one actually worked for the clinton foundation. you don't think these people have an agenda. listen up, republicans. you are the ones in power. where is the investigation of bill clinton meeting with the attorney general loretta lynch days before her scheduled meeting with the f.b.i.? and days after that, the target hillary comes out and says, i'll keep loretta lynch as attorney general. talk about in your face, pay-to-play. put loretta lynch under oath and find out why no grand jury was even empanelled regarding our classified document? possible diversion of our democracy. there is evidence bill clinton wanted to quash hillary clinton's investigation. certainly more than the pathetic we are going to find collusion between donald trump and the russians. where is the investigation of the clinton foundation, a criminal end prize. a hell of a lot more than the hope of finding collusion between donald trump and the russians. you want to talk russia? let's talk about russia. let's talk about the sale of 20% of our uranium to russia and hillary clinton signing off on the deal. the c

into his finances, then why not investigate the pay to play scheme that was going on in the clinton foundation? remember the uranium one deal, there's a rush of conspiracy. hillary clinton, secretary of state, signing off on giving 20% of america's uranium to vladimir putin and the russiansf by the way, all the while people involved in that deal, donating millions and millions to the clinton foundation. and her husband doubling his speaking fees in moscow. instead of creating crimes, mueller should be investigating the ones we actually know occurred, including the feloniea by hillary clinton. here's a reaction, author of the brand-new book bestseller, newt gingrich. you said, people are going to be indicted over something that has nothing to do with the original investigation. >> i absolutely believe that. you look at, it gets worse the more i've done research over the last three or four days. the state department, or the justice department, has 97% of its donations went to hillary clinton, 3% went to trump. that's the justice department. that was bad enough as a culture, now it turns out that

one actually worked for the clinton foundation. you don't think these people have an agenda. listen up, republicans. you are the ones in power. where is the investigation of bill clinton meeting with the attorney general loretta lynch days before her scheduled meeting with the f.b.i.? and days after that, the target hillary comes out and says, i'll keep loretta lynch as attorney general. talk about in your face, pay-to-play. put loretta lynch under oath and find out why no grand jury was even empanelled regarding our classified document? possible diversion of our democracy. there is evidence bill clinton wanted to quash hillary clinton's investigation. certainly more than the pathetic we are going to find collusion between donald trump and the russians. where is the investigation of the clinton foundation, a criminal end prize. a hell of a lot more than the hope of finding collusion between donald trump and the russians. you want to talk russia? let's talk about russia. let's talk about the sale of 20% of our uranium to russia and hillary clinton signing off on the deal. the c

number two, hires clinton's lawyer for the clinton foundation who is fighting freedom of information request. there also obama and clinton donors. "understanding trump," we will ask him about that, we will also ask him why the special counsel should get out of the way tomorrow. what republican should do pretty will join us after the break. also coming up next -- coat >> we have got to restore a regular order principle. we cannot have persons in our intelligence agencies, our investigative indices, or in congress leaking sensitive matters. >> the attorney general jeff sessions tears it up today explain how damaging the leaks are for our national security. newt gingrich has reaction on that and later tonight, they weigh in on his testimony and sarah carter's big breaking news about james comey and loretta lynch, and possibly loretta lynch putting the kibosh on hillary clinton. also tonight, we told you about the disturbing play going on in new york city, depicting the assassination of president trump. but guess what, you won't believe the taxpayer dollars were actually given to the so-c

number two, hires clinton's lawyer for the clinton foundation who is fighting freedomhe of information reques. there also obama and clinton donors. "understanding trump," we will ask him about that, we will also ask him why the special counsel should get out of the way tomorrow. what republican should do. will join us after the break. we have got to restore a regular order principle. we cannot have persons in our intelligence agencies, our investigative indices, or in congress leaking sensitive matters. >> the attorney general jeff sessions tears it up today explain how damaging the leaks are for our national security. newt gingrich has reaction on that and later tonight, they weigh in on his testimony and sarah carter's big breaking news about james comey and loretta lynch, and possibly loretta lynch putting the kibosh on hillary clinton. also tonight, we told you about the disturbing play going on int new york city, depicting therb assassination o of president trump. but guess what, you won't believe the taxpayer dollars were actually given to theth so-called shakespeare in the park

