status of daept on the cleanpowersf program and tim line for program launch.atus update on proceedings at the california public utilities commission. >> we have barbara hale and you will be sharing on the timeline? >> yes. you and director fried came to the public utilities commission on tuesday and talked about how the timeline can be sped indicted and -- expedited and i'm wondering if there are any changes that you are proposing based on our ideas and input >> barbara hale, manager for clean powersf. we built the schedule with the comments we received at our january 30th, lafco joint puc meeting in mind. we think this is a realistic schedule and our general manager feels we should keep this schedule . some of the discussions with chair avalos and if those presentations and opportunities present themselves we'll definitely pursue them and where you can help make those opportunities present themselves, we would definitely welcome that help. at this point in time we aren't proposing to make additional changes to, we didn't come in the door here with changes to

all the beautiful glossy brochures and things we can take to potential cleanpowersf, where does this fit in with this? >> let me address first the statutory required. the second sheet, you see a row 7, activity which is prepare and finalize pg & e rate comparison. that is a required communication with potential customers. as well as the requirement rows in 32. the other thing you see in rows 25. education. we have an adopted education campaign dmoptd our prior program design. we are refreshing that. that's a multilingual multimedia campaign. we are as you noted we are updating our and were looking at ways trying to project out as part of the program what we can community actively before we have the program design detail set. we are trying to time and shape our communications to establish a voice and an accurate representation of the program consistent with what the information that we have and the approvals we have. so much of the really wholehearted multimedia communication happens after we have this final rate set, after we have a good sense of what the full program offering is. bu

the last two things that i will say are that today i signed up for cleanpowersf as a customer so thank you very much for fixing that part of the website. i did take a quick minute and the old excuse me but i am a project manager in communication. it says it launched in 2013 and i was excited about that then i realized it was a typo. if you can have your team take one more look at that website. i just wanted to ask because i'm interested in whether or not you posted the requisition for the director position? >> yes. the director position is moving it's way through the city process. so it's moving, but it has not been posted yet. >> great. thank you. >>supervisor john avalos: thank you, commissioner mar. >> >>supervisor eric mar: i'm very pleased that the timeline has been discussed at the puc and that mr. fried suggestions for expediting the timeline sounds like there is openness to the time process. i like speeding up the process and that makes a lot of sense and concurrent scheduling and beginning the drafting of the rfo's make sense to me as well. i have been getting good letters fro

is out there and will be out there quickly to know what cleanpowersf is and my hope is that we work closely with community base groups so multi-outreach is done as well. >> thank you. >> commissioner campos? >>supervisor david campos: thank you, mitch, -- mr. chairman, just a quick question. i would like to thank the puc for taking comments to heart. i appreciate the very expedited way in which you try to approach this in the openness also to hear comments from our staff, from our executive officer. in terms of the cca program director position, i know it hasn't been posted. i want to thank vice-chair crews for asking about that. what is the timing of when you think you will have someone hired? now, that's very difficult to predict. so, the physician right now is going through the requisition approval process. typically once we have an approved requisition, we then go, we then publish the position as it's been approved and begin recruitment. and the recruitment process will stay open until we have a sufficient number of applicants to begin an interview process. this is a high priority for m

to get it ready to go as soon as we have cleanpowersf off the launch pad and elections which i think was listed in the agenda. this is a little bit more of a future thinking item like public banks. the voting has improved things but it's not doing what progressives thought it was going to do to improve the elections and make-up the board of supervisors. i think we should start changing the board of supervisors to' representation to bring a lot more public diversity and a lot of activist would run because they would have a chance to win. it may profoundly approve a city government. >> that's intriguing. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. go on to our next item. city clerk: item no. 6, public comment. >> general public comments related to lafco. if anyone would like to further the discussion on recommendation. that would be welcome. seeing no one coming forward, we'll close public comment. >> next item. city clerk: future agenda items. >> colleagues, any future items? commissioner crews? >>cynthia crews: i was going to ask something from the

san francisco co-coordinate er and other groups just to say yeah this program should continue cleanpowersf will be launching by early next year and we should wrap in this program to cleanpowersf and what's striking about the presentation on this excellent program is that even though the sfpuc has go solar sf and provides kind of the basics for that the department of the environment has a staff that's going out and doing outreach to help people plan outputting it on their roofs so what's striking about this is it's showing us as the advocates of cleanpowersf and other clean power programs and showing the public that your staff is not just doing energy efficiency what's called behind the meter and what that means for the public is inside of the house for first and on top of the house for small wind and solar that means it's inside of pg&e's meter and they don't get charged for electrons moving over its wires that way and you not only save yourself but you save the system money and lowers the cost of elect electricity and it really points to what we, as advocates are going to ask for your ite

