under 4 e, we plan to go under cleanpowersf and other renewable efficiency programs. that's under 4e under the next item. >> thank you. >> thank you. can i call francisco decosta. thank you. >> commissioners, my name is francisco decosta. i want to speak about the people of this area. i read the agenda and subjectively speaking, this agenda is about bringing two bodies together to decide about something. and i want to watch how you are deliberating this something. what i want to speak about is that 350 years ago, all that you see here was pristine. it belonged to the first people what we have done without contamination is on us. and what we want to do using fancy words like carbon foot print and addressing that is on us. do we really have the empirical data on the carbon foot print that we are going to be addressing? i doubt so. having said that, i would encourage the san francisco puc to bring full on hetch hetchy and bring to san francisco here our home. don't sell it to somebody else and you have those permits and when those permits come before you, don't renew the

that's what this program, the cleanpowersf program could ultimately provide. but that's a small part of what is before us today. the puc is one of our largest departments and its mission

that's what this program, the cleanpowersf program could ultimately provide. but that's a small part of what is before us today. the puc is one of our largest departments and its mission is to provide water, power, and deal with wastewater across the bay area, northern california, and it's important that we approve these projects and move the puc forward, and also put a small part of keeping cca alive. so, colleagues, i hope for your support. thank you. >> thank you. , supervisor avalos. any further comments? ~ all right, colleague, can we take these items same house same call? without objection these ordinances are passed on the first reading. [gavel] >> madam clerk, could you call items 15 through 16? >> item 1a is the interim proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and expenditures for selected departments for the city and county of san francisco as of june 2nd, 2014, for the fiscal years ending june 40th, 2015 and june 30th 2016. item 16 is the interim annual salary ordinance [speaker not understood] position

the subcommittees and the commission or the environment commission recently insisting that the cleanpowersf plans and program be put back into climate action strategy. that the mayor pressured the department of the environment to remove from the climate action strategy when previously the department of environment staff said there's no way the city can make it's environmental goals and greenhouse gas goals with clean power powersf. it's absurd that it's not in there. sense it's -- since it's in the local area formation, it needs to go back in there. we said this before to the environment commission and have seen it not agenda ized and seen no action on it. the commission needs to say to the public what's up. then i would add a a n a little bit unconferredable -- uncomfortable notes the puc put the budget back in the mayor's lap because it was inappropriately making a grab as monies that the board of supervisors specifically set aside for cleanpowersf. the interesting thing you should know about that budget hearing is that essentially what the mayor did was attempted to use that grab at the

i wanted to express my thanks and appreciation for the memo, go solar san francisco cleanpowersf because irrelevant -- it answered some of the questions and i understand at the end of june we will have marin and sonoma to talk about what they have been ale are able to achieve. i wonder if we can get information on the budget because there is questions on the board with regard to ca monies. i think there is a budget hearing tomorrow. then i have one more question. >> as far as the budget is concerned, we worked closely with supervisor avalos, london breed, farrell, mar, to talk about their issues and concerns as it related to the position that the budget committee took to tabling our budget. we had many conversations andante end of the day they realized that the $13.5 million that was set aside to create a cca was not the same that it was two 2 years ago. so, we talked about if we were to pursue a cca would be the magnitude of $4 million. so we went over those numbers and they felt comfortable that identifying $4 million in our budget would be sufficient. so what we did was we looked at t