she talked about the controversy surrounding her e-mails and the clinton foundations, and the clinton foundation and she explained why democrats are so enthusiastic about vermont senator bernie sanders. >> thank you so much for talking to us today, you're here in iowa for a couple events. you're the front-runner in this state, we're also seeing bernie sanders attract a lot of attention, he's had big crowds here 10,000 people in wisconsin last week 7500 people in maine last night. why is it do you think that someone who is a self-described democratic socialist is really attracting this organic interest that your campaign seems to be struggling a little bit with. >> i always thought this would be a competitive race, so i am happy to have a chance to get out and run my campaign as i see fit and let other candidates do exactly the same. >> we have a committed supporter in every one of the 1600 precincts and one of the things that i learned last time is, it's organize organize org dmiz. you have to get people committed and they will follow through, and you bring more people. so i feel very

>> let me start by saying i am so proud of the clinton foundation. i am proud of the work that my husband started, that my daughter continued. i'm proud of the very small role i played in being there for about a year and a half. i'll give you an example of why what the clinton foundation has done is so critical. the united states government was using our tax dollars to treat 1.7 million people around the world with hiv aids. i looked at the contracts that the clinton foundation had been negotiating to buy medicine and pass it through, working with foreign government who is provided the funding to buy the medicine to treat more people. so we negotiated lower prices. by the time i left thanks to contracts and work that the clinton foundation had done the united states was treating 5.1 million people. that's just one example. maybe it's because my husband knows so many people in the world and he's so creative and smart, but he was able to put together solutions to problems, whether it was hiv aids or expanding farming in africa that was hard for others

the clinton foundation. foreign donations that have gone to the foundation and the work that it does. has it made you think, seeing this controversy that has come about. has it made you think about, if you are president, what will happen to the clinton foundation? have you thought about perhaps shutting it down? >> well, let me start by saying, i am so proud of the clinton foundation. i am proud of the work that my husband started, that my daughter continued. i'm proud of the very small role i played in being there for about a year and a half. i'll give you an example of why, what the clinton foundation is so critical. when i became secretary of state, the united states government was using our tax dollars to treat 1.7 million people around the world with hiv aids. i looked at the contracts that the clinton foundation had been negotiating to buy medicine and pass it through, working with foreign governments who provided the funding to buy the medicine to treat more people. so we negotiated lower prices. by th

who are committed to giving $100 million to the clinton foundation. that should be troublesome not just to a conservative who doesn't like the clintons but i think to somebody who would be concerned about human rights and corruption and other issues. >> host: as you well know hillary clinton supporters call your book fiction they say, quote, it is a political hatchet job masquerading as a book, and you fail in the book to outline the many good things that the foundation has done in some of the poorest areas of the world. >> guest: right. well, i would certainly reject the hatchet job. i think the information speaks for itself. it's all about transactions it's all about follow the money. and i do say in the book that the clinton foundation has done some good things. the problem is it's hard because of the way they intentionally set it up, it's hard to actually ascertain what the clinton foundation does. and that's just not me saying that. this is what charity groups like charity navigator, you can go online and look at charity navigator, and they look a

find out that you went the extra mile to have her employed by the state department and the clinton foundation as well as another clinton connected company. this has never been done in state department history. so hillary, why go through so many hoops? the white house told you you couldn't hire cynthia blumenthal. you put sydney on the clinton foundation payroll and e-mailed him about security issues at a time when he represented interests that would benefit in the fall of gaddafi in libya. those e-mails were actually hacked by another group. so much for the secure private server argument. to top it off, you didn't turn those e-mails over. we find out about them when blumenthal turns them over pursuant to a subpoena. hillary, you just hid and deleted our e-mails. you were conducting the people's business in a manner that prevented anyone from knowing about it. and if that isn't intent to hide secrets, deceive, and defraud the american public, i don't know what it is. so why? were you afraid that people might find out the reasons for your shift in policy decisions or were donations to the clint

