this is hillary clinton and her own words. and mrs. clinton we welcome you. this is a an auspicious occasion in every sense. i want to thank you and the members of this committee for the many courtesies and good advice and hours of your time that you have spent with me as a whole committee and that many of you have spent with me individually in the past few weeks, mr. chairman you and other distinguished members of this committee have raised tough and important questions about how best we can finance health care reform. this is as we all know a subject of great complexity one that has been studied exhaustively, but which is still subject to a great many questions. we have to in the coming weeks and months ahead work closely together to understand as fully as we are able the kinds of issues that are raised by the reforms that are offered not only by the president but by the republican senators represented here on this committee and others we have to be sure that we get the best value for the healthcare dollars. we currently spend and that we do the best job we

political scandals marred the clinton years, culminating during bill clinton's second term with his impeachment and senate acquittal. hillary clinton was asked in 1994 about the couples credibility during what came to be known as the pink suit press conference. >> a recent news reports about the first lady's -- earnings and all these whitewater allegations, many of us americans are having a hard time with your credibility. how can you earn our trust back? is there a fundamental distrust of the clintons in america? >> well i hope not. i mean, that would be something that i would regret very much. i do think that we are transition figures, if you will. we don't fit easily into a lot of our pre-existing categories, and i think that having been independent, made decisions, it is a little difficult for us as a country maybe to make the transition of having a woman like many women in this room, sitting in this house, so i think that the standards, to some extent, the expectations, the demands have changed, and i'm trying to find my way through it, and trying to figure out how best to be true to mysel

i had a gap of five months with president clinton. a lot of time not to do your job per se you get a little rusty sifter practice at times but some weekends the presidents are always on a big comes and operations tempo you would say. >> that is the question that gaudi had, what happens at camp david when the president is a way? what do you do as a staff? >> we have more time to do training, physical nest programs, contest if time allows it. we send our sailors and marines to school you always have to be ready. you are really sitting waiting taking care of the place, mowing the grass, training, firefighting training is constant. certainly because you're always ready your way to execute when the president does visit we look forward to those visits. >> has hollywood or the news media for a documentary ever films on site at camp david? >> harry reasoner with abc news interviewed president ford inside the camp. i believe that was the only time there's an interview done in that regard, certainly during world events like middle east peace su

every thanksgiving the clintons went to camp david. they do it pretty differently, nancy reagan loved going there. he did all this on saturdays from the cabin and elsewhere. they all use it differently. the meaning comes from the world leaders. it has a camp david spirit. it's coined by the soviet premier at the time. it was about a place where you can come together with trust and within nature and no press unless you want it there and just the ability to sit down as people and break bread and share a story and get to know each other. to me, that is the true meeting at camp david. a place for presidents to get away and relax. a place to entertain family and guests and world leaders. probably one of the most unique places to do that. all within reasonable distance of the white house. >> mike, we had some great questions from our live audience. i know that president reagan and nancy reagan were riding horses at camp david. is there stable there? and one other activities are available? >> >> the only time we've had a stable there, a corra

then when clinton comes undercl fire and when the investigation heats up and clinton has to shore up his support among democrats, those talks about away. newt gingrich sees real opportunity in working with clinton that is foreclosed by the impeachment. you have a lot of republicans, or conservatives including laura ingram who said everyone ise' talking about impeachment, that is not a great idea. in part because when clinton was going to b impeached offer over, wasn'ta big of a deal. there was a battle over impeachment is going to happen. that newt gingrich is reluctant to get into, and also probably because his own marital record was not as clear as it could be. so, he gets dragged into it, when he decides to do it he does it it does tap into his desire for a political sight, he goes all in. when impeachment gets underway.t >> opening it up to audience, on your media treatment, i think i see a veteran of the mclaughlin group in the audience. at its peak it had 4.4 million viewers. >> so much bigger than just about anyone else. >> anyway, interesting treatment ofs that. so, let's go

