well the largest unprosecuted fraud in history is going on right now that's the clinton foundation the obama foundation creating these fake foundations that our audit is where billions of dollars is sent towards these foundations but not accounted for where they're engaged in partisan activities where they're enriching the clinton family the obama family and all of that is supported in the case of the clinton foundation by the ivy league by the big universities the universities who if the drug ministration wanted to do this could be put out of business i mean you could go to a harvard which has support of the clinton foundation and say listen you're engaged in illegal enormous you're donating to a charity that doesn't exist we want to shut you down you're out of for profit corporation technically you could do that if you wanted to you know mark it's really interesting i mean i've got one interesting element in all of this i used to be an academic and. i was basically hounded out because i can't i can't accept political correctness because in accepting political correctness gets in the

now top republican senator john baraso now expanding a uranium one probe that involves the clinton foundation finding out that the russian-owned min ing company connected with clintons was able to shift american uranium outside the united states despite clinton supporters making denials to the contrary. the details are next. today we're out here with some big news. jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease... ...and lower your a1c. wow. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, and trouble breathing. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction. symptoms of an allergic reaction include rash, swelling, and difficulty breathing or swallowing. do not take jardiance if you are

i will let you close tout. >> my focus on fact enormous gifts to the clinton foundation. it's not whether there was a process, nine agencies approve it and so forth. it may have been exactly the right thing to do. why were these gifts enormous year after year after year to the clinton foundation. >> laura: i don't think it was a good thing to do. have a russian interest. everyone is always afraid of russia. now russia owns 20% of uranium stake. oh that could have been a good thing? i don't understand how you think that could be a good thing. >> i think it's very clear that countries like kazakhstan and others honestly believe you need to give gifts to get things done. wonderful work, aids, they spend every penny on doing good. what you are looking at is the intention of the authorities. that's very different at pointing fingers at the clintons. >> laura: both of you have a wonderful holiday. by the way guys, much of the world today at the condemned the president's recognition of jerusalem as the capital of israel. where does the president go where does the president go fr

know that hillary clinton was far more kind of russia and russia paid far more money to the clinton foundation than they've ever given donald trump so that is the bungs completely debunked to say that dosia is a relevant is ridiculous think of the legal concept fruits of the poisonous tree when i when i was active law enforcement if i proved presented junk to a judge and i lied i stood in front of that judge and said i vetted this it's valid when i knew it wasn't when i knew it was garbage and that judge gave me a warrant a defense attorney would get the entire case thrown out because it supports industry i provided drunk to get the warrant i got the warrant under unconstitutional false pretenses which is exactly what happened with the doses of the dosey is not irrelevant dosia is the crux of the issue and there is nothing improper nothing illegal smoking nothing remotely wrong with opposition research whether it comes from a russian a saudi arabia of venezuelan a canadian a texan or someone from rhode island as long as you're not exchanging money and not disclosing it there is nothing remotel

and needs to be investigated. >> katie: harris, my question to you about accountability, the clinton foundation longer around really. is it going to get anywhere? >> harris: this is different though. this is a situation of this foundation that took money from countries that don't treat women well. that would be bad enough. this has to do is national security. since there are some conflicting reports about how much uranium, what it was used for, i think it bears a closer look at, just so we know the answers are. if something was really done wrong and criminally, that exposes our national security. we need to know about that. the accountability level is a little bit different than what we talked about previously with the other issues. >> katie: the timeline here is really interesting. they sent a letter to the obama administration in 2010. here we are almost 2018, eight years later, what does that mean when it comes to the questions that haven't been answered? >> david: there is no downside to having an investigation and finding out what really happened. you all have hits on the crux of what this