one of them actually works for the clinton foundation.hy would any reasonable person have faith in this? >> sean: mr. speaker, it's at now time because of democrats have pushed so hard and we know i have no doubt that hillary committed felonies. now that they pushed so hard, if we believe in justice and equal justice under the law, doesn't she not need to be fully and completely investigated, both on the foundation pay to play and on the email server, where we know and comey pretty much admitted that she committed felonies. >> there are reports that the state department is actively looking at taking away her security clearances, which would be a pretty big sign of guilt. look, here's what i honestly believe. i really think that the new director of the fbi should look at all of the evidence and should follow it where it leads. i don't want a vendetta against hillary clinton, but i also don't want -- we talk about russian influence like you, i want to know about all of the different parts that were comingled between jonathan and his brother

now you have a clinton foundation lawyer fighting foia requests for information requests on hillary clinton's private email server. i think what rod rosen tine needs to do is go through congress and say i laid out a budget and i laid out parameters for mueller and i will report weekly the progress of what's going on with special counsel. steve: why didn't they just stop the thing? he hasn't taken a bribe. what's to investigate. all you have going to do dwsh karl rove pointed out when they went after bush and libby, they were going to try to get him. then he pulled up some evidence to show he actually remembered the conversation correctly. they try to find something to hang something on. lou: for libby the ultimate end game for. >> the expansive special counsel that lost its way. the question here becomes why did the republican leadership in the senate and the house accept the special counsel? and why did they not today stand up and defend the president of the united states. the republican party is at a crossroads. and i said that just for karl rove's benefit. the establishment in this country

lou: democratic donors, and donors to the clinton foundation and the list goes on.tate is working overtime to subvert president trump and his administration. >> the democrats are fighting for power. republicans have to understand this is a real war. the democrats want to destroy them. being passive and slow doesn't count. lou: we received word that that veal world incidents at the travis air force base is related to what is now described as an active shooter on the base. but again that is all the information we have at this hour. we'll be putting together more for you in just moments and stay with us for that. special counsel robert mueller met with leaders of the senate intelligence committee. just one of the five congressional committees investigating the so-called russian collusion or interference. democrats vowing to keep pushing that issue until the 2018 mid-term election despite no evidence whatsoever of collusion between the trump campaign and russia and it is all being supported by the national left-wing media. our next guest says what we need are grand juri

lou: democratic donors, and donors to the clinton foundation and the list goes on. the deep state is working overtime to subvert president trump and his administration. >> the democrats are fighting for power. republicans have to understand this is a real war. the democrats want to destroy them. being passive and slow doesn't count. liberty mutual stood with me when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. hold on dad... liberty did what? yeah, liberty mutual 24-hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. don't worry - i know what a lug wrench is, dad. is this a lug wrench? maybe? you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. i am totally blind. i lost my sight in afghanistan. if you're totally blind, you may also be struggling with non-24. calling 844-844-2424. or visit my24info.com. lou: we received word that that veal world incidents at the travis air force base is related to what is now described as an acti

officials in bangladesh to drop a corruption investigation of mohammad yunus, a businessman and clinton foundationonor. peter schweizer is the author of "clinton cash." he joins us tonight. so, peter, what is the substance of this investigation? what are they looking for?r? >> basically, the substance of this investigation is that senior state department officials in seeing this investigation taking place, this longtime clinton friend, told b the prime minister of bangladesh, to get their mother, the prime minister, to call off the dogs on the investigation, if they didn't do that, according to the prime minister's son, they were going to have the irs audit him. the son of the bangladeshi prime minister lives in the united states. he has been here for 17 years. so, it was a very serious threat. based on what that individual has said, it is a pretty detailed claim. i think that is why senator grassley is saying this needs to be investigated. >> tucker: so, is it typical for a secretary of state tona insert herself into the internal politics of bangladesh? >> no.o. i mean, look. i think we could all

