now you see not only trump voters are much more optimistic and for example the clinton voters are more likely to say their future financial situation will be worse than today. but as that number has shrunk to only 5% for the trump voters. about the same, there's not too much of a difference. we can still also show it in a different way. what i do here is simply look at the difference between the percent of -- between the clinton and trump voters. what you see is sort of the dark red, that's before the election and then sort of the, what is it, vague pink is after the election. you see before the election there was quite a difference in optimism between clinton and trump voters, and then after the election you see it goes the other way. you see that now the trump voters are 30 percentage points more likely to be optimistic. if you look at worse, you see that among -- before the election the clinton voters was 6% less likely to think it was going to get worse and now they're 11% more likely to think it is getting worse. so we see really a remarkable change in optimism. realistically noth

trump. those are the facts. >> okay. let me be clear on this. first of all, if hillary clintonouldn't have gotten caught by somebody trying to take advantage of bernie sanders and game the system like she does everything, there wouldn't be a problem at all. if i'm the trump campaign i don't care if the fbi exposed it the russians exposed it -- if it is true, which it was true, i'm going to be out there making sure americans know it because they deserved to know that hillary clinton was trying to do this. >> fair enough. you are proving my point. you are saying that the information that was stolen by the russians and dumped into the public doe main was indeed embraced and distributed by the trump campaign. >> if you want to say that about the russians go ahead. >> isn't that what's going on, john. >> i'm just laying out the facts. you just said none of that happened. now you are saying now it did happen. >> you know what, what did hillary clinton say today? she said it was the media that every time that anything got released used world war ii or pearl harbor headlines. she blame

you see around 80% of the clinton votes actually agree with that and less than half of the trump votersieve that is true. to have one final example we have the long-running discussion about the russian influence in the 2016 election, and you see again about 80% of the clinton vote really think of literal and then among the trump vote is more like 15%. they are really very stark differences. the question is where of these differences coming from? obvious place to look a is the sources of news that the consult. we asked people, what are your new sources, and they can click on many as they like you. what you see is robbing a surprising is that the clinton voters, they have a pretty broad range of new sources. they console like npr and cnn at the national newspapers. if you look at the trump voters of course it is also a variation across sources but for them foxnews is by far the most important whereas at the same time for the clinton voters box is at the bottom. it even gets more stark or more striking if you look at who did the trust. so this is about who they trust. now you see that the

we hear from hillary clinton, president trump, senator bernie sanders, congresswoman mia love, formerting attorney general's delegates, ceo meg whitman, and the director of the national institutes of health, francis collins. we start with hillary clinton, deliver the commencement address several modern, wellesley college, where she was the first student commencement speaker in 1969. [applause]

number two, for clinton then voted for trump. numbertwo, i for clinton then voted for trump.o, i think and what i say very often, is that it wasn't so very often, is that it wasn't so much that trump — who by the way was the most unpopular candidate for president in the history of the united states, very unpopular — it was not so very unpopular — it was not so much that trump won but that the democratic party lost. and by that i mean, not just the lost. and by that i mean, notjust the presidential election, the republicans now control the us house, the us senate, almost two thirds of the governage chairs in america and in the last nine years, running against a party that has moved extremely far to the right, the republicans, democrats have lost almost 1,000 seats in state legislatures throughout america. so the real question to be asked is, what has happened to the democratic party? why is its strategy and its message failing to such a significant degree? second part of the answer is that, and tied to the first part, is that while the economy in the united states under presid

so donald trump says fake news, their heads explode and hillary clinton says fake news, oh, maybe fake news had something to do with it. >> and there are reports that then candidate trump received 91% of the coverage was negative. one week alone. the unsubstantiated sexual misconduct allegations, received coveragesen wikileaks 36 minutes of coverage. this is a joke from hillary clinton. she had everything at her disposal. spent double the amount of money that then candidate donald trump spent. she had the dnc rig the primary in favor of her. there are reports leading up to the election, a month before that she had five times the amount of boots on the ground and the amount of staff that then candidate donald trump had. so she literally had everything that she could possibly need and/or want to win an election and she managed to lose. i'm over the excuses from hillary clinton. she was a horrible candidate. and i could go over the litany of mistake the campaign made and the only reason she lost the election is because of her. eric: rachel, is it time for ms. clinton to fade off into the

