she had a passion for child welfare issues which she handled before working with the clinton administration. >> she devoted her life to keeping children safer, reducing domestic violence and helping families. >> as reno stepped forward she made no secret of her competing. she invited elian's miami relatives to plead their case. >> we filed a very significant lawsuit in federal court. it's the case of elian gonzalez versus janet reno. >> my hope is people will look at this little boy ooand get hi

they proposed several weeks before the event they were going to have a clinton administration, deputy chief of staff come and speak about the proillegal immigration. i know it's rude but that's what i call it. the proundocumented peoples, the proundocumented students so, you know, the nonpartisan group was okay with this. my clients presented this again. agreed to underwrite the cost of this event. ann is an old friend of mine. i know from her speaking career she is very concerned about her own safety. she always has some exmilitary bodyguards when she was is coming to a place like thchlt they started making arrangements, asked for a room to hold the kpped siexpected si people. ann draws a big crowd. the university allowed the clinton administration official to speak in the evening in the middle of campus, all of the advertising they wanted, no restrictio restrictions. some people showed up. it wasn't that compelling. nothing near 500. but when it came to ann they kept giving the students the run around. first they said the same restrictions as david. well, you know, we have determine

basically, the clinton administration and obama administration ignored the problem. they kicked the can down the road. if all of that sounds familiar, it is. it's so similar to the deal that president obama struck with the radical steve was born to move. over the course of 9 days he walks 26.2 miles, that's a marathon. because he chooses to walk whenever he can. and he does it with support from dr. scholl's. only dr. scholl's has massaging gel insoles that provide all-day comfort to keep him feeling more energized. so he even has the energy to take the long way home. keep it up, steve! dr. scholl's. born to move. get your ancestrydna kit.here. learn about you and the people and places that led to you and see yourself in a new light. ancestrydna. save 30% through august 15th at ancestrydna.com. ...nausea, heartburn, when indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea! nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea! here's pepto bismol! ah. nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea. of trying to negotiate or pressure north korea out of getting weapons. sur

probably as close now as we were in 1994 when the clinton administration gaveit 1994 when the clintonation gave it serious consideration but i still don't think we are on the brink of war here. president trump's rhetoric notwithstanding it is clear that his advisers are looking for a diplomatic and peaceful solution. and yet north korea seems to see the us as an invading power that overturns nationstates in its own interests and will do so to north korea unless north korea puts on measures to deter that. they won't back down, will they? north korea doesn't want to give up its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programme but whether they will use them is another matter. even though i don't support president trump was matt overwrought rhetoric and threats on this, he has made clear what has been long—standing us policy. if the north koreans use any of their weapons of us district —— weapons of mass destruction they will be met with overwhelming force. that's not quite the question. does it mean we have to get used to as a world a nuclear armed north korea and somehow try to contain i

the university allowed the clinton administration official to speak in the evening, in the middle of campus, with all of the advertising that they wanted without restrictions. some people showed up. it was not that compelling. nothing near 500. let us be fair. --n it came to ann coulter they kept giving the students the runaround. then they said it would be the same restrictions as david horwitz. takedecided they needed to some security precautions to make sure there was the violence. and we will charge you a security fee. we will not tell you what that is. but you will have to abide some restriction -- by some restrictions. they used the word curfew. a 3:00 p.m. curfew. it has to start at 1:00 or 1:30 p.m. and end by 3:00. you cannot have it in the middle of campus because that would make it easy for people to get to. we don't want people to get to it easily. you cannot advertise the event except for a few hours before the event. come toff campus cannot the event. back and forth. coulter accepted these restrictions. she was ready to come speak at 1:00, off-campus, if they would just

not a smart thing.ns basically, the clintone administration and obama administration ignored the problem kicked the can down the road.icke if all of that sounds familiar, it is. it's so similar to the deal that president obama struck with the radical mullahs in iran. president obama gave that rogue regime in tehran $150 billion in loads of cash. remember the plane loads of cash? and other currencies? the mullahs in iran said in the exchange for that money, they promised not to build nuclear weapons. tehran agreed to let inspectors into the nuclear facilities. after 25 days, iran was still allowed to have their centrifuges and conduct missile test. what we are seeing a north korea is so simple and easy to see where this iranian deal is headed. what you have to understand tonight is this. evil in our time must be recognized for what it is. you cannot appease and capitulate to evil radicals and rogue dictatorships. they don't care about honoring agreements because breaking promises, taking money, is part of the course when dealing with these kind of regimes. m5jm chamberlains hitler. that s