>> timeline for program launch cleanpowersf a proposed aggregation program to allow san francisco customers to pull their purchasing power to buy or generate their own electricity from renewable sources and draft or adopt a resolution and in your packet are documents and a presentation actually that's going to be is shown on the screen. you have received a link to the enernex document and deborah raphael and speakers are geof syphers and barbara hale of sfpuc commission and the department of the environment energy program. >> thank you monica. this issue is probably one of the most important issues this commission will be thinking about certainly in the next year. this is it. this is big. this is incredibly important for us to consider. i am deeply grateful to the people who came tonight to speak. you are going to hear from four outstanding speakers, people who bring tremendous credibility and expertise to their jobs and we have a variety of perspectives because we want to take a look at this issue from different viewpoints the last time the commission heard this issue before i started, the

send a letter to the sfpuc that indicates that we support moving forward with the new version of cleanpowersf that offers a product that is affordable green and creates local union jobs and offer the support of the san francisco department of the environment to assist the sfpuc in this effort particularly with respect to planning behind the meter resources such as efficiency and renewable energy and with effect to community outreach a motion please. >> the second. before we do a quick vote was there any other parameters we should be aware of? all right. all of those in favor please say aye opposed say no. all right passes. thank you everybody and thank you for all of your work. a long time. >> the next item is consent agenda. all matters constitute a consent agenda are considered to be routine by by the commission and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote . approval of resolution 2015-02 and exemptions for city properties subject to limitations. in your packet is a copy of the draft resolution and i will be pulling up the pesticide list on the screen momentarily. this is an action ite

believe they call it environment now they actually did a tremendous amount of outreach for the cleanpowersf program in the early days and i heard about this and so can you incorporate this and they covered i want to say over 75 percent of the sunset and talked to a whole lot of people in that area about the program so the department has been involved for quite sometime to get the message out there and i want to encourage the good partnership that occurred then and still continuing now but it has occurred we're doing that and that was you know good you know getting people the job skills and a lot of people in that program back in the day a high percentage of them got jobs and i'm willing to bet they still have jobs because they were given that opportunity then. >> yeah, that's the world famous sf environment outreach and the team commissioner king was talking about yeah very excited about that. mr. fried, i seem to remember from my bouts of ininsomnia, as a part of the total job creation that the local number i want to say around 45 hundred? >> it was in the mid4 thousand range it was about

advocates and coalition folks around power plant plants and that's the way i heard cca it wasn't cleanpowersf it was just cca and to see how how how far it's how far it's come is really amazing the work of assistant general manager hale and executive officer fried and ceo syphers it's a whole new conversation hearing it now and story and i think commissioner king on these components he's consistent with what he says and he's going to to to be to be our conscientious and folks in low income communities and think about this program. i'm really excited you know we talked about this as a discussion i do have one question but i'd be really excited to send a message to the puc to agendize for possible action maybe not a full on resolution but you know maybe i want to hear commissioner king's thoughts about this but sending some kind of message to the to the puc that we're supportive of moving this proposal forward and it's meeting some some of the stuff we initially laid out there that we wanted to see in this program but you know a little bit more discussion perhaps on that and i did have a questi

after the sfpuc meeting where they stopped all work on the cleanpowersf program there were a lot of remaining questions and the answers were in it the staff reports and available all we needed to do is bring them out flush them out and have a discussion about them and what we did with community advocate support was put out an rsp and answer all the questions people were having about the program get solutions to them and address put into a report and we came up with enernex winning the bid and it's over 200 pages i hope you have all read it by now especially you commissioner arce you have plenty of time now to read reports i'm sure. >> cover to cover. >> i'm going through the presentation that they presented you can go and watch that on sfgtv if you want to go back and read the whole thing i'm going to skim over it but i wanted you to have the full presentation so if you have questions on any of the slides i can go ahead and pull them out but otherwise i'm going to skip on their selections here. first off they looked at a whole bunch of reports and meetings and part of the meetings were with t