and clark. they sent out expeditions to apprehend them. they came within a few hundred miles on two occasions to nearly arrest them. the jefferson's instructions to lewis work right -- were quite clear. the mission is to explore the missouri river. you may offer the most direct and practical water communication across this continent. for the purposes of commerce. this was jefferson's letter to lewis that became his marching orders. lewis knew -- this letter to lewis was epic, it was over six pages long. it has a list of things he wanted to do. he wrote it to his friend, william clark. he served on a campaign in the 1790's, asking them to join him as co-commander. if there's anything under the circumstances, it would participate with me in its fatigues, dangers, it's honors, believe me, there is no man on earth with whom i should feel equal pleasure in sharing them as with yourself. the president and secretary of war had not given permission. clark wrote back and said i cheerfully join you in an

that's what jeff clark was doing. even had he been the attorney general, this would have been an unlawful act. >> and judge jones resoundingly rejected meadows' efforts to move this case to federal court. which does not bode well for anybody in this case, maybe not even donald trump. let me ask you, joyce, about -- barb, not joist, barb, the fact that donald trump's lawyers were in the courtroom as katie phang has reported, listening to jeffrey clark's lawyers make this argument that he was doing all of this at the direction of donald trump? >> yeah, i think it's very interesting. you know, it's not uncommon for codefendants' lawyers to sit in when hearings are occurring against the other defendants. they don't want to miss any other dynamics that were heard in the courtroom to be important to their client's case. it's interesting that people are beginning to point the finger at donald trump as the ring leader here. one, he is the most culpable face on the allegations in the indictment. at some point it will be intere

it was based on something clark was doing. he was lying and claiming something false, and he was trying to do it through his government powers and in writing, claiming significant concerns may have impacted the outcome of the election. that was a lie. it was not only a lie. it was a bad lie, because trump's attorney general bill barr had already rejected that and done so in public as attorney general. now, today in court, there was other damning testimony that also hit clark. it's never the role of that civil division that he was in to engage in election matters as clark tried to do. clark's lawyers pin the whole thing on trump, saying, look, the president put it in his lane. a judge will decide whether that is enough to make this a federal question. it is the same judge who rejected mark meadows' bid to do the same thing, making the exact same argue to try to get out of the atlanta d.a.'s court and said it wasn't in his job scope to take those actions to try to steal the race. so that's a few minutes on these enablers and ric

he challenged clark's attorney on why clark was circulating these claims of election fraud his bossesus in these draft memos to georgia officials, and it hurt clark that he didn't show up for person in this hearing. he submitted a sworn statement that the judge refused to accept into evidence because prosecutors can't cross-examination a sworn statement. that came up. this is interesting to see what happens for jeff clark, and also interesting because we want to know what's going to happen to donald trump in this case. trump's attorneys signal it's possible they will try to move his case to federal court as well. they haven't done that yet but we know they have been watching in closely. they were in the courtroom again today. at one point our team in the courtroom overheard trump's attorneys opining that things were not going well for jeffrey clark. they want to learn what they can from the codefendants before they make their own move to move to federal court if they do that. we'll see if clark prevails, and we'll see what happens with trump. >> process continues. thank you very much

clark?protected by the supremacy clause. >> those are all really interesting points that now they're trying to use the supremacy clause in a different way in the case. let me ask you now a question about hunter biden. he has been charged with other things after his case was thrown out. and now he's suing the internal revenue service, alleging that the agency legally released his tax information and that it failed to really protect his private records. does he have a case? >> well, under title 26, 6103, i did this for 11 years, you're protected from the disclosure of your returns. however, if there is a investigation or proceeding involving your returns, the doj and the irs can use it to investigate or to put forth a position. i don't know if that case has a lot of merit. >> gene rossi, i love that you're giving us all literally the itsy bitsy details of the case because you know what the codes are in the law. and obviously, you have been a good attorney throughout. thank you so much for comi

part of the problem for clark is he didn't testify. and the burden is on that individual to prove their case. without that evidence or without that testimony, it looks like it's really going nowhere. >> so, trump, if he's going to do it, will have to most likely will have to testify. anthony, you were there in that courtroom, as jeffrey clark's lawyers tried to make the case today. what stood out to you the most? and what did you take away from it about the judge? >> well, i think the judge was very frustrated over the fact that we were having an evidentiary hearing without much evidence. and, so, that was really not a particularly, i think, great dynamic for clark and his team. i think that the testimony today by the former civil division chief was really very significant because it made it very clear that the prerogative that exists to enforce election law on a federal level would come from the civil rights division and not the division that jeffrey clark was part of or the criminal law division which, again, is not the division that

