clinton said he'd lost count. >> it's close. this is the clinton presidency.ff we want to do will not happen unless we approve this plan. >> as majority leader, i was very much concerned about what the outcome was going to be. we needed 50 votes and we were at 49. bob kerrey, senator from nebraska, he had genuine doubts. >> will you tell us what you're going to do, senator? >> no. >> until he went to get up to speak in the senate, i wasn't sure what he was going to say. >> president clinton, if you're watching now as i. suspect you are, i tell you this. i could not and should not cast a vote that brings down your presidency. >> by the slimmest of all possible margins, the president saved his budget bill and the political clout of his administration. [ cheers and applause ] >> after 12 long years, we can say to the american people tonight we have laid the foundation for the renewal of the american dream. >> passing the budget was a victory because we didn't lose. but usually you could get one member from the other side. >> every single republican in the congres

former president clinton: no. i wind it up have been one step at a time i asked her twice to marry me and she said no times. smart girl. the third time i said just come down here. they liked her so much that they offered her a job teaching. she did not have anything else to do. she was working with the house judiciary committee, when that was over she took the job and network out pretty well. -- job it worked out pretty well. >> you decided you were not going to get into politics? former president bush: not true. we got married in november. the next year i campaigned for congress. i said she would never have to give a political speech and she did. she is a good speaker. >> when you lost the house see, did you say i am out of politics? former president bush: for a while, but like bill said, it is the best thing that happened to me. the guy who beat me said, if i what -- if i did not beat bush i would still be on the agricultural committee. >> your mother and father said you had no chance of winning. former presiden

clinton: thank you all. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org]

clinton: i did not know. having just one step at a time, i asked her twice to marry me and she said no both times. smart girl. the third time, i told her, just come down here and they offered her a job teaching. she had nothing else to do. was workingb, she for a committee. when that was over, she took the job and it worked out pretty well. married, youu got said to your wife, i don't want to make speeches. you implied you weren't going to get in politics. pres. bush: no, not true. [laughter] we got married in november and the next year i campaign for congress. i have since never had to give up political speech and she did. [laughter] host: and she was pretty good at it. when you lost the house seat. pres. bush: 1978. host: did you give up politics? while, but for a like bill said, it was the best thing that ever happened to me. host: when you decided to run against the incumbent, your mother and father said you had no chance of winning. pres. bush: father didn't say that, mother did. [laughter] host: what di

>> not just clinton. the dnc met with ukrainian officials for dirt on donald trump and there was no uproar over that. the american public is saying let's be consistent. >> kat: i think as a human i am allowed to be bothered. >> i am bothered by the selective outrage. >> eboni: let's not have such short memories. if we go back to before the election, i was one of the people advocating and i wasn't alone that said there should be an investigation into the clinton foundation, investigations into business dealings with the clintons. i don't buy there wasn't outrage about what both clinton's did. >> eric: you are both right. you said this should be. but you are in the minority of journalism. most people are like, i let that go. meeting between trump's son and a lawyer and this is the collusion you want to investigate? >> on two issues that matter to the american people. 353 minutes dedicated between may 17 and june 20 to rush on the major evening news networks. how much to tax reform, something everybody was v

what's even worse, one of the lawyers of mueller's team was working for clinton and the clinton foundation. we've also learned that the former obama attorney general loretta lynch influenced the investigation into the email server scandal, pressure james comey to call it a matter instead of an investigation. then the 40-minute tarmac meeting with bill clinton. when are we going to put these people under oath? it's got to happen sout sooner n later. reopening -- this is most important part. if we're going to have equal justice under the law, reopen hillary clinton's email investigation, since we know, well, in that particular case lynch influenced that investigation. only a matter? not really. there's also hillary breaking the law, have secret, top-secret, special action program, classified information on her server. that's mishandle by definition. then destroying stuff. then the corrupt deal, serve as secretary of state, approving the transfer of up to 20% of america's uranium, a russian controversy, going to vladimir putin, going to the russians. and people involved in that deal, kicked b

i looked atar hillary clinton.he was a treasure trove, she was a treasure box of negative hillary information with arms and legs. >> sean: that was counsel to the president kellyanne conway, that was earlier today on on "fox & friends" ," joining us n, nationally syndicated host larry elder, former white house secretary fox contributor ari fleischer. i guess from a p.r. standpoint, i will sit here all day and i will point out the duplicity, the double standards, not equal application of standards, i dnc operatives whose being paid by the dnc passing on information, i could talk about fusion dps and where it comes to some of the same russians. the media won't even touch it. whyi? >> i can see everything you said is true and i've also said it's so much easier to be a democrat talking to the media than it is to be republican because democrats in the media see things very much the same way and in this case they all hate donald trump for the most part they hatein trump. i still have to say that it was a mistake and dona

