we know that the clinton foundation has disclosed most of their donors. we know that while secretary clinton was at the state department she -- the foundation raised millions of dollars from foreign sources including $500,000 from the country of algeria that was in contra vengs of the agreement she had with the state department not to raise foreign money in the clinton foundation. and then we know that since she left the department of state that they raised almost a quarter of a billion dollars, a third of the million-dollar donors to the foundation are foreign sources. and this raises a lot of concerns as to whether that money or any of it was solicited by her or anyone on her staff while she was secretary of state. >> well, the thing is that this staff that surrounded her while she was at state, they're also very relevant. because if they were not on the state.gov servers, we also don't have their e-mails. we have reason to believe there's been reporting this week that her top staffers were also on the clinton's e-mail server including a guy by the last

>> the good news, based on 20 years of data from more than 190 countries, collected by the clinton foundation and the gates foundation through the no ceilings project is that there has never been a better time in history to be born female. >> now, hillary went onto say there's unfinished business and much more must be done, but a new report by the liberal "new york times" questions donations made to the clinton foundation by foreign government with lousy women rights records. fox & friends first co-host ainsley is at the big board. >> a report by "new york times" says hillary finds herself under attack and the millions of dollars the clinton foundation received from the governments of some middle eastern countries is now casting doubt on hillary's record as an advocate of women. the countries listed include saudi arabia, oman, algeria qatar the united arab emirates and kuwait as well as brunei. all seven of these nations have poor gender gap rankings with saudi arabia ranking 130 out of 142 countries. and then brunei the only nation ranking in the top 100 is at 98. here's a closer look at how

while hillary clinton was representing america as our top diplomate the clinton foundation was receiving millions of foreign dollars. hillary and ba ba will tell you the two aren't related. according to my sources at the wall street journal secretary of state clinton arranged numerous sweetheart deals with foreign entities on behalf of the u.s. corporations that in itself is not necessarily a bad thing but what happened next is. again according to the wall street journal many of these companies followed their clinton brokered deals with don't nations to the clinton foundation. mrs. clinton lobbied the algerian government for ge to build power plants. they donated heavily to the clinton foundation. boeing dropped 900 grand into the foundation after secure a $3.7 billion deal with russia again, thanks to the lobbying efforts of clinton. 60 companies that lobbied the state department during her tenure dough fated more than $26 million to the dlin clinton foundation. the clinton's nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to them. they've always thought they're be

according to reuters, the clinton clinton's foundation stopped making thedisclosures in 2010. >>> trey gowdy losing patient to questions from congress about her e-mail scandal. gowdy wrote a letter to clinton's attorney. in it he formally requested she turn over her private e-mail server to a third party for a neutral investigation of its contents. congressman went onto say if she refuses to comply it could lead to house action to force her to do so. >>> the head of the bureau of alcohol tobacco, firearms and explosives atf, today announced he's resigning after four years at head of the agency. tom jones planning to step down by the end of the month. no official reason given for resignation but the agency has been under severe criticism for a proposed ban on one of the most popular bullets for the most popular sporting rifle in this country. the ar-15. the atf originally said they caved on the proposal after a backlash of 80,000 comments. a spokeswoman for the atf says the response was more like 300,000 comments. we're coming right back. >>> president obama's department of homeland sec

let's start with the clinton foundation. how big a problem for hillary clinton and her prospects?here are two problems for hillary. not necessarily the substance of it as troubling as it is but it might inspire and seems to already be doing so democratic primary challengers. people who smelled blood in the water will jump in and challenge her to the primary. lou: nobody will get in no matter what. he is committed to his quest. >> this gives him more confidence that hillary clinton is not inevitable. her second problem is while this is today's news she is old news. you saw the rasmussen poll which shows even democratic primary voters want fresh bases for 2016. lou: is that bad news for clinton and jeb bush? >> i think part of jeb bush's rationale for his candidac is hhath lstnae of somebody with a last name of clinton and when you see recent clinton scandals reminds the american people, republican, democrat or independent of all the previous democratic previous clinton scandals. what worries me is i actually as a republican want to run against hillary clinton. see is imploding. you