needs to be focused on what in the hell the clintons were doing for two years with attorney general loretta lynch, what they were doing within the administration the leaders of the fbi, so-called, didn't have the principle or the guts to investigate hillary clinton and recommend her prosecution either for the email scandal or the clinton foundation. >> i talked to several field agents about this, and they are appalled. there is two f.b.i.s. there is the f.b.i. which you and i know and respect who does the hard work of counter-intelligence, counter-terrorism. and you have these folks you just mentioned. any agent who did with comey did, leaked that memo to a friend, classified or not, the fbi would come down on the field operatives like a ton of bricks. this is where the republicans have the right and the requirement to see something changed law * aliases being used by the clinton and obama administration. >> there is no reason for her to do an alias account. lou: she wanted to avoid foia trails. >> that's another factor she should be prosecuted on the breaking of the law, the act that says you have to maintain documentation and the policy that

backward for too long, do you see the way that some of the administrations, particularly the clinton administrationgiving money to north korea, and then the parallel of the obama administration giving money to iran, do you see that the appeasement that seems to be going on is only to our detriment and it's time to stand up because these bullies are at a point where the iranians yell "death to america," "death to the big devil and the little devil, israel and the united states." are we supposed to put our tail between our legs? >> the policy has been called appeasement. former secretary of state jim baker right after the clinton administration signed the agreed framework, wrote an op-ed that called the clinton administration policy appeasement and that was 20 years ago. it hasn't worked. if you want to have a future where north korea can threaten with missiles, you have it look at one more diplomatic play to convince china to reunite the peninsula with us or have to look at the military option. people are worried about the difficulty, the chaos that it may create today. the risk is real. what about

the figures that you cited as well as those that date from the period when i was in the clinton administration nsc that a war on the korean peninsula that could escalate from limited strikes would entail 1 million casualties and economic costs. can you use an inflator factor for two decades that passed since then. >> robert, people like donald trump, donald trump of 18 years ago clearly believe that we can just bomb the north korean nuclear capability out of existence without any real risk to the united states or possibly any anyone else p. that's clearly the person tim russert was confronting 18 years ago. had no information technically how would he do this. for our audience out there, what are our capacities right now tonight to actually take out the north korean nuclear capacity? >> they are substantial but when you're working on the national security council staff and the pros and cons memo, if one of your cons is these limited strikes could escalate into a war on the korean peninsula, that's a nontrivial con. we basically have three options to deal with the north korean challenge. bomb, n

were having during the clinton administration? jamie metzl -- administration?he threat is greater today than it was then. at that time, the united states was acting in a very strategic and measured way where there was the possibility of the use of force, and that was set in the larger context of a strategy that actually had a decent, very imperfect result. in this case, there is no discernible strategy. now, the president seems to be, according to administration officials, mouthing off, not part of any kind of strategic medications plan, and the world has already accommodated the fiery rhetoric that comes from north korea. that is what we expect. ofody expect a similar level rhetoric coming from the united states. in many ways, while the north korean nuclear missile program is destabilizing the world, the seeming irrationality and uncontrolled ability and unpredictability of the american destabilizedmore because the world is based on an exhibition of help united states will act. correctt strikes me -- me if i'm wrong that it seems the president appreciated the

jim baker right after the clinton administration signed the framework, op-ed, and called the clinton administration appeasement. 20 years ago. it has not p worked. unlessye you want to add a futue where north korea can threaten the united states with nuclear tipped missiles, you have to look either at one more diplomatic play and commits china to reunite the peninsula and constructive way to eliminate north korea, or you haveul to look at the military options. people are worried about the difficulty, chaos that might create today. the risk is real. what about the chaos went north korea launches missiles at the united states? >> jeanine: it is almost at -- kim jong-un is putting a time period. by the middle of august. what is interesting is that they came out that there is background negotiations that began with auto one beard the college students and home in a coma and died shortly after. that we will always consider negotiation, even at the point where we are now. what option does america have rightoe now? >> there is no option to negotiate with north korea. we try to for 25 years. i

