status update on the cleanpowersf program and timeline for program launch. and b status update on proceedings at california public utilities commission. >> thank you. i'm barbara hale. i'm going to talk about five topics. enrollment in our program and some facts that we have solidified and we have new staff and materials from our outreach efforts. first offer enrollment, i'm very happy to report that the program continues to successfully operate. we are serving 7300 active locations. we have no additional customer opt outs for about a week now. we are at a steady 1.9% opt out. very low. our fall enrollments are under way a continue. we have sent 64700 enrollment notices. what we are talking about doing here is going from 7300 to 67400. so quite a big jump. >> and if we continue to have that 1.9% opt out rate, that's a huge jump. >> that's a big jump, yes. and so far we've only had 0.4% of the customers we sent notices to opt out. that's how we started with our may enrollment. we started with two notices so far. we are going to send out two more as required b

status update on the cleanpowersf program and timeline for program launch. and b status update on proceedings at california public utilities commission. >> thank you. i'm barbara hale. i'm going to talk about five topics. enrollment in our program and some facts that we have solidified and we have new staff and materials from our outreach efforts. first offer enrollment, i'm very happy to report that the program continues to successfully operate. we are serving 7300 active locations. we have no additional customer opt outs for about a week now. we are at a steady 1.9% opt out. very low. our fall enrollments are under way a continue. we have sent 64700 enrollment notices. what we are talking about doing here is going from 7300 to 67400. so quite a big jump. >> and if we continue to have that 1.9% opt out rate, that's a huge jump. >> that's a big jump, yes. and so far we've only had 0.4% of the customers we sent notices to opt out. that's how we started with our may enrollment. we started with two notices so far. we are going to send out two more as required b

>>so that is my update on the cleanpowersf operating activities. in terms of legislating activities item b, on this item we are continuing to work with the public utilities commission there are number of economics that affect this program as you know what that pca is among them and we also recently saul, i'm sure as did you that pg & e has announced they will be closing them miablo canyon and there is other interest in the california power market of how pg&e is can replace that part of the power that they need. part of the reason that pg&e is said they are going to close diablo canyon is because there use is lower than they had expected and primarily because there will be more programs implemented in their service territory which will reduce their generation needs. so, they are knowledge and that they will have to replace all 200 mw and the talking about having the community choice aggregation customers help pay for some of that power so we deftly have a strong interest in that and we deftly have a strong part in that and the whole part of cleanpow

thank you oh, and the other thing for cleanpowersf comment working capital reserves are $3. million what's that's part of what we are building up what is the end target on that. >> 3 months operating expenses that is 25 percent that's a little bit above operating reserve - $5 million. >> 5 modified so. >> so its - we're looking at a month and a half of results it results during the high margin part of year working capital low fluctuate over the year i wouldn't look at that number and incorporate - >> sounds like we've made it twice over. >> that's obviously something we want to keep an eye on that was part of the trigger to think about what else we can do with revenue of costs are in terms of what the build out i know we'll keeping an eye on that. >> some do not will be more meaningful. >> any other questions or comments? by public comment or questions. >> mr. sandler appreciate your bio annual update. >> next item we've spent a lot of time in the winter and spring working on the bilingual budget the between a rock and a hard place that you adopted in february for fiscal yea

that has now happened and cca and cleanpowersf can go on without lafco.here are a number of us at lafco that has been going on for 8 years we are going to be termed out. if there is no one else to replace us, then we'll see that lafco could die in the vine. what led each of us to want to take part in lafco was that we had a big project that we wanted to see happen, cleanpowersf. so i think it's important that if we are going to make sure that it's not just the, you know, the existence of the organization, but what the organization can do. i think having these two projects are really great ideas to explore. fiber has been one that lafco has looked at and addressed 10 years back if not more. i think there is a possibility of fiber being a really program and project that can grow. and i think it's important if we are going to have, it seems like the department of technology is doing their own rfp that looks for fiber, i think that's a project that we can monitor. lafco should have that report heard here when it's ready. i think we should also you know, talk

>>so that is my update on the cleanpowersf operating activities.n terms of legislating activities item b, on this item we are continuing to work with the public utilities commission there are number of economics that affect this program as you know what that pca is among them and we also recently saul, i'm sure as did you that pg & e has announced they will be closing them miablo canyon and there is other interest in the california power market of how pg&e is can replace that part of the power that they need. part of the reason that pg&e is said they are going to close diablo canyon is because there use is lower than they had expected and primarily because there will be more programs implemented in their service territory which will reduce their generation needs. so, they are knowledge and that they will have to replace all 200 mw and the talking about having the community choice aggregation customers help pay for some of that power so we deftly have a strong interest in that and we deftly have a strong part in that and the whole part of cleanpower