nobody -- if they can go into detail like that, let us hope that the clinton foundation becomes a target of that investigation. they want to find out what affect russians had on our elections, let's find out what the millions of dollars that went into the clinton foundation did that might have helped hillary's chances of being elected. let's find out that. and let's find out whether or not the millions of -- how much money was actually put into the clinton family's pockets when former president clinton, speaking again before russian oligarchs, was able to receive certain payments, exorbitant payments from what i understand, we need to know exactly what they were, into his own pocket at the same time the russian oligarchs were putting millions, maybe tens of millions, into the clinton foundation. so, ok. that needs to be looked at. but i would suggest that the american people need to go beyond this crisis, this made-up crisis. the american people need to take a look at what we have been accomplishing here. we have been accomplishing. a health care bill passed. yes, it's not a perfect heal

defending the clinton foundation against getting you information and preventing freedom of informationct request. it is and that's great about the foundation? imagine for a second, just stand back, if republicans ever tried to pull anything like this, you know, let's hire donald trump's lawyer to investigate hillary clinton. the left rage would be unlike anything you have ever seen before. if mueller was going to investigate real crimes, real collusion, a real donald trump conspiracy with russia, maybe he should focus attention on other things. let's start with loretta lynch, let's start with the clintons, james comey testified that lynch influenced the investigation into hillary clinton's email server. is that not the textbook definition of obstruction of justice. and if democrats in the media want to talk about collusion, we can talk about collusion. was it wrong for loretta lynch to meet bill clinton on the tarmac or to commence james comey not to say investigation about "a matter?" was it wrong when she said that coming confronted her as having been in the tank for hillary all alon

defending the clinton foundation against getting you information and preventing freedom of informationct request. isn't that great about the foundation? imagine for a second, understand that, if republicans ever tried to pull anything like this, let's hire donald trump software to investigate president hillary clinton. the left-wing outrage would be like nothing you've ever seen before. if mueller wants to investigate actual crimes, actual collusion, by the way, real conspiracy with russia, maybe he should focus his attention on other things, let's start with loretta lynch, let's start with the clinton's. james calmly testified that lynch influenced his investigation, is that not that textbook definition of obstruction of justice and if the democratic media want to talk about collusion, we can talk about collusion. was it wrong for loretta lynch to meet bill clinton on the tarmac or to convince jane comey not to say it investigation, but a matter, or as sharon carter and john solomon have reported, was it wrong when she reported that comey confronted her and having been in the tank hil

in terms of the iranian deal, her being secretary of state, then buying access through the clinton foundation he did not want to open the box. >> kennedy: when you are a commander in chief, you do what is right for the american people, so as perimeter presidet barack obama knew about russian meddling back in august, you do the right thing and you do something about that then. regardless of who is expected to win. that did not happen with him. >> bill: regardless of your ideological preconceptions pretty remember mitt romney in the third debate, the greatest geopolitical threads in the world? russia. he was left off the stage by democrats, and barack obama dismissed it. then it falls into barack obama's lap, and he does nothing about it. that was a "washington post" story that needs more attention. >> kennedy: just to go back to comey and loretta lynch. i am wondering in bringing her up in the testimony of that was a signal to please subpoena the rest of my memoranda. because he was talking about the explicit way in which he documented the conversation that he had with the president. and you a

what was the interaction there with russia, with the clinton foundation, with bill clinton, with hillary clinton then as secretary of state? liz: quickly, to your point, ken starr's whitewater investigation into bill clinton morphed into the monica lewinsky investigation. you're saying the robert mueller investigation into russia meddling could turn into how loretta lynch and the obama administration handled the hillary clinton probe and the clinton foundation. >> exactly rate. liz: thank you so much for your time. >> good to see you. >> the latest in the british election. conservatives still the largest party with 314 votes. they need to hit 326. they got to get to that number in order to win the majority. we're staying on this story for you throughout the night. the british pound dropping after that exit poll was released. and conservative party, theresa may's party would stay in the majority. the results are still coming in. ashley webster will be all over the story. also lou dobbs and neil cavuto throughout the night. >>> back to james comey attacking the "new york times" today sayin

