clearview scours the internet for images.e, shape and distance between facial features to find potential matches. i don't know where that is. it's wild how many pictures are just out there on the open web. the search finds pictures i've literally never seen before. i'm in the back of someone�*s profile picture and it still finds me. fascinating. that is, once again, extraordinary. i don't know where that is and it's picked me up because i am right in the back there. it doesn't need to be a picture that you uploaded or your friends uploaded, it's just if you're in the back of a picture, you can still be found. it is a really accurate technology. how many images is this scraping? are in the database? in the database, there is about 30 billion images. because i guess the debate is, some say this is just google for faces and other people say this is going to change privacy as we know it. it's both. i mean it really is google for faces — that's exactly how it works — but i do think it is a big change in the fact that people can be

expanded online account for the clearview of tax information and easier ways to address issues with their tax return. for sample taxpayers will be able to respond to issues instantly by electronic means avoidingng mailings and paper processing. for many letters from thehe irsn the mail could be a thing of the past.ma abby's up in the new irs will make a complex tax system easier for people and will be easier to file and understand tax liobligation and will make it easier for people to claim the vital credits they are entitled to, something millions can overlook each year. for example, fizzing out on the earned income tax credit and other vital credit so not only will it be bigger and faster refunds for many of the changes will help people get it right the first time avoiding follow-up contacts from the irs and reducing the need for potential audit. >> one of the common most reviewed words in the response was easier for taxpayers. >> irs to be a world-class customer service, not something known for now among $7.5 billion customer service part of the plan such making things easier and truly

host: it is -- does this give you a a clearview of the republicans' view of their -- does this give you a clear view of the republicans' view of their role in government. guest 1: there's a clear difference in the belief of what the government should do. 70% of interest payments go to people for their child or health insurance, medicare, medicaid, chip, acas payments. where we disagree is whether we are giving too much to help people or whether we should be giving less. what the government spending is doing is largely going to people and making sure we have safe water. making sure that we have safe food. these are essentially really good functions of the government, and i don't think they should be cut. host: we got this from republicans last week, and the speaker, there have been some complaints that this was not a budget. the president has is skewed his budget -- issued his budget. this was not a budget. it was a plan. does it matter at this point? guest 2: we know already where the federal government is. i tellst us what the underlying budget of the government is. this is a vision of

there are clear statements out there, clearview that could be invoked. at the same time, as we know, defining what would be a clear attack, how would you do that? this is really hard. these base treaties from 1966, nothing else has been agreed on a later, the subspace and its -- it is pretty hard right now if you compare those two. this is what we are working to, you need a code of conduct. if you don't have the code of conduct, then where is your redline? this is from a military point of view. it comes down to deterrence and this is what we are working on. right now, we come to the decision if something happens but it is hard to do that and we need to do better. >> if i can add something on that. article five, there are two things. first, the attribution. how can we give evidence of attribution? usually in this domain, we vote typically include a short. take example the nord stream. some people are saying we are beyond it. it is done by professionals and then they carefully sure they were not damaging any evidence that would attribute to it. the attribu

host: it is -- does this give you a a clearview of the republicans' view of their -- does this give youiew of the republicans' view of their role in government. guest 1: there's a clear difference in the belief of what the government should do. 70% of interest payments go to people for their child or health insurance, medicare, medicaid, chip, acas payments. where we disagree is whether we are giving too much to help people or whether we should be giving less. what the government spending is doing is largely going to people and making sure we have safe water. making sure that we have safe food. these are essentially really good functions of the government, and i don't think they should be cut. host: we got this from republicans last week, and the speaker, there have been some complaints that this was not a budget. the president has is skewed his budget -- issued his budget. this was not a budget. it was a plan. does it matter at this point? guest 2: we know already where the federal government is. i tellst us what the underlying budget of the government is. this is a vision of where we

host: it is -- does this give you a a clearview of the republicans' view of their -- does this give youiew of the republicans' view of their role in government. guest 1: there's a clear difference in the belief of what the government should do. 70% of interest payments go to people for their child or health insurance, medicare, medicaid, chip, acas payments. where we disagree is whether we are giving too much to help people or whether we should be giving less. what the government spending is doing is largely going to people and making sure we have safe water. making sure that we have safe food. these are essentially really good functions of the government, and i don't think they should be cut. host: we got this from republicans last week, and the speaker, there have been some complaints that this was not a budget. the president has is skewed his budget -- issued his budget. this was not a budget. it was a plan. does it matter at this point? guest 2: we know already where the federal government is. i tellst us what the underlying budget of the government is. this is a vision of where we

change gasoline blend during the summer driving season, that according to the managing director of clearviewe energy department calculates the seasonal increase at an average of $.32 per gallon this year. this story from the associated press. we found that out yesterday from the wall street journal. several other papers, as well. this is barbara in oklahoma city. independent. good morning. this is our open forum. caller: hi. [laughter] god. i cannot believe it. you have these people on here every day just lying and lying and lying. do not care about asa hutchinson and what he has got to say. you have every republican that has got anything to say on here. it is always lies. we have one problem with our social security. greed. that is it. you keep having them in here. we need to do this, you do not need to do anything. get rid of the great. that is all. until we do, it is going to be like this. we do not have capitalism. if you do not have people fighting to make the best product, which is what capitalism is, you do not get to merge, you do not get to buy off the people who are against you, wh