clinton: thank you. [crowd chanting "hillary"] sec. clinton: thank you. sec. clinton: thank you. wow. let's do that again. [laughter] [applause] sec. clinton: this warm welcome is one of the many reasons that i always appreciate coming to this campus, to this great university. and i am so pleased to have a chance to talk with you today about an issue that as the president said, has really provided the impetus for a lot of the work that is being done here at the university, particularly in the institute that has been the first of its kind anywhere in the world, studying women and security and the contributions that can be made. i'm grateful to the president's visionary leadership and to this university for your commitment to nurturing diplomats, peacemakers and leaders. i'm one of those who thinks we need more peacemakers, diplomats and leaders who are devoted to the ongoing and difficult work of bridging divides, of bringing people together, of trying to find common ground. now, some of you may have been here back in 2011 when we announced the creation of this institute. it came

clinton off the hook. congress is only beginning to touch the surface on these issues and examine this, but they've got to up the urgency and to move faster. including revisiting hillary clinton email investigation, so much evidence that lynch influence the investigation. we know hillary broke the law. why? she had a top-secret, special access information. program access on the email server, that's mishandling, that's a felony, she destroyed some of it, that's a felonym combats breaking the law. hillary clinton needs to be held accountable, we're calling on that tonight. then you have the uranium one deal. as secretary of state, she was 1 of 9 people to approve the transfer of up to 20% uranium to vladimir putin the russians. people involved in that field, they kicked back as much as $145 million to the clinton foundation.si democrats and the media in the country if they care about theto rule of law, the equal application of the rule of law, it's time to start demanding justice, time to start investigating

hillary clinton, let's see. we know she mishandled and destroyed top-secret special access government information. what about a real russian collusion conspiracy? the uranium one deal. at secretary of state hillary clinton, she signed off on giving up to 20% of america's uranium to vladimir putin and the russians. all those people in the deal? they kicked back over $100 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled the speaking fees in moscow. let's not forget the clinton foundation, taking millions of dollars from the worst human rights record nations. since he took office, 125 deep state leaks and 126 days. by the way, they are all likely felonies and happened at a rate which is seven times greater in the previous two administrations. what about lieutenant general michael flynn? you will follow the story, have you been reporting on the fact that he was unmasked and that intel, raw intelligence was leaked to the press? that would be a crime. then james comey. company of comey's seven the most containe

bill clinton was pissed off. hollered at john podesta loud enough to be heard through the walls of the little ante room he clade claim to on the 10th floor of the historic savoie hotel in des moines, iowa. it was the damn pundits on tv. getting it all wrong again. as a result of iowa caucuses trickled in. hillary was leading but it was going to be tight. omg, wolf blitzer said on cnn it doesn't get a whole lot closer than that. that assessment invited parallels to hillary's 2008 loss to barack obama. it was in bill's view an absurd comparison. after all that had been a three-way race. she was still likely to come out the winner on this night, not the third place finisher. but journalists competing with her in iowa and deja vu was a hard storyline to resist. the outcome tonight insures this ways will go on for months and months on the democrat side, blitzer's colleague reported that night from sanders headquarters. the perception all night hillary was such prohibitive front-runner heading into the democrat nominat

more scandal related to the clinton foundation, the intersection with the clinton state department. screams for the need -- as president, to tell this justice department to take a look at the clinton investigation was handled were mishandled and if they need to be reinvigorated or re-started. with all this information. and fbi mishandling the information, giving everyone immunity. where records are destroyed. the necessary restarting. >> sean: jay, i agree with gregg. we have to reopen these cases. this is obstruction of justice. with the mom and pop shop and deletion of emails and this new information. does it take to get an investigation into multiple, serious felonies if your last name isn't trump or sean hannity or jay sekulow? >> you have to look at it right now. this is the reality. we left off the famous tarmac discussion between the former president and the then current attorney general of the united states, loretta lynch. that's all going on simultaneously. here's the commonality. who was the director of the fbi when all of this was going on? james comey, who we now know is

