certain things or perhaps there is nothing seriously afoot with all this money flowing to the clinton foundation or in the form of speaking. but they have been playing on the international stage iv a long time. a lot of people but contributed and paper speeches by bill clinton they are not an insurance company in the u.k.. they are companies that operate in places like nigeria, the congo and some of these individuals have left a individuals have let's say sketchy histories as it relates to issues involving financial crimes. the clintons are not shocked that there's gambling going on. they knew exactly what was going on and i think that's troubling that they don't seem to have a filter that prevents them from taking money from some pretty sketchy characters. >> host: one of these foreign governments or foreign leaders give money directly to their own countries where it's needed rather than the clinton foundation? >> that's a great question peter. the late christopher hitchens the great liberal reader asked the same question. when you have these oligarchs in third countries like africa. why are th

and a major donor to the clinton foundation. all of these assets are accumulated, all of this money is flowing to the clinton foundation and then the russian government arrives and says we want to buy uranium because it's had a long interest in cornering the uranium market. this is a personal desire laughing at him and he authorizes the release of the funds to buy this uranium company. in order for russia to acquire what amounts to 20% or 25% of all of the uranium assets in the united states it requires federal government approval. there is a process the committee on foreign investment in the united states that requires a number of government agencies including the state department to sign off on this deal. they do sign off on the deal. what i think is troubling about terri clinton in the midst of all of this is that no other government agency that approves this is headed by somebody that's received $145 million to the foundation from nine individuals connected with this firm. the second thing that is troubling is that hillary c

when i first contacted both the clinton foundation, the clinton spokesman, and mr. such meeting took place. when we said, well, we already talked to him and told us all about the meeting has a picture of bill and him at the helm and it was probably acknowledged on his wall. and then they acknowledged, yes, the meeting had taken place. >> so what happened to the company that benefited from the deal in kazakhstan? after a merger it became a uranium giant called uranium 1. and then the russians bought it. >> uranium 1 was important. in 2008 and 2009 they attracted the russian government. they would acquire 50% of projected uranium output in 2015. >> in other words russia now controls what was projected to be up to half of america's uranium. >> does secretary clinton factor into this? >> for that deal to go through, it needs federal government approval and one of the people that has to approve that deal is secretary clinton. >> who as senator clinton was vigorously opposed to these buys from countries into the u.s. >> that's a great point, bret. remember the dubai ports

. >>> new questions raised about a connection between donations to the clinton foundation and arm sales approved by hillary clinton's state department. one week after being driven out by isil fighters, iraq security forces launched a new operation to try and take aback the strategic city of ramadi. even if the iraqis succeed, it will take years to dislodge the group completely. that's why the recriminations from iraq's main military backers in washington are piling up. over the weekend secretary of defense ashton carter all but blasted iraqi military units for losing ramadi in the first place. he accused them of showing, quote, no will to fight. that's despite the billions washington has spent on advisers and weapons and other military aid since last summer to roll back isil's gains in iraq. in fact, the return on the entire two and a half trillion dollar u.s. investment in iraq since 2003 looks awfully slim these days. isil, which hardly existed before the u.s. decided to invade the country, still controls huge swaths of territory in northern and western iraq. makes matters worse isil

>> well, the clinton foundation, supporters would say, nothing out of the ordinary. ld say that the foundation has connections with so many entities around globe that, well, if there's some corruption problem, that's not really -- don't touch the foundation. on the other hand, what we know now is this has to do with the awarding of the world cup. remember in 2010 bill clinton was on part of the team trying to bring the world cup to the united states. afterwards the winning team for 2022, the winning country, qatar. basically, the government gave at least a million, maybe as much as five million to the clinton foundation -- david: so let me just stop you there, was that kind of like a consolation prize? sorry, bill, we took the world cup, but, here, we're going to give you a couple of million? >> we don't know. and the olympic committee, the committee -- excuse me, the world cup committee, trying to get the tournament for qatar tar, gave the clinton foundation a ton of money. and fifa gave the foundation a ton of money. so you have to wonder as with so many of these cl

