allowed 20% of our uranium reserves to go to the russian firm, whose investors gave money to the clinton foundation. the clinton campaign -- you're talking about actual evidence, not conjecture. my other impression of your interview is -- how refreshing to have someone take responsibility, be transparent and earnest, admit that maybe he would have done things differently. i think many people in last year's election should say they should have done things differently. hillary clinton had a 92% chance of winning michigan. she had a 0% chance. many things could be done differently. at the bottom line is, what came out of this 20 minute brief meeting? nothing helpful, meaningful, consequential. if that weren't true, there would have been immediate follow-up. no follow-up whatsoever. >> sean: the woman being paid by the dnc -- i will go to the politico article --dash she shared her findings with officials. she went to the ukrainian embassy and they were disseminating false information on donald trump. they even take credit for helping to push out a paul manafort at that particular point in the campaign.

clinton foundation. what about the russian dossier of the clinton foundation got their hands on.eone, i think john mccain had it. it ended up being all falls, all foreign put together. christopher steele was a british national with the information together. collusion was far more pungent on the left than anything to do with trump. >> eboni: jeff, let me ask you. we can have that conversation eric is talking about. at some point, that narrative also got stale. aren't we going to have to look at what the trump administration is doing? >> yes. we can go back and look at what the clintons did and on and on. i agree at some point we have to be in the present moment and move forward and focus on what's happening now. >> kat: i don't understand why we are talking about the clintons right now. yeah, they've gotten away with a lot. they are at the center of a lot of corruption but i don't understand how anybody can look at these emails cannot be at least bothered and not say he clearly made the wrong choice in this instance. >> i will go back to what eric was saying. i get your frustratio

people involved in that field, they kicked back as much as $145 million to the clinton foundation. democrats and the media in the country if they care about the rule of law, the equal application of the rule of law, it's time to start demanding justice, time to start investigating these scandals and these people need to be put under oath. from circa news sarah carter is a lawyer and investigator, gregg jarrett, john solomon welcome back, good to see you. john let's go back to her investigative work here, tell us why this is so critical to all the donald trump junior hype. >> if you go back to last saturday, just days ago, the story was there was a kremlin backed lawyer who snuck into trump tower and had a secret conversation with donald trump, jr., that looked like collusion, people were using trees and on monday morning. what we found out that this lawyer was part of a lobbying campaign commits a private attorney, a lobbying campaign that started before the donald trump meeting in march when a congressman dana war barker was approached and carried out all the way through june when

clinton. the foundation, the clinton foundation that they have reserved and that up and so mention anydo not ofhis and i was a federal employee for 39 years. in the area of taxation and what is going on with the clinton foundation is unbelievable. rolfe from charlottesville. keith, independent line. caller: thank you for c-span. opaganda, tell their lives, but that young man cannot tell a straight story if he tried. us got up fairly early for this -- we will show little bit more from that interview, but how long did sean hannity speak with donald trump junior? caller: that interview went what, 20 minutes or better? host: you listened to it. you talked about him being a liar. do you think he learned any new information that you learned any new information you did not learn before? caller: the young man -- he is not even truly part of this administration, yet he is part of this administration. this is one of the most bizarre times in american history. it is incredible what america can believe. it is almost shameful, the nonsense we can believe when we should be thinking about one another and work

. >> if you are looking forcluding clinton foundation. wraclin >> if you top look at collusion and foreign influence and uses sear o state secretary of state position as a arm for clinton foundation. look no further. lou: i don't want to. i want to look at jewel company, and money they received. and connection to the enterprise, why isn't that part of the collusion discussion investigation, why? >> very cute with your coleague mar maria bartiromo, he said i don't have any stock in russian company, his holdings are in massachusetts incorporated u.s. afilliate of that russian company. podesta likes to play both ways, he is deeply involved with the russia taft and the they like to play word games or parse language it is more disgraceful behavior. lou: chris ferrel thank you. we appreciate you and judicia judiciary catch and your inquiring ways. we hope more is produced on this russian collusion. thank you. >> thank you. trish: we're coming right back we're have a lot more, all of it in a while. >> guess what, machines still don't to the vote