>>> plus, will foreign contributions to the clinton foundation be a problem for hillary clinton's presidentialampaign. we'll bring back our panel to discuss both. >>> what do you think? do you see a problem with the clinton foundation taking donations from other governments? let me know on facebook or twitter @foxnewssunday and use the #fns. the future of the market is never clear. but at t. rowe price we can help guide your retirement savings. our experience is one reason 100% of our retirement funds beat their 10-year lipper averages. so wherever your long-term goals take you we can help you feel confident. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. >>> now you can connect with "fox news sunday" on facebook and twitter. be sure to check out exclusive material online on facebook and share it with other fox fans. and tweet us @foxnewssunday using #fns. be part of the discussion and weigh in on the action every "fox news sunday."

let's start with the clinton foundation. how big a problem for hillary clinton and her prospects?are two problems for hillary. not necessarily the substance of it as troubling as it is but it might inspire and seems to already be doing so democratic primary challengers. people who smelled blood in the water will jump in and challenge her to the primary. lou: nobody will get in no matter what. he is committed to his quest. >> this gives him more confidence that hillary clinton is not inevitable. her second problem is while this is today's news she is old news. you saw the rasmussen poll which shows even democratic primary voters want fresh bases for 2016. lou: is that bad news for clinton and jeb bush? >> i think part of jeb bush's rationale for his candidacy is he has the last name of bush but most likely he will run against somebody with a last name of clinton and when you see recent clinton scandals reminds the american people, republican, democrat or independent of all the previous democratic previous clinton scandals. what worries me is i actually as a republican want to run a

while hillary clinton was representing america as our top diplomate the clinton foundation was receivingell you the two aren't related. according to my sources at the wall street journal secretary of state clinton arranged numerous sweetheart deals with foreign entities on behalf of the u.s. corporations that in itself is not necessarily a bad thing but what happened next is. again according to the wall street journal many of these companies followed their clinton brokered deals with don't nations to the clinton foundation. mrs. clinton lobbied the algerian government for ge to build power plants. they donated heavily to the clinton foundation. boeing dropped 900 grand into the foundation after secure a $3.7 billion deal with russia again, thanks to the lobbying efforts of clinton. 60 companies that lobbied the state department during her tenure dough fated more than $26 million to the dlin clinton foundation. the clinton's nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to them. they've always thought they're better than you and me and they never own up to anything

that do business with government, like big corporations, other countries do business with the clinton foundation and hillary clinton they will expect something in return. goldman sachs did not give money to the clinton foundation, they could have given it to the goldman sachs foundation by the way, because it is so charitable. it gave money to the clinton foundation because it wanted to kiss up to hillary. it wanted stuff in return. i will say this though. here is one thing about hillary clinton she shows no shame. she won't care -- >> that is a compliment right? >> won't matter to her. she will trudge on and fight on. rip people's heads off that get in her way. >> whoo. >> her defense is the foundation helps people. but this is so loaded with conflicts of interests this story has legs. i think it drags on, if she does win the nomination. melissa: yeah. amazon is one step closer to delivering your packages by drone. the faa giving the green light for amazon to test delivery drones but not without a few strings attached. the operators need a private license. can only go as high as 400 feet. has t

"wall street journal" reporting that while the clinton foundation agreed not to seek donations from foreignate. the foundation did raise millions of dollars from a foreigners with with connections to their home governments. okay, panel, your thoughts on this one. i mean this is -- we don't know if there were prescribes exchanged. was there money exchanged for hillary to not do certain things meaning not wag her finger publicly and shame some of these foreign governments that have awful records against women. >> we don't know. the sandals should be connected. that's why it's so important we get those servers. remember andrea, this is how the clintons roll. remember in the 90's when they were taking money from the indonesias and in that scandal. documents disappear before in the 1990s. it's important to remember that history. the chronology here is important. the clinton foundation says in 2009 we are not going to take money from governments but they take it from individuals after she leaves the secretary of state position, they take it from governments again. they take it from saudi arabia.