jeffrey clark. the trump political appointee despite the objections of his bosses tried to help trump over turn the 2020 presidential election. by pushing conspiracy theories about an international scheme to rig voting machines against republicans. and drafting a letter to states instructing them to flip the results and at one point trump considered installing him as acting toerpg. katelyn polantz joins us from the courthouse in atlanta. clark wasn't in the courtroom today? i would assume that irritated the judge? >> reporter: jake, he didn't have to be in the courtroom today but he didn't take the necessary steps in advance and so there was a bit of a hitch at the beginning of this hearing where cluck clark had to sipe a form to say, i consent to not being there as a criminal defendant and from there this issue did create a bit more of a problem for jeffrey clark moving forward in that his lawyer had tried to submit into this case as evidence something that jeffrey clark had written, semly what is

i don't think it helps jeff clark with his removal petition but it certainly suggests that jeff clarking at the direction of donald trump in drafting this fraudulent letter. >> yeah. if you don't mind i will answer that. it was clearly argument that was being made but in the absence of jeffrey clark the only thing you can rely upon is his lawyer, and he made it clear because jeffrey clark was acting pretty much outside of his lane of his ability to do stuff the fact that donald trump ratified his conduct and said it was okay it made it okay to do what they were doing. they acted in concert. there was no sunlight between the two of them and that was made clear today. it's notable the defense lawyer here in georgia steve sadow was sitting in the courtroom from the gallery the lawyer for donald trump listening to this unravel and we're watching it unravel in real time. >> it's interesting because i mean, he doesn't work for trump. he works for these two gentlemen who testified under oath they told him not to send the letter. let me show you rosen and donahue. do we have that, control roo

clarke: thank you, mr. leader. for those comments and for leaving our caucus and putting the -- leading our caucus and putting the american people's voice into this process and of course for your our today -- hour today setting out the vision democrats have in contrast -- contrast with maga extremists. today democrats ensured that the needs of the american people won out over the demands of maga extremists but only after speaker mccarthy and republicans playing chicken with the lives and livelihoods of american people bringing us to the edge of a needless shutdown trying to blackmail the country into accepting their extreme right-wing agenda. today, democrats came to the rescue. speaker mccarthy admitted defeat. he asked democrats to put out the fire that he and his party started. we proved today that democrats will continue to unify around our shared values. we will continue to put the concerns of the american people first. and, we will not allow the twisted priorities of the maga republicans to become law. as we

clark: thank you so much, mr. leader. i want to join in taking a moment to honor and remember senator feinstein. and just wanted to add to her incredible legacy is also one as a role model to women. first woman mayor of san francisco. part of the 1992 year of the woman. and someone who has really smashed ceilings, broken ground for those of us who get to follow and stand on her shoulders. what a contrast to that legacy of service to what we're witnessing in the house today. another wasted day on voting on an extreme right-wing bill with zero chance of becoming law. another day of fighting among the maga republicans. another day wasted talking about deficits while failing to take up the bipartisan agreement we already entered into that would reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion. so now weeks after political theater, we are one day from a disastrous republican government shutdown. so let's take a moment to talk about the people who are truly at the center of this story. it's not speaker mccarthy. it's not marjorie taylor gre

clark? between the justice department and the white house. white house lawyers pat cipollone and patrick philbin also intervened and warned clark not to communicate with the white house. clark agreed -- but just two days later escalated the situation with an e-mail that set off a series of events that would rock the justice department. >> we came in on monday, december 28th, a hectic day as they all were, and then in the afternoon we got that e-mail, which i had to sit down and read more than once to make sure i understood what he was proposing. >> what was he proposing? >> he was proposing sending out a letter signed by the three of us -- the acting attorney general, myself, and jeff clark -- to georgia, but also the other states, the other swing states as well -- suggesting, essentially, that they set aside the electors assigned to support president-elect biden and hold hearings and basically have the state legislatures pick a new slate of electors. >> the letter claimed the u.s. departmen