>> i think it's very important that the american people know the truth about the clinton foundation.ncerned that the media isn't spending more time asking these pertinent questions. we are arguing more about the source of the information but in the end, the american people need to know what was the clinton foundation doing with the russians, especially as it pertains to uranium. >> eric: you talk about the clinton foundation -- >> of the big news story of today is the email that went on between donald trump, jr., and gladstone. i am not the kind of democrat who hates donald trump, i don't hate the term family. i have been willing to take them on their word that they were not requesting information or trying to find dirt on the hillary clinton campaign through the russians. but now that it is obvious that they lied to us. this is something, if you are a donald trump supporter, if they had just gotten it together, if this white house had just gotten it together from the start, think about how much of the agenda they would have been able to accomplish. this is a very aggressive presiden

one of the lawyers working for him worked for the clinton foundation, she didn't want you to know many things, she was trying to squash freedom of information act requests. the special counsel is full of conflicts of interest, he's becoming more corrupt by the day.al it's time to expose who these people are. we've also found out that the former obama attorney general loretta lynch influence of the investigation into hillary's email server. erremember, she told james comay it's a matter, not an investigation and he listened to her. then she met 40 minutes on the tarmac with bill clinton that happened to be days before he let hillary clinton off the hook. congress is only beginning to touch the surface on these issues and examine this, but they've got to up the urgency and to move faster. including revisiting hillary clinton email investigation, so much evidence that lynch influence the investigation. we know hillary broke the law. why? she had a top-secret, special access information. program access on the email server, that's mishandling, that's a felony, she destroyed some of it, that

was secretary of state. >> sean: how rich did they get. $145 million plus to the clinton foundationof dollars in speaking fees. it is hard to know. it was a financial bet for them and classic exchange. you have the clintons making and getting all. money and the russians getting the benefit in return. urannian and the transfer arrangement. there is a clear exchange and yet no outcry to investigate it. if it were trump instead of clinton i would support a investigation and others would too. >> peter, we appreciate it. >> thank you, sean. >> sean: up next on hannity. >> let me very clear. i did not collude with russia nor do i know of anyone else in the campaign who did so. >> sean: he could not be any more clear. he did not collude with the russians. and also later tonight, they have a important minimonologue and how you the american people can stand up to "fake news" and stand up to the agenda of those who are trying to destroy what you voted for. there's nothing more important to me than my vacation. so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy. booking.com

more scandal related to the clinton foundation, the intersection with the clinton state department. screams for the need -- as president, to tell this justice department to take a look at the clinton investigation was handled were mishandled and if they need to be reinvigorated or re-started. with all this information. and fbi mishandling the information, giving everyone immunity. where records are destroyed. the necessary restarting. >> sean: jay, i agree with gregg. we have to reopen these cases. this is obstruction of justice. with the mom and pop shop and deletion of emails and this new information. does it take to get an investigation into multiple, serious felonies if your last name isn't trump or sean hannity or jay sekulow? >> you have to look at it right now. this is the reality. we left off the famous tarmac discussion between the former president and the then current attorney general of the united states, loretta lynch. that's all going on simultaneously. here's the commonality. who was the director of the fbi when all of this was going on? james comey, who we now know is

people involved in that deal kicked back over $100 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled the speaking fees in moscow. where i grew up from, that's called bribery. pay to play. it then we have the former attorney general, loretta lynch. she also pressured james comey to call the investigation in to the clinton server a matter, not an investigation. who cares about possible obstruction of justice in that case? of course we have the deep state. what have they been doing? selectively leaking and unmasking raw intelligence to a corrupt media. the deep state leaks are so bad that a recent senate report found they were happening at a rate of one a day through the end of may. 125 leaks and 126 days. seven times more than the previous two administrations. nothing there, right? comey leaked government documents to the media. at that they care? not at all. members of the destroy-trump-media have been lying, smearing, slandering, trying to delegitimize the president and stop him from doing his job. that is what they do. we shouldn't care, right? it shows how abusi

they kicked back over $100 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled the speaking fees in moscow. let's not forget the clinton foundation, taking millions of dollars from the worst human rights record nations. since he took office, 125 deep state leaks and 126 days. by the way, they are all likely felonies and happened at a rate which is seven times greater in the previous two administrations. what about lieutenant general michael flynn? you will follow the story, have you been reporting on the fact that he was unmasked and that intel, raw intelligence was leaked to the press? that would be a crime. then james comey. company of comey's seven the most contained classified information. the comey may have committed to felonies. broken the law, removing those files from the fbi. i will end on this note to the mainstream media. you have zero credibility left. spreading fake news stories, you will be critical of all my interviews but you carry out or your personal attacks against the president and his family and anybody that dares to be a