clinton trump polls or debated but if they go clinton -- they go clinton trump polls -- compare that to state voting they're much lisch likely to go clinton, if they good trump clinton, they're -- subtle indicators will be predictive and as we do more and more elects we can weight them and calibrate them and figure out whether you can add information to the polls. >> i think we have time for one last question. a quick one. and then we'll wrap. >> hello. with the possibility of artificial intelligence bots do you think that some of these searches could be manipulated? >> that's one of the value's google search data relative to other sources is that google has the smartest people in the world fishing out who is a bot. i think a lot of searches are by bots but google puts a lot of energy into eliminating those searches because advertisers don't want those to be included in the data. i kind of didn't an arm's race between google and the hackers but a bigger issue if you take a random search. >> going has the smartest bots in the world working on this. is that right? >> all right. with th

donald trump wins the presidency. >> how damaging was this to the clinton campaign?k, it was our job to win and we didn't do it. what went into that, a lot of thing, and we bear our own sense of responsibility for that. but i think it was an important element of electing donald trump and i think the russians got what they paid for. >> after election day with growing urgency, the obama administration finally retaliated, closing russian compounds in the u.s. believed to be used for spying, expelling some 35 russian diplomats and imposing more sanctions on russia. in secret, mr. obama considerrd taking more aggressive steps, including initiating a plan to take cyber weapons inside the russian testimony as reported by "the washington post". for attempting activation if russia was to attack again. >>> next was president trump also in russia's cross hairs. >> we thought that it was important that he knew about it. >>> to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend. >> pruv, protect, and defend. >> the constitution of the united states. >> the constitution of the

go to sleepnumber.com for a store near you. >> lou: hillary clinton is not finished explaining her loss to donald trumpy spenning a new narrative. clinton campaign tried to tell people about russian interference in the election and no one would listen to her this despite the democratic national committee denied it was hacked by the russian and clinton accusing the trump campaign of weaponizing the cataand hitting the mercer family for teaming up with cam bridge analytical. >> they came to jared kushner and saidy we will marry our operation which was more than it is described centument and a lot of harvesting of facebook information and they married content with delivery and data and it was a potent combination. the question is where and how did the russians get into this? it is an important question. >> lou: where did that question come from. the russians? joining me to talk about the clinton latest attempt to spen a foul narrative regarding the reason for her loss last november. digital and social media advisor of trump campaign and america first policy. brad, i have to say the dnc, was the first know

cnn projects donald trump wins the presidency. >> how damaging was this to the clinton campaign?o win and we didn't do it. what went into that, you know, a lot of things and, you know, we bear our own sense of responsibility for that. but i think it was an important element of electing donald trump and i think russians got -- >> after election day with growing urgency, the obama administration finally retaliated. closing russian compounds in the u.s. believed to be used for spying, expelling some 35 russian diplomats and imposing more sanctions on russia. in secret, mr. obama considered taking more aggressive steps, including initiating a plan to place cyber weapons inside critical russian systems. as first reported by the "washington post." for potential activation if russia were to attack again. >>> next, was president trump also in russia's cross hairs? the emergence of a mysterious dossier. >> we thought that it was important that he know about it. what do you have there? p3 it's meat, cheese and nuts. i keep my protein interesting. oh yea, me too. i have cheese and uh these

we may never know, but it triggered a nasty exchange between hillary clinton and the trumps. listen to the comment secretary clinton made at an event in california last night. >> i don't think we can get into covfefe right now, because it's a longer thing, but -- >> i thought it was a hidden message to the russians. >> oh, you did? [ laughter ] >> that's not all hillary had to say. she also went after "the new york times," the democratic party and former fbi director james comey for her loss in november. never mentioning wisconsin, by the way. president trump responding "crooked hillary clinton now blames everybody but herself, refuses to say she was a terrible candidate, hits facebook and even dems and dnc." and christine, we weren't done, were we? >> no, clinton firing back, tweeting "people in covfefe houses shouldn't throw covfefe." then donald trump jr. comes to his father's defense, tweeting "what house is he in again? that's what i thought. you're trying too hard." >> at the heart of this again is the question why didn't sean spicer just say he fell asleep tweeting and