clinton on speaker gingrich says that one of them was actually opposing the foia request for the clinton foundation. that's relevant information for people to have. steve: all right. kellyanne thank you for dropping by. now go back to work in our

of course, he didn't investigate the clinton foundation. uranium one deal. 20% of america's uranium are in the hands of vladimir putin and the clinton foundation got millions from people associated with that deal. here's the bottom line. jim comey is a skilled political operative who navigated his way to the top of the deep state by doing whatever is necessary. that's why i gave him the new name: t j. edgar comey. jay sekulow, the founder of skybridge capital, anthony scaramucci and gregg jarrett. let's start with you and let's go over these issues in terms of the legality. u.s. code 4. 641. >> yep. gregg has done a great job on reporting on 18 u.s. code 4. he had an obligation to go to the department of justice to at least have a file open and report this. if you don't do it, it's a crime. obviously he did not think it was obstruction of justice. number two, let's look at what took place here. the director of the federal bureau of investigation has a meeting with the president of the united states. he takes notes from those meetings and do

the clinton foundation, that slush fund for hillary receiving $140 million. ed, dammit. do something. cut this "kumbaya" crap, put on your big boy pants and act like you're in power. act like you give a damn! and more importantly, convince us that you are not in on the effort to take down the president of the united states. pete: as you guys said, the democrats are united. they've got their talking points, they're resisting. we recognize you're not going to get any democratic votes. if so, then when will republicans close ranks? i want to put out a missing poster for mitch mcconnell. what's he doing? where is he being full-throated about fighting back against this resistance? they're not only to going to lose their agenda, they're going to lose at the ballot box. abby: and some of these attacks have been sick. i mean, already talking politics when you talk about representative scalise and the shooting that happened last week. it should have changed the way we talk about things, really lowered -- >> it did for about 13 seconds. abby: he's already tweeted out so

one of the lawyers that represented the clinton foundation. now, those are the stories we're helping the media hear. those are the scandals that the media should be focused on, instead of the destroying of the president. liketh cnn. like nbc. like the major networks. like the washington post and the new yorkwa times. editor in chief, fox news contributor, nationally syndicated talk show host, actually funny occasionally laura ingram. >> i can't believe that in that litany of the past sins of cnn you forgot one of the best that you've talked about in the past. >> what did i do? >> i can't believe it. >> you forgot the donna brazil sending questions from roland martin in advance to bernie sanders. >> t the was a classic one, almost more than a year ago i stand corrected but that's not a crime. >> rememberor cnn stood by, uh, and claimed that none of that was true. despite the fact that wiki-leaks has a thread they published in october showing that, in fact, she said from time to time, i get questions in advance. that's just another in a long lis

one of the attorneys he has hired represented the clinton foundation. so, jeff, these are six stories that you and cnn and frankly all of you in the left destroy truck media should actually be covering. instead of these tinfoil hat black helicopter conspiracy theories. maybe it's time to step up, and instead of publishing fake, misleading, flat-out fake news, maybe it's time to help the american people the truth. do some real reporting. former governor palin is now suiting the op-ed that incorrectly linked rhetoric to the shooting of congresswoman gabby gifford. "the new york times" later issued a correction, and today we learned that vice news had to retract two stories about president trump. this never ends. with reaction the author of the brand-new book "the smear" sharyl attkisson and fox news correspondent at large geraldo rivera. >> we color coordinated. >> sean: what'd i expect that right out of your mouth? i have two minor additions if i may. to me, the real story is an atmosphere of unremitting hostility. the specificity of your monologue reall

one of the lawyers that represented the clinton foundation, now, those are the stories we're helping the media hear. those are the scandals that the media should be focused on. instead of the destroying of the president. like cnn, nbc, like the major networks, like the "washington post" and the "new york times." reaction to all of this, editor in chief, nationally send dated talk show hosts. funny occasionally, laura ingraham, how are you? >> laura: i can't believe in the litany of the past sins of cnn you forgot one of the best that you've talked about in the past so often. i can't believe this. you forgot the donna brazil sending questions from roland martin in advance to bernie sanders. >> wickie likes showed they all colluded with a hillary. >> laura: that was classic, almost a year ago. >> i stand corrected. but that's not a crime. the other ones are crime where you have ethical problems. >> laura: well it's all, she ultimately resigned from the network in the fall. remember, cnn stood by, and claimed that none of that was true. despite the fact that wikileaks had the thread in