, i mean, clinton governed kind of a moderate new democrat. he was -- i mean, the liberals distrusted clinton as much as the far right have distrusted reagan, so, talk about that, please. >> yes, of course. well, this is what is so interesting and what sort of confound one argument people make about the 1990's that it was an era of polarization. you look at it, the democrats were moving to the right, they weren't moving to the left. how is it a decade of polarization. polarization is a political process described in the 1990's, it's a political tool being used by people like newt din grinch to make it look like, oh, the democrats are enemies and extension threat while at the same time he's having the back room negotiations with bill clinton. and if you wanted to apply a causal explanation to the democrats moving to the right, the i go abouter story i'm telling, you could say the democrats are moving to the right and the republicans have to move further right in order to heighten the contradictions between the two. i would say that's part of th

theories about the clintons. they were willing to embrace the worst about the clintons, even if it had no basis in empirical fact. and this kind of personal animosity, i think, drove them not to recognize how good they had it after they won congress in 1994. it's clinton's presidency, beginning in 1996 with the reform of america's welfare system, that begins to consolidate the reagan years and advance the conservative movement, when you think about it. i mean, as you mentioned in that quote, margaret, you have welfare reform, which is the first time we've abolished an entitlement at the federal level. you had a balanced budget for three years. remember, we were talking about budget surpluses, right? part of that deal was a cut in the capital-gains tax. and th we also saw these massive reductions in crime. so i think, in retrospect, the conservatives, even while they should not admire clinton personally, might begin to see some value in the clintonite politics that gave them such victories in the 1990s. >> let me

and then when clinton comes under fire clinton has a shore up his support among democrats.nd an opportunity with clinton is foreclosed by the impeachment. you have a lot off republicans andd conservatives including laura ingraham everyone to talk about impeachment which is not a great idea. in part because what clinton was going to be impeached over was not that big of a deal. and so there is this battle over whether impeachment is going to happen. in fact gingrich is reluctant to get into produce also reluctant because his own marital record was not as clear as it could be. anyway gets dragged into it when he decides to do it, he does it. it really does tap into his desire for political fight and he goes all in when impeachment finally gets underway. >> wont open it up to the audience but i just want to jump ahead. under immediate treatment i think i see a veteran of the mclaughlin group in thek audience. it had 4.4 million viewers. >> it is so much bigger than just about anyone else. >> anyway interesting treatment ofn that. it was go from clinton to w. c is the last reag

, clinton is moderate new democrat, he was no -- the liberals distrusted clinton as much as the far right types distrusted reagan. talk about that. >> of course. this is so interesting and what sort of confounds one argument some people make about the 1990s, that it was an era of polarization. when you look at it, the democrats were moving to the right, they were not moving to the left so house a decade of polarization? polarization is not a political process being described in the 1990s. it's a political tool being used by people like newt gingrich to make it look like the democrats are our enemies ended existential threat while at the same time he' he is having these macro negotiations with bill clinton and if you wanted to apply a causal explanation to the democrats moving to the right you could say the democrats are moving to the rights or republicans have to move even further right to heighten the contradictions between the two. i think that is part of the process at play and you especially see this around immigration, proposition one hundred 87 was not just about republicans, democr

and then when clinton comes under fire, when the investigation heats up in clinton have to shore up his support among democrats those talks goaw away. gingrich sees real opportunity in working with clinton that is foreclosed by the impeachment. you have a lot of republicans or conservatives including laura ingraham who is like everyone is talk about impeachment which is not a great idea. in part because what clinton was going to be impeached over was not that big of a deal. and so there is this battle over whether impeachment is going to happen. gingrich is reluctant to get into he's alsoca probably reluctant because his own marital record was not as clear as it could be. anyway he gets trapped into it. then when he decides to do it he does it. so it really does tap into his desire for a political site and he goes all in when impeachment finally gets underway. cooks don't open it up to the audience. just want to jump ahead. by the way on your immediate treatment i think i see a veteran of the mclaughlin group in the audience. at its peak it had 4.4 million viewers. >> it was so much big