foundation at least 5$500,000. both british banks are under investigation. asked about it last week hillary clinton work. >> think people who want to support the foundation know full well what it is we stand for and what we're working on. >> but bill allison says the clinton foundation is a unique nonprofit that can't be separated from the u.s. system. >> if there's money coming in it will raise the question is the president going to be doing business for a foreign business foreign government, foreign individual, and you just cannot have that. the american system of government where the president's supposed to represent the american people. >> clinton foundation officials note that many major institutions have been under investigation but that should. stop them from giving. the big issue is when she was with the state department they could rely on the obama administration but they don't have that mechanism build into the campaign. >> thanks. let me bring in cbs political analyst john dickerson. good morning. >> good morning. the report shows foings be to draw that line. the goal is to keep foreign

did she do clinton foundation business?re so many things that she could have been doing that are now just absent from the public debate about this this number 55,000 emails that they produceside totally meaningless. immaterial. what if there was a pool of 200,000 emails and she produced a 5,000, then we are missing 150,000. what if she produced a thousand and there were 3,000 emails related to benghazi and 2,000 emails related to the clinton foundation? the 55,000 number was foolish and it was what we heard throughout the course of the earlier benghazi investigations. they would say t exhaustive. we have produced 300,000 pages worth of documents. who cares? it doesn't make any difference. >> john podesta, current aid sid blume that former aid john podesta said this in 2007 at the end of the day it looks like they the bush administration were trying to avoid the records act by operating official business off the official systems. are they going to have a big problem, juan, politically in the democratic party? as she gets rea

>> what the clinton foundation is does is entirely separate story.k times" did a pretty interesting series on this a couple years ago. i don't think you would find that any single person anywhere the most effective way to help the poor to give the money to the clinton foundation. not that they're good but there are other options rising the poor out of poverty. the key distinction with the clinton foundation the people that run it are in position of profound influence. one of them was in charge of american foreign policy it is very hard to believe that, for example, a key chinese businessman/member of the ruling government in china is giving money to the clinton foundation simply because he wants to raise the status of women in west africa? not possible to believe that. martha: all right. so been laid out here is understandable to raise questions but the -- >> right. martha: the next point that would need to be made is a tie between any sort of favorable treatment that was given to that country or any kind of policy that was initiated because that don

for one aspect of the clinton foundation this is the health access initiative. said they had published all of these names. well, the publishing ofdonors' names actually stopped in 2010. and the foundation itself has acknowledged that that is a, quote oversight and they're making up for it. so what is happening here is that there are these two investigations ongoing. one has to do with the ee-mails what was in there, what did she communicate not only on benghazi but other things. and then the funding of the clinton foundation while she was secretary of state with foreign governments contributing, obviously, to this fund. now there is a transparency issue with the listing of donors. some of these investigations, i think, will be intertwined with the e-mails and the foundations obviously crossing paths. >> and there were statements made that there were going to be very specific people or entities that wouldn't be donating but yet even if it isn't a government itself, it looks like there are a number of high profile people very deeply connected with some of these go

while she was secretary of state, the clinton charitable foundation stopped for the mostn part taking donations from foreign governments, and it says it will likely do the same again if she runs for president, but what about donations from th foreign companies linked to their governments? julianna goldman is looking into this. >> i'm very proud of the work the foundation does. i'm very proud of the hundreds of thousands of people who support the work of the foundation. >> reporter: since its founding, the clinton foundation hasor raised at least $42 million from foreign governments, and according to an analysis by cbs news, at least $170 million fromig foreign individuals,g organizations and companies covering a range of industries such as banking, energy and o shipping. >> we're now up to more than $3,100 commitments. >> reporter: like rilin enterprises, a chinese construction and trade l conglomerate that pledged $2 million to the clinton foundation in 2013. it's run by billionaire wang wenliang, a delegate to the chinese parliament and the firm is one of the contractors that built