the clinton foundation is more like a management consulting firm working in the area of charity. this is the reason why, for example, a charity navigator won't rate the clinton fundation because of what they call their unique business model and they have been dinged by the better business bureau because they lack internal control retlated to finance. >> eugene in hickory, kentucky. go ahead. >> caller: i am not a republican, democratic libertarian, i am an american. and i don't believe in being affiliated with a party. my question is if you or i or any other average american were brought up or the question by congress and asked to give over information and we destroyed it would we be walking the streets or would we be behind bars? our congress gives them 30 days. the way i see it, 30 days given to destroy everything. and that is what they did. if we did that, they would come into our home and they would not -- >> all right. eugene eugene i think we got the point. >> guest: you are referring to the e-mail problems. hilary clinton was on the watergate committee as a junior lawyer an

the clinton administration, for the clinton foundation are entitled to. bill clinton, all right? he is the big boy. is he in charge. now, his travel is paid for by the foundation if he is going on charitable explore explore -- exploration right? >> that's right. bill is on the board of directors not a officer. they have chose not to compensate the board members. none of the board members north bill, not chelsea who is also on the board get compensated when hillary was on the board she didn't get compensated either. however, they are entitled to have their travel, reasonable travel expenses reimbursed. >> okay. now reasonable is not a private jet. right? >> well, in most cases and for most organizations a private jet would not be reasonable. however, in the case of bill clinton, a former president who traveled with secret service, the case of hillary clinton, former secretary of state, they do have some extra security concerns. if you look at the irs form 990 that the foundation filed. they note this. they say former president bill clinton and hillary clin

what you have of the clinton foundation and bill clinton's speechmaking is a conduit for foreign businesses, foreign governments, and foreign financiers around those rules. and to say they are tossing tens of millions and sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars of the clintons, but will have no effect strikes me as absurd. especially if you're the same person concerned about domestic more -- money in politics here it. in one case you're dealing with u.s. citizens and the other case you're dealing with citizens who should have no role in influencing our leaders. host: michael from georgia. caller: good morning. this is really funny listening to this republican powwow. for the next year we're going up to listen to clowns like this here it i have worked in the government. there is no way publicans working in the state department because there are republicans working in the state department would sit back and allow hillary clinton -- president clinton to be bought off. this guy is going out a bunch of accusations and this and that. and he has no proof. c-span should be a ashamed for having hi

the clinton foundation. watch this. >> this is a direct breach of an agreement they signed with the white house. >> that is an issue for them but it's not a criminal -- it's nothing for a criminal investigation. this deal approved by a board of the government that's chaired by the secretary of treasury. >> correct. >> not the secretary of state. >> right. >> eight other agencies on board. secretary of state, homeland security commerce defense. >> right. >> signed 5u6 on it. and even though it's one of nine agencies to sign off over it that's no evidence that hillary clinton got directly involved in this decision. the secretary of state on the committee said she never intervened on any issue at all. >> i think that deserves further scrutiny. >> based on what? >> i think based on her track record. >> do you have any evidence she intervened in this issue? >> a're confirming what i reported. people can look at the fact -- >> they haven't confirmed any evidence of any crime. >> did abc really investigate? did ste

new reports claiming that the clinton foundation attempted to pressure the group to take them off the list. joining me ken berger, who was ceo of charity navigator when the decision to put the foundation on the watch list was made. ken, welcome back to the show. we know you very well. we know your organization very well. remind our viewers what this watch list is and how you evaluate charity. >> the watch list is something we utilize when there have been concerns raised about what is going on in the charity's operations. something that we think is so serious that we should make donors aware of it because it may affect their decision in terms of whether or not they are going to support an organization. gerri: when you took a look at the clinton foundation i know you don't do gumshoe investigation, but when you took a look at it, what did you find? >> when it comes to the watch list we based it upon media reports. we look what is coming in from different reputable media outlets. when we saw entries in the "washington post," "politico," market watch, all expressing concerns about things