find out that you went the extra mile to have her employed by the state department and the clinton foundation as well as another clinton connected company. this has never been done in state department history. so hillary, why go through so many hoops? the white house told you you couldn't hire cynthia blumenthal. you put sydney on the clinton foundation payroll and e-mailed him about security issues at a time when he represented interests that would benefit in the fall of gaddafi in libya. those e-mails were actually hacked by another group. so much for the secure private server argument. to top it off, you didn't turn those e-mails over. we find out about them when blumenthal turns them over pursuant to a subpoena. hillary, you just hid and deleted our e-mails. you were conducting the people's business in a manner that prevented anyone from knowing about it. and if that isn't intent to hide secrets, deceive, and defraud the american public, i don't know what it is. so why? were you afraid that people might find out the reasons for your shift in policy decisions or were donations to the clint

lot of journalistic outlets taking this sort of frame of looking at the money going to the clinton foundation or the money that bill clinton has collected in speaking fees, and seeing it as potentially a transactional business model. >> host: your publisher said it was a well-researched book, yet all of the research you've did george stephanopoulos' name did not come up in your research. he admitted to contributing $75,000 to the foundation. and the first interview you did was on abc with george stephanopoulos. >> guest: you're right. i knew he would be aggressive, bum i got a lot of aggressive questioning, chris wallace was very tough. andrea mitchell was very tough. frank sees know at cnn, so i don't mind tough questions. the problem i had with stephanopoulos was the interview that he conducted had the audience known and had i nope he was an active clinton foundation donor and that he had appeared at that least seven clinton foundation events in recent years, clearly he has a connection in some sort of affinity for this organization. think the interview would have been seen in a very, very

lot of journalistic outlets taking this sort of frame of looking at the money going to the clinton foundationor the money bill clinton collected in speaking fees and seeing it as potentially a transactional business model. >> host: your publisher said it was a well researched book and get in the research you did george stephanopoulos name didn't come up in your research area he later admitted it to contribute in $75,000 to the foundation and the first interview that you did was on abc with george stephanopoulos you >> host: that is exactly right. it is interesting. i knew that he was going to be aggressive but i got a lot of aggressive questions and it's that's fair enough, chris wallace on fox news sunday was very tough. andrea mitchell at nbc was very tough. frank says no and cnn. so, i don't mind tough questions. i think the problems i had with stephanopoulos was the interview that he conducted had the audience know in and had and had i known that he was an active clinton foundation donor and that he had appeared at at least seven clinton foundation events in recent years clearly he has a

that all this money was pouring into the clinton foundation in exchange for political favors. this is how the clintons who are both political figures have amassed tens of millions of dollars of income. i don't know all the facts yet, trish, none ever us do but looks likes clintons are one-half step in front of the law here. trish: julie, she would have had to know some day she would run for president, she had to know stuff like this would come out and just wouldn't smell right. >> i don't get it. i never got it before she announced running for president. giving speeches after she left to the state department, i said why would she do this if she intends to run for president even if there is nothing nefarious bit. per essential is so bad. i did this for a living. >> you're a democratic strategist. you would say don't go near this stuff? >> of course i would advise her never to go near this stuff. i don't understand why she did. >> she wanted money. >> wanted money but you know, steve, if you're running for office there are certain things in life you have to give up and this is nu

martha: some big new questions surrounding the clinton foundation. wall street journal" has reported that some of hillary clinton's big campaign donors are also stepping up their contributions to the clinton foundation at this point. with at least 14 of them volunteering to chip in $100,000 apiece. also fresh allegations that the foundation received donation from the swiss bank ubs after then secretary of state helped the company to settle a tax issue case which we're going to get into details of. she said nothing inappropriate took place. >> i would say that any, any implication that is attempting to be made along those lines is categorically false and i worked hard as our nation's first diplomat to solve problems, to work with my colleagues in government. martha: all right. let's get to this. peter schweizer is the president of government accountability institute and author of book "clinton cash." welcome back to the show. >> great to be here martha. martha: we work through the issues as they continue to come up. this is a "wall street journal" stor

