clare murphy, speaking to us _ be complacent on this issue. clare murphy, speaking to us earlier.ony zurcher nrdc studio and what is your assessment on this sweeping decision the us supreme court? it assessment on this sweeping decision the us supreme court?— assessment on this sweeping decision the us supreme court? it changes the debate on abortion _ the us supreme court? it changes the debate on abortion in _ the us supreme court? it changes the debate on abortion in the _ the us supreme court? it changes the debate on abortion in the united - debate on abortion in the united states and something that was conducted in very narrow ground that's what self—serve people can put on abortion clinics, —— clinics, when things can be regulated after fatal viability, what sort of consent and information is available for abortion seekers to much wider debate... whether the government can amend abortion ban abortion rights of the federal level —— foetal. this is all of a sudden change the abortion debate into something much more unpredictable and we really don't know which direction this i

clare murphy ofthe 21st-century democracy. clare murphy of the british — 21st-century democracy.trolled supreme court has achieved their dark, extreme goal of... a woman's right to make their own reproductive health decisions. because of donald trump, mitch mcconnell, the republican party, their super majority in the supreme court, american women today have less freedom than their mothers. with roe and their attempt to destroy it, radical republicans are charging ahead with their crusade to criminalise health freedom. in the congress, be aware of this, the republicans are plotting a nationwide abortion ban. they cannot be allowed to have a majority in the congress to do that. but that's their goal. and if you've read, and again we are all studying this, but if you've read what's in the very clear... one of the justices had his own statement, it's about contraception, in vitro fertilisation. family planning. that's all what will spring from their decision that they made today. it's such a contradiction. yesterday, they said the states cannot make laws governing the constitutional