this morning he apologizing again for donating to bill and hillary clinton's charitable foundation. what his colleagues and his rivals are wondering is whether that's going to be enough. let me back up and tell you the story from the beginning. stephanopoulos was one of bill clinton's closest aides in the '90s, and pretty much ever since then he has been distancing himself from those roots. he has turned into one of the biggest stars of television news cohost of america's most-watched morning show, skilled political interview and abc's chief news anchor. well now it turns out that abc's chief news anchor gave $75,000 to the clinton foundation. this might sound like a wonderful act of charity. the man makes millions of dollars a year and donates a lot of it. but stephanopoulos has been reporting on the foundation without telling viewers or his bosses about the donations. that is a journalistic lapse. and let's keep this in mind. the clinton foundation is no ordinary charity. it is one of a kind. created by former president bill clinton that expanded to include potential future preside

the clinton foundation is acknowledging mill

certain things, or perhaps there is nothing seriously afoot with all the money flowing to the clinton foundationor to them as speaking fees. but they have been players on the international stage a long time. a lot of the people who pay for speeches by bill clinton they are not an insurance company in the u.k. or a media company in germany. these are companies that operate in places like nigeria, south america, and some of these individuals have sketchy histories as it relates to issues involving financial crime. i think the clintons are not ones who would be shocked that there is gambling going on as it was set in the film. they know exactly what is going on. that is what it is -- that is what is troubling, that they do not seem to have a filter that prevents them from taking money from sketchy characters. host: why don't some of these foreign governments or leaders give money directly to their own countries where it is needed rather than the clinton foundation? guest: that is a great question. christopher hitchens, a liberal writer, asked that very question and asked why is it you have these ol

. >>> truth serum segment tonight as controversy and confusion continue to swirl around the clinton foundatione some statements that deserve analysis. here is one of them. >> i give 10% of my revenue off the top every year to the foundation. and hillary in the year she was there gave 17. over the last 15 years i have taken almost no capital gains and i you give. >> to pay -- >> -- to pay my bills. >> joining us from washington shannon bream here in the studio eric shawn both our fox news correspondents. what is the truth about the capital gains statement. >> first of all we can't prove one thing that he said there that he gives 15% and 15% because it's not public. if you go to their 990 forms to show hot contributors are, the names are blacked out. that's by law. 9 people gave $70 million. we don't know. >> wow nine individuals gave $70 million to the clintons but they block them out so you you don't know who they are unless they publicly say who did it. >> that's correct. and it's legal in terms of the capital gains it depends on what the definition of is. he says almost no. that's not true.

clinton foundation raises actually goes to charity work. ed, to you, what do you make of the way they treated these charity foundation executives. >> they want ad special deal. the charity navigator has a policy of once you're on our watch list, because questions have been raised about the legitimacy of how you're acting as a charity you're on there for sir months. well the clintons didn't want to be there on for six months. they didn't want to be on at all. they were pressuring the charity to drop them from being on the watch list. the charity wouldn't do it. they wanted to get off the watch list without answering all of the questions raised by stories in the press about how the foundation was operating with russia and uranium and haiti and algeria and all these other countries. they didn't want to answer. they wanted to get off the list. i think it speaks well for charity navigator to say, when they said no. gerri: so so, liz we know these folks because we've had them on the show a million times. they're the most respected evaluator of cha

. >> yet the controversy over the clinton foundation keep on coming. today mr. clinton is in morocco at a an event sponsored by an alleged human rights violeter and the kennedys have involved. we'll have a factor investigation. >> shut it down! >> shades of the '60s, students at the university of california berkeley trying to strong arm ear other students into not attending classes. >> what would you like written on your tombstone? >> also did you know your humble correspondent, me has a pretty wild work resume? caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. factor begins right now. i'm a bill owe reallilye rilwe reallyewe riley. thanks for watching. the debate continues to rage over whether an anti-muslim group was justified in insulting every muslim on the planet. two jihadis were killed by a brave police officer in garland, texas on sunday after they tried to storm a conference held by the american freedom defense initiative. the dead men deserved what they got. but the incident was i go noted by contest featuring cartoons of the prophet muhammad. any depic