the same judge here hearing the clark case. think of the brief expected to be filed in the mark meadows case? >> mark meadows and the clark case are still on the ropes. they still have a chance. this is a close call. yes, clark and meadows have the burden here. but that burden is a pretty light burden in the world of burdens. it's not beyond a reasonable doubt. and all they have to show is that they have a colorable defense. it may be a suing defense, it may ultimately be an unsuccessful defense that their federal officership allows them, or permanen permanen permits thl court. it just needs to be plausible. and the northern district of georgia and the supreme court had even observed that the federal officer authority, yes, ewe right, is someone in that division acts outside of their authority getting involved in elections? absolutely. but courts have said that the federal officer removal statute applies even where that officer acts outside of his or her authority. soer it's a thorny question that has yet to be resolved. yes, i

day clark's defense just got up and argued to the court. they attempted to enter it into evidence. jeffrey clark's declaration as well as that of former attorney general edwin meese. the judge saying, no, to the admission of jeffrey clark's declaration and after wavering deciding at the last minute i will allow edwin meese's declaration in however i'll only give it the weight it is due. the reason why this hearing took a little longer was the state also put on a sole witness to combat and refute any type of allegations by jeffrey clark that when he acted as assistant attorney general, when he drafted that letter that was supposed to be sent to all of the fake elector states including the state of georgia, jody hunt, former assistant attorney general in the civil division which is the division jeffrey clark served in, testified under oath today that absolutely not. any involvement in any type of allegations of election irregularities or fraud had nothing to do with anyone's job within the civil division. that was particularly damning for jef

charles, let's start with jeffrey clark. we know that this same judge did not by mark meadows argument to move his case to federal court. so, jeffrey clark has a chance it up and for him? >> he doesn't. and, his cases on even more tenuous grounds because of the argument that he's making. what he is saying is that donald trump instructed him to do what it is that he did. there are a couple of problems with this stephanie. number one, the president typically does not communicate with a doj employees who are not the attorney general. so, there is no precedent to establish that donald trump, that's president of the united states, in his official capacity would've made any direction to an assisted u.s. attorney to do anything. >> but, let's say he did. >> okay. >> let's say donald trump was fishing, searching, looking for someone inside the doj to buy the lives he was pushing because we know that bill barr wasn't. >> let's say he found jeffrey clark and jeffrey clark said yes sir i will do your bidding for you. is that a defense?

i know katie and clark can check me on that. boris epshteyn has got to be thanking his lucky stars this morning, how long that luck will run for him, remains to be seen. >> jack smith has brought superseding indictments in the classified documents case and the grand jury in d.c. actually was meeting again this week with the special counsel. so who knows if they are working on superseding indictments in the other case that is before the special counsel, right? >> or independent indictments that are separate and apart from the pending indictment against donald trump stemming from other facets of the investigation, some of the fund-raising issues that we understand that jack smith is looking into. but i want to turn back to lindsey graham. irrespective of whether he faces any criminal exposure, he's the reason that this georgia investigation started in the first place. you will recall that in november of 2020, brad raffensperger said he got a strange call from lindsey graham asking if he could discard mail-in ballots from counties

clark seems like less of a case, how did it go today? >> not well. the burden in removal hearing is always on the defendant who wants to take their case from state court to federal court. clark, by not showing up, and taking the stand himself, and then having all the evidence that he tried to proffer, rejected, has fallen short of meeting that. you have an evidentiary burden to me, and your evidence is not accepted, that is not going well for you to begin with. >> there is a's big thinker he had headwind the, former attorney general of the united states under reagan, to just write a big essay, like his take. it's his take, it's just a take, he's just a guy. to me says, he should be moved to federal, court but the judge didn't seem persuaded by that. >> he didn't, and on the other side of the aisle, you have the prosecution, which did present, not only arguments, but evidence, which again, the burden is not on the prosecution for the purposes of the removal proceedings, but they actually did provide live testimony and exhibits. this was from the head