she was asked about the clinton foundation and the allegations as asserted by the book "clinton cash" that she may have done favors for companies in countries while secretary of state in exchange for donations to her family charity. at this point mrs. clinton said she had no plans to say or do anything about the clinton foundation other than to say how proud she was and the work of the foundation should continue and much more in a minute. >>> first digital editor is here. so the e-mail scandal -- now it's just fun. it was kind of shocking to hear her come out and say -- to dismiss that as just fun and she did nothing wrong and dismiss the clinton foundation as i'm not going to talk about that other than go team and the fact about honest and trustworthy thing which is right wing conspiracy which is like six out of ten americans. are they part of it? >> they have been duped. it's not important at all that hillary clinton destroyed the documents. she said i destroyed the documents that would help me if we found them. it's not the same as she said in the '90s when she turned out to be rat

breaking news, in fact, fox news has just learned amid new revelations about e-mails, the clinton foundationllary clinton's aides are getting increasingly nervous that vice president joe biden may join the race later this summer. joining me now, the one and only lou dobbs. lou, you have been around for a long time, but this presidential campaign -- i say that in a loving way, by the way. >> i love being with you. charles: this presidential campaign is getting very interesting, and now the notion that joe biden jumps in, i swear if you'd have told me 24, 48 hours ago, i would have laughed, now i think he's got a shot on the democratic side. >> well, right now no one has a shot other than hillary clinton. she's in, he's leading substantially in all of the races whether people want to talk about how much she's lost over the course of the last several months, but this woman is formidable, her campaign is formidable. and you can make the argument even though she's getting hammered with every day, it seems, with a new scandal and a new interpretation of a so-called scandal, she continues to withst

this story and the stories well documented particularly in the wall street journal, of the clinton foundation of work that the clinton -- money that the clinton foundation got from foreign governments while she was -- and people who work for foreign governments while she was secretary of state. >> did that dictate policy in. >> i'm not saying it was. people will want to know is there something connection there between the fact that there were -- some countries got remarkably good -- and some companies got some remarkably good treatment from the u.s. government while she was secretary of state. after they had given money to the clinton foundation. nobody is necessarily saying there is a connection. but it kreetzcreates a suspicion. i think it will be on her to demonstrate the suspicions are not justified and the zigdecisions were made on the basis of the merits. >> the underlying issue that's here is inspector generals are independent. but for this report to be thrown out to the "new york times," what have you, someone in the white house put that out. it clearly -- there's an effort in there t

it will be about the e-mails and about the clinton foundation stories. : everything here is about process. it is about the process of politics and scandal rather than substance and i think the best thing hillary clinton has going for her is that reporters keep asking her about process. a lot of that for voters is -- it is to her advantage. when we come back, "the simpsons." ♪ mark: all is right with the republic. harry scheer is getting his job back. could ted cruz have done a better job than the incumbent? >> release the hounds. >> upward, not forward. and whirling towards freedom. >> forward, not awkward. upwards, not downwards. and always swirling, swirling for freedom. mark: i call it a try. we are on twice a day. until tomorrow for myself and heidi, we say to you, sayonara. ♪ this is a great place to work. not because they have yoga meetings and a juice bar. because they're getting comcast business internet. comcast business offers convenient installation appointments that work around your schedule. and it takes- done. - about an hour. get reliable i

he was receiving money from the clinton foundation on the outside and advising hillary clinton on all of this. and top white house officials like david a xelrod was trying to get her e-mail address and eventually got it and e-mailed her on the private server and just a couple of weeks ago, a xelrod was surprised the top aides didn't know about the private server at all. >> it is unusual that the chief of staff, i confess, i was there and senior advisor and i didn't know that. >> interesting because now david a xelrod was e-mailing her on her private account based on the e-mails we are receiving now. and the clinton campaign is pushing back hard and suggesting that there is nothing new here. and watch this. >> do you know more today than who was responsible for hitting our consulate in benghazi. >> no i never expected sidney bloomingthal to tell me that. we'll have committee hearings until the lord comes back if that is what it takes. >> they are trying to say there is nothing new in the document. the clinton campaign is revealing she raised $45 million in the first quarter of the year