. >>> the clinton foundation funding questions have continued.t of fox's "media buzz," howard kurtz on the questions of objectivity that george stephanopoulos is facing. >> reporter: george stephanopoulos failed to disclose $75,000 to the clinton foundation. >> they were a matter of record but i should have made additional disclosures on air when we covered this and i believe that's a mistake. i should have gone the extra mile to avoid the appearance of a conflict. i apologize to all of you for failing to do that. >> reporter: the issue is especially sensitive because of the abc anchor's background as an operative and white house aide for bill and hillary clinton. even as he aggressively interviewed the author of "clinton cash". >> the clinton foundation says he haven't provided a shred of evidence. >> and talked about it on "the daily show." >> it's got to shape the thinking. >> right. >> reporter: some republicans were quick to call him bias. >> i think his bigger problem is his association with the clintons and given mrs. clinton's prominent r

we'll be joined by the man who first exposed the clinton foundation's questionable dealings, "clinton cash" author peter schweizer joins us in just moments. we're coming right back. >>> coming up becoming increasingly belligerent and provocative. a potential flashpoint in the strait of hormuz. >>> and this woman, some say she deserves to be titled mother of the year for what she did in the midst of baltimore riots. her story and more coming right up. doug. you've been staring at that for awhile, huh? listen, td ameritrade has former floor traders to help walk you through that complex trade. so you'll be confident enough to do what you want. i'll pull up their number. blammo. let's get those guys on the horn. oooo looks like it is time to upgrade your phone, douglass. for all the confidence you need. td ameritrade. you got this. >>> breaking news saudi arabia has arrested 93 terrorists with islamic state ties. they had planned a series of attacks including one targeting the u.s. embassy in riyadh. the timing of the foiled plot coincides with a decision by u.s. officials to halt all con

still more revelations tonight, a possible impropriety by hillary clinton and her family's charitable foundation it even appears a warning from her husband, former president bill clinton may have been ignored. ed henry explains. >> after hillary clinton promised to restoren politics new allegations emerged that two different offshoots to the clinton foundation accepted tens of millions of dollars in foreign donations, never disclosed to the public. >> if your spouse is the secretary of state people overseas in particular want to influence you and you can't influence american politics if you're overseas with campaign contributions you've got to find other ways. >> the remarkable part is that criticism was echoed nearly word-for-word three years ago by a surprising source former president bill clinton. >> and it if your wife is secretary of state and you get sponsors in another country, they may be doing it just because they believe in it but it opens up too many questions of conflicts of interest so we suspended those. >> reporter: he was referring to a specific foundation event in hong kong that

we'll be joined by the man who first exposed the clinton foundation's questionable dealings, "clinton cash" author peter schweizer joins us in just moments. we're coming right back. >>> coming up iran becoming increasingly belligerent and provocative. a potential flashpoint in the strait of hormuz. >>> and this woman, some say she deserves to be titled mother of the year for what she did in the midst of baltimore riots. her story and more coming right up. when cigarette cravings hit, all i can think about is getting relief. nicorette mini starts to relieve sudden cravings fast. anytime. anywhere. i never know when i'll need relief. that's why i choose nicorette mini. >>> breaking news saudi arabia has arrested 93 terrorists with islamic state ties. they had planned a series of attacks including one targeting the u.s. embassy in riyadh. the timing of the foiled plot coincides with a decision by u.s. officials to halt all consular services at the embassy in mid march. iranian forces today fired shots and boarded a commercial container ship in the strait of hormuz. the ship, a marshall i

tonight, the clinton foundation reveals millions of dollars in undisclosed payments. he state department releases the first wave of hillary's emails. but the clinton drama far from over. also, americans hitting the road this holiday weekend in record numbers. but will a rise in gas prices ruin your summer plans? and are we creating a generation of moochers? why more and more millennials will hit up the bank of mom and dad. ♪ we begin tonight with new clinton cash coming to