is for cleanpowersf to procure from the favorite counter parties hetch hetchy power we propose that cleanpowersf purchase in hetch hetchy a small strip of the generation from the sunset solar generating facility and we will bring that transaction to you for approval by our december meeting that's my report i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you, commissioners any questions. >> any questions from the public. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon, commissioners good see to see you eric brooks sf green party/our city/sf clean energy advocates. as well as the green party and local grassroots group of our city it is good to once again hear we've got an opt out that is basically one percent i think the main reasons for that we're martin this program as a clean energy program not a choice program and a clean energy program that will build logically we're looking forward i believe next month to get a preliminary report if staff about what they're looking at for rolling out local build out excuse me - on the hetch hetchy matter i think you might have th

that has now happened and cca and cleanpowersf can go on without lafco. there are a number of us at lafco that has been going on for 8 years we are going to be termed out. if there is no one else to replace us, then we'll see that lafco could die in the vine. what led each of us to want to take part in lafco was that we had a big project that we wanted to see happen, cleanpowersf. so i think it's important that if we are going to make sure that it's not just the, you know, the existence of the organization, but what the organization can do. i think having these two projects are really great ideas to explore. fiber has been one that lafco has looked at and addressed 10 years back if not more. i think there is a possibility of fiber being a really program and project that can grow. and i think it's important if we are going to have, it seems like the department of technology is doing their own rfp that looks for fiber, i think that's a project that we can monitor. lafco should have that report heard here when it's ready. i think we should also you know, tal

is for cleanpowersf to procure from the favorite counter parties hetch hetchy power we propose that cleanpowersf purchase in hetch hetchy a small strip of the generation from the sunset solar generating facility and we will bring that transaction to you for approval by our december meeting that's my report i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you, commissioners any questions. >> any questions from the public. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon, commissioners good see to see you eric brooks sf green party/our city/sf clean energy advocates. as well as the green party and local grassroots group of our city it is good to once again hear we've got an opt out that is basically one percent i think the main reasons for that we're martin this program as a clean energy program not a choice program and a clean energy program that will build logically we're looking forward i believe next month to get a preliminary report if staff about what they're looking at for rolling out local build out excuse me - on the hetch hetchy matter i think you might have th

coming to speak with us i have two quick questions one how does the sfpuc play into this with cleanpowersf or is that something that you'll flush out with the option. >> i think it is something we'll flush out. >> great, great i wanted to make sure that was on the radar and the second i'm not familiar with the capital planing committee we have a number of advocates that come to bosco that expressed an interest in the broadband i wonder in the made up of capital committee has this retention i'm not sure of the make up. >> it is city departments that participate. >> okay so for example, on lafco i'm the public person and none not part of city departments. >> i'll need to check or the board is represented in the mayor's office but i'll need to check. >> it is pretty much 9 department heads that deal with the investment last week puc and airport and then the president of the board serves think the capital improvement committee and generally the president of the board staff if there's other you know offices like the board of supervisors participate that and lafco is not part of that it is neat

coming to speak with us i have two quick questions one how does the sfpuc play into this with cleanpowersf or is that something that you'll flush out with the option. >> i think it is something we'll flush out. >> great, great i wanted to make sure that was on the radar and the second i'm not familiar with the capital planing committee we have a number of advocates that come to bosco that expressed an interest in the broadband i wonder in the made up of capital committee has this retention i'm not sure of the make up. >> it is city departments that participate. >> okay so for example, on lafco i'm the public person and none not part of city departments. >> i'll need to check or the board is represented in the mayor's office but i'll need to check. >> it is pretty much 9 department heads that deal with the investment last week puc and airport and then the president of the board serves think the capital improvement committee and generally the president of the board staff if there's other you know offices like the board of supervisors participate that and lafco is not part of that it is neat

coming to speak with us i have two quick questions one how does the sfpuc play into this with cleanpowersf or is that something that you'll flush out with the option. >> i think it is something we'll flush out. >> great, great i wanted to make sure that was on the radar and the second i'm not familiar with the capital planing committee we have a number of advocates that come to bosco that expressed an interest in the broadband i wonder in the made up of capital committee has this retention i'm not sure of the make up. >> it is city departments that participate. >> okay so for example, on lafco i'm the public person and none not part of city departments. >> i'll need to check or the board is represented in the mayor's office but i'll need to check. >> it is pretty much 9 department heads that deal with the investment last week puc and airport and then the president of the board serves think the capital improvement committee and generally the president of the board staff if there's other you know offices like the board of supervisors participate that and lafco is not part of that it is neat

coming to speak with us i have two quick questions one how does the sfpuc play into this with cleanpowersf or is that something that you'll flush out with the option. >> i think it is something we'll flush out. >> great, great i wanted to make sure that was on the radar and the second i'm not familiar with the capital planing committee we have a number of advocates that come to bosco that expressed an interest in the broadband i wonder in the made up of capital committee has this retention i'm not sure of the make up. >> it is city departments that participate. >> okay so for example, on lafco i'm the public person and none not part of city departments. >> i'll need to check or the board is represented in the mayor's office but i'll need to check. >> it is pretty much 9 department heads that deal with the investment last week puc and airport and then the president of the board serves think the capital improvement committee and generally the president of the board staff if there's other you know offices like the board of supervisors participate that and lafco is not part of that it is neat