it will be about the e-mails and about the clinton foundation stories. everything here is about process. it is about the process of politics and scandal rather than substance and i think the best thing hillary clinton has going for her is that reporters keep asking her about process. those things for a lot of voters are just, down. and when we come back "the , simpsons." ♪ mark: all is right with the republic. harry scheer is getting his job back. as mr. burns room -- might say that is great news. but as you recall, a guy named ted cruz, could he have done a job better the -- then the in common? we asked. >> release the hounds. >> upward, not forward. and whirling towards freedom. >> forward, not awkward. upwards, not downwards. and always swirling, swirling for freedom. mark: i call it a try. -- a time. remember, we are on twice a day at 5:00 and 8:00 eastern. until tomorrow for myself and heidi, we say to you, sayonara. ♪ we live in a pick and choose world. choose choose choose. but at bedtime? ...why settle for this? enter sleep number don't miss the f

once the case was settled, the bank's donation to the clinton foundation rose a mere ten fold and paid former president bill clinton $1.5 million in speaking fees. hillary clinton today denied there was any conflict of interest. >> this is just the kind of unfortunate claim or charge that you see in campaigns, and all i can do is there's no basis to it. i'm proud of the work i did as secretary of state. lou: i'll have a few words to say about it in tonight's commentary. >>> and turning to the controversy surrounding planned parenthood. antiabortion activists released a fourth undercover video they claim shows a doctor negotiating the sale of fetal body parts. agreeing to illicit pricing per body part harvested and suggesting ways to avoid legal consequences. those videos have sparked a nationwide backlash and brought renewed attention to the fact that there have been more than 57 million abortions in this country since roe v. wade. 57 million. fox news correspondent kristin fisher with the report. >> reporter: this is undercover video of a meeting between a planned parenthood vice pres

she said she had no plans to say, or do anything about the clinton foundation other than to say how proud she was and the work of the foundation should continue. there was much more but first chris stierwalt is here. so first, it's fun. it's so fun. >> that is the word. >> i mean it was kind of shocking to hear her come out and say, you know to dismiss that as just fun, and she did nothing wrong and clinton foundation, i'm not going to talk about that other than "go team" and talking about a right wing conspiracy. six out of ten americans are part of this. >> they've been duped it's not important that hillary clinton destroyed documents i destroyed evidence that would clear me but take my word for it. it's fun. and ha ha giggle giggle. it's not just the same as she said in the 90s, which she turned out to be wrong about what her husband had been doing. >> not necessarily her fault. >> it is the same as what the obama administration does now, to say your line of inquiry is not valid. it's the judge's defense and he's got danny noonan saying danny do you want to be good or bad? >> so what s

. >> she did ask questions about e-mails and she asked one question about the clinton foundation mess. she let hillary clinton give a long answer praising the work of the foundation and did not follow up. >> i think that all of the soft questioning hurts hillary clinton. she would have fared better with more aggressive questioning. she walked away with people wondering whether they can trust her which in the polls is one of her biggest problems right now. >> in your "daily beast" headline hillary plays victim on cnn by one of your colleagues. she came across as guarded under the tv light. do you agree or disagree with that? >> we have a different range of views at the beast. >> what's your view? >> she's a very guarded interview subject. no question about that. i interviewed her she was first running for senate in 2000. the silence was much longer then. she started her campaign in july of 1999 and didn't sit for full henning length interviews until 2000. it's a tough interview. she filibusters and she doesn't -- she goes on for a long time and you sit and look at your watch. this is a

clinton foundation donations.t these things, she did not take responsibility for what we have seen recently. this erosion of belief that she is trust worthy and honest from many americans. here's what she said. do you see any role that you've had in this sentiment that we've seen where people are questioning whether you're trustworthy? >> i can only tell you that this has been a theme that has been used against me and my husband for many many years. and at the end of the day, i think voters sort it all out. i have great confidence. i trust the american voter. so i trust the american voter 100%. because i think the american voter will weigh these kinds of accusations. i mean peel write books filled with unsubstantiated attacks against us and even admit they have no evidence. of course it is your job to cover it so of course that will raise questions in people's minds. during the course of the campaign, as in my two prior campaigns and in my other years of service, i have a lot of confidence that the american people