as far as that goes i think that hillary clinton. earlier cartmell comments hillary clinton was chosen way before two thousand and fourteen so chosen right after she lost to barack obama and her coronation we thought was inevitable in two thousand and sixteen that changed because hillary clinton was overconfident and the democratic party was also arrogant and overcontrol it's good to go back to back in seattle and i think that because i think that they were they were the media and the establishment parties particularly the democrats they just talk to them so they have it's group think in their in their room everybody has the same values it looks down upon conservatives who look down upon the flyovers states they look down on religion they look down on the nucular family that's why i go ahead zach well and that's. that's a really good point but it's not it's gaslighting it's basically them trying to make it seem like it's fine that we've got someone like hillary clinton just rig the primary with barack obama's blessing in front of us

hillary clinton, let's see. we know she mishandled and destroyed top-secret special access government information. what about a real russian collusion conspiracy? the uranium one deal. secretary of state hillary clinton, she signed off on giving up to 20% of america's uranium to vladimir putin and the russians. all those people in the deal? they kicked back over $100 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled the speaking fees in moscow. let's not forget the clinton foundation, taking millions of dollars from nations with the worst human rights records. a senate report showing that the trump administration has had to deal since he took office, 125 deep state leaks and 126 days. by the way, they are all likely felonies and happened at a ratee which is seven times greater in the previous two administrations.ti what about lieutenant general michael flynn? you will follow the story, have you been reporting on the factti that he was unmasked and that intel, raw intelligence was leaked to the press? that

aide -- >> she wasn't a clinton aide.sultant to the democratic national committee. >> she was in the democratic government -- >> hillary lost. >> it doesn't matter. >> it does matter because the chalupa thing is nothing like this. >> if we're talking about code 531 where they got something of value -- >> ukranians offering information about what paul manafort did in ukraine is not the same as this. >> it is the same thing. >> jim, your response to e-mails today. >> i think the most striking piece to me was what he knew about going into the meeting. we don't know a lot about what happened in the meeting, we heard different reports, but the fact he knew going into the meeting that they were going to produce information or he expected information that would be harmful to his political opponent, he invited the campaign manager and his brother-in-law. whether or not donald trump knew about it, i know they said he didn't, how could he not have if three of the most important people to him were going to see him. >> we don't know

about hillary clinton.is the account that they didn't bring anything to the table except their desire to get the sanctions repealed. and donald trump jr. was inexperienced enough to take the meeting. >> thank you very much for providing that insight. e we do appreciate it. thank you for being with us. >>> just moments ago, president trump weighed in teaming up with vladimir putin tweeting this. the fact that president putin ask i discussed a a cyber security unit doesn't mean i think it can happen. it can't, but a cease-fire can and did. the latest words from the president regarding russia and the idea of teaming up with russians on cyber security. once again a big night ofbreaking news. stay with cnn. thank you for being with me. brooke baldwin take its you to "the nineties for a a cnn original premier live to the preparty, next. at whole foods market, we believe in food that's naturally beautiful and fresh. delicious and powerful, and full of nutrients. so there are no artificial colors... no artificial f

guest: i think given the way politics works, if we had a president clinton now and chelsea clinton had the meeting, and the republicans had the house and senate, there would be a number of investigations now. i think the media right now is heavily supporting president trump in this issue and would be attacking her. we live in that world, but it does not change the facts that if there was a violation of the law, it needs to be investigated and we need to know what is going on. president trump is our president and we have to update it what he is doing is for the country, not because of business deals with russia or has had previous involvement with russia and they helped his campaign. host: very noble with the campaign legal center -- larry noble with the campaign legal center. up next, iraqi forces to back the previously isis-held city of mosul. we would talk about that with the u.s. ambassador to iraq. had a bill clinton discussion with george w. bush. you can watch the entire event on www.c-span.org. here's an. [video clip] both of you became president, your father had been president

president clinton believes hillary clinton should be trying to persuade people who didn't agree wither. it is true by the way anybody will tell you that is true. typically they do not abandon persuasion efforts entirely and this campaign abandoned the persuasion efforts and they became more and more focused on the base and they alienated some of the people that might have been persuaded particularly talking about the process from the primary where she was focused on turning out the hispanic voters to win the delegates and the nomination you needed to get to the nomination to win the delegates and the path must focus heavily. there is no way to know that they done things differently one of the sort of motifs of the book is that there was a big battle over the level of the alliance on the data versus say bill clinton coming in. we need to spend more time with them and frame it this way. he would essentially be like that's great mr. president, but i don't want to send it out into this area i want to send you to a city where there's more people to turn out. >> he was angry about it and a