billions of dollars and that was during the clinton administration electricity enough right and look for this did you really believe that that's what they were going to use a for tom come on seriously and calling his comments off the cuff or inaccurate because in one thousand nine hundred nine in a n.b.c. interview with tim russert he had stated that that was the strategy that he would take if you was president who's the editor talking about to the negotiation table. stuff yes i usually who's the he that you're talking about in one thousand a president trump i didn't make the remarks that he made yesterday were not off the cuff ok he had stated clearly and if anybody was actually paying attention to what donald trump has said over the years this is in line with what he saw all along you're acting like he's making these decisions as he's going along and no i get it and i know about his i know about his nine hundred ninety nine comments julio you know i get that but what i'm saying is the first time that we had a president make make and inappropriate remark you know say you know not in

the clintons administration facilitated north korea when it comes to this issues.a administration when it so called leading from behind. that just allow that space to be filled and they were taken for a ride. that is true, but that is history, and that is all changed. you look at what we have done in just the scans six months. the present has been in office. whether it is revitalizing nato, the liberation of mosul and our iraqi partners. domestic and national security successes with regard to illegal immigration.nd this is a result oriented presidency, and we will do the same with north korea.ed please understand, there is a whole pallet of options. it's not a question of peace or war, there are a lot of things that we can do, some of them less than overt. qac the fact that this present will not allow american lives or our partner's interests to be in danger. >> sean: we have seen and we have read, this is really scary. if they can reach, new york with their icbm, and i know we have the ability to take these out of the sky, but i would rather they never be lost. he

of international security studies having served on the national security council and the clinton administration. gordon is back with us. is author of nuclear showdown, more on that in just a moment. how big of a diplomatic victory was it this weekend? i'm sorry, robert, forgive me. of course you're not going to respond until i use your actual name. how big of a diplomatic victory was this and how normal are the comments from tillerson as opposed to going back two or three presidents? it. >> it was a significant accomplishment. it will cut off perhaps one-third of north korea's exports, about a billion dollars out of 3 billion. south korea has half a trillion dollars. it is also a state that is on the cusp of acquiring a nuclear arsenal. in three years could be half the size of great britain. it is about 100 nuclear weapons. they have been putting out mixed messages about the possibility of jump starting diplomacy. if that does begin the focus would be on capping or freezing the program which is estimated to have about 15 to 20 nuclear weapons. it wouldn't be a total roll back. >> we have heard

we have a surplus in the clinton administration the last time we had a surplus in the federal government we thought that would last forever and we thought we haven't seen it since because of the tax cuts that they are proposing today. we have seen an example of the bush tax cuts as well as the recent example of the work done by governor cantor cutting taxes in the name of fiscal discipline can lead to some very bad things. today's we stand here we are collecting revenue of 80% of our gross domestic product and spending almost 20% of gross domestic product. the proposed tax that would just add to that deficit and that's not something we should do but the final point i would make, colorado is so weary of these partisan approaches to legislation especially on things like health care and tax reform. my hope is the finance committee can come together in a bipartisan way and legislate in it during results for the american people. >> thanks michael. we are ready for your questions. >> what can you do to help compromise? >> senator alexander on health care on the health committee is going to mee

and yet in many ways the clinton administration felt the korash had left them no alteative. >> i d not government of the united states is responsible that they decided to kill themsives, and i'm sorry they killed their children. >> there were millions 067 americans who absolutely believed the government had murdered those people. >> this whole situation started with violence. it ended in violence that was not justified and not provoked. >> waco was proof this was an aggressive predatory federal government and now we have to fight back. like the minute men in 1776 to bear arms to defend their own rights. >> this is the michigan militia, a self-proclaimed fighting force of ordinary citizens preparing to defend themselves against the federal government. >> you will be receiving live fire over your heads this morning. >> there's also an armed mupublisha here in louisiana other states. >> gun shows became an extremely important venue. not just for selling guns, but they're selling real life nazi literature along with survivalist handbooks and those kinds of thing. >> so your prepared to fig

the clinton administration before them. they do have a point that changing it up, i mean, why not? >> look, they're right, to say to your point that nothing has worked in the past, that is true. we are at this point because nothing has worked. the question is, are we proceeding forward with a clear strategy? perhaps there is a clear strategy among trump's national security advisors, but the president going off the cuff and doing something that may or may not be part of that strategy is really alarming in a situation when you're talking about nuclear warfare here. >> the other theory is that maybe this is a theoryascribed to ipso facto, that the president was trying to send a signal to china, that you've got to step up here, if you don't, this is your backyard, this is your region, if this gets out of hand, it's going to be your problem. >> escalating tensions, the chinese saying this is getting out of hand, we should do x, y and z, if that would have been the strategy, the statement would have been a little bit more thought out. th all of this focus on white house chaos and whether