right after that deal goes through $600,000 bucks appeared in the hillary clinton foundation. ro quo. is it? >> you know it's hard to say, but it's a very very troubling pattern and this relationship between ubs and the clintons is fascinating stuart. go back to early 2001 you remember the name marc rich the international fugitive that bill clinton pardoned on his last day in office. one of a handful of people who wrote letters pleading for president clinton to pardon marc rich was a senior executive at ubs. bill clinton pardoned marc rich. days after that the new york times because of the uproar in the story, reports that ubs had been negotiating to give bill clinton a series of lucrative speeches and those negotiations were cut off because of the marc rich scandal. fast noored now to-- fast forward now to 2009. hillary clinton is secretary of state and they don't want to hand over the names and hand over a fraction of them because of hillary clinton's intervention. which is unusual. this is a matter that the irs has been looking into and ubs is let off the hook and what happe

hillary clinton has shown at least some signs of weakness. scandals regarding her foundationnd private e-mail server continue to dog her campaign. a source familiar with the investigation confirmed to fox news that classified e-mails stored on that private server contained information from not one, but multiple intelligence agencies as many as five. yesterday, when asked about the delay in releasing some of these records, clinton blamed it on the state department. >> this is really a question for the state department. they're the ones that are bearing the responsibility to, you know, sort through these thousands and thousands of e-mails. >> there's also fresh allegations against the clinton foundation, specifically that the swiss bank ubs sharply increased donations to the foundation after clinton intervened to help the company in a tax evasion case. clinton called those accusations, quote, categorically false. ainsley. >> how is the latest news impacting her poll numbers, clinton's poll numbers? >> it's unclear if these latest developments have had any impact on this poll. i

i don't think -- whether the clinton foundation took money from trump or he went to a wedding will have any impact on her chances. or the presidency, of course. >> i think it's an issue of principal. hillary clinton is willing to take a check from pretty much anybody, including foreign governments, with the clinton foundation as well. this will be an issue. look at how much money donald trump has given, more than six figures. he has given a lot of money not only to that foundation but also hillary clinton and people around the clintons and then to act as if you don't like donald trump or you are not tight with him -- how many people's weddings did you go to that you didn't like? i didn't go to someone's wedding that i didn't like or didn't have respect for. to act as if there's a separation that's hard for voters to distinguish the difference. >> i will say -- i will say i think most voters don't think most politicians take money from everybody no matter who they are. they don't think highly of anybody on that front. >> that money is going to help poor people around the world. it's not

he donated to your campaign to the clinton foundation.is your reaction to his recent comments that some mexico immigrants are rapist and criminals? >> i'm very disappointed in those comments and i feel very bad and very disappointed with him and with the republican party for not responding immediately and saying enough, stop it. but they are all in the -- you know, in the same general area on immigration. you know, they don't want to provide a path to citizenship. they range across a spectrum or being either grudgingly welcome or hostile toward immigrants and i'm going to talk about comprehensive immigration reform. i'm going to talk about all of the law-abiding productive members of the immigrant community that i personally know and met of the course of my life that i would like to see have a path to citizenship. >> what about jeb bush's approach to that? it's different certainly than donald trump's. >> he doesn't believe in a path to citizenship. if he did at one time, he no longer does. pretty much -- as i said, they are on a spectrum

. >> i am proud of the clinton foundation. >> i feel good about where we are. sounds familiar. we will be right back. ♪ mark: when you're not watching us here, you can go to our website. heidi: our colleague has a piece up on marco rubio, he is out in the field reporting on the candidate. check that out. mark: i have a little more on the john kasich ad we showed you at the top of the show. this program is on twice a day here at 5:00 and also at 8:00 . thank you for watching. same bat time, same bat channel. sayonara. ♪ emily: a technical glitch cripples the new york stock exchange. is high-frequency trading to blame? emily: i am emily chang. this is "bloomberg west". china's stock plunge. the selloff continues and investors pouring money into uber's chinese operations. and its biggest competitor. microsoft surrenders in the smart phone wars. it plans to cut 7800 jobs. we will look at what microsoft ceo has plan next.