one worked for the clinton foundation. justice department has specific rules. for the clinton foundation, it almost seems like that would cause them to recuse themselves from this investigation? >> tell, you steve, it would seem to me, when you are investigating the president sy, the president, the white house, oval office itself, heart of american democracy, you better make damn sure that every t is crossed, every i dotted. i would urge those on the mueller team and the other investigatory agencies probing the trump administration now to make sure their own homes are in order. to make sure this like caesar's wife, beyond reproach. if any indeed can be proven to given money to the clinton foundation that is a strong indication that maybe objectivity isn't, isn't a foregone conclusion. if there is that taint, i would hope because the stakes for the american people are so high, put aside partisanship, put aside where you come from, where you hail idealogically or politically speaking, do this for your country, have the courage, sometimes, the sometimes the courag

they kicked back over $100 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled the speaking fees in moscow. let's not forget the clinton foundation, taking millions of dollars from nations with the worst human rights records. a senate report showing that the trump administration has had to deal since he took office, 125 deep state leaks and 126 days. by the way, they are all likely felonies and happened at a ratee which is seven times greater in the previous two administrations.ti what about lieutenant general michael flynn? you will follow the story, have you been reporting on the factti that he was unmasked and that intel, raw intelligence was leaked to the press? that would be a crime. thenss james comey. four of comey's seven memosou contained classified information. the fbi considers the memos to be government property. comey may have committed two felonies. broken the law, removing thosehe files from the fbi. i m will end on this note to the mainstream media. you have zero credibility left. spreading fake news stories, you will be criti

and people involved in that deal, kicked back as much as $145 million into the clinton foundation. that's called bribery where i grew up. while bill clinton doubled his speaking fees in moscow, nobody else is telling you. it's outrageous the double standard beyond anything i've seen in my lifetime. joining us former governor of new hampshire, john sununu, and fox news anchor, bob jarrett, and the president's attorney, the chief counsel for the american center for justice, jay sekulow. have you ever seen a double standard like that? >> you're right about a double standard. we have to keep up at it. a couple points are more serious than you made them. the ukrainian folks are puppets of putin. they provided opposition research, and therefore provided a campaign contribution. so the clintons were guilty of not reporting that campaign contribution. if they want to play this game, we have to be specific, be sharp, we have to be focused, and we have to point these things out. i'm not a lawyer. you got two other lawyers on with me. i'm sure they can tell you how serious that is. the other p

what's even worse one of the lawyers to mueller's team is working for clinton and the clinton foundation. with also learned that the former obama attorney general loretta lynch influence the investigation into the email server scandal pressuring james comey to call it a matter instead of an investigation. inme the 40 minute tarmac meetig with bill clinton, when are we going to put these people under oath? it's got to happen sooner's than later. all of this includes re-opening -- this is the most important part -- if were going to have equal justice under the law, reopen hillary clinton's email investigation since we know in that particular case, lynch influence to that investigation. there's also hillary breaking the law, having top secret special access program, classified information on her server that's mishandling by definition and then destroying stuff, than the corrupt uranium one deal. she was serving as secretary of state, america's uranium, the foundational material nuclear weapons a real russian conspiracy. that goes to vladimir putin, that goes to the russians. people involved

millions of dollars to the clinton foundation and i understand even hundreds of thousands of dollars put in her husband's pocket for a speech that he gave in russia. these things need to be looked at. but instead, what we're hearing about is sinister-sounding words about a meeting, a meeting, where someone said they had some information that would help, yes, the campaign, but the reason it would help the campaign is it was -- there was supposedly information that showed that hillary clinton was involved in some activity that was contrary to the interests of the united states or contrary to the law. and to the law. if someone says they want to give you information, there's nothing wrong with that. in fact, i would hope my colleagues who just said what is happening on our side of the aisle is naked partisanship, i wonder if the democratic party and my other colleagues in this body are calling for hillary to release all of her emails and make sure that we have under oath an explanation of these transactions to the clinton foundation. but instead, we're hearing all sorts of sinister desc

the university deal which had $2 million to the clinton foundation. the silicon valley of russia. if someone came to a political campaign and said we have information on your political opponent, of course you should listen to that. where else do you think we're going to hear it? do you think cnn, which provided the debate questions in advance to hillary clinton's campaign? liz: the media's elevating donald trump jr.'s, you know, meeting as if the trump campaign took foreign campaign donations. we know the clinton campaign under bill clinton did that with china, and they had to turn back money; right? >> yeah. i mean, the statutes that govern that, liz, is actually good time because there's a provision that they can point to. there's a civil law provision about taking foreign money. it's not really been used to prosecute, to take it to the crÈme level in the clinton case, which they actually had the transfer of funds. they did the refund back, you know? it was, again, a civil matter. these are not criminal matters. and in this situation, if everything