security studies at the wilson studies, having served on the national security council in the clinton administration gordon chang is back with us. edward, how big a diplomatic victory was this at the u.n. this weekend? i'm sorry, robert, forgive me. of course you're not going to respond until i use your actual name. how big a diplomatic victory was this? and a subset question, how normal are the comments from tillerson as opposed to and compared to u.s. policy going back two or three presidents? >> well, it's a significant accomplishment to achieve the u.n. sanctions resolution. it will cut off perhaps one-third of north korea's exports, $1 billion out of $3 billion. to put that into context, south korea has exports totalling almost $500 billion. so that points to the minuscule size of the north korean economy. but it's also a state that is on the cusp of acquiring a nuclear arsenal, which in three years could be half the size of great britain. about 100 nuclear weapons. so pyongyang and washington have been putting out mixed messages and the possibility of jump-starting diplomacy. if that diplomacy

why are they so -- why are they trying to keep this information private >> let's review the clinton administration wanted to hide monica lieu skinny visits. the obama administration haddi to hide so they release records and the trump administration is fighting to release records. the secret service spokesperson told fox 45 they don't comment on pending litigation ahead, on the final five, comedian michelle sometimes joins me to talk about some of tonight's headlines. back in a moment. here we go, welcome back, my first guest is a writer and catch at various venues around the area. michelle. thanks for joining us. >> thanks for having me. >> you're welcome any i'm. especially with those fantastic guitar picks. >> all you need is good fashion to get on the show. q. that's all it takes. these headlines. first off even white sue you prem isabellas are looking for love on appses or online or at least they were. okay queue pid says white supremest chris can't well has now been banned from the site. you might have seen him, he was subject to a advise news documentary about the charlottesville. he talked

the clinton administration, if ou remember, they sold china computer technology to get accurate and we see russia using that technology expand calls and one other comment i'd like to make this. all of this like the woman that called earlier concerning the this is in f scriptures, revelations and book prophets and mentions countries by old biblical names and these are coming to pass today. thank you very much. ost: ed, in idaho, line for republicans, ed, go ahead, open phones. caller: yes, good morning. immigration on thing and talk a little bit about north korea. be here hey need to five years before receiving welfare. as far as north korea and i may it, i came in a bit late, why don't we just tell tell the a, china, world, look, you can test all theyissiles you want, once leave air space, whatever the border is, we will shoot them down, we're not taking any chances. where tten to the point if they fire something off and long, we are looking at who knows what. say all you not-for-profit your that, if other than air space, we are shooting them down. alabama, line n for independents, den

everybody else who is advising the president and would they feel uncomfortable in a hillary clinton administration about that for conservatives who look at this administration and say this is not the one that i saw? >> i think that's a very good point. but it's also worth remembering that donald trump is not afraid to roll any of the people around them. he has rolled a lot of people. he rolls his own daughter on the paris climate deal. i just -- i think that the fact that he is -- that trump himself is the last trumpian in the white house is a very significant detail. and the lovers of steve bannon is significant but i don't think that it necessarily changes all of that. >> bret: on the outside, he has a huge mega phone in breitbart news. he apparently now is back to being the executive chairman and also led the afternoon editorial meeting today. it happened quickly. executive chairman of breitbart news friday afternoon, the tweet went out. he has a lot of information, a lot of inside scoop from that white house that now is at his fingertips. >> i think, perhaps even more significant than his retu

the clinton administration subsidized, i think, nuclear reactors for north korea. d out that. it sounds like you're a critical call, a little bit, of the trump administration. strong leaders set the tone, and do you believe the trump administration has set the right tone in dealing with radical islamic terror? >> well, i think the white house has, but strong leaders also have to get control of the government, and i don't think the national security apparatus yet reflects the kinds of policies that we need. it's not to say that the game is over yet, but we're running out of time. you know, really we didn't elect the hillary clinton administration, but we've got now many similarities and continuities with the obama administration policy that i think we could have expected under clinton. elizabeth: ambassador bolton, always good to see you. thank you so much for coming on the show. >>> getting back to barcelona, 13 now dead. over 100 injured in a terror attack. a van plows through a crowd of pedestrians. we will bring you the breaking news. we've got the very latest, d