that's why doesn't mention republicans or democrats or bill clinton. it's trying to attract those perot voters. the other person out so quickly because i think he attaches to the wallace question is david duke. in 1990 and 1991 as a duke is becoming a more known figure, it's now not richard vagary pat buchanan is looking over he sang why i want to reagan and h.w. bush denouncing this guy? we need to be figure out why he so appealing. not a hard puzzle. and when his voters, and so part of pat buchanan scampi 1992 is about the duke about come just as previous candidates had looked at the wallace vote. >> so the book does not focus on donald trump. however, he makes an appearance at the end and it's a wonderful passage because it really pulls the book together. there was a debate at the reagan library in simi valley in 2015, and every candidate on the stage basically appealed to the reagan legacy except for donald trump. as you write, trump understood something that debate moderators and other candidates did not, the age of reagan was over. it had been ov

let's go from clinton to w, whom you see house the last reaganite in the way, and there is a lot there and he was willing self compassion conservative is him before the work you love and by the end, he was taken on the right by me as he was the entire right for parts of the right is on the left and of course the immigration reform failed which i havee always taken is the firt sign of what was coming. >> yes. >> and for good, we will go from there to the tea party to trump and then open it up. >> all right, as of bush, even of the time was being compared to reagan andnd everybody was talking about how he was the heir to reagan, real blow to h&w rush but it was because he had the idea of compassionate conservatism a and the immigration reform and after 911 then you're talking foreign policyic any passes before going 11, the largest tax cut in american history. so is doing stuffy in the southern feels very reaganite in his presidency. in one by one he presented part of it so you have the financial deregulation and tax cuts that you ultimately have the collapse of the global economy, and y

and then when clinton comes under fire and when the investigation heats up and clinton has to shore up his support, democrats, those go away. so you gingrich sees real opportunity in working with clinton. that is for close by the impeachment and have a lot of republicans or conservatives including laura ingram who's like everyone's talking about impeachment. this is not a great idea, in part because what clinton was going to be impeached over wasn't that big of a deal. and so there is this this battle over whether impeachment is going to happen and that gingrich is reluctant get into. he is probably also reluctant because his own marital record was not, you know, as clear as it could be. right. so so anyway, if he gets dragged into it, but then when he decides to do it, he does it. so there's a very sort of it really does tap into desire for a political fight. and he goes all in when when finally gets underway. so i want to open it up to the audience. so i just want to jump ahead, by the way, on your media treatment. i think i see a of the mclaughlin group in the audience at its peak.

and here's the 2nd point. hillary clinton is a loser. and when the democrats trot out a loser to be the focus like they are right now, it's not going to help when any retention with s t u. s. republicans as right wing extremists or sorts of response could that spock from some of those republicans, can perhaps even radicalize most people. well, i think it's 2 things. one, she's doing what joe biden did, and you showed a clip. he stood in front of a historic space with military behind him, red and black, and he called american citizens, a clear and present danger. now that phrase clear and present danger is from american constitutional law, which is used to limit the constitutional freedoms of the people who are the clear and present danger. hillary is doing the same thing. she's trying to make the people in this country turn on the supporters of donald trump and the so called conservatives. and again, it won't work, but it is scary. and when the government, the department of justice as you referenced, is in on the game in, on the gambit.

i remember when bill clinton got into trouble, and he sent hillary clinton other and she defended himnowing that what he did was wrong. at that point, bill clinton lost my support. these republicans, these evangelicals, they claim i am for jesus christ, but when bill clinton had his issues, they all turned on him. a president that -- here you have a president that bragged about grabbing women by the private parts, he got elected. herschel walker paid for a woman to have an abortion, had kids he did not take care of, and you don't hear nothing from the religious right. just stay in power, does not matter, morals be damned. it is so hypocritical of them. he character does not count anymore. but look how they be attacking biden. they for jesus christ, they have no problems with this. thank you for my call. host: when it comes to support for herschel walker, "washington examiner" has a story saying scott and kotten went to campaign with him today, hoping to boost his campaign. senator scott says democrats want to destroy this country and will destroy anyone who gets in the way. today it i