are you bothered by these donations going to the clinton foundation? >> yes. there was a process set up. all of the other contributions were reviewed as i understand it. there was transparency. this was an unsisitied contribution, at a time when u.s. was duluthed for help for haiti. i guess it got lost in the system. i think it needs to be explained. i don't understand why the money wasn't returned or in some way, after the fact, approval wasn't sought. but i assume the foundation will explain it. i want to add, chris that wilson center accepts small amounts of border approval but we have transparency. >> that the question these millions of dollars -- maybe you are running for president. >> i am president of the women's center. >> here's the question. hillary clinton will run for president and the clinton foundation is continuing to accept millions of dollars in donations from countries. a lot of which, like algeria, like qatar, have problems with the united states, have human rights problems. aren't they in a way trying to buy influence from hillary clinton b

citizens united decision rible was, and then we find out that wa her foundation is taking this money.dati and again, i think the clinton is less a charity than a political group, basically, a super pac put in place to help hillary clinton politically. >> you've got about half a minute. >> perception is everything and >> that becomes the reality. everyth it is a big problem for hillary a clinton. and i think one thing we haven'tg we hav mentioned is that it cuts to the question of judgment, because t b all of thisec controversy could sy have been preempted had she not insisted -- i think she insisted on having her name as part of thispa foundation. >> one last point.>> one l in 1996, the clintons had a big problem with alleged foreign lege money coming intd o the dnc and their campaign operation from china, et cetera. this is going to remind everybody of that. >> and one second the clinton foundation has done a lot of linton good in the world. don >> they sure have. that must be said as well.e >> all right! i love the fact that there was ahere great final statement there.l segmen thank you, panel. see you next. up >>> u

journal" many of these companies followed their clinton broker deals with donations to the clinton foundationan government for ge to build power plants after a multi-billion dollar deal was done ge donated heavily to the clinton foundation. then there's boeing which dropped $900,000 into the foundation after securing a $3.7 billion deal with russia. again, thanks to lobbying from clinton. in fact, at least 60 companies lobbied the state department during her tenure donated more than $26 million to the clinton foundation. the clintons nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to them. they've always thought they were bigger and better than you and me. and they never own up to anything. wake up america, this smells fishy because it probably is a rottingñwhale. and this is it for us tonight. thanks for watching. i'm eric bolling in for bill o'reilly. please remember the spin stops here because we'r$sjjájjá$ @r(t&háhp &hc% for you. >>> breaking tonight new questions about the future of the 2016 white house race following a week of bombshell headlines involving the most

just looking at some of the top line figures from the no ceiling report from the clinton foundation and from the bill and melinda gates foundation they found more laws and countries protect women's rights but the laws often go unenforced. girls still face unique obstacles and discriminatory treatment. what what's the number one thing that you would like the see in the next 20 years of progress in women's rights? >> we have the maternal mortality rates which is very good. there's a mayor gap injor gap. we still have areas that we have to improve health care. evening though we have actually really cut maternal mortality rates but we could do much better. it's goal by goal. i think that one of the most encouraging things is that the united nations is going to develop another 15 years of goals. we know one thing from the last 20 years. when you develop goals things happen. you said that laws aren't enforced. that's true unfortunately. they now have an equality provision for girls and women. you'd be surprised. >> let's look at the figure in terms of a number of women that are participating

. >> what about the clinton foundation accepting money from foreign governments as hillary clinton preparesbid for president? that story broken by the "wall street journal" got a fair amount of attention. >> why is it that the clintons have a blind spot for money, they don't need the money from saudi arabia, they are doing just fine with the clinton foundation. >> it for more coverage when the "washington post" disclosed the clinton foundation took foreign government cash while she was secretary of state and broke the rules at one point. what about wasserman schultz worried obama would replace her and lining up supporter it would be antiwoman and anti semitic unconfirmed story in "politico" based on unnamed sources on something in 2013 that never happened. joe biden say he has great relationships with somali cab drivers in delaware and the "washington post" gave that four pinocchios but the media gives him a pass when he make as gaffe or gets too hands on women, joe being joe. and another v.a. president falsely claiming to is served in the special forces. that became a one-day story because