that's what donald trump tried to do with meadows and clark and the like. and to me, the most significant point of all these court actions over the last 48 hours is you're seeing, ari, the conflict between trump and his aides like meadows and clark. clark is saying in his filing, trump told me to do this, and he's blaming trump, and these kinds of conflicts are only going to increase over time. >> do you think that there is kind of a -- the creep i mentioned -- things recently, even after four year of trump we're seeing as extreme or out of bounds are being laundered. is that a, a concern for us as a society? and "b," could that affect how these cases are lit kated? >> it's 100% a concern for society. they're trying to normalize something i would have thought was the most obvious thing for all americans that if you lose an election, you lost the election, you don't go and try to call out people for violence, and you don't try to justify it afterwards the way jeffrey clark did in that testimony. when he said, the real problem here is the lawless action on th

lewis told clark to ask lead the expedition which covered from 1804 -- 1806 lewis and clark kept detailed journals throughout the trip on the terrain, plant and animal life, native people and potential trade routes. authored several books on the lewis and clark expedition veteran traveler of the lewis and clark trail will join us to discuss the expedition. watch books that shaped america feature the journals of lewis and clark mandate light at nine eastern on c-span, c spend our free mobile video app or online at c-span.org. also be sure to scan the qr code to listen to our companion podcast where you can learn more about the authors of the book featured. ♪ c-span is your unfiltered view of government. they are funded by these television companies and more including comcast. >> are you thinking this is just a community center? it is way more than that. comcast is part of the 1000 community centers to create wi-fi enabled so students from low-income families can get the tools they need to be ready for anything. comcast support-span as a public service along with these other television prov

lewis chose clark to lead the from 1804 to 1806. lewis and clark had detailed journals on the trip, plant and animal life, native people. and author of several books on the lewis and clark exhibition and the trail will join us to discuss the expedition. journals of lewis and clark, monday, live 9:00 eastern on c-span and cspan now and scan the q. r. code and you can learn more about the authors of the books featured. >> house is scheduled to gavel back in at 430 to block a biden administration education policy and expand current funding expires. and members will start debate some 440 amendments to the defense, homeland security, agriculture and state foreign operations are covered under the rule being considered today. in the meantime, senate leaders are considering a short-term resolution to avert a shutdown that contains little or no money for ukraine. it isn't clear whether kevin mccarthy would bring it to the house floor. live coverage of the house here on c-span and the senate on c-span 2. >> since 1979 in

but this move by jeffrey clark, particular jeffrey clark, to get into federal court, i'm wondering if a worse fate in federal court, and that the federal judiciary could be even more offended if possible, by what he was doing in the justice department, since the justice department is within the federal judiciary realm, so much more so than the state of georgia. >> well, i think that any state or federal prosecutor and any state or federal judge will be able to understand what he is charged with and if he is convicted, just how, how much and abuse of a position of trust he engaged in. i, too, though, was very struck by his lawyer's comments, which by the way are not evidence, as the judge pointed out. you know, there is no evidence that's been put forth. but the lawyer did say that with respect to the most critical piece of evidence against jeffrey clark, which is this fraudulent letter, where he claimed that doj was not just investigating, but it actually found significant election irregularities that could upend the election in various battleground states. that's the critical letter.

none of us have fallen as far as jeffrey clark has fallen.ecide exactly how long, and exactly where, defendant clerk will repent. neal katyal is back with us and safely back from burning man. neil, you have the floor. neo-pagan ritual from an attack from jeffrey clark's quite remarkable. but please. we are willing to hear your defense, if you have one. >> first of all, i think jeff clark was a key participant, lawrence, in one of the most neo-pagan rituals of all, which is worshipping donald trump. and you'd think that's a guy who simultaneously facing disbarment, state criminal charges, and the possibility of additional federal charges, might have something better to do than to troll people, frankly, to troll people poorly, online. i guess, you know, in a way, i feel for him. he's under an enormous strain of criminal indictment. and if i could advise him i'd say, look, you're in a hole. stop digging. but i realize it's kind of futile, that's the kind of behavior that landed him in jail in georgia in the first place. so, you know, part of age

clark to join the mission. lewis and clark had detailed journals throughout the trip on terrain, plant and animal life, native peoples and potential trade routes. an author and veteran traveler of the lewis and clark trail will join us to discuss the expedition. watch of books that shaped america featuring the journals of lewis and clark monday live at 9:00 eastern on c-span, our free mobile video app or online at c-span.org. it's the qr code to listen to our companion podcast where you can learn more about the authors of the book featured. announcer: democratic leader hakeem jeffries called on speaker mccarthy to put a potential continuing resolution from the senate to a floor vote while speaking to reporters on capitol hill. funding for the government expires this saturday at midnight. leader jeffries also responding to questions on whether new jersey senator bob menendez should resign amid federal charges of bribery, calling the situation troubling. -- an illegitimate impeachment inquiry as opposed to doing