it's expected, and what has gone on for years, but over $200 million found its way into the clinton foundation and bill clinton's pockets, a piece of that, and yet, and also, she claims she didn't chair the meeting. of course, she didn't chair the meeting. they know enough not to have the fingerprints on that directly. she had one of her people chair the meeting. whole notion that the clintons had nothing do with this purchase is, you know, yeah, i just say like they say in brooklyn, yeah, right, you know? that's just a crazy thought, and liz, have you ever heard an explanation by anybody why this was good for the united states of america? i never heard an explanation from anybody. liz: that's a good question. >> why is this good? of course, it isn't good. liz: that's a great point, sifias, for the viewer and the radio listeners, it is a panel of nine federal agencies that signed off on a foreign purchaser of u.s. assets, meaning uranium. the russian company got approval by sifias to buy uranium one. everybody in the media, jim, misses the elephant standing in the room, and it's this. the sifi

jeannie wray, very defended the clinton foundation against foia requests. in fact, half of the members of the mueller team have financially contributed to the complains of barack obama or hillary clinton or both, and none of them contributed to donald trump. i don't think it's a coincidence and i think it's ridiculous that the congress doesn't have any information about how these people were selected, how they were vetted, how they were approved. but it's not just the mueller team. it's also the department of justice. bruce orr, the head of counterintelligence, he meets with christopher steele who is the author of the dossier during the campaign, and then after the campaign, he meets with glenn simpson. all the while bruce orr, working at the department of justice, has a spouse getting paid by the very people developing these lies about the president to discredit him. it is smoking gun evidence of bias and conflict of interest. but it's not just the mueller team and the department of justice. it's also the f.b.i. andrew mccabe is the current deputy director

the more the american people learn about the pro-hillary bias in the investigation of the clinton foundation and the anti-trump bias that my grade from this team over to the mueller investigation. the more we start to see change and the more the truth comes out. gregg: how about the exoneration statement that was originally composed by james comey, the fbi director. in the original version he finds hillary clinton broke the law. somebody changed the language to absolve her. who did that? and isn't that obstruction of justice if they did it for a political reason? >> the elements of obstruction of justice would be met if you had senior officials changing this statement prepared by james comey. that is the definition of obstruction of justice. there is a team of people that appear to have been involved in the drafting of this exoneration statement. james comey was involved. there were drafts sent around to other people. we'll get to the got tomorrow of who had their nantd cookie jar as hillary clinton was held to a different standard. she got special treatment because she was a asked for presi

the question fbi agents are now looking at about that uranium one deal linked to the clinton foundation. we are keeping an eye on the united nations this morning. the general assembly getting ready to condemn the jerusalem decision. nikki haley is set to speak within the next few minutes. we'll bring that to you live the second it starts. i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424. the great emperor trekking a hundred miles inland to their breeding grounds. except for these two fellows. this time next year, we're gonna be sitting on an egg. i think we're getting close! make a u-turn... u-turn? recalculating... man, we are never gonna breed. just give it a second. you will arrive in 92 days. nah, nuh-uh. nope, nope, nope. you know who i'm gonna follow? my instincts. as long as gps can still get you lost, you can count on geico saving folks money. i'm breeding, man. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. >>> so, right now fbi deputy di

until we have a thorough investigation of the bribes that the clinton foundation took and the actions that fell as a consequence of those bribes, i fear we won't truly know the depth of the corruption and the last administration. we've got the change the law so that never again can we have a circumstance where someone gets special treatment because of their political status or because they're a candidate for high office. that is not the blind lady justice that we promised the american people in this country under our contusion, jesse. >> i agree with that 100%. so are you calling for a new or second special counsel to investigate hillary and the foundation? >> for five months now, over 20 members of the judiciary committee have been calling for a second special counsel to investigate the clinton foundation, the e-mail server and the handling of that process. what is so troubling is that the attorney general has been sitting on his hands despite the fact that we've had these calls for a second special counsel. it's a double standard when you have the special counsel that has a limit bu