melissa: that is the money that fifa itself gave to the clinton foundation. is it interesting that we're finding all these names being looked into now also gave money to the clintons? >> nodded also pricing. everything is connected. this is the beginning. this is not the end. they busted these guys at a hotel. they seize electronic data and a whole stream of documents fair. you will also have a race to the courthouse to try to flip and do a deal to incriminate others. >> it also shows that the clinton foundation was really nothing more than a lobbying organization. they can point to things they have done around the world but the big money came from organizations and governments who thought the clintons themselves could do this. that is why they were giving money. >> that is a great point. why would fifa be giving money to the clintons? is it because they want to provide skied oh netting? all right. a tale of two luxury brands. to pick staff movers today. peter: is the best performer in the s&p 500. the other is the worst performer. first, tiffany. came out wit

the clinton foundation, what is wrong with the clinton foundation?t does a lot of good for people around the world. there is no conflict there. i feel like he should be able to be one of the moderators of the debate. -- in the so-called liberal commentator. host: thank you. we leave it there. here has -- here is how "usa today" plays it. -- wayne in richmond, virginia. caller: i have been watching you all my life, practically. i am 55 years old. i learned a lot from c-span. i want to tell you something. conflict of interest is when the police investigate themselves. that is a conflict of interest. stephanopoulos, fox news, they all contribute -- i think this is a ridiculous subject. we know how politicized our voting is. we also know that the supreme court said companies are human beings. everything is out of balance. i do not think it is a conflict of interest. reporters give money. foxnews, you know what they do and "the grudge report," and rush limbaugh. i always know what my enemies are doing. in virginia, i have the fight of my life. police inve

. >>> and the clinton foundation's pay to play scandal keeps growing. orsening it seems each passing day. this time, a czech supermodel paid out half million dollars to get former president clinton to accept a lifetime achievement award. a supermodel, a half million dollars and bubba. the clinton foundation scandal gets better and better. ed rollins among our guests tonight. after the united states will not be responsible for iraq's security the islamic state claimed responsibility for bombings at two hotels in baghdad. and in russia vladimir putin taking advantage of mr. obama's flexibility. conducting surprise military exercises and the sea as nato is holding its own military exercises. >>> joining us to discuss the consequences to the president's decisions former army advice chief of staff fox news military analyst general jack keane general good to have you here. it seems an appropriate question tonight. has the president simply decided that every president over the last half century has been wrong on cuba wrong on europe and russia and china? >> wha

the clinton foundation is a pass through that spends a large amount of its money to support clinton and i would go that far. he wasn't making up a story. it's not good. really on two fronts and i don't know if you played the full apology or not but he didn't address the other one at all. first of all, i think it was foolish to contribute to the clinton foundation for exactly the reason you see here. obviously, he worked for the clintons, it looks like he still has ties to the clintons and for a fellow who is supposed to be covering politics fairly and even handedly it raises question. the big engineer mistake is the failure to disclose. whatever you do, whatever relationships you have and a lot of us do, particularly if you've been around washington or politics for some period of time, a huge help is if you disclose to it the viewers, and for him to have an interview as he did with peter schweizer the author of the book, quite an extensive interview and talking about the foundation and taking the other side you haven't pointed out anything that the foundation did wrong and not to disclo

what you have of the clinton foundation and bill clinton's speechmaking is a conduit for foreign businessesreign governments, and foreign financiers around those rules. and to say they are tossing tens of millions and sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars of the clintons, but will have no effect strikes me as absurd. especially if you're the same person concerned about domestic more -- money in politics here it. in one case you're dealing with u.s. citizens and the other case you're dealing with citizens who should have no role in influencing our leaders. host: michael from georgia. caller: good morning. this is really funny listening to this republican powwow. for the next year we're going up to listen to clowns like this here it i have worked in the government. there is no way publicans working in the state department because there are republicans working in the state department would sit back and allow hillary clinton -- president clinton to be bought off. this guy is going out a bunch of accusations and this and that. and he has no proof. c-span should be a ashamed for having him on