>> let's find out what was going wouldn't clinton foundation and the russians. s find out what was going on with hillary clinton and the russians. let's find out with president obama and whether or not he obstructed justice in that fox clip or was trying to send a message. let's find out. let's go to it. let's get loretta lynch up there. let's get susan rice. come on, carl, let's go. let's rumble. >> carl, your response? >> my response is that we have an incumbent president of the united states who is under investigation as part of -- we need to find out what happened with the russians and the campaign and whether or not there is collusion is part of that question. if any crimes occurred in the clinton administration, there is a justice department that is in place and has every ability to inquire, prosecute those crimes. >> let's investigate. >> matt, i want to bring -- >> i believe there's an assistant attorney general in charge of the criminal division. thus far, i have seen no inclination of that assistant attorney general to prosecute those crimes, if they ex

been very clear about the fact that mueller hiring four democrats, one of them worked for the clinton foundation, but could not find a single pro-trump attorney to hire. i think it's a mistake to pretend that this is going to be some neutral investigation. >> kimberly: so we are hearing a lot discussed about obstruction of justice, the shift has gone from collusion to obstruction. >> greg: it's fake news. it's like those old movies where the hearing is constantly up like this, and then he sitting down at a ramp, but he's going to get dinner. trump all the time has to be doing this while he is getting this other stuff done. he's kind of basically -- they are trying to throw all their stuff at him, but he's trying to get through the side battles while trying to fight to the front battle. it would be interesting if the democrats could just loosen up on their delayed release convulsion. that's what this is. since the election. it never let go. they are still going through it. they've got to learn to live with it. >> kimberly: do you buy the theory, dana? >> dana: two weeks ago when robert mueller wa

one worked for the clinton foundation.ntly couldn't find a single pro-trump attorney to hire, and i think that's a rigged game. >> reporter: mueller will also explore whether the abrupt firing of comey in may was an attempt to disrupt the fbi's russia inquiry. in order to dismiss mueller, the president would have to get consent from deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. good cause for firing of special counsel mueller? >> no, i have not. >> reporter: president trump ignored questions about mueller's fate. >> thank you. thank you very much. >> reporter: attorney general jeff sessions, who has recused himself from the russia investigation did little to clarify the president's thinking. >> do you believe the president has confidence in director mueller? >> i have no idea. >> reporter: but he didn't join the attacks on mueller. >> you would not take any actions to try to have special investigator mueller removed? >> i wouldn't think that would be appropriate for me to do. >>> a new study shows that many mid-sized suvs do a p

one of them is a person who defended the clinton foundation. in this environment with a justice department where 97% of the donations last year went to hillary, 97%, explain to me why i should relax as a republican. >> bob english says the charges against trump are more serious than lying under oath. he writes that former president clinton was impeached for charges less serious than the ones before us now. in the current case, comey was exploring the possibility of american involvement in the russian plot, a treasonous >> what are the charges? >> talked about what they could investigate. >> notice how the whole system, including you moves the game. there are no charges against trump. comey said, three times, no evidence of collusion with trump. senator feinstein. the ranking democrat. >> comey is no longer there. we know that. >> he's said after six months of looking, there is no evidence that trump's involved. senator feinstein said there is no evidence that's been found that trump is involved. so what is the evidence against trump? >> let's t

whatever sort of small donation -- i am not aware of those the nations -- that were made to the clinton foundationi don't think putin was interested in having a good relationship with hillary clinton. that was the rationale behind a lot of the russian actions during the campaign. thisllary clinton had won could have been a focus of attention. president trump is in office and i think the focus of attention turns to him and his business activities. pedro: you talked about that. could you paint a picture of what you might look for as far as relating the president's business activities and relations with russia? mr. pomeranz: the question is how much money did donald trump get to maintain and run his businesses from not just russia, but from ukraine and azerbaijan and from the former soviet union. as i mentioned before, president trump had great difficulty obtaining financing from western banks. therefore, you have to look for alternative means for financing. allegedly, a lot of that money ultimately came from the soviet union. that poses a problem because under various u.s. laws, president trump was