>> well, mark meadows is exhibit a of why jeffrey clark is not testifying.s, and they told him, you don't want to be anywhere near the courthouse or in the state of georgia. now, if you are making the motion where he says, i want to take my case out of state court and over to the federal court, you have to prove that he was doing his job. so he could take the stand, but also, he could submit a written affidavit, and so what he is going to do by his attorney is saying that affidavit is the strength of his testimony. >> and what evidence does he have to have to have his case moved from state to federal? >> it is some untrod territory here, and he has a weakened case, because he is a doj official, and i didn't have the same job, but i have a good familiarity of what you are supposed to do there. and what he did is to draft a letter from the department of justice and to the state of georgia saying that we have found fraud, and this is a fraud, and this is opposite that you are supposed to investigate with good faith, and reveal the findings of that investigation

the judge asking whether or not clark waived his right to appear. his lawyer indicating he didn't realize he had to file the waiver. the defense got up and basically made argument, did not present evidence, and the reason that's critically important for our viewers to understand is because the burden is on the defense when they're attempting to review their case from state court to federal court. it was an evidentiary hearing that was supposed to take place today, and an argument by lawyers is not by definition evidence. the state of georgia getting up and basically presenting their case through the form of assistant attorney general, jodi hunt. you may recognize that name. he was the attorney representing cassidy hutchinson when she secured new counsel to testify before the january 6th committee. testifying that when he was the assistant attorney general in charge of the division, the same division that jeffrey clark worked in when he was at the doj, that election fraud or election irregularities or voter fraud, that was never within the purview, i

but this move by jeffrey clark, particularly jeffrey clark, to get into federal court, i am wondering end, in the event of a guilty verdict suffer a worse fate in federal court. and that the federal judiciary could be even more offended if possible by what he was doing in the justice department since the justice department is within the federal judiciary's realm so much more so than the state of georgia. >> well i think that any state or federal prosecutor and any state or federal judge would be able to understand what he is charged with. and if he's convicted, just how much of a view set a position of trust he engaged in. i too, though, was very struck by his lawyers comments which by the way are not evidence as the george pointed. out there is no evidence that been put forth. but the lawyer did say that with respect to the most critical piece of evidence against jeffrey clark, which is this fraudulent letter where he claimed that the doj was not just investigating, but had actually found significant election irregularities that could up and the election in various battleground state

clark. of course mr. clark is pointing the fingers at trump. his lawyer, and trying the case removed, said everything he did was at the direction of donald trump. so there will be more people pleading guilty, but mr. hall is one, the first one, probably, a number of other defendants who will be cooperating, who will be testifying for the prosecution against the higher level people in this case. >> which brings us to powell and chesebro. they're facing trial, they both want to invoke the speedy trial rights, they are facing what is now a very speedy trial. and harry, the question is, my understanding is that willis's office, i don't know if they said this specifically or if it was implied, that they would offer a plea to these two individuals as well. do you think a plea is forthcoming? do you think today's plea changes the odds calculation for either of these? what do you think is happening in their corner on defense right now? >> so the second question, let me take, because the answer is definitely. that's how these things work. there's a comp

decommissioned meriwether lewis and william clark -- he commissioned meriwether lewis and william clark, some people think that they were commissioned in pittsburgh, they went across the missouri river to the continental divide, and they kept these minute, detailed, brilliant journals, because lewis was a naturalist par excellence, documenting and interacting with indigenous people, that nobody knew had lived there, sacagawea becomes a big part of that corps of discovery. but the journals are gold for their detailed scientific observation of the tragedy, and the science that became their -- that they might have been able to trade for china. there's no way were going to be able to quickly use the pacific as a gateway to china, and meriwether lewis about the best parts. people defend clark's writing, but lewis was depressed after it. it was a huge success, people didn't die, for a military exploration, highly successful. but he committed suicide, he was depressed after, and felt that it had been a failure because there was no shortcut to china. there was no big economic, you know, it was