so let's go from clinton to w who you see as the last reaganite in a way.a lot of sunniness there. he was willing to, he tried to sellcompassionate conservatism for a while before the war came along. and by the end , he was just as hated on the right by many parts of the right as he was but not the entire right but a significant part of the right as he was by the left and of course his immigration reform failed which i have always taken as the first sign of what was coming. and if i could, i'd like to link, will go from there to the tea party to trump and then open it up . >> so george w. bush even at the time was being compared to reagan. everyone was talking about how he was the heir to reagan which is up load to each george hw book bush, so me but it was because he had the idea of compassionate conservatism that you wanted to do immigration reform, after 9/11 many were talking about democracy and foreign policy. he fat passes before 9/11 he passes i think the largest tax in american history so he's certainly feels very reaganite in his presidency. and on

clinton was a moderate new democrat.u distrusted clinton as much as the far right distrusted reagan. >> this is what is interesting that confounds one argument people make of the 1980s with an eragh of polarization that the democrats were moving to the right, not to the left that polarization is not a political described on —- process in the nineties but a tool used by people like newtvi gingrich to make it look like the democrats are enemies and the existential threat while at the same time having backroom negotiations with clinton. if you wanted to apply a colorful explanation to the democrats moving to the right with the bigger story come you could say now they are moving further right to high-end the contradictions. so that is part of the process at play. then you see this around immigration proposition wasmu not 187 was not just that but janet reno was expanding border patrol and dianne .feinstein was saying nasty things about immigrants at the time. a shift in the politics more broadly and a different kind of right

and and so i step up there and introduce them to president clinton and president clinton was the best schmoozer i think i've ever been around a really likable person. but he put his arm around me and he said he said, you all take care of this guy down there now. and bill warwick, he said, oh, we do, mr. president. we think duncan is the greatest. and i always wished i'd had a recording of that because i don't. he knew what he was saying. i believe so. but we have a tough question here. hi, i'm congressman duncan. you've mentioned that you believe that in all the republican groups around the country that a vast majority of them would be really good people who just want good things for the country, but right now, we have an enormous of people in republican party who either are election deniers, the 22 election, or are about the other election deniers. and there's a saying that for, you know, for evil to triumph in the world it just takes good people to do nothing. and where are the people in the republican party who want the good things for the country, who aren't shouting down the elec

so, let's go from clinton to w whom you see as the last reaganite in a way.here's a lot of signing in us there. he was willing for a while before the war came along. and by the end he was hated on the ride by many parts as he was, not to the entire but a significant parts of the right as he was by the left. the immigration reform failed, gnwhich i've always taken as the first sign of what was coming. and if i could, i would like to link from there to the tea party to trump and then we will open up. >> so, george w. bush even at the time was being compared to reagan. it was because he had of that idea of compassionate conservatism that he wanted to do immigration reform after 9/11, then he is talking a lot about democracy and foreign policy. he passes before 9/11 the largest tax cut in american history. so, he's doing stuff that feels very reaganite. so you have with the financial regulation and tax cuts that also have the collapse of the global economy. you take that idea of the nine worst words in the english language are i'm from the government and i'm here

obama and clinton and biden. very much is, deaf nunez, former house intelligence committee chairman, for joining us. so what will the 118 congress do about it? he is the man who will likely have the gavel in the next house oversight committee. what will representative james comer do with that subpoena power? he's next live right here. ♪ ♪ at ameriprise financial, our advice is personalized. based on your goals, whatever they may be. all that planning has paid off. looks like you can make this work. we can make this work. and the feeling of confidence that comes from our advice? i can make this work. that seems to be universal. i can make this work. i can make this work. no wonder more than 9 out of 10 clients are likely to recommend us. because advice worth listening to is advice worth talking about. ameriprise financial. (vo) the fully electric audi e-tron family is here. with models that fit any lifestyle. and innovative ways to make your e-tron your own. through elegant design and progressive technology. all t