. >> as you know, senator, diplomacy was tried for the 8 years of the bill clinton administration, for the 8 years of the george w. bush administration, for the 8 years of the barack obama administration. diplomacy clearly failed. north korea right now has intercontinental ballistic missiles and the latest u.s. intelligence assessment is they have miniaturized nuclear warheads that could be fitted on those intercontinental ballistic missiles, potentially hitting the mainland of the united states, l.a., maybe even chicago. so diplomacy over all of these years for decades clearly has failed. so why do you believe, if you do believe, that diplomacy might work now? >> i believe diplomacy can work if china will be much more engaged in enforcing sanctions against north korea. that requires the united states international community to work with china. if china turns the screws on north korea, north korea is going to have little option but to come to the bargaining table. there's a way of using diplomacy, but if you give up on diplomacy, then your only option is military, the consequences coul

better, looking back on not just the obama administration, but the bush administration, the clinton administration, first bush administration, what could we have done differently? >> well, this goes back more than 20 years to i believe it was 1994 when the clinton administration negotiated what is known as the agreed framework. something that essentially fell apart when the north koreans were caught cheating on it. look, we have always abided by the principle whether north korea or iran or any other potential nuclear adversary that it's trust but verify. and in these two cases, we usually put verify before the trust. because we knew these regimes would and could potentially be up to no good. but clearly in the case of north korea, we weren't able to dissuade them from moving forward with a nuclear program. and that is why especially in the second bush administration and certainly in the obama administration, there were a number of u.n. security council sanctions against thoek with the support of the permanent five members of the security council to put north korea in an economic vice. but a u.n. s

we sent a letter, the chairman of the judiciary committee, to the administration, to the department of justice asking if hilary clintond under oath in testimony before congress, they never responded to that. and so president trump and his current administration can follow through on things that were started a year ago because those answers have never been given to congress, never been given to the american people. that's where it starts. if you can't do that, then you have a hard time rooting out somebody who did something last month. >> by the way, does hilary clinton still have security clearance? there was a debate recently that she still has security clearance. what does that entail? her still having security clearance. is that true? do you know? >> it probably is true. as a former first lady and also as a former secretary of state, you want to be able to tap into that knowledge base. i can understand why they do that. what i don't understand are all the people that are around her, some of her senior most aides, why are they given those security clearances? how about the attorneys that she used who didn't have the

and yet in many ways the clinton administration felt that koresh had left them no alternative. >> theender there was david koresh. and i do not think the united states government is responsible for the fact that a bunch of fanatics decided to kill themselves. and i'm sorry that they skilled their children. >> it was proved later that the davidians lit that building on fire themselves. but there were literally millions of americans who absolutely believed that the government had murdered those people. >> this whole situation started with violence. it was not justified, not provoked when the atf weren't in there. and it ended in violence that was not justified and not provoked. >> waco was proof positive to many people that this was an aggressive, predatory federal government and now we have to fight back, like the minutemen in 1776 to bear arms to defend their own rights. >> this is the michigan militia, a self-proclaimed fighting force of ordinary citizens preparing to defend themselves against the federal government. >> you will be receiving live fire over your heads this morning. >>

the late 1990s before north korea had nuclear bombs, and he put some of the blame on the clinton administrationdo you agree there's fault there? >> look, if you go back over the history of negotiations with north korea, you'll see they went through the clinton administration, they went through the george w. bush administration, not so much during the obama administration because we kind of learned our lesson that those negotiations won't work unless there's overwhelming economic pressure on north korea. there were moments back in the late 1990s where we thought we had a deal, where an exchange for more economic support for north koreans, they would stop their nuclear program. that clearly did not work. but what did bring them to the table at the time was the -- some economic pressure that the united states was threatening to bring. we need to recreate that and even more so. and china is key here. i mean, i know everybody says it, but china cannot just, you know, say the right words. they can't just, you know, talk the talk. we've got to pressure them, and we've got to pressure them through the

i was talking to some people from the clinton administration. i served in the clinton administration from their defense department t in the mid-1990s. they faced a crisis like this. and these lib ram, thoughtful democrats looked at the situation and the risk of north korea getting nuclear weapons and they said, you know, we ought to go to war. we ought to g to war even if the casualties are several hundred thousand casualties in the korean peninsula. these were democrats in the '90s. so you have to recognize that there are a lot of people who are not screaming right-wing maniacs who recognize the threat of north korea with nuclear weapons, the ability of kim jong-un to push a button and eliminate a city in the united states is so grave that really dire measures may be e seasonial. >> chicago, denver, los angeles. we're not just talking about missiles in the ocean at this point. but i would say the question whether or not president trump understands that the economic sanctions won't do the trick. he seems to be trying to speak to china say, you s

