mammoth is climeworks' second commercial plant and almost ten times bigger than the last one, collectinging 8,000 petrol cars off the road. but it costs a whopping $1,000 to remove just one tonne. what do we mean by removing emissions? among its customers are microsoft, h&m and lego. worldwide, more plants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's it going to take to scale it up, bring costs down and make it really impactful? by the end of the decade, we want to be at a cost of capture of $300—aoo. technology improvements will help drive down costs. a second lever will be scale. the team says this is just the beginning. mammoth will soon be dwarfed by another, much bigge

mammoth is climeworks' second commercial plant and almost ten times bigger than the last one, collectingt the same amount as taking 8,000 petrol cars off the road. but it costs a whopping $1,000 to remove just one tonne. what do we mean by removing emissions? among its customers are microsoft, h&m and lego. worldwide, more plants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's it going to take to scale it up, bring costs down and make it really impactful? by the end of the decade, we want to be at a cost of capture of $300—400. technology improvements will help drive down costs. a second lever will be scale. the team says this is just the beginning. mammoth will soon be dwarfe

mammoth is climeworks' second commercial plant and almost ten times bigger than the last one, collectinglants like these are on the way, though they'll still only remove a fraction of what's needed. and despite calls to slash our emissions, the c02 we churn out continues to grow. do you think direct air capture can be an effective tool for removing carbon? we release about a0 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year, so this won't make a dent into the big problem. but i think you should use all methods and methodologies to fight this problem. what's it going to take to scale it up, bring costs down and make it really impactful? by the end of the decade, we want to be at a cost of capture of $300—400. technology improvements will help drive down costs. a second [ever will be scale. the team says this is just the beginning. mammoth will soon be dwarfed by another, much bigger plant, project cypress in the united states, which will eventually capture a million tonnes of c02 each year. from mammoth to cypress, we're now looking to break that hundreds of thousands of tonn