcair: mr. harper is playing on fears all the time-- [indiscernible] mulcair.'s go to mr. immigration on the economy. m.p. mulcair: canadians wanted prime minister that understand the sense of urgency we all feel when we see the current crisis in syria. mr. harper unfortunately is fear mongering. its complete be false to affirm that any of the parties in canada would want to throw open the doors to people without any regard to security. we have got to stop using security concerns as an excuse to do nothing. mr. harper, why don't you stop

so, we will defend these principles, while encouraging china and other claimants to resolve their differenceshis recognizing that diplomacy is hard. that the outcomes are sometimes unsatisfying. that it's rarely politically popular. but i believe that leaders of large nations, in particular, have an obligation to take these risks. precisely because we're strong enough to protect our interests if and when diplomacy fails. i also believe that to move forward in this new era, we have to be strong enough to acknowledge when what you're doing is not working. for 50 years the united states pursued a cuba policy that failed to improve the lives of the cuban people. we changed that. we continue to have differences with the cuban government. we'll continue to stand up for human rights, but we address these issues through diplomatic relations and increased commerce and people-to-people ties. as these contacts yield progress, i'm confident our congress will inevitably lift an embargo that should not be in place anymore. [ applause ] change won't come overnight to cuba, but i'm confident that openness, n

fewer americans filed front of claimant benefits last week. initial jobless claims drop to 275,000.000 46 months. housing, j.p. morgan says home prices will rise more this year than originally or cast. the average rate type 4.4%. rising demand and fewer distress cells will keep pricing moving higher. will keeped sells pricing moving higher. mark: airstrikes using jets or helicopters could be launched from their against islamic state militants. the disclosure is the latest sign russia is trying to pop up president all all a sharp -- the president's government. more than a quarter people have died in the four-year long civil war. the u.s. senate pushing toward a critical vote today on the nuclear accord with iran, with democrats in position to hand a major victory to president obama. this afternoon they are planning to put up the 41 votes or more to block the resolution with a filibuster that would prevent it from reaching a final vote, making a presidential veto unnecessary. nearly a third of republicans are supporting donald trump's presidential bid. trump is at 32%. ben carson seco

the overtime we removed it is are we had clearly bogus refugee claimants that have been turned down. we do not offer them a better health care plan than the ordinary canadian can receive. on the issue of refugees, this remains one of the largest countries in the world in terms of refugee resettlement. i have said we will bring in more. these guys would have had in the last two weeks, throwing open our borders and literally hundreds of thousands of people coming without any kind of security check or documentation. >> that is not true, mr. harper. m.p. mulcair: mr. harper is playing on fears all the time-- [indiscernible] mulcair.'s go to mr. immigration on the economy. m.p. mulcair: canadians wanted prime minister that understand the sense of urgency we all feel when we see the current crisis in syria. mr. harper unfortunately is fear mongering. its complete be false to affirm that any of the parties in canada would want to throw open the doors to people without any regard to security. we have got to stop using security concerns as an excuse to do nothing. mr. harper, why don't you st

they have reached a legal settlement with about 1380 individual claimants for the faulty ignition switchesllion. you were listening to bloomberg surveillance. it is fed day. i michael mckee in washington. tom keene in new york. we have all the news for you. ♪ brendan: this is "bloomberg surveillance." unemployment claims fell to the lowest level in two months. since july.evel employers have been holding back on layoffs since early in the year. the latest reading on housing market indicates that it might be leveling off. housing has been gaining most of this year. a 2.4% increase in holiday sales is predicted by one company that study consumers. that would be little more than half of last year plus increase. we have the futures section -- session now closed. down 2.1%. as we wait the opening bell, let's look at the two year yield. the dollar index is about -- down about 0.2%. let's take a look at crude futures. tom: good morning, everyone. "bloomberg surveillance" worldwide. we welcome all of you on this historic day. marketsd check, the look like a friday after thanksgiving. it is clearly

claimants to disputed areas routinely use coast guard vessels to enforce their claims while keeping these issues out of the military sphere. tactical miscalculations can lead to strategic consequences. the united states does not take sides on issues of sovereignty with respect to these territory disputes, but we do insist that all maritime claims be derived from naturally-formed land features this accordance with customary international law as reflected in the law of the sea convention. the united states also emphasizes the importance of peacefully resolving maritime and territorial disagreements in accordance with international law, and we oppose the use of intimidation, coercion or aggression. the u.s. believes every nation, large or small, to have the opportunity to develop and prosper in line with international laws and standards. if one country selectively ignores these rules for its own benefit, others will undoubtedly following, destabilizing regional security and the prosperity of all pacific states. part of paycom's role will be insuring all nations have continued access to the m

claimants to disputed areas use maritime law enforcement to enforce their claims while nom ali keepingese issues out of the military's sphere. while no country appears to the sire military conflict miscalculations mislead to consequences. the united states does not take sides on issues of sovereignty but we do insist all maritime claims be derived from naturally formed land features in accordance with customary international law. the united states emphasizes the importance of peacefully resolving maritime and territorial disagreements in accordance with international law and oppose the use of coercion or aggression. the u.s. believes every nation, large or small, should have the opportunity to develop and prosper in line with international laws and standards. if one country selectively ignores these rules for its own benefit, others will undoubtedly follow eroding international legal system and destabilizing regional security and prosperity of all pacific states. part of p-cons's role will be ensuring all nations have continued access to the maritime spaces vital to the global economy.