guest: i think given the way politics works, if we had a president clinton now and chelsea clinton had the meeting, and the republicans had the house and senate, there would be a number of investigations now. i think the media right now is heavily supporting president trump in this issue and would be attacking her. we live in that world, but it does not change the facts that if there was a violation of the law, it needs to be investigated and we need to know what is going on. president trump is our president and we have to update it what he is doing is for the country, not because of business deals with russia or has had previous involvement with russia and they helped his campaign. host: very noble with announcer: c-span's washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that affect you. coming up monday, the los angeles times in washington tarune former reporter and up primary from politico. discussing donald trump administrations approach to border control. watch live on monday morning. join the discussion. announcer: c-span, where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-spa

to the clinton foundation. and at the same time, bill clinton like he always does, trying to enrich himself further, he doubled his speaking fees t in moscow. you don't have to connect the dots on this one because it's so obvious -- pay to play, where i grew up, we call it bribery. the clinton stuffed their pockets while putting america's security in jeopardy. that's almost as dumb as the uranium deal. here's another example misdirected outraged by the left -- hillary clinton, barack obama, the media, all freaking out over fake news. they are fake news. watch this. >> voters who are being targeted with all of this false information are generally trying to make up their mind. they have to help prevent fake news from becoming a new reality. it does influence howke people think of themselves, see the they, the decisions that make.eo >> the general misinformation from all kinds of sources, domestic, foreign, on m social media... that make it very difficult for voters to figure out what's true and what is not. >> we

attorney on the clinton foundation.e news dossier which has connections to democrats. the dossier commissioned by republicans but clinton paid for that. steele a former spy put it together. that should be shocking. it didn't stop democrats from repeating the falls information found in the dossier. there is progress. we are pressing every day. so we have equal justice under the law. fox news left-handers that the co-found is cooperating with the senate judiciary committee. the american people deserve complete investigations into this all of these scandals, but we can't take our eye off the ball, repeal and replace. here with reaction geraldo rivera and monica crowley. this is where i am torn. i think the double standard is outrageous. the nevada wolf pack in all of these cases overwhelming. republicans are in control of these committees. why aren't they doing their job there? why is it so hard to get repeal and replace done at this point? >> yes, two separate questions all going to the same point. when democrats are in c

paul, i also have to say it would not surprise me at all if clinton senior asked chelsea clinton to site chair, if the roles were reversed. >> not a chance. >> not a chance in. >> i've known that family for 25 years. chelsea has a ph.d. from oxnard. hillary clinton never did it when secretary of state. she didn't step aside and let her daughter step in. the president was very successful in running a tightly held family business. but the united states government is not a tightly held family business and i know it's a tight family and i do admire that. the problem is, if you're so tight with your family, now you want us to believe that when your son met with the russians, he didn't tell you about it? you know, you can't have it both ways. you can't be so tight with your family that your daughter can sit in for you and then your namesake son didn't tell you anything about it. baloney. >>> tonight, the kremlin saying they don't even know the russian lawyer who met with trump jr. my next guest knows her and says that the rush sans are lying. >>> and some risking arrests and maybe even their

i think that caused more damage to the clinton camp. but i also think if they go down this road, they're going to find out there was foreign money going into the clinton camp. it's well documented in peter swiets ert's book clinton cash. and you look at the follow the money, they always say. i think it's something that if we go down this path, i think you'll see some things come out that there was money going into her campaign from foreign nationals. >> but you don't have any hard evidence of that because that would be illegal, right? >> that would be pretty illegal. >> why do you make that accusation? >> because of the stuff i've read, the investigations that we've done, you know, and the reports, if you follow them. i mean it's pretty well documented. if you look at uranium one and the other things that went into the clinton campaign, their foundation. >> but it's one thing for foreigners to give money to the clinton foundation, which is legal. it's another thing for foreigners to give money to a political campaign, which is illegal.