the clinton foundation accepted millions of dollars from middle eastern countries that are about as nice to women as frank underwood is to journalist. that issue came over -- came up over the weekend. >> there are more than 300,000 people who have country rated the work we have done over the years. and i believe we have done a lot more good than harm. and it believe this is a good thing so i am going to tell you who gave us the money and you can make your decision. >> make up your mind after that. >> clinton's tenure as secretary of state once seen as one of her latest assets, is it a liability? >> no doubt. she was at her most popular when she was secretary of state, way more than that any other time in her career. she has been sucked back into the political fray. we have not talked about the benghazi hearings that will go on and the subpoenas coming out of that. she got a lot of problems that are going into the nexus of the foundation and the state department. >> i do not think the issue of taking donations from middle eastern countries that are not so great with women are going to hur

when they can and we have this now we have disclosures about foreign governments giving to the clinton foundation. just seems to raise a whole lot of issues that people used to have and it looks like they're back in the news. >> well, look, i mean, bottom line she's a national figure, potential presidential candidate. people are going to shoot at her. i know her. we were the two senators for new york for eight years she's is one of the most finest, most upstanding, most hone rabble people. always trying to do the right things. cares deeply about the country and the middle class. this is politics. this is how it is. i don't think the public is going to pay much attention to this. they care much more about middle class people, who is going to get their wages going up again. who is going to create good paying jobs. these are the issues that matter to people despite the little storm we have in washington right now. >> schieffer: let me turn to the iran deal, you heard prime minister netanyahu this morning, you heard president obama should congress vote and approve a deal with iran if in fact one is r

yesterday in "the new york times" were they talked about the possibility of donations to the clinton family foundationm some countries in the middle east that are not particularly friendly to women and girls, but those donations would in some way undermine hillary clinton's main achievement at the secretary of state, that she was a champion for women and girls. what do you think about the possibility that it will undermine her in that way, and whether that is a potentially more significant problem which is to say we still have a lot of stories to cover about the donations to the foundation. there is still we do not know about that. talk about those interconnected issues. >> welcome back to i do not al: -- i do not place much credence in that at all. i think the overall story of contributions to the clinton foundation, including countries that hillary clinton was dealing with when she was secretary of state i think could be a very big deal. there is still a lot out there that we are not sure of. the clinton defense is foundations, churches, all of them take money from that governments. they do, but she

reuters is all over the clinton foundation for not disclosing some of it donors. the wall street journal is all over the clinton foundation for taking money from foreign donors. something tells me that if "the new york times" reported hillary clinton's middle name was not diane but benghazi, it would not make a difference. with all the clinton schedules past, present, and future, how big is a scandal have to be to impact hillary clinton's chances? campbell: it is not going to matter in the primary, because her people have nowhere else to go. core supporters talking about the e-mail scandal -- they can real ethical concerns about that. they never said, we are going to look at the republican. they do not even know who martin o'malley is. in a primary, it is irrelevant. in the general, i think it is background noise unless it is really huge and new. i think her bigger problem in the general and the bigger impression is, what is her vision for the country? she has yet to lay that out and talk about what her agenda is. i think that will dominate more. mark: there is a

>> i spoke to her and president clinton at the wednesday night gala at the great foundation that does lot of great works. wednesday night. >> so recently. various outlets are reporting that secretary clinton will do a press conference, or do some kind of media availability, over the next couple days in new york to address the e-mail controversy. i'm curious, what is the work she needs to get done at the press conference? how should she do it? >> i have no direct confirmation of that. ima friend, and i have no official status. let me clear that up. she simply has to answer the question, why do you do it with both official and private messages on one blackberry. i'm guessing her answer will be nothing nefarious, because the facts do not support that nefarious interpretation. it will be purely convenience easier to do it that way knowing it would have to be separated and turned over to the department at some point between personal and business. and that is exactly what happened. >> she is not new to this. it makes you wonder why for the sake of convenience, she knows that she has an obli