one of these people actually represented hillary clinton's foundation.woman represented her during her email investigation defense. one of the other lawyers that they just hired is representing or represented the guy that smashed hillary clinton's iphone with a hammer. the i.t. guy. on the other hand, you have the relationship between mueller and comey. they worked together for over a decade, they were close friends of the department of justice and the fbi, they were "joined at the hip." it was a mentor-protege situation. so, if he is going to come in and look at the dinner between trump and comey, and his good close friend is the star witness, or potentially the target, can he be impartial? those are the kind of questions people are asking, and like we said before, a lot of times these special prosecutors are like a hammer in search of a nail.in >> juan: i don't know how it'sti new information that robert mueller has some relationship with the former fbi director. >> jesse: it slowly came out. >> juan: they were in the same administration together ten y

haven't the republicans, the department of justice, attorney general, begun investigation of clinton foundation, and clinton e-mails? the reckless disregard for the obligations to preserve the records. >> i think if you have a broad spectrum of looking at team that mueller is putting together is as big as any justice department criminal investigation, she should investigate it all. >> mueller is bringing in democrats. me is in violation of statute, appearance of conflict of interest. in so doing. it is time, is it not? for this administration, department of the justice to attack mueller had on, and get this nonsense ended and if democrats want to play in this foul, stench of a swamp, let them have it. but, stop the nonsense. >> again, remember that they talk about there are day, special counsel acts on behalf of the tern attorney general, my sense either attorney general steps up and says -- lou: has sessions lost his guts? >> i hope not, if he has, someone else needs to come in there, if you let this run for 3 or 4 months or years, that administration will never be able to do anything, it is t

i don't think that whatever small donations and i am not aware of any donations made to the clinton foundation and iun don't think president putin was interested in being able to have a good relationship with hillary clinton. that is the rationale behind so much of russia's actions during the campaign. if hillary clinton had one,s potentially this could of been a focus of attention. she did not win, president trump is in office and naturally, the focus of attention turns to him and his business activity. >> host: you talked about that could you paint a picture of what might people, what you might look for as far as relating the presidents activities and relationships q russia? >> guest: the question is how much money did donald trump get to retain and run his businesses from not just russia but from ukraine, and from the sovie forr soviet union. as i mentioned before, president trump had great difficulty obtaining financing from wester banks and therefore, he had to look for alternative means for financing and allegedly a lot of that money openly came from the former soviet union. that poses a

there were certain questions about secretary clinton's character from the clinton foundation and the way money was raised and actions were taken. some within the state department. i think that that possibility that she could be under advised -- you will be indicted, locker up, all things turned a lot of people who were on the cusp over and said we cannot have that. they voted for the lesser of evils. if comey would not have done that, hillary clinton would have been president. once he got into the investigation of president trump and russian interference, then it was important that he continued on that thread because that was not going to be a political judgment to come down -- it was to agree our democracy in jeopardy? is there a question about treason on any people's part and collusion? for the president to fire the man who was directing that investigation after he apparently asked several people to get them to drop the investigation on flynn, more and more we see here about michael flynn, the more more incredulous in an leasable they allowed him in the hearings when he obviously h

conducting a major investigation and should thus be neutral actually representing the clinton foundation in iraq and tearing up there and she actually represented clinton herself in a lawsuit over her private email so she not only donated to clinton she represented clinton and now she's going to be a member of the team and the rest of probe and we're supposed to believe she'll be impartial just like the probe itself which and this is the worst part to me has probably only just begun. i'm a trial lawyer i've spent countless hours poring through documents to tell the story about the ugly side of cauldron of. corporate media rich uses to talk about the carnage is coming i'm going to paint a clear picture about how disturbing alcool blood corporate conduct has become a mom these are stories that no one else can tell my parents or your host of americans question. what politicians do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president i'm sure. most somewhat want to be rich. but you going to be prosperous like them before three in the morning