is he a close friend to bill and hillary clinton who son the payroll of the clinton foundation when mrsinton was secretary of state. apparently mr. blumenthal had private business interests in libya at the same time he was emailing mrs. clinton about policy there. it's all kind of murky but there is no question that sydney blumenthal a long with a number of other individuals is a very controversial person so much so the obama administration for bade hillary clinton to hire him to work in the state department. with us is the president of the accountability project and andrea tantaros the host of outnumbered. do you know why they for bade her from hiring him? >> yes. they know his past. is he not a new hire or new friend of the clintons. he is a point man bill, for the clintons. he is their hench man. they sent him out to smear monica lewenski back in the clinton scandal. he has been around since the days of white water. >> who else did he smear. >> he smeared a the love people. he smeared president obama for the clintons. >> there you go, barack obama nomiki ordered that he not be hired

she said these questions about the clinton foundation and other personal matters for both clintons have to be pressed by the media but by the eventual republican nominee. listen. >> i think the republicans need a nominee who will ask these questions. i hope the media will continue asking these questions. i appreciate very much the opportunity to answer your questions. i hope you'll continue to be as aggressive with mrs. clinton. but, yes, i think we need a nominee who will ask her these questions about transparency and about track record. >> as to your question about whether or not she's getting under the clinton skin, i know that officially the campaign says they're not paying attention to some of this, what they consider to be noise. i did note on the sidewalk as i asked a couple questions, there were a couple of clinton campaign staffers outside at least tracking and keeping up with what she said. >> thanks. here with reaction i don't think there's been a day that's gone by where something new doesn't develop for the clintons. >> right. >> she's not viewed as honest and trust worthy.

coming up sending the tax man after the clinton foundation. what some lawmakers are asking it's part adrenaline and part adventure. it's part geek and part chic. it's part relaxation and part exhilaration. it's part sports car and part suv. and the best part? the 2015 gla. it's 100% mercedes-benz. i've smoked a lot and quit a lot but ended up nowhere. now i use this. the nicoderm cq patch, with unique extended release technology helps prevent the urge to smoke all day. i want this time to be my last time. that's why i choose nicoderm cq. al starts in just ten minutes. >>> new revelations from the clinton foundation. turns out it received up to an additional $26 million from speeches made by the clintons that were not previously disclosed. u oh. and now a group of republicans asking the irs to investigate and drop the charity's tax exempt status. they say it quote, a cloak of philanthropy to facilitate transactions between foreign groups when hillary was secretary of state and, wayne, you agree. >> it's a laughable thing. here you've got the ir

live from the nation's capital starts in just ten minutes. >>> new revelations from the clinton foundation. turns out it received up to an additional $26 million from speeches made by the clintons that were not previously disclosed. u oh. and now a group of republicans asking the irs to investigate and drop the charity's tax exempt status. they say it hid behind quote, a cloak of philanthropy to facilitate transactions between foreign groups when hillary was secretary of state and, wayne, you agree. >> it's a laughable thing. here you've got the irs, a corrupt agency of the united states government who's being investigated on their own, investigating the clintons a 501 c-3 allegedly tax exempt which isn't at all. the whole thing is a mess. and you can't have an arm of the federal government who is absolutely under water and, and, and, and, doesn't know what they're doing, investigating somebody else who doesn't know what they're doing. >> i would suggest both what say you, john? >> well i mean eric all charity tax exemptions. it's not like it's the government's job to choose who's a charit