. >> i am proud of the clinton foundation. >> i feel good about where we are.k: sounds a million. we will be right back. ♪ mark: when you're not watching us here, you can go to our website. heidi: our colleague has a piece up on marco rubio, he is out in the field reporting on the candidate. check that out. mark: i have a little more on the john kasich ad we showed you at the top of the show. this program is on twice a day, here at 5:00 and also at 8:00 area thank you for watching. same bat time, same bat channel. ♪ >> we crunch today's number and cut through the noise. alix: we're moments away from the closing bell. >> i am in for joe weisenthal. alix: there it is. what a day. the closing bell at the new york stock exchange is working. stocks tumbling today. concerns with china and greece dampening economic growth. the new york stock exchange for

more with former president bill clinton on his foundation and his family. mr. clinton: that would be not an easy decision should she be elected president. ♪ >> welcome back to this bloomberg television special from cgi america in denver, colorado. can technology and innovation be forces for expanding opportunity and enhancing diversity in the workplace? bloomberg television's betty liu discussed that topic with a panel of innovative thinkers and doers from the world of tech. betty: when people talk about technology and the labor force, they think about it mostly in a negative way. they think about robots taking over the labor force and we will see lower wages and fewer jobs. give me a sense of how you are deploying technology for the greater good. aneesh, do you want to start on the? aneesh: sure, and maybe i will put some context. last thursday, a report by mckinsey was issued that suggested if we applied those same technologies that might be modernizing our manufacturing operations or addressing how we shop on the internet but put them more to connect us to th

senator lindsay graham says he's keeping the 2014 campaign funds that trump gave him and even t clinton foundation lists an undated donation on its website. >>> and a new public policy polling survey finds trump at the top of the pack among gop contenders in north carolina. what everyone is talking about this morning is the nbc interview conducted by our own katie terr. >> we are taking mexico's problems. mexico is beating us on trade, and they're beating us at the border. but mexico doesn't want to take these people. what do they do? they send them to our stupid politicians and we have sanctuary cities and all of this nonsense. i've been saying this for a long time and it's a disgrace frankly, inf i didn't bring it up you wouldn't be talking about immigration right now? >> when is the last time you've been to the border? >> three or four times over the years and i have many people who live around the area. i'm going to arizona this weekend where they want to talk to me. arizona is some of the -- they tell me i'm one of the most popular persons in arizona because of my stance. >> when is the last

favors for a swiss bank and then all of a sudden, the swiss bank giving her organization the clinton foundation $600,000 and 1 1/2 million dollars in speaking fees to her husband. now, this is the being viewed, rich, as a quid pro quo. in other words, she does a favor for them. she helps reduce the number of accounts that they have to provide information on, for potential tax evasion, and they in turn give her money for the foundation and for her husband's speeches? do you think we'll see anything in these emails about that. >> i don't know whether, if these are the emails we would like to see about that like to see the u emails, we did this, better do that. my guess is we never will. trish: would she be smart enough to make sure emails are in the included of tens of thousands. >> not her emails. emails internal to the bank to see if their discussion assured, by the secretary's office -- trish: we would need investigation for that, right, rich? >> separate thing. let me talk about this for a second. leslie might agree. details of all this stuff, we pay attention to it. we live with it, emersed

server and the e-mails and the deleted e-mails and that whole controversy in addition to the clinton foundation situation. i think those two are the big drivers for hillary clinton. i think just not bogeing able to give a direct answer. we saw on cnn saying she sounded rusty. it didn't come across genuine. those are issues playing into the fact that i believe voters are questioning her trustworthiness. >> governor do you think people care about her e-mails? >> no. and i'm not worried about this issue. i do agree with mercedes that that's what's driven her poll numbers down. but what's going to happen is exactly what happened when all the clinton foundation blew up. there is no story there. it was a lie. the "new york times" has run front page stories that have been untruthful twice and gotten caught both times. it is going to sink in that isn't true. this is another attempt to smear hillary clinton and the clintons. just like what itite water. i'm not worried in the long run. >> and mermercedes can a candidate like bernie sanders make some real head wi in a campaign or movement without running