trump carried my county over clinton. i have friends back there who are democrats and would call themselves liberals, but not in the same way that people in brooklyn and berkeley, california are liberals. that is what this piece is trying to get out and explore. i'm trying to create this category of people as they don't exist in the media, at all. we have red states and blue states, we understand blue states -- blue state liberals and red state conservatives. we understand blue state conservatives because they have been getting all this attention, the people that switched from obama to trump, but red state liberals are never discussed. i'm trying to make them a media category. host: let me turn to today's headlines. essay,frank bruni -- the by frank bruni. guest: that is a big one that everyone is watching and it is interesting about the democrat in that name -- in that race. he is not running a bernie sanders kind of race. he is running a pretty moderate democratic race and one that i would say is probably appropriate to

comey has been cleared for takeoff, permitted to testify before congress on the trump-russia probe, that as hillary clinton addresses the role russian spies played in her doomed presidential campaign for the very first time, alluding to possible collusion by trump staffers. nbc's andrea mitchell has more. >> reporter: james comey has the green light to testify to congress as early as next week. nbc news previously reported that comey told friends he felt pressured to back off from the investigation. this as the house intelligence committee approved seven subpoenas, four for former national security adviser michael flynn, trump lawyer michael cohn and their businesses on the russia probe and three for classified reports related to whether former obama officials susan rice, samantha power and john brennan improperly accessed the identity of trump associates in intelligence reports. rice strongly denied it to us. >> did you leak the name of mike flynn? >> i leaked nothing to nobody and never would. >> reporter: hillary clinton blasted russian spies for hacking her campaign manager's e-mails, then working with

trump supporters that notion. >> right. except that he was talking about potentially being rigged in favor of hillary clinton, not in favor of>> yeah, that's what trump was saying. >> exactly. >> jeffrey tubin, i want you to listen to what the president said on fox news, this interview this morning, shedding some light on that may 12th tweet, suggesting that there may be tapes of his conversations with james comey, the fired fbi director. listen to this. >> you never know what's out there, but i didn't tape and i don't have any tape and i didn't tape. but when he found out that i -- you know, that there may be tapes out there, whether it's governmental tapes or anything else and who knows, i think his story may have changed. i mean, you'll have to take a look at that, because then he has to tell what actually took place at the events. and my story didn't change. my story was always a straight story. my story was always the truth. but you'll have to determine for yourself whether or not his story changed. but i did not tape. >> all right, jeffrey, how do you interpret that? >> well, it's amazing at many different levels. firs

clinton posted quote people in covfefe houses shouldn't throw covfefe. hitting trump for that strange tweet that had many scratching their heads. >>> florida police released new video showing tiger woods before he was arrested monday. after the star golfer was found asleep at the wheel an officer asked him a series of questions. >> do you know where you're going? >> no. >> have you had anything to drink tonight? >> are you sure? 100%. >> have you taken illegal drugs? >> no. >> okay. have you taken medication? >> yes. >> the officer then conducted a field sobriety test on woods. >> w, x, y, and z. >> sir, what i want you to do is place your hands behind your back. okay. >> the officer released pictures of woods mercedes with a gash down to the rim. police conducted two breathalyzer tests which registered a 0.0 reading indicating woods was not under the influence of alcohol. woods claimed that he was affected by an unexpected reaction to prescribed medications. >>> new this morning, drama on a malaysia flight from melbourne, australia, a passenger had to be forcibly rem

sources tell the post that the firm has a pro-hillary clinton, anti-trump agenda.here's also this. according to reports, the fbi, james comey at the time, offered to pay the person who created the fake dossier of $50,000. they previously told fox news that they denied making any payments. the trump-russia conclusion investigation has been turned completely on its head and shouