okay, let's see questions about claypool family related, and interesting note we just got a donation from the descendents of betsy ross connected to, that had that revolutionary war diary of john claypool who eventually became betsy ross' third husband. there's an interesting story there. so what is the best book on the constitution convention of 1877 any recommendations jim? >> there are so many. the book by richard demon which gives a good overview. it is such a vast illiterate sure that could be a good starting place a good narrative of what happens. >> there is another questions about native american constitutions what other nations broke constitutions. maybe you want to talk about the cherokee constitution a little bit, bring it up? >> many do, many did and do have constitutions today. the cherokee constitution is an especially notable one. it was written in the 1820s. again it was part of the attempt by the cherokees to secure their place in this new transformer confident. the cherokees and other nations did. interesting things in order to, these are all different strategies. d

robert patillo and brian claypool.the two of you never thought you'd be fighting over onion rings. >> may be out of bar but not on tv. >> shannon: let's start with exhibit a. this is the complaint about the so-called onion rings. by labeling the product as onion snacks consumers will get the false impression the product contains onions as an ingredient in an appreciable amount. the product is fried corn meal, that's the first ingredient with added onion powder. robert. >> these cases come up every few months. there was a notorious mozzarella stick case. saying that it didn't contain mozzarella from the mountains of italy but it had cheddar cheese. people are looking for a fried item. the only thing that the package does, flavor wise. these cases get dismissed because these are lawyers trying to make a quick book and hoping major corporations will settle these out of court. corporations are fighting back and understanding that they can no longer be bent to the will of any law lawyer who wants to file a lawsuit. >> shann

criminal defense attorneys andell brown and brian claypool. welcome. very interesting.ant to read something from foxnews.com about police showing up to talk to the parents. northport police entered the laundrie home. this is the boyfriend's family home. police were shocked to learn brian laundrie wasn't there and his parents told investigators they haven't seen him since tuesday, september 14. they didn't even report him quote-unquote missing. it's that police showed up and they found out he hadn't been seen by his parents since tuesday. what potential liability or charges could be in the works for the parents if it turns out brian laundrie is in any way responsible or they helped him escape in some way? >> shannon, the most relevant charge would be what's called accessory after the fact. that means arguably the parents knew that their son brian laundrie may have committed a crime, in this case avers to be felony. they provided any aid whatsoever, to help him escape authorities. the statute in florida is very broad. if there's any evidence law enforcement unveil the cho

brian claypool, civil rights attorney.ing of the government, how far it can push it. by the way back and forth how far the government goes, heard it apple stock taking it on the chin, the judge ruled in favor of epic games, apple gets too proprietary with the app store. it has to loosen things up to allow third party efforts, to find own paying mechanisms. getting in the weeds here. one thing the judge said in that same statement in a quasivictory for apple. not behaving as a monopoly, not a monopoly. epic is focused on that, wait a minute, that was the promise of our entire lawsuit that we think apple behaves like a bully and we're going to appeal you, judge, even though we technically won with you, judge, we want to win the whole kibosh. amazing. more after this. this is worth. that takes wealth. but this is worth. and that - that's actually worth more than you think. don't open that. wealth is important, and we can help you build it. but it's what you do with it, that makes life worth living. principal. for all it's wor

it the legal discussion with a specialist and attorney sarah gounder with defense attorney brian claypoolys. >> hi, shannon. >> hi, shannon. >> shannon: this is a report from the headlines to take stimulus checks back from prisoners under the law. past as a corrections omnibus bill and covid related stimulus will be received by any offender to make a court order restitution. maybe the money would go to -- >> shannon, at the federal level, if this was intended to eliminate inmates, the onus on congress to create the guidelines from the top. in fact, there was a requirement year and income had to be met and therefore the inmates are eligible. now at the state level, it is not uncommon in the department of corrections would be managing these inmate accounts and dispersing it to victim restitution. now, what is really interesting though is yes, it could be legal based on that. but they don't talk about access amounts. what i mean by that, what if restitution isn't required or what if restitution is already paid? what happens to the stimulus? and so there could be a way where inmates get the s

was get the read from attorney brian claypool. first of all, is it legal to tack on these fees if you were unvaccinated? >> happy labor day. this is a colossal heavyweight covid fight between employers like delta and other employers across the country who are going to do the same thing. in the early rounds of this legal battle, delta and other employers have the other hand and here is why. most employees across the country are what's called at will employees which means they don't have a written contract and that means employers such as delta can do whatever they want, they can assess these additional fees to get vaccines and guess what? if the employees of delta don't want to pay these fees, they want to get vaccinated, they are likely to lose their jobs and that's the way the groundwork is right now. >> edward: what about the basic question here. is your employer or even legally allowed to ask if you are vaccinated? they were so many rules around health care. >> absolutely. let's be clear for your viewers, there is no game plan