and bill clinton refused the money in the '90s.this shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. >> so if donald trump junior reportedly met with this russian national who claimed to have the damaging information on clinton, is it possible he could have met with another? does the kremlin give up? >> no. they don't give up. i mean, was there a full-on program with the kgb to go after the american elections. you know, if this didn't meet then they went to somebody else and there were multiple meetings with terrorism aides and e-mail contact. you know, context with meta data, and it's all over the place. it's not just one meeting. roger stone talking to hackers on e-mail, and it wasn't another countries. and frankly, i agreed with the last guy on, anybody who withholds information or impedes the investigation is flat-out treason. >> we know jared kushner was in this meeting that wasn't originally disclosed on his security clearance form. we also know kushner tried to set up that secret channel to the kremlin on previous reporting. does securit

i mean, here hillary clinton had done the uranium one deal for $2 million to the clinton foundation,e the university deal, which made university for $2 million to the clinton foundation. the silicon valley of russia. someone came to a political campaign and said we have information on your political opponent. of course you should listen to that. where else do you think we're going to hear it? do you think cnn, which provided the debate questions in advance to hillary clinton's campaign is going to give us information of what the hillary clinton campaign is doing? so opposition research, you have it in business, you have it in law. i can tell you stories -- i may write a book some day if i'm sure i'm going to die within a year that can tell you all kinds of stories of infiltrating opposite camps. it's very common. it's a part of the process of politics. liz: you know, president trump made an interesting statement last week, doug, that if he -- if president trump was winning last -- during the election cycle last time, that president obama would have acted about russia medaling and ins

vladimir putin was not a fan of hillary clinton. of course, vladimir putin wanted hillary clinton to lose. he hat hillary clinton. >> the tensions between leaders had been brewing for years. in 2001, another american leader george w. bush vouched to putin. i was able to get a sense of his soul. >> thank you, thank you. >> on the campaign trail in 2008, hillary clinton had a different take. >> i could have told him he's a kgb agent, by definition, he did not have a soul. this is a waste of time. >> originally mrs. clinton said you do not have any soul. >> putin's reply. statements should not be guided by their hearts, they should use their heads. put clinton had a lot of tough words for putin over the years. >> we have to stand up to his bullying. he's somebody who'll take as much as he possibly can. but, it was what happened in 2011 that marked a point of no return. it began with the arabs spring protest early this year. the kind of popular up rise that putin dreaded. he begins to see himself through the eyes of closing the mark. >>

to the clinton foundation. the clinton campaign -- you're talking about actual evidence, not conjecture. my other impression of your interview is -- how refreshing to have someone take responsibility, be transparent and earnest, admit that maybe he would have done things differently. i think many people in last year's election should say they should have done things differently. hillary clinton had a 92% chance of winning michigan. she had a 0% chance. many things could be done differently. at the bottom line is, what came out of this 20 minute brief meeting? nothing helpful, meaningful, consequential. if that weren't true, there would have been immediate follow-up. no follow-up whatsoever. >> sean: the woman being paid by the dnc -- i will go to the politico article --dash she shared her findings with officials. she went to the ukrainian embassy and they were disseminating false information on donald trump. they even take credit for helping to push out a paul manafort at that particular point in the campaign.

it was hillary clinton. >> you're saying it was okay for an american president. >> it was hillary clinton, it was hillary clinton who called out vladimir putin for rigging his election in russia. it was hillary clinton who called out vladimir putin for human rights abuses. >> wait a minute. >> we're saying then if putin chooses to get involved in our election that's okay? that's crazy. >> congresswoman. >> anderson, it was hillary clinton who signed off on 20% of our nation's uranium. >> i being sold to a russian majority owned company. >> that's false. that's false. it's not true. might like to peddle fake news, that's not true. >> let's. >> that's a real national security issue. >> to paraphrase kellyanne conway, can we refocus on actually what happened today.

which clinton agreed to do. that is a clinton talking point. and lynch tarmac meeting with bill clinton only days about that meeting in july. you the american people demand that the issues get investigated. and one of the most dangerous issue is the deep state. there is an unprecedented amount of leaks of classified raw intelligence to the press in this country. a recent report over 125 leak and 126 days. these things need to be investigated. and the only crime we know committed in the russia collusion wild goose chase was the unmasking of raw intelligence of michael flynn and given to the washington post and that is a felony and crime that needs to be investigated. and james comey, he gives a memo to a friend to leak to the new york times in the hopes it will lead to the appointment of special counsel, robert mueller who is carrying out the witch hunt. mueller is looking into business deals with president trump and people with his campaign. the special council is investigating paul man ford. mueller should be investigating who is potentially a