i don't think they knew that the clinton foundation had taken $145 million from a company that was acquiring these mining rights. i'm not sure we understood the connection between the $500,000 fee that president clinton took from russian interests connected to this transaction. i am not sure we in understood the entire scope of it. we certainly did not understand the role of mr. mueller, mr. comey, mr. mccabe, and mr. rosenstein at the time. now we do, which is why i laid this out in the long piece for infowars, and why i have reported on it for the last week. i think you have real evidence, unlike the collusion investigation, of what could be the largest financial crime in history. >> just following up on the uranium one story, it is complicated. but as i understand it, part of what is new here is the focus on the investigation of bribery and corruption by an employee in the united states. the theory of your case is that mueller news that and should have alerted senior people in the justice department and the obama administration about it so that they could have pulled the plug on the urani

all this money going to the clinton foundation and to bill clinton's pocket where people connected to uranium one. so you have this expansive time period but, really, you are talking about a few actors and i think from the standpoint of investigating that, if you have the right tools, which the fbi asked the doj for, it would not be that hard to figure out precisely what went on. and i think that's the next step. >> kimberly: it's so interesting because you look at that long time frame and how about coordination and collusion there in terms of these people working together and i mean this is really fascinating to me that why wasn't this looked at? you know, during the obama administration or prior and then nothing while hillary clinton is, you know, running for president of the united states? but yet they want to accuse president trump of collusion and his transition team and do a gigantic document and wire grab without really any evidence to support it and they come up with nothing there. >> well, you know, kimberly, i said at the beginning of this process they should look into the r

another investigator represented former national security advisor ben rhodes and the clinton foundation as well as hillary clinton herself in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails. what about all of that? joining me to talk about it, chris farrell from judicial watch. there are so many highly qualified, experienced and skilled lawyers across america who do not have a political ax to grind. had mueller chosen them, it would have lent credibility and integrity to his investigation. he chose not to do that. are you concerned that the mueller team, including mueller himself, have extreme political bias and corrupt motives? >> the credibility is less than zero. the unlawful or highly questionable investigative tactics that have been employed so far, and i have reason to believe chairman nunes from the intelligence committee has been lied to over and over again with respect to this unmasking issue. in large part the same cast of characters, the same inner circle who are willfully blind with respect to the clinton foundation and mrs. clinton's server and uranium one, but they have exc

gee, wouldn't they still have contributed if it was all about the good the clinton foundation was doing instead of a quid pro quo, you give us this uranium, we'll make you rich and you'll hit the russian lottery, the mega millions for the clintons and hit the russian lottery, they did. . a former f.b.i. agent sid the investigation into strohs and the emails shows, quote a bias that can't be ignored, particularly if he had any -- anything to do with flynn's interview and his role in it. the former intelligence official questioned, quote, how logical is it that flynn is being charged for lying to an agent whose character and neutrality was called into question by the special counsel? according to an anonymous source in "the washington post," strohs and pates exchanged a number of texts that, quote, expressed anti-trump sentiments that appeared to favor clinton. that was apparently between him and his lover. man s not because he's a full of hate. apparently, a man full of love. mccabe told flynn, quote, some agents were heading over to the white house but flynn thought it was part of the r

i view payments to the clinton foundation and to bill and hillary as bribes as well. they should be seen in the context. it is somewhat ironic that this ended up on mr. rosenstein's desk. i to scratch my head about the appointment of rosenstein. my understanding that he was recommended for this job by elijah cummings, the democratic congressman. i have an example talked about of the president in many cases appointing establishment republicans who do not support his agenda for reform. who did not vote for him. and i fear the extent to which he is surround himself with people who did not support him, who are not loyal to him. i am a loyal supporter of the president and i'm concerned about some of the people he has perhaps inadvertently put around him. michael: you have said you don't believe the president should fire mueller. do you believe you should fire rosenstein? stone: third reason i don't believe he should fire mueller is -- the reason i don't believe he should fire mueller is i believe democrats feel that lost the upper hand and i think they are trying to goad h