over in russia, millions of dollars to the clinton foundation. and i understand, hundreds of thousands of dollars put into her husband's pocket for a speech that he gave in russia. these things need to be looked at. hearingead, what we are about is sinister-sounding words meeting, a meeting, or someone said they had some information that would help, yes, the campaign. but the reason it would help the campaign is a supposedly information showed hillary clinton was involved in some activities that were contrary to the interests of the united states or contrary to the law. and yes, if someone says to you that they want to give you information, there is nothing wrong with that. in fact, i would help my colleagues who called us who just said what is happening on our side of that i'll is "naked partisanship," i wonder if the democratic party and my other body ares in this calling for hillary to release , and to makeails sure we have, under oath, an explanation of these transactions about the foundation? but instead, we are hearing all sorts of sinister

they'll talk about hillary clinton and the clinton foundation and that's fine. we're not talking hillary clinton and the clinton foundation. we're talking about the leader of the free world and the commander in chief. we're talking about the president of the united states. to the point of changing stories, we've seen this. when you talk about a pattern, we saw michael flynn, the fired national security adviser was not necessarily truthful in what his relations were or his discussions were with the russian ambassador. we also saw that jared kushner had had to change or at least amend his forms to get his top secret clearance. we also saw the attorney general, jeff sessions, during his confirmation hearing not reveal that he himself had met with the russian ambassador. they all have answers or excuses for doing so. but you have to wonder when you see all this smoke, what i don't understand is why people get upset when we look for the fire. >> i have to say the response from the president's team tonight is that asked for reaction in the "new york times" report, mark

lou: do you believe that the attorney general sessions opens up the investigations on the clinton foundatione clinton emails, the clinton corruption, and the actions of certainly the attorney general of the obama administration, would he keep his job? >> that's what he needs to do. if he doesn't do it that's when he needs to go away frankly. lou: we are coming right back with much more on jeff sessions, the attorney general, and our president. but when family members forget, trust angie's list to help. [ barks ] visit angieslist.com today. everything i did circled smaround that cigarette when i started taking the chantix that urge just slowly diminished and it was a great and empowering feeling. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. chantix reduced my urge to smoke. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. some people had changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, agitation, depressed mood or suicidal thoughts or actions with chantix. serious side effects may include seizures, new

. >> you have millions of dollars flowing into the clinton foundation. g against the sanctions move. and while promoting -- from the same entity that was promoting the uranium one stock which was spiraling out of control downward at the time clinton was making his speech. going back to what are we suppose to be concerned about, according to the donald trump, jr. email the russians wanted to talk -- the russians were completing with trump to talk about the collusion with clinton because they had dirt on russians and the dnc. i can't make that work in my head. maybe some here in washington can, but it doesn't make sense. when it doesn't make sense, i don't believe the underlying theory that there was collusion of any substantive nature. what i am concerned with is maybe they thought they were telling the truth. maybe they thought there was information on collusion with the russians. i think that ought to be a subject of investigation. my view is investigate everything. make it clear it's being done in an independent, serious fair way which it can't be done

donated thousands of dollars to the democrats and even hiring hillary clinton's attorney on the clinton foundationke news dossier which has connections to democrats. the dossier commissioned by republicans but clinton paid for that. steele a former spy put it together. that should be shocking. it didn't stop democrats from repeating the falls information found in the dossier. there is progress. we are pressing every day. so we have equal justice under the law. fox news left-handers that the co-found is cooperating with the senate judiciary committee. the american people deserve complete investigations into this all of these scandals, but we can't take our eye off the ball, repeal and replace. here with reaction geraldo rivera and monica crowley. this is where i am torn. i think the double standard is outrageous. the nevada wolf pack in all of these cases overwhelming. republicans are in control of these committees. why aren't they doing their job there? why is it so hard to get repeal and replace done at this point? >> yes, two separate questions all going to the same point. when democrats are in

oligarchs how much as the clinton foundation received from qatar?. >> do we know of any? maybe it hasn't. >> none of us have those figures there is some debate with the united states asked qatar day ask them to be open since they were already there. >> i have one minute left so madam chairman i do think it would be fitting that we make a request to find out if qatar has been the source of major donations to the clinton foundation and if indeed our government during that time when hillary clinton was secretary of state did indeed ask qatar to permit some of these terrorist organizations this needs to be looked at very closely because we know the clinton foundation and russia was receiving tens of millions from the russian oligarchs. so whether al qaeda or hezbollah but 1.made earlier do not consider the rebuilding of guys the to be a positive act. if indeed the palestinians are shooting rockets into israel and israel retaliates for qatar just to step forward and rebuild everything that is destroyed by the israeli retaliation rearing purging the people