>> this is exactly when the false financials of the clinton foundation came out, and it was found there trying to intimate that russian people were trying to get a mine in canada trying to influence the clintons by having donations sent to the clinton foundation. this is crap if you pardon my french. my betting is this ends up the same way. sure, there's a bounce in her negatives. if it's untrue she'll do fine. >> i'll call you later and tell you how to say that in french. mrs. clinton is going to -- this is seriously. before the benghazi committee, she wanted it to be a public hearing. what are the risk/rewards for her as candidate for president? howard, can you hear me? >> yes, i can. oh, i'm sorry. i thought you were moving on to the next story. i beg your pardon. >> just from the political standpoint, how does this play into everything in terms of her candidacy? >> benghazi has been so beat to death, especially by darrell issa. the basic republicans' mou is obstruct obstruct and obstruct. the outgoing intelligence committee chairman in the house, who is a republican after he left of

he donated to your senate campaign to the clinton foundation. what's your reaction to his recent comments that some mexican immigrants are rapists and criminals? >> i'm very disappointed in those comments. and i i feel very bad, and very disappointed with him, and with the republican party for not responding immediately and saying enough, stop it. but they are all in the, you know, in the same general area on immigration. they don't want to provide a path to citizenship, they range across a spectrum of being either bridgingly welcome or hostile toward immigrants. >> but what about jeb bush's approach to that? it's different, certainly than donald trump's. >> he doesn't believe in a path to citizenship. if he did at one time he no longer does. >> have you given any thought to the woman who should be on the $10 bill? >> you know, i am very torn about it. i want a woman on a bill. i don't know why they picked the $10 bill. some people are now agitating for the $20 bill. >> do you think it should be the $20? >> i want a woman on the bill. and i thin

too small to fail and they have a number of national collaborative partners, bill and hillary clinton foundatione piece. american academy of pediatrics, sesame street, whole slew of the best and brightest in early education. this campaign hopefully will succeed in oakland. we'll take the best pieces of it, including the clothing line and the outdoor signage, which by the way designed by silverstein, they are the folks behind the got milk commercials and best and brightest in the advertising world. we've combined the talents of wonderful organizations to create this and hopefully we can scale it nationally with our national partners and but oakland is where the pilot is going to run, for again, launching shortly. >> i know people are going to want -- they say, how can they get the good stuff? you have a website? >> yes, it's talking is teaching.org. people can go on to that website and find out where the materials are available. we will be working with community partners in oakland, clinics and hospitals and libraries and be distributing the materials to family who most need them in oakland. but

you have the e-mail scandal, the benghazi scandal, the clinton foundation scandal, the fact she has herdies double dipping at the state department. she is a hypocrite. she says bankers are broke. >> that's popular in the democratic party. >> it is but when she gets in front of the camera people don't like her. she doesn't have the political skills of bill. she is grating and hard to listen to. >> you don't think she's a good candidate? >> that's right. for all of these facts -- >> you said the core political skill. >> the core political skill and the fact this is a person not only who does not light up the room a person who is difficult to listen to. i used to think if you wanted to extract information from terrorists put them in a room with hillary clinton and force them to listen to a speech. >> i don't think that's true on the republican base dorothy. a lot of them like to listen to her. i mean the democratic. >> the other thing the contrast between hillary clinton and the three front-runners, it is not just a fantasy. these are serious candidates the republican top three, marco rubi