chinese construction company gave $2 million in 2013 to the now named bill, hillary and chelsea clinton foundation after she left state department but mitch mcconnell told fox it raises questions about whether clinton had a conflict and was raising money for the foundation during her time in office. while republicans in the house like chairman of the special benghazi committee are threatening to subpoena clinton's private e-mail server to determine if deleted e-mails were official business. >> the house as an institution may be forced to go to court to try to get access to that. >> reporter: clinton dodged a question from fox about whether she signed this document promising to account for all records in her position before leaving the state department. >> did you sign that statement. >> reporter: violating the terms of that document amounts to perjury though state department spokesperson would not disclose if clinton signed it. >> i understand why you are asking. we are looking for an answer. >> reporter: the clinton camp clarified that lawyers read every e-mail before deleted even though a fact s

. >> woodruff: one thing that came up today was a question about money the clinton foundation has taken from foreign countries who have treated women badly h and in some cases abused women, saudi arabia, secretary clinton said she and the foundation have been very open about what they do. where do you see that issue. >> i think that issue you're bringing up is a bigger issue than the email issue. one, i'm an independent so this isn't a republican witch hunt. secondly, the "new york times," no republican news room broke this about the e-mails. the idea that she walks around the world and claims i'm for women's empowerment and want women's rights and she is doing a lot, but simultaneous the countries with the worst records on women's rights are giving large contributions to a foundation she and her husband are a part of is a huge problem. >> woodruff: hilary rosen, one final comment. >> one quick thing. first of all, the reason we can even judge the countries is the total transparency of the clinton foundation unlike other foundations, they've listed their donors. secondly, saudi arabia i

donated a million dollars to the clinton foundation.ke code pink donating a million to cpac. it is a cover charge for something. what is the cover charge? i could use that money. i have more in common with chris ruddy than hillary and bill. why don't you give me a billion dollars. i have some serious debt. you get to go on the jet. >> i think there is a couple of reasons she is moving it up. having no formal organization and no formal spokesperson is starting to hurt them. she has no formal opponent. there are reporters who are assigned to cover the presidential election. they have a lot to cover on the republican side several different candidates. every day the ones that are covering the democrats have to turn in a story. without something proactive coming from the clinton camp the only thing for the reporters to dig into is the shady stuff that they are trying to uncover now. they want to formally have something that they can say here is our new policy for this and look at this shiny object over here. without any other democrats to co

she ignored the issue yesterday at a clinton foundation event. a number of voters think this controversy is a big deal. take a look at this. a new poll showing four in 10 voters saying she deliberately used the private email account to hide things from bought oversight. you think? meantime the chair of the select committee on benghazi, congressman trey gowdy, wants clinton to turn over her server to an independent investigator. if she refuses he will ask her to testify. on "the kelly file" gowdy making clear what emails he is looking for and why they are not clintons to keep. >> i have no interest in emails about bridesmaids dresses or wedding cakes. none of my business, i don't want them. but public records are all of our business and that subset that deals with benghazi is particularly our committee's business. >> i kind of want to know if they were considering a floral and peach combination? don't you, tony? i'm just kidding. we attend ad number of these crisis press conferences before. this has taken a number of days to happen. a lot of peopl

and there are republican criticisms that the money for the clinton foundation went not only for wonderful good things. but also for some things that were essentially keeping the clintons going as an operation. will work it's way out the biggest speech is the one that tells us why she is running for president, what she wants to do. end of story. >> let's be cheer the clinton foundation is a global foundation. they take money from organization corporations, governments, individuals, from all over the world because of the kinds of things that they are doing to make millions of people's lives better. give back the money, i don't think it's going to happen. if bush becomes nominee should the bush library give back money that kuwait has given them? saudi arabia has given the bush library? >> not his library. >> not her foundation. >> dickerson: and hillary clinton's brothers comparison to roger clinton. >> republicans will have to -- i feel like john boehner here. >> don't make me do my boehner impersonation. >> the big hang over this is the american public looks at this they see the clinton dr