obama and clinton and biden.much is, deaf nunez, former house intelligence committee chairman, for joining us. so what will the 118 congress do about it? he is the man who will likely have the gavel in the next house oversight committee. what will representative james comer do with that subpoena power? he's next live right here. ♪ ♪ maria: welcome back. you just heard from former house intelligence committee chairman devin nuÑes on the need for republicans to appoint a commission to examine the politicization of the fbi. i want to bring in the man who will likely oversee the next house oversight committee, congressman james comer. we also see, congressman, that retired and disgraced former fbi operative timothy timothyty ballot is refusing to cooperate with you and the investigations into all of this. think bow, of course, opened the trump mar-a-lago investigation, killed the hunter biden laptop investigation and, by the way, was also the spokesperson for, quote-unquote, election integrity before the to -- 2020 e

obama and clinton and biden.much is, deaf nunez, former house intelligence committee chairman, for joining us. so what will the 118 congress do about it? he is the man who will likely have the gavel in the next house oversight committee. what will representative james comer do with that subpoena power? he's next live right here. ♪ ♪ >> tech: at safelite, we take care of vehicles with the latest technology. when my last customer discovered a crack in his car's windshield, he scheduled at safelite.com. safelite makes it easy. we're the experts at replacing your glass... ...and recalibrating your advanced safety system. >> customer: and they recycled my old glass. now that's a company i can trust. >> tech: don't wait. schedule today. ♪ pop rock music ♪ >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ about two years ago i realized that jade was overweight. i wish i would have introduced the fresh food a lot sooner. after farmer's dog she's a much healthier weight. she's a lot more active. and she's able to join us

wow, wow, this is how us secretary of state hillary clinton reacted to the video with gaddafi's corpsemocracy in 2011 quickly escalated into a real civil war against the government. muammar. gaddafi was made by the libyan jamahiriya, they were supported by the united states and the eu later became. it is known that the rebels were actively supported coordinated and even provided by the countries. west, for example, weapons and ammunition were dropped on the territories occupied by the rebels as early as august. three evolutionary. nato forces joined, they bombed major cities and the capital of tripoli on october 23. the same year fell, the last bastion. duffy city politician brutally murdered, and his body put on public display in the refrigerator of the mall , too, by the way, clinton again. when we said we had come we saw he had died. just imagine the americans. so media rocked hatred gaddafi and that the leftists themselves, living in washington, went to the white house with a request to bomb an african country, as for the arab spring, not only tunisia. this was the first experience

neil: what about hillary clinton?eally figure out -- i don't see hillary coming back in you know. neil: yeah. >> i think that you get a certain number of chances and they don't give you another chance. i think america wants to look forward. look, i do think newsom is not in a bad position to come with the nominee. andrew cuomo was in a great position until he got taken out in new york for his own personal actions. there isn't, there is a generational vacuum in the democratic party, right? that is a real problem for the party at this point. neil: but liz truss proves that people can turn on you, even your own party if they don't like what you're doing, right? i'm wondering whether republicans should feel so cocky in this environment where they might you know, score the house and maybe the senate but it is not as if things could turn on them as well. your thoughts? >> yeah. usually what happens is if you're in power people turn on you. when you're out of power actually people getting together and figure out how to get b

but nobody is done a book on clinton because hillary clinton got into the mix and then she didn't win. now the me to movement our son why he was impeached and somebody that is right for a revision, it happens so that would come by way of documentary and a new book probably not from political process anymore because really a really clinton lost, retired from that predict somebody does it book on clinton you will see him rise a bit predict. >> so i'm happy got through that it was amazing you got through that without it joe frankly predict and democrat good morning. it. >> good morning and thank you for taking my call and i'm happy for everybody. thank you on behalf of everybody. this is a great survey as though hundred always and the panel is exceptional. my question is regards like categories and which categories if there's any particular one that each of the panelists codified is more important in the top four looking at presidents and i just want to say today is the fourth of july. i have two kids who share birthdays with presence kool-aid and got john quincy adams we tell them that