you have the e-mail scandal, the benghazi scandal, the clinton foundation scandal.nd a job outside in the private sector. he's a hypocrite, she denounces banking and takes banker's money. >> that's popular in the democrat party. >> it is but when she gets in front of the camera, people simply don't like her. she doesn't have the political skills of bill. very hard to listen to. >> you don't think she's a very good candidate? >> that's right. for all of these facts that are quite relevant, the core political skill and the fact that this is a person not only who does not light up the room, a person who is difficult to listen to. i used to think if you wanted to extract information from terrorists all you had to do was put them in a room with hillary clinton and force them to listen to a speech. >> i don't think that's true on the republican base, dorothy. a lot of them like to listen to her. i mean the democrat base is what i meant. go ahead. >> the contrast between hillary clinton and those three front runners. it is not just a fantasy. these are serious candidates,

the "wall street journal" is pointing out for ron, i'm curious, the extent to which the clinton foundationppening particularly during hillary clinton's time as secretary of state. the paper reports in 2009 clinton was alerted by her swiss counterpart the irs was suing the bank to find out which americans have secret accounts there. the journal reports in months clinton announced a tentative legal settlement an unusual agreement by a top diplomat. they turned over information on a fraction of the accounts sought by the irs. the paper points out after that ubs' donations to the clinton foundations multiplied. from 2008 and earlier, they totaled about $60,000. as of 2014 about $600,000. >> boy, i can't wait to read the e-mails between secretary and ubs officials. >> ubs has also paid former president clinton to do sessions. >> say that again. >> ubs, the paper points out. >> paid bill clinton. >> $1.5 million to do q & a sessions with one of its executives. according to the paper, that makes them the top corporate source of speech income since he left the white house. >> wow. ron fournier jus

in the field have an on a good job of pointing out the fact that he has donated this to the clinton foundationason why he is so rich, as he likes to brag about it, he partnered with the government to take advantage of eminent domain in a crony way and that includes bringing of serious topics that people do agree with. kennedy: perhaps it would be surprised about it. >> instead they are throwing cheap shots back when it comes to having a debate. kennedy: jeb bush says and i'm going to talk about this anymore. so how can they do that, what do you say to some of the mid-packers who are in the day? >> i've been watching it and i've been falling asleep, they are talking about national security not doing it in a compelling way. what you need to learn from donald trump is this is a guy who is viewed by many as having guts and not being afraid to tackle. whoever it is. that's how he's being viewed like it or not. i have yet to see one good ad in the economy. talk about the obama economy and how you would do a different and how people can keep more of their hard-earned cash. i see these candidates flou

all of the things that came up during the discussion of the clinton foundation.he amount of money that she got for speaking and lots of different things. this is one morass pictet of that. -- more aspect of that. the campaign has said that this is not aimed at her or there's no evidence that this is aimed at her. that she handled things properly. but we just don't know yet. gwen: as long as it doesn't go away jonathan, how much does it worry the campaign that this trust issue which dan talked about continues to reverberate in different ways? >> it certainly concerns them. and this is why. the republicans for decades have tried to attack the clintons. especially hillary clinton as a liberal. the sort of l word. out of touch. given what's happened in the country, politics and demography, that's a harder charge to make in 2016. they don't get the same political pop from calling her a liberal. what they want to go after her on is character and ethics. and so this is a gift for the republicans in a lot of ways. because that's what they're so focused on nowadays. they'

>> let me suggest this to you emails released last night were not released by the clinton foundation.d by mrs. clinton. they were released by the state department. who controls the state department? president obama. did president obama know by the release of these emails his wannabe successor would look even worse than she already looks? charles: but does she look bad enough to lose? six months from now will this resonate with the average voter out there? >> it will -- charles: indictment would. a formal investigation would. >> he has to prove an indictment. charles: but he wouldn't do that. that would be against the entoo irparty. i'm sure enough people -- >> it would. there is enough evidence from which one could conclude clearly she provided material assistance to terrorist organizations and lied about it to congress. charles: if republican wins in 2016 can they retroactive at her for this. >> it isn't retroactive. statute of limit tastes would be alive. on the other hand, if she gets elected president will she pardon herself? exactly. exactly. in my column she can pardon herself.