know that hillary clinton was far more kind of russia and russia paid far more money to the clinton foundation than they've ever given donald trump so that is the bum's completely debunked to say the dosey is a relevant is ridiculous think of the legal concept fruits of the poisonous tree when i when i was active law enforcement if i proved presented junk to a judge and i lied i stood in front of that judge and said i vetted this it's valid when i knew it wasn't when i knew it was garbage and that judge gave me a warrant a defense attorney would get the entire case thrown out because if it supports industry i provided drunk to get the warrant i got the warrant under unconstitutional false pretenses which is exactly what happened with the doses so that o.c. is not irrelevant the dosey is the crux of the issue and there is nothing improper nothing illegal smoking nothing remotely wrong with opposition research whether it comes from a russian a saudi arabia of venezuelan a canadian a texan or someone from rhode island as long as you're not exchanging money and not disclosing it there is nothing r

know that hillary clinton was far more kind of russia and russia paid far more money to the clinton foundation than they've ever given donald trump so that is the bum's completely debunked to say the dosey is a relevant is ridiculous think of the legal concept fruits of the poisonous tree when i when i was active law enforcement if i proved presented junk to a judge and i lied i stood in front of that judge and said i vetted this it's valid when i knew it wasn't when i knew it was garbage and that judge gave me a warrant a defense attorney would get the entire case thrown out because if it supports in history i provided drunk to get the warrant i got the warrant under unconstitutional false pretenses which is exactly what happened with the doses of those he is not irrelevant dosia is the crux of the issue and there is nothing improper nothing illegal smoking nothing remotely wrong with opposition research whether it comes from a russian a saudi arabia of venezuelan a canadian a texan or someone from rhode island as long as you're not exchanging money and not disclosing it there is nothing remo

help the clinton foundation? down the clinton foundation donor list and the fusion gps source list and employee list and say hey, we need you guys in the doj and on the special counsel. sean, this woman works there. she said she's married to a guy who had a very powerful position in the doj, who by the way didn't feel they need to disclose this, that this may have been a conflict of interest. by the way, why wasn't all of the stuff sold to the house intelligence committee a long time ago? why so cryptic about it if there's nothing to hide? listen, this is one big joke on the american people, but unfortunately it will have real-world ramifications. >> sean: hillary got past by comey. do you think hillary, now that we know they denied a four-year, that her campaign and money of the dnc she was running according to donna brazile, that they paid for this russian propaganda, these lies to influence the american people, is that collusion? >> are you asking me? >> sean: and asking you. austin goolsby, is that you? >> is

she represented former obama top aide ben rhodes and the clinton foundation. the krichtion of the -- the corruption of the leadership of the fbi and department of justice is now obvious. the doj and the fbi's political corruption the source of a hearing today. we'll talk about that agency's tie to the trump dossier and what they did with it. also tonight, embattled senator al franken is resigning but not apologizing. the minnesota democrat says he won't step down for weeks, despite calls from his senate colleagues to do so immediately, effectively telling the democratic party to go to hell. wildfires raging through southern california for a fourth day. no end in sight. firefighters are battling four major fires that have burned 100,000 acres in ventura and los angeles county, and none of those fires even close to being contained. new evidence of political corruption surfacing today in the special counsel's office and the department of justice. we learned one of robert mueller's top attorneys, jeanie reid previously represented ben rhodes in the beenr -- in the

nine people involved in the deal made donations to the clinton foundation totalling more than $140 million. in exchange, secretary of state clinton approved the sale to the russians. a quid pro quo. the accusation is predicated on the charge that secretary clinton approved the sale. she did not. a committee of nine evaluated the sale. the president approved the sale. the nuclear regulatory commission and others had to offer permits, and none of the uranium was exported for use by the u.s. to russia. that is uranium one. >> i love shep smith. but other than the obvious explanation of using the justice department to punish donald trump's political opponents, what possible explanation exists for today's development? and with control of both the house and the senate, why would the republicans on the committee cut out the democrats if the investigation they wanted to pursue was legitimate? we will ask the best reporters and analysts those questions. joining us today in washington, nbc's intelligence and national security reporter ken dilanian. he's bylined on the new uranium one story. from "th