so what's different about jeffrey clark's case?reporter: well, boris, he is looking at a different question here today, one that has a lot of importance for the protection around the federal government. or the ability of the state to bring this case against someone like jeffrey clark or even against donald trump himself. his question is can a state prosecutor reach inside the federal government and determine that there were things that may have happened inside one of those agencies, in this case, with clark. the justice department, that the state says was illegal. and they say that what jeffrey clark was doing, it was not part of his job at all. he wanted to use the justice department to make false statements to the state of georgia. and within seconds of voicing this interest was told, no, you're not allowed to do that and kept bringing it up. so, that is the big question here. were these even actions of the federal government that jeffrey clark was taking after the election on behalf of donald trump when he was working within tha

authored several books on the lewis and clark expedition veteran traveler of the lewis and clark trailch books that shaped america feature the journals of lewis and clark mandate light at nine eastern on c-span, c spend our free mobile video app or online at c-span.org. also be sure to scan the qr code to listen to our companion podcast where you can learn more about the authors of the book featured. ♪ c-span is your unfiltered view of government. they are funded

does clark have an additional chance of getting this successfully moved?, his argument is this was an issue right before the justice department, the question of whether federal election law was certified in these elections. he is trying to make the case it was part of his job. the problem is he was the acting head of the civil division which has almost nothing to do with the election, maybe civil rights. unusual for the civil division which handles lawsuits against the u.s. typically to be involved in such a matter. hard argument to make. >> former department official jodie hunt made that point and hunt was the head of this before clark took it over. i assume that testimony must be somewhat influential. >> joudie hunt would know. i think it is going to carry a lot of weight with the judge as to whether jeffrey clark was acting in his official capacity. >> let's talk for a moment about the principle co-defendant in all of this, foremmer president trump. he gave a wide-ranging interview over the weekend and, of course, as he often does commented on the case.

an expedition to explore the west all the way to the pacific ocean and louis chose william clark to help lead the mission which covered nearly a thousand miles from 1804 to 1806. lewis and clark kept detailed journals on the terrain, plant and animal life, native peoples and trade groups. the author talks about the expedition and a veteran traveler of the trail will discuss the exhibition. watch books that shaped america featuring the journals of lewis and clark, monday, live at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span now, or online at c-span.org. also scan the qr co to listen to our compani podcast where you can learn me about the authors of the books featured. ♪ >> c-span is your unfiltered view o governmt. we are funded by these telesi companies and more, including cox. ♪ >> this syndrome is extremely rare. >> hi! >> but friends don't have to be. >> this is joe. >> when you are connected, you are not alone. >> cox support c-span as a public service along with these other television dividers giving you a front row seat to democracy. >> the house today passing a short-term 45-day government

two experts weighed in on clark's chances. >> i think it is bad news for clark. looks like that he will be tried in fulton county georgia. and it also is a sign for donald trump. if you are going to try the same idea, you might have to testify. part of the problem for clark is he didn't testify and without that testimony, it looks like it is really going nowhere. >> i think the judge was very frustrated over the fact that we were having an effort area hearing without much evidence. and so that was really not a particularly i think great dynamic for clark and his team. i think that the testimony today by the former civil division chief was really very significant because it made it clear that the prerogative that exists to enforce election law on a federal level would come from the civil rights division or the criminal law division which were not divisions that jeffrey clark was part of. the other important pinkimportas that the letter where jeffrey clark drafted a letter to urge the general assembly here in georgia to convene and overturn the election, that he di

clarke: this is based on -- ms. clark: and kevin mccarthy has lost control of the gavel. he has proved beyond a shadow of the doubt that the republican conference is controlled by conspiracy theorists devoid of reasonable voices that are coming here to govern and solve problems. donald trump is the puppet master and marjorie taylor greene is calling the shots. they have purged their ranks of anyone who could call themselves a moderate. if there were moderates left, where are they? why haven't they demanded a vote and called this a distraction a gross political stunt? why? because maga extremists are running the house. six weeks ago kevin mccarthy sent the house home to keep the federal government. we have a few days to keep the government open. instead of getting to work and instead of thinking about the brairve firefighters who need to get paid and our heroic troops who deserve a paycheck for their service, the communities that need disaster aid and seniors who depend on government service, he has launched a sham impeachment inquiry based on lies. there is no evidence, n

