we are back with claudia wright and jim matheson. the "new york times" profile this race this very week saying that it was an opportunity for party crashers to crossover primary voters, for republicans to come in and make mischief. at a primary like this in june when turnout is really everything, what are you doing to ensure that that is not negatively impact your candidacy? >> first of all, we have gone out and tried to get underrepresented democratic areas to the polls. trying to infuse the party with new blood and table that have not been participating in the electoral process. i believe that republicans are out there with a senate race that needs to be determined, and i truly believe that registered republicans are going to vote in that race. >> a new web sites is everybody can vote. today in my view benefit from that kind of crossover? >> i might, but the truth of the matter is that basically, 40% of utah is republican registered. 40% is independent. there has to be an appeal -- >> they will not be reporting in the republican cl

. >> claudia leyva from the university of baja, california, says she sympathizes with the impoverished residents but worries about sempras' plans. she gave her student the assignment to evaluate the impact report currently under review by mexico's environmental agency. >> ( translated ): they began to review the document, and the principal thing they found were some omissions. this is supposedly a project with 1,000 turbines but when they described the project they only geographically pinpointed 50. >> reporter: the location of transmission lines, substations and up to 500 miles of new roads are also ill-defined in the reports says leyva. >> ( translated ): if the authority aproves such an open-ended proposal it would really make us worry. >> reporter: the company declined a request for an interview but a spokesman wrote in an e-mail: >> reporter: mexico's environmental authority semarnat will be careful evaluating the process. >> i think that in general, semarnat welcomes all clean energy projects. that doesn't mean we'll approve everything with our eyes shut. we also have to evaluate

claudia, democrats line. caller: my concern of the tax breaks for laws corporations and the influence of large corporations on congress and our lawmakers. i agree with one of the previous callers that the corporations do not care about the people. they only care about making a dollar. and many of these corporations are international. they have no loyalties to the united states or the people. i am concerned about the influence that they have on congress. all of laws are being written by -- appears to be written by the congress -- i mean, the corporation, and not to benefit the people, we the people of the united states. it appears to be to benefit, we, the corporations. thank you very much. host: "the wall street journal" frontpage lead story -- netanyahu decries offensive of hypocrisy. and warren buffett of housing bubble -- i was wrong on it, too. warren buffett said moody's does not deserve special blame for not seeing the housing market collapse. his berkshire hathaway owns a stake in the firm. at&t and li

. >> claudia right is facing jim matthiessen. this is about 20 minutes. >> this is sunday edition with bruce lindsey. >> in the sunday edition, >> i am a democrat. >> a congressman faces a challenger. >> i believe the people come first. >> a conversation with jim matthiessen and clear right in this addition. -- with jim matheson and claudia wright. >> this is not want to be a formal debate, but rather a conversation in which our guests will be able to differentiate their opinions. i have asked them to give a self introduction and i will ask jim matheson he would go first. >> you know me. you know that in my time in office i've always put utah first, and i am proud of the fact that i approach every issue with the notion of solving problems and making progress. i've listened to people in utah and they've helped guide me in how to make progress on issues. so whether it's stopping foreign radioactive waste from coming to utah or whether it's resolving very contentious public lands issues and moving the first major blm wilderness legi