bill clinton and anthony weiner made a major hit. james comey is a boy scout. greatly and i can get anything good. dagen: after the james comey testimony where he said he felt queasy when loretta lynch said refer to it as a matter, even diane feinstein said she should go in front of the judiciary committee. >> at the end of the day there is no comparison between russia's influence and trying to impact our democracy and bill clinton talking to loretta lynch for few minutes on the tarmac. if an investigation is called for, fine. i think she has made it clear that she is willing to come forward and share her information, but at the end of the day you are literally comparing apples and oranges and trying to compare the russia situation and their influence in our democratic process versus president clinton speaking to loretta lynch for a few minutes. dagen: gary b, it was a matter of days after that meeting in late june between lynch and clinton that james comey stepped up and said we are not going to recommend charges against hillary clinton. >> exactly. i'm not su

we had a fraction of the staff than clinton had over there. you're trying to have your viewers think because these three principals were in there, it was viewed with some type of seriousness that simply is not true. this was standard operating procedure for the campaign. let's focus on what did not happen in that meeting. no information provided that was meaningful. no action taken. nothing. >> let's focus on what did happen. the woman stated she had information that individuals connected to russia were funding the democratic national committee and supporting ms. clinton. that's from donald jr.'s statement. that's why he went to the meeting. >> right. and apparently she didn't. >> that is a problem, though. taking that meeting. because it goes to one of the questions of this investigation, which is was russia trying to get to your campaign for purposes of affecting the election? this is don jr.'s own statement about it. a statement which has changed now twice about what this meeting was. that doesn't raise legitimate concerns? >> chris, you ke

>> well, look, i don't think there is a clinton campaign today, but in clinton world. >> the remainsf the clinton campaign. >> one of the frustrations we had throughout the summer and fall when it became aapparent that russia was interfering with our elections was that we couldn't get people in the media to take it seriously. what we now know is not only should they have taken it seriously, but you had the trump campaign complicit in it. donald trump jr. was dishonest. thankfully chris rate said today this is not a witch-hunt. director mueller's investigation is not. and so sits coming out now with clear facts that he not only had this meeting, he knew that there was a plan in place, because his friend e-mailed him that this is part of the russian government's attempts to help mr. trump. >> i don't accept your premise that the media ignored it because i remember it and i certainly pushed donald trump on russia at press conferences. but more broadly, at the time russia was not -- wasn't -- the word didn't mean the same thing it means today. there was the concrete proof at that time th

she didn't have anything about clinton.n we learn about collusion later on, it gives some plausible defense to whether the trump campaign was trying to motivate this negative russian activity? >> we don't know, for example, what representations were made in the meeting about the trump willingness to do away with the magnitski act. was this motivation for what they would later do? >> he brushed that aside and said, my father is not a public servant but a private citizen. if he wins, you can talk to him then. >> he said it wasn't about the campaign but the whole point was about the campaign and getting help from the russians. that's why the meeting was taken. for the president to dismiss this and say this is a fake story when apparently the family itself knew before just about anybody else, it demonstrates how serious and real this story is. >> are you going to call don junior? >> we are going to want him to come into the committee, everyone in that meeting or anyone who had a role to come before our committee. >> timetable?

there is a lot of stuff on hillary clinton.he foundation, the clinton foundation that they have reserved and that up and so mention anydo not of this and i was a federal employee for 39 years. in the area of taxation and what is going on with the clinton foundation is unbelievable. rolfe from charlottesville. keith, independent line. caller: thank you for c-span. opaganda, tell their lives, but that young man cannot tell a straight story if he tried. us got up fairly early for this -- we will show little bit more from that interview, but how long did sean hannity speak with donald trump junior? caller: that interview went what, 20 minutes or better? host: you listened to it. you talked about him being a liar. do you think he learned any new information that you learned any new information you did not learn before? caller: the young man -- he is not even truly part of this administration, yet he is part of this administration. this is one of the most bizarre times in american history. it is incredible what america can believe. i

clinton. now, in that story, from the "wall street journal," which went live last night, you might have noticed that shane harris of the "wall street journal," he included a line in the story saying he asked the white house for comment on that story and they declined to give a comment. but asking for comment is a specific thing. it has logistical consequences. you have to show somebody what you've got and ask them for comment. if you think about the logistics with that store being posted last night, that means that sometime before last night when the white house was asking for comment, they became aware of what the "wall street journal" was about to report. they knew that that story was coming out. they knew that that was in the pipeline. and so as they are preparing for that to drop, the first reporting about american collusion -- attempted collusion with the russians attacking our collection and what appears to be a very close tie to the president's campaign, through michael flynn in that co