but once a clinton, always a clinton.ost honest thing she's ever done is run for senate in a state she didn't live in. but it's something. remember just minutes ago it was considered a threat to democracy to question the legitimacy of an election. that it was worse than the civil war to even broach the subject. so here's the rule. democracy's only in peril when the republicans complain about elections. but it's never the reverse. and yet, who are the real election tamperers. i mean who pushed the dossier, who pushed russian collusion? who buried the laptop story? and isn't the party that cheats against the other side that's bad or is it the party that also cheats against their own candidates. when the dnc gave debate questions to hillary, it wasn't to beat trump. remember bernie? does anybody remember? >> yeah. >> greg: i thought that was a good point but you guys are so quiet [cheers and applause]. >> greg: no, stop it. i don't need any mercy applause. this isn't the daily show. but if you bring in the possibility of ele

but some of these women use the hillary clinton example. do identify as feminist, they're taking on whether endorsing they're supporting the victories of women leaders who are who, who victory signal really the undermining of feminist goals around all sorts of empower. absolutely. i think we have to hold the contradiction sort of in our hands while we're understanding. you can't assume that a woman is going to be supportive of, of any rights for women. and in fact, in, in these cases, we're seeing repeatedly the majority of women who voted for trump in 2016 and again in whenever you think that is the perfect example. 20162020. the majority of white women in the united states of america voted for dominic priest in 2020 went up to 25 and i'm baffled by right. i mean 26 women of accusing sexual misconduct. he introduced policies that chip away, women's health, women's, economic, security, etc. i don't know it's mind boggling. and you fast forward even to the capital insurrection. on january 6, 2021, women represented 14 percent of people being

back at the event, clinton had this message. >> or ii harold p. change laws and this is one of several stops for the organizers of this event. the next panel discussion will take place in los angeles. >> reporting from san francisco, gayle ong kron. 4 news. well, in national news in a public hearing, members of the committee investigating the attack. >> on the capitol made the claim that former president trump intentionally deceive his followers, claiming that he had won the election. committee members say now they want the former president to answer the questions directly. washington correspondent alexandra limon joining us with those updates. good morning. >> in a good morning. and the select committee members voted unanimously to subpoena former president donald trump. they say they do want him to answer their questions directly about the attack on the capitol that they say was planned in advance by white-supremacist groups that support trump. >> the central cause of january 6th was one man donald trump. >> members of the committee investigatin

how close my own wife was to the clintons. i did not realize it at the time. >> that you were married to her. >> how close were she to the clintons. >> a cell phone away or hay a tailgate away to say this away or go you should platform to push the vaccination away. >> do you feel at times you were manipulated by political forces through your wife. >> attent manipulation, yes there was manipulation, me saying i don't like trump was a form of manipulation. larry: joined with the conversation lee carter and frances newton, what an interview, your reaction? >> i'm not entirely surprised, the kardashians or an influencer of all influencers, they start sort of started but this was to find out that they have that you're like the people like the clintons were the clintons are trying to get them to talk about certain things, we shouldn't be surprising to anyone, it shouldn't be surprising to kanye west. we all know that that platform is used by many other people to try to get them to push their agenda. maria: it is interesting lee, tha

machine, bill clinton, hillary clinton through the years, and there's an enterprising fbi agent or toess secretary and that gets denied at the highest levels. how in the world when the fbi is digging in and finds out charles dolan allegedly has ties and is working in hill lakeland and's state department, works for bill clinton, state director for the clinton campaign along the way and the fbi shut it down, doesn't spend a dime on that so they have $200,000 to pay an informant who has bogus claims, meanwhile they don't have a time to go investigate somebody with ties to the kremlin in the clinton operation. that is how corrupt this thing is. rachel: you are referencing britney herzog and here's what she said about dolan. you to hear about danchinco. but she was focused on dolan as well, the connection was important because of dolan's connectivity with the press secretary you said. i wanted to interview dolan. fbi analyst wanted to interview dolan, his connectivity to sources in the russian government officials. some others in the fbi didn't want to investigate. to the best of my knowle