one of them worked for the clinton foundation. fo, apparently, couldn't find a single pro-trump attorney to hire and i just think that's a rigged game. >> reporter: mueller, a former f.b.i. director, will also explore whether the abrupt firing of james comey in may was s ptthest mestruct the f.b.i.'s russia inquiry. in order to dismiss mueller, the general rod rosenstein. >> have you seen any evidence of good cause for firing of special counsel mueller? av no, i have not. >> reporter: president trump igmuler's te. yquab.tnoesnk ons out thank you very much. >> reporter: attorney general t'selsessions, whoas recclusy tn toinking. >> do you believe the president n encenfordire ict >> reporter: but he didn't join the attacks on mueller. >> you would not take any actions to try to have investigator mueller s rpeemovel >> i wouldn't think that would be appropriate for me to do.>> e ident trys that pres ump interviewed mueller for the t b.i. director job just the day before the justice department announced that he'd serve as an impartial

there were questions about secretary clinton's character from the clinton foundation and the way that money was raised and action was taken, some of which interface with the state department. the possibility that she could being underictment, investigation all-time, indicted, locker up, those things turned a lot of people on the cusp over and said we can't have that. they voted for what they thought was the lesser of evils. of comey had not done that hillary clinton would have been president. he was wrong. once he got into the investigation of president trump in the russian interference it was important to continue on that thread because there was not going to be a political judgment to come down the pie. was our democracy in jeopardy? is there a question about treason on the part of any people or collusion? complicity? fire theresident to man who was directing the investigation after he to gettly asked several him to drop the investigation on flynn, we always hear about michael flynn more and more, incredulous and unbelievable as it is that they allowed him into sensitive and classif

answer to the first question, the carter center was emulated ith clinton foundation and so they had presidential library, but the foundation to do good the around the world and george w. bush library has the freedom institute, which is more of a think tank and less of a carter center model. presidential obama center will follow the carter center model. massachusetts, independent, go ahead. caller: hi. yeah, i know a couple people who been to the different libraries. i haven't. libraries.ential they were really impressed with he, i guess the quality of everything and i feel -- well, if they were put i think the important, they that aren't places wealthy, go to areas where there re shortages of information, where big library like that boom to people of the area, rather than places that to every form of education available because they are in a well-healed location, that would help a lot. guest: i agree. the only presidential library to has been able demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt they made significant the local economy is the clinton library. other than that, you get a big build it and u wh

hardball like that the president could reopen the investigation into hillary's email and the clinton foundation, take a look at what happened with the irs situation. fast and furious could be reexamined. you brought up the leaks. major "washington post" leaking going on daily. one about jared kushner potentially. and this other obstruction of justice situation that mueller is looking into. these are serious leaks coming out designed in my opinion to undermine the president of the united states from within. >> i'm sure they are. look at the leak now. i don't agree with what general flynn did. but it was a leak of his conversation with the russian ambassador in the "washington post" which is a defacto crime that brought down the national security advisor to the president of the united states. where is the outrage here? and the reason this thing is tolerated is because the media are benefiting from it. together the media and the deep state are determined to bring this president down in disgrace. break his mandate and remove him from office. jesse: he has to do a better job fighting back and make e

could run a criminal enterprise and you not take any interest in it, namely in reference to the clinton foundation, and the obvious conflicts of interest that surrounded its entire life span. those would be interesting to me. would they not you? >> i would love to hear a discussion on many of those topics, lou. now, i think at the same time, there is going to be the central question of what did the president say to you and what did you say to the president. and my guess is that comey is going to testify consistent with what apparently his allies have been leaking, about his conversations with the president, and i expect that's what we'll hear on thursday. i agree with you, there's a lot more fertile territory for the senate to explore with james comey and i hope they'll use that opportunity to do so. lou: at some point, is there one person of mature, mind, spirit and soul, who is going to stand up in the middle of this circus and say, there is no evidence and we have heard the statement that there is no evidence of collusion between mr. trump and mr. putin, or the russians and the trump campaign?