so forget that she runs the clinton foundation.- that she is under investigation by the benghazi select committee and everything else. when she took that office she knew better than anybody when you work in the governmen private. and everything has to be secure and you have to be accountability. and she made the decision to make her emails as insecure as possible and, therefore, her business as state department secretary. this part alone ais astonishing. let alone she has been a presidential candidate since 2005. and in 2009 when she took this job she was leaving every single door open for that job. >> steve how do we know that there aren't clinton foundation emails where she is talking to foreign governments about donations for the clinton foundation and really she is secretary of state at the time? that would seem to be a bank shot. >> we know that because the state department has assured us that's not the case that she has turned over the relevant emails and everyone should butt out. what i find is astonishing relying on sydney

this also by the way, merges with a controversy over the clinton foundation and the fact that the clinton foundation took dollars from foreign governments like the saudis. so do those kinds of emails, is that personal or is that private? you know or is it public record? you know if she's talking about the wedding, does she -- you know, what if she's talking to somebody that's a guest at a wedding about something that's a public nature? and again it goes back to the trust me thing and it plays into the narrative and this is important of the whole white water years in the 1990's when the law bills, mysteriously showed up in the white house and the clintons says trust me. jon: i'm being a little facetious here but i could see where she writes something to bill like could you pick up a carton of milk and oh by the way, what should i do about the benghazi hearings and all of a sudden, that becomes the personal email. >> what about the foundation stuff? is that completely personal? that played directly in a role as secretary of state. i think the interesting aspect here is one of the benefits s

they give money to the clinton foundation in return for something. even if it's just to buy a hearing in washington. for example the deal between general electric and i think it was the algerian government. so they're not giving money because the saudis are the most charitable people on the planet. again there's some -- this is the clintons being clintons. they did this for eight years in the 1990s, and this particular leopard does not change her spots. and it boils down to a consistent position. the rules are for little people. no republicans need be involved in these scandals. it was a democrat ambassador to kenya that hillary clinton's state department fired because he used private e-mail. it was the cia director of a democrat administration, general petraeus, who pleaded guilty to a crime for having supposedly classified material at his home. she has by her own admission all the classified material from her time as secretary of state went to this private e-mail address. why is it that if you're a low-level democrat ambassador, you have to be -- y

one could imagine that there might be clinton foundation emails from governments that maybe didn't crosshe bin that was state department business. >> that's because she is the one, the only one who decides what the government business and what is private. and do you really want to trust her judgment? no one has asked her yet whether in the criteria that her staff used before destroying the 30,000 emails they decided that the communications about the clinton foundation and the contributions of other governments was a private or public issue. i suspect it was all deleted. but we won't know. she needs to be asked and the a.p. is now suing her. suing the state department. that and the congressional committees are going to force ultimately revelations. >> i have got to go. down the road political problem for her? >> ongoing for a long time. >> yes, i agree with that. >> and substantive. >> that's it for the panel. stay tuned for some surprising moments from yesterday's press conference you may have missed. do you want to know how hard it can be to breathe with copd? it can feel like this. cop

the clinton foundation. stuart: glad you were on the set when the news broke. thank you very much. and will stay on hillary. the big story of the day and will remain so. wall street journal editorial board member mary kissel is with us. i am going to quote from the last paragraph of your editorial in today's wall street journal democrats are nervous, they convince themselves little mrs. clinton can save them from the republicans, they might want to delete that assumption and think again. maria: she raised more questions than she answered yesterday, trey goudy is going to try to get her to testify in front of the house so this scandal has only gotten bigger. i think the biggest problem for democrats set aside these multiple scandals simply the arrogance that was on display yesterday. we already have the most arrogant commander-in-chief we have had in our modern history. this is not the type of person the american electorate rich large wants to see repeated in the white house. stuart: your editorial, not you b