hillary clinton is fundraising on serious allegations about the clinton foundation.ere's more. will this funding scandal sway potential 2016 donors? more money. more fox news political insiders. remember we love it when you chime in. i'm reading some of your messages and we'll read your tweets to put on facebook as well. stay with us. >>> new concerns for potential donors turning away from hillary clinton in the wake of major allegations for questionable funding practices. the former secretary of state attended fund-raisers this week. the fox news political insiders are back. actually pat, i'm going to start with you. we're getting information that take as look back but much closer at some of the finances. what's going on? >> well there's a report tonight that the taneo company, which is a -- the chief deputy chief of staff while she worked for the state department -- this is an exemption to the law i never understood and remember her, and this is a family internal operation. the long and the short of it is she went on a trip at the end of her last for secretary of s

why are they putting it in the clinton foundation? what do these individuals and institutions want in exchange? there's certain evidence that they got favorable action from hillary clinton. why are you taking money from these people? they won't answer that question. gerri: we made a simple judgment of the clinton foundation. we look at charities and how well they spend their money. when we dug into that, we found there's a puny amount of money going to the actual good works that the former president likes to talk about. helping people in third world countries. keeping people from starving. aids. very little goes to help people in poverty of that money. >> you're right, gerri. if you look at the organizations that evaluate charities like charity navigator go online, they rate lots of charities. they won't rate the clinton foundation because they say it has a, quote, unquote unique business model. or you look at the better business bureau which -- them substantially. they have all sorts of internal control problems at this foundation. ch

he failed to disclose contributions to the clinton foundation.d why abc did not conduct an investigation or punish stephanopolous in anyway reports surfaced today saying the anchor has a seven-year $105 million contract. a pretty big investment to protect. does that answer some questions about why there's been no punishment at all? >> well if the story's true and suppose he was only making half that, that's still a pretty big investment. i was talking to howard kurtz about this a few minutes ago. he suggested the term for stephanopolous at abc is too big to fail. they can't afford to let go of him, and they can't afford to discipline him in a way that i think would mean they would deeply disapprove what he's done. i think they don't quite know what to do. >> we knew he was tied to the clintons. first he came out and said i should have taken the extra step of disclosing i had made the donations, no problem with the donations. i probably shouldn't have donated. then he came out and said it was a mistake to donate but i did it nor great reasons and

he gave $75,000 of his personal fortune to the clinton foundation. this is a conflict. s interviews on the subject of the clintons and even in an interview with peter sweitzer author of the thousand famous book clinton cash. >> this back and forth throughout this entire year, was slamming sweitzer for questionable sources and material. listen to this. >> do you have any evidence that a crime may have been committed? we have done investigative work here at abc news and found no proof of any kind of direct action. there is no evidence at all that hillary clinton got directly involved in this decision. do you have any evidence that she actually intervened in this issue? the democrats have said this is indication of your partisaj qzw you were funded by the koch brothers. >> conflict. stephanopoulos finds a conflict here. >> are the executives taking this too lightly. stephanopoulos came out yesterday and apologized and saying did he make quite a mistake. this is significant breach to the policy what is the punishment going to be? >> the punishment if you remember geraldo riv

he was paid to do research and message guidance for the clinton foundation. cretary clinton at least 25 memos on libya in 2011 and 2012. chris plant is a syndicated radio talk show host, lesley marshall fox news contributor. this is problematic, is it not? he's been subpoenaed to give a deposition june 3rd in front of the benghazi select committee. >> right. i think it's going to be behind closed doors and for the record and not for cameras, as i understand it. it certainly could mean more trouble for hillary and all these interconnected scandals that are plaguing hopefully hillary clinton at this point. it could be more bad news. they'll get him on the record under oath. that's where people in washington start to run into trouble when they are under oath and potential perjury charges and all that sort of thing. >> do you think it's a problem he was on the payroll at the same time he was paid by groups helping mrs. clinton's presidential run and seeking libyan contracts and secretly advising secretary of state clinton about libya? >> no. he wasn't asked to adv