add special counsel, and that james comey should be pulled investigated in his actions and clinton foundationhould not be the subject of a major investigation. may i add to it, that we have two oversight committees, intelligence committees in senate and house, who have not done a damn thing. they are acting as if -- >> unmasks names and leaking things, we have judiciary committees when talk about a justice department matter who should get involved. we've been pushing that for i don't know how long. james comey misled us in that and this year, he furthered idea that trump was under investigation and was not, was told 3 times by fbi, he gets fired, leaks a memo to friend of new york time with stated goal of creating momentum for the special counsel, and like we said, not just any special counsel but his friend, predecessor, mentor, bob mueller, unbelievable. lou: turning to development, senator macdougal connel -- mitch mcconill, not going home on august first. senate will have time to work, i can't proms they will work, but they will have time to work on the health care legislation. they will

while that was going on the people involved in the deal kicked back over $145 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton doubled his speaking fees in moscow. doesn't that sound like something the congressional investigators, robert mueller should be focussed on or looking into? and the fake news dossier that has ties to the hillary clinton campaign and the phony dossier quoting russians was originally commissioned by a donor but a clinton ally wound up funding it and cited russian government sources or sources tied to the russian government. doesn't that sound like colluding with a foreign government? and the law firm with ties to fusion gps and the russian lawyer with donald trump jr. what's disgusting is the democrats feigning disgust were willing to repeat information from the dossier that used russian sources in some cases. doesn't that make democrats complicit in this? we'll let you decide. look at what they said about the phony dossier which is proven false citing russians. >> do you believe anything about the dossier? >> oh, i think it should be taken a look at. i think they should

states and efforts to shape the united states but how do you do that without investigating the clinton foundationllary clinton, bill clinton, all the people surrounding them? i'm perfectly happy to have them be tough-minded about trump but they are to be tough-minded about mueller. they are to be tough-minded about comey. how can he testify and say, the arrogance of saying i gave this link to a friend of mine at colombia university so he would give it to "the new york times," so i would give it to the special counsel. that is such a blatant public arrogant abuse of power, where's the investigation? why isn't comey in the process of being investigated? >> sean: all great questions, i've got to tell you. this is getting really ugly and the conflicts of interest and double standards are amazing. we'll take a break, will have more with newt gingrich right after this break. texas senator ted cruz will join us later in the studio, he'll explain how republicans can get to a "yes" on repealing, replacing obamacare and lowering premiums. later tonight. >> here's a news flash for the leftist mainstream med

go from here when you can't get the attorney general, his own appointee, to investigate the clinton foundation there were collusions between russia and the obama administration. kim: nobody is doing anything about that, now, are they? the justice department gets to get on board and do a proper investigation and follow through on the facts and evidence that are there. he needs to put somebody up against it. there are too many free passes up here. i think it's enough already. lou: thanks so. appreciate it. join her tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern on "the five" on the fox news channel. president trump taking part in a prayer circle in the oval office. pastor robert jeffress joins us after this break to talk about it all. i join john hannity to discuss the deep state's efforts to subvert the president and his administration. stay with us. we are coming right back. don't miss a single moment of don't miss a single moment of it. ♪i hope life treats you kind ♪and i hope you have all you've dreamed of♪ ♪and i wish you joy and happiness♪ ♪but above all this i wish you love♪ ♪and i will always love you ♪i

is there any -- how much has the clinton foundation rz seeceivedm qatar? do we know -- or maybe qatar has not given any money to the foundation, is that right? >> none of us have those figures, but i just want to correct one thing. there's some debate as to what the united states might have asked qatar to do or not regarding the taliban, and i think it's now clear. they asked qatar to allow this office to be open since the taliban was already there. >> all right -- >> this is not hamas and this is not hezbollah and al qaeda. >> i'm sorry. i have one minute left on this and let me just note. madam chairman -- >> you have more time. don't worry about it. >> i think it would be fit, madam chairman, that we make a request to find out if qatar has been the source of major donations to the clinton foundation, and if indeed our government during the time when hillary clinton was our secretary of state did indeed ask qatar to permit some of these that we consider terrorist organizations into their country. this needs to be looked at very closely because we know tha