the money went to the foundation, a charitable organization. none of it went to hoik or bill clintony. that's important to note. you can look at the facts. >> if we want to know why cfius voting members approved his deal, i think devin nunes should extend an invitation for them to come the house intelligence committee and ask each one of them under oath hopefully in a public setting. why did you approve this deal in an expedited fashion. was there something to this? let them answer under oath, then we can get some real answers. katie: thank you so much for your time. appreciate. america is facing high-tech threats from around the world and our government needs to be on the cutting edge of technology and innovation. production of the f-35 fighter jet was recently ramped up. it's a steal the fighter that will be used by our government in different parts of the globe. judge jeanine even got to fly in an f-35 simulator. take a look. judge jeanine: here we are in arlington, virginia. and we are going to be flying, kind of, an f-35, which an amazing stealth vehicle that you have been heari

asked her specifically about donations that might have been illegal to the clinton foundation.o be the focus of his interest during that meeting when she says she told him she didn't have any information like that, he very quickly lost interest and she described sort of their mutual frustration that they were both in the room looking for something that neither one of them was prepared to give. she wanted to talk about the magnitsky act and trump junior pretty tightly focused on the clinton foundation, according to these documents that were obtained, again, written answers obtained by our colleague. look, this is not uncommon to what we already know about this meeting. donald trump jr. was looking for information about the russians. he continues to say, you know, he was looking for information that hillary clinton was unfit. we'll see how he deals with those questions here today. >> joining me now, "new york times" reporter kate kelly along with richard stengel and joel benenson. kate, what kind of questions do you think don junior will face today? last night i spoke with a bank

why did uranium one's chairman donate $2.35 million to the clinton foundation? why did mr. n receive $500,000 once it became known russia was going to acquire majority interest in this company? trish: they say coincidence, jesse. >> just a coincidence. the problem is, only defense is timing of it. that not the only thing. as we say it is quid pro quo, if you receive money at a certain time, doesn't necessarily mean at later date you're not trying to return the favor and i think that is the big issue here. when we talked about, another associate of bill clinton who was part of the uranium one deal when uranium one is formed to what it is now, who is involved with mr. clinton in acquiring mining rights in kazakhstan. a year later, a year later donated over $31 million to the clinton foundation. raises a lot of questions. trish: a lot of questions. good it is getting looked into. >> fantastic it is getting looked into. trish: we'll take a quick break. we'll be right back. the alerian mlp etf can diversify your equity portfolio and add potential income. bring amlp into the game.

if you used money from the clinton foundation to pay for it it's even easier. >> there is no evidencejenna: you show me one iota of evidence that this clinton foundation was properly structured and every attorney general who is not corrupt is looking at it. >> let it play out, let's see where it goes. any attempt to make anything go away will make it work. judge jeanine: we are not talking about alabama, we are talking about evidence. mueller apparently called gsa and says i wants documents from the trump transition team because they have been apparently working in gsa offices. some are protected by attorney-client privilege. mueller doesn't go about getting subpoenas and doing what he's supposed to do. he just bullies his way in and gets it. why do you think mule wore do that? >> because this is not a properly conducted investigation. if i had done this as a federal agent i would probably be fired from running an investigation. we have a president who has bent victim of an unprecedented unmasking scandal. and look at fake news charges, an improper investigation. judge jeanine: dan, y

know that hillary clinton was far more kind of russia and russia paid far more money to the clinton foundation than they've ever given donald trump so that is the bum's completely debunked to say the dosey is a relevant is ridiculous think of the legal concept fruits of the poisonous tree when i when i was active law enforcement if i proved presented junk to a judge and i lied i stood in front of that judge and said i vetted this it's valid when i knew it wasn't when i knew it was garbage and that judge gave me a warrant a defense attorney would get the entire case thrown out because it supports industry i provided drunk to get the warrant i got the warrant under unconstitutional false pretenses which is exactly what happened with the doses of the dosey is not irrelevant dosey is the crux of the issue and there is nothing improper nothing illegal smoking nothing remotely wrong with opposition research whether it comes from a russian a saudi arabia of venezuelan a canadian a texan or someone from rhode island as long as you're not exchanging money and not disclosing it there is nothing remotely