. >> he served in the clinton administration, he contribute to work on climate change, and he was appointed science envoy one year ago by the - - he was - - >> i just do not see my science envoy work going in the direction that is consistent with the bad direction mr. trump is taking. >> when it comes to impeachment, he is not speaking as he would as a member of congress. he says trump has caused harm to the united states and cause harm to our standing abroad. amberly, fox news. >>> the park service has approved a permit for a group, patriot prayer, holding a controversial rally this saturday, despite stiff opposition from top leaders including the mayor, and a congresswoman. jana has more information tonight where the event is raising questions about free speech as opposed to public safety. >> they decided to approve this permit because they felt people may show up anyway, and law enforcement told them that they could maintain increased security if they issued the permit with tight restrictions. and today they show the zones that will be closed off. take a a look. so number one is going to

what gives you the greatest now, the clinton global administration. pres. clinton: building my foundation and trying to fund it. it got so big so fast that it took up all of my time, and i'm trying to make it more entrepreneurial. gets really big and can fund itself, i'm trying now but them all off our health initiatives gives medicine to poor people in the whole world, thanks to no bill, measure to pass the even though we didn't take any american money, it meant it the price of all medicine down everywhere. and the initiative which we don't have anymore in its incarnation, but i'm working on some specific things, help 400 million people with that. trouble. lot of you have to keep at it all the thought, at first, i oh, i don't want to do this. but i did. worka holic and didn't think i would be a gifted painter. [laughter] i admired him but for doing that and he will tell the best thing that can happen to you in politics is to consistently be interested in it. i'm very good at that. [laughter] pres. clinton: okay. me -- he made me a a ius because i look like

clinton administration released first report and it is now a presidential campaign. mr. bush delayed for years on eleasing updated version until suited and final version was released in may of 2018. he obama administration, trumpeted third version in 2014. but the government building website to tout the findings. steve in bisbee, arizona, republican line. ahead. caller: good morning. eferring to the caller who was saying about the propaganda was legal, that was amended, offered to the national defense basically on act to repeal the -- i believe they the month act of 19fright, psychological not be -- could hatever, you know, continuing within the united states. and i'm not sure whether that through or gone not, i believe that it was not, something that it wasn't actually fake news she was talking about, there was ndaa.ment to the the rest of the stuff, i think ou are doing a good job, thank you. host: tennessee, republican next.barbara, you are caller: good morning, how are you? host: i'm well, thank you. go ahead. caller: good. would like to tell the president to make a s

had tried to stop, mainly, nuclear weapons capability north korea, emerge not in the clinton administration but in the bush administration. it emerged just as the north koreans said it would if we abandon the agreed framework. we abandon the framework. they develop nuclear weapons and eventually ballistic missiles. the bush administration discovered option one, containment, after the discovered option two, negotiations and old ended up with containment. it is not clear to me the next administration, the obama administration, really, really pursued negotiations. they may have. they argued they did. seems like an awful lot of strategic patience to me, but option to was there to some degree. we now are in a situation which it is very difficult to tell what we're doing at least for me as an observer, and i try to watch this particular subject pretty closely but it seems like we're involving containment option one. we are talking about the possibility of option two, negotiations, negotiations can mean almost anything. they can be very narrowly focused on a particular thing like, for example, now

the clinton administration, real standoff at a moment where we thought this might happen. is we're really close to a critical red-line moment when they have the ability to deliver a nuclear weapon that could hit the united states, and we have in office the least competent, least experienced, most temperamentally unsuited person for this kind of a crisis who has ever held the job. >> and the message we've been getting today from the white house and from unnamed aides in the white house is, you can ignore the president. don't worry about what president trump says in situations like this. >> it's like the scene in the wizard of oz, you know. ignore the man behind the curtain, you know. but the problem is donald trump's uncle may have taught him about the power of nuclear weapons. what he didn't teach him about was about the power of tweets and words in crises like this because the things he makes up off the cuff, the flamboyant, ridiculous, dangerous statements he makes have a consequence in north korea and in china, and for children across america who are looking at this and