she insisted they are roux he leased as well as foreign donations to the clinton foundation. the recent scandals mrs. clinton does not seem to be using steam, traveling to iowa, new hampshire and chicago, illinois last week. we want to bring in our panel, former adviser to president reagan judith miller at the manhattan research center and meekle goodwin is with us columnist for the "new york post." all three are fox news contributors. >> two pultizer prize winners on the stage. >> what did you think about hillary? i didn't like how she handled ed henry. >> five questions is not a press conference. she has been in this race for 30 45 days. she has not talked to a major reporter one-on-one. she is basically ducking and dodging. i wouldn't call this a press conference. >> is it working for her? >> it is working monday democrats. it is the independents she is losing and it is affecting her superpac money. the expectations of what she raised are way below what she is raising. she has only $5 million in hard commitments. >> so then it is not working? >> i don't think it is working

long-time clinton crony was being paid $10,000 a month by the clinton foundation while sending error-filledadvice and, quote, intelligence on libya to hillary clinton who, in fact forwarded the e-mails. the author of "clinton cash," peter schweizer is with us. she would forward these e-mails, right? >> right. >> okay. from him. wasn't he looking to do business with libya at the time? >> he was, sean. i mean this is a classic example of what we call the clinton blur. you had sid bloomen paid $10,000 a month, being brought to the clinton foundation to work on legacy projects but he's working with clinton, secretary of state. the obama administration said they weren't going to allow him in the administration. he's providing reports for an area he's not an expert for, while working for a company seeking contracts from the libyan government. sid was pushing them. talk about a massive conflict of interest. if this isn't one, i don't know what one would be. >> what do you know about the slush fund of bill clinton? what do you know about this nexus of the swiss wanting to continue to do business wi

if you look at the trustee of the clinton foundation, long time friend benefactor pushing this nuclear said in 2010 that back in 2006 hillary clinton did not support the deal the indian government wanted. she by 2008 by the time the vote took place, she had reversed course and no longer voted for those amendments that would have put restrictions on the use of that technology. >> she was overall supportive of the deal. is it fair to say reverse course? isn't that overstating? in the camp she was the overchair of the india caucus. >> she was the leader of the caucus but on this particular issue and non proliferation advisors remained in this position until 2008. her position all a along was the indian government could have access to the technology provided it did not put the treaty at risk and not enhance the nuclear weapons program. by 2008 she no longer supported restrictions even though senators were still pushing that. amendments she supported and voted for in 2006 she no longer supported in 2008. i'm not saying andrea that there was a quid pro quo, but what i'm saying is you see a p

as you may know we have called for the fbi to look at the clinton foundation. because hillary clinton is running for president. and the american people deserve to know all the facts surrounding her financial portfolio. the fbi doesn't need anyone's approval to investigate anything. today spokesman paul bressen told us the bureau cannot divulge details about any investigation because it does not want to besmirch anyone. fair point. once the fbi announces a probe, those suspected are put in a negative light. but if the fbi declines to investigate the clinton foundation we the people need to know that. and if the opposite is true we need to know that as well. it all comes back to the presidential election. and the legal authorities in this country have to tell us through subpoena powers, what is going on. very, very serious. "factor tip of the day," we respect the fbi and we expect the agency will brief the american people in the months to come about the clinton foundation. and that is it for us tonight. please check out the fox news factor website which is differ

the clinton foundation and people who paid to play. >> exactly. e problem is the foundation has already -- >> allegedly paid to play. go ahead. >> -- has already been wrapped up in so much versecontroversy. but the appearance is that he was trying to buy access, he was trying to buy an interview. and if you are the public face of a news network that is something that my bosses certainly would not tolerate. >> al hunt he did say he wasn't going to moderate the gop debate. >> i'm not going to pitch for the washington nationals against the yankees next week either. >> what does that mean? >> that thatmeans he wasn't going to moderate the debate anyway. my wife gave $250 to the haiti relief fund in 2010 after that earthquake and you recall the context thing was that bush and clinton had appealed for it. i don't think $250 to the haiti clinton relief fund is really a problem. that was also a time when barack obama was running for re-election. the problem what george did was the size, 75 grand is a lot of money at least to most of us at this will table.