you add that the fact that a lot represent the clinton foundation and ben roads how does a regular american person not look at the mull are team as political add sears who want to undue a presidential election >> when we say you serve in law enforcement, we don't have a political test for those individuals. you sign up and give your country well is no test. you don't have to pledge aliegence to the president you pledge it to this country. when robot he fired what we want him to do. the meamerican admissiblep opinn i think what he is how this was of people involved in an investigation that could lead to the impeachment of a period. if there is an appearance of i conflict try to get this information. >> do what he did. to fire it. i want to know what they said politically and the e mails. >> if we focus on every individual as opposed to this. t the gates. of course i do. if you have if you have ill-gotten games -- because of a bad actor or a biassed actor. everything that come as a result could be called to question. i want to go to the congress man. y timed the president's legal team to be a

you add that the fact that a lot represent the clinton foundation and ben roads how does a regular americanerson not look at the mull are team as political add sears who want to undue a presidential election >> when we say you serve in law enforcement, we don't have a political test for those individuals. you sign up and give your country well is no test. you don't have to pledge aliegence to the president you pledge it to this country. when robot he fired what we want him to do. the meamerican admissiblep opinn i think what he is how this was of people involved in an investigation that could lead to the impeachment of a period. if there is an appearance of i conflict try to get this information. >> do what he did. to fire it. i want to know what they said politically and the e mails. >> if we focus on every individual as opposed to this. t the gates. of course i do. if you have if you have ill-gotten games -- because of a bad actor or a biassed actor. everything that come as a result could be called to question. i want to go to the congress man. y timed the president's legal team to be a l

that's what the clinton foundation was. i wonder if she were elected, how many deals would have been made, how many governments was her campaign talking to and what kinds of transactions would they have justified and rationalized in the exact same way. if it's poor taste then don't do it on either side. >> let temperatures remember the media aspect of this. a very incomplete story. bank records are shoasd to be subpoenaed from the white house. that's not true. reuters is walk that back. and brian ross said during the campaign he ordered them to talk to the russian spooks. then he said oops, no, it was during the transition which is legal. kennedy: every time i read something like this i'm wondering where did this come from? >> that's a good question. and two other things to keep in mind, the fact that bill clinton got that $500,000 for a speech he gave. and the fact that most of incoming administrations have conversations with other governments. so that in itself is not a crime to be having conversations about u.s. policy w

wrote to the senators that donald trump jr was seeking evidence of a legal donations to the clinton foundation when she said she had no such evidence he apparently lost interest in the conversation vessel it's guy believes trump jr had misunderstood the nature of the meeting she expected the senate committee to publish her written testimony but that never happened so she handed it to the u.s. media facilities guy told us more about the controversial meeting. what this mia said this summer it dawned on me why mr trump had decided to meet with me in person and why he decided to meet a school where it's all linked to e-mails from mr goldstein some incriminating information just look at the e-mail that got the attention of the president's son it was sent on june third and this is the latter that the congressman questioned me about this e-mail paints the whole picture of the spy drama that's been unfolding since july and the first part of the letter goldstone writes the crown prosecutor of russia has information that would incriminate telerate and his dealings with russia and you were see if this i

money froml of this the clinton foundation and the clintons for years. up.ed them sexual-harassment comes into the thisre, and she decided whole big thing about sexual harassment. as far as the democrats are concerned, pelosi did not back one of the senators saying that he was a great civil rights guy. host: a lot to comment on. go ahead. guest: i will take the comments about steve bannon and trump, having backed different candidates. the president's endorsement of luther strange in the primary. this has been a recurring problem. maybe trump will come to understand what mitch mcconnell often talks about. there have been candidates who have appeared in republican primaries from time to time who cost them very winnable seats. i can think over the past few years of a handful of candidates, probably. i do not think it is a stretch to think there could be republican senators from ,elaware, missouri, and indiana and alabama. that i don'tts think it is a stretch of the imagination to say that part,ats won, at least in because of terrible candidate selection on