a veteran traveler of the lewis and clark trail will join us to discuss the expedition. watch books that shaped america featuring the journals of lewis and clark monday live at nine eastern on c-span, c-span now our free mobile video app, or online at c-span.org. also be sure to scan the qr code to listen to our companion podcast where you can learn more about the authors of t books featured. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more including buckeye broadband. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> buckeye broadband supports c-span as a public service along with these other television providers give you a front-row seat to democracy. >> host: we will take you through the latest from capitol hill, aris folley is congressional reporter with the hill newspaper. good morning to you. thanks for joining us via zoom. >> guest: yes, yes thank you for having me. >> host: a headline from the hill this morning, this is a paper that's on the doorsteps of members of congress at the offices today, send it grabs the wheel from house in a bid tofr avoid a

the latest on jeffrey clark's bid.takes two to make it outta sight ♪ ♪ one, two, get loose now ♪ ♪ it takes two to makake a... ♪ stay two nights and get 5k bonus points. book direct at bestwestern.com. ♪ oh what a good time we will have ♪ ♪ you can make it happen ♪ ♪ yeah oh ♪ now, try new dietary supplements from voltaren for healthy joints. thursday night football on prime. it's on. welcome to thursday night football. thursday night football is on! it's saquon barkley, holy mackerel. up against christian mccaffery. for a touchdown! as the new york giants take on the san francisco 49ers. stream thursday night football. only on prime. ( ♪ ) morgan stanley is partnering with the women's tennis association to remove boundaries... ( ♪ ) because this game is for everyone. >>> this morning, a federal judge is showing skepticism of whether to allow jeffrey clark to move his case from a state court to federal court and whether he was working in official capacity to write a letter sowing doubt in the 2020 election. he says he

jeffrey clark is trying to succeed where former trump chief of staff mark meadows failed getting hiseral court. clark claims his actions in the final weeks were on behalf of the federal government and, therefore, should not be adjudicated in a state court. he was also a key player in the january 6th committee's presentation last year. >> i made the point that jeff clark is not even competent to serving as the attorney general. he's never been a criminal attorney and never conducted a criminal investigation in his life. he's never been in front of a trial jury. he kind of retorted saying i've done a lot of complicated appeals and civil litigation and environmental litigation and things like that, and i said that's right, you're an environmental lawyer. how about you go back to your office and we'll call you when there's an oil spill. >> today in georgia former president trump is joined a motion from his former campaign lawyer sidney powell asking the court to dismiss the rico charge in the indictment. joining me, gary grumbach outside the courthouse in atlanta, university of georgia p

they've risen 20 places in the world rankings to 30th under steve clarke.in and norway in european qualifying and they could even qualify for the euros tomorrow night. that's if norway and georgia ends in a draw in oslo. but right now, all that is occupying the mind of steve clarke is that challenge of england. and he says that match will be the perfect barometer for how far his side have progressed. obviously, we played well in cyprus. we had a good, comfortable evening. i know we see what we can do against a team that's nominally a point one team always in the later stages of major tournaments. that's the that's the benchmark i want to judge myself against. we'll find out tomorrow night how close we are. meanwhile, england travel here to glasgow off the back of that 1—1 draw with ukraine and that boisterous atmosphere in poland. now, gareth southgate admitted in the aftermath of that match that his side weren't quite at their best, that they didn't click in attack. so he was asked earlier here what his approach would be to this game against scotland, give

up as see the freelance caught the when to use this is a of the, the said member of the circle is clark of the healer. he lives in my village too when way together time just flies. 2 no, nope, since you were i moved over here now. course for say for, for was guy. what are they more than out feed or timing? go through a creative. now i'm very forwarding to you mean to mind that might have every day or including the phone for the of the i so proud to abide own credit and then sell us at the biggest market in jamaica in the capital kingston. the farmer comment on the way from the top of the video took care of my load. oh, you know that these are that difficult. so you would say, i'm hurricane part of that one. pin that off of my buy. now you have to pay the $10.00 now, so when im palm uh for the journey i me let me see. and carol, my lord let this to the road and my gonna say okay, at the bottom on about you will do your applied. so give me 5 by 5 or 5 of them. yeah. yeah. you know, i need you give me a lots of experience for maintenance strong on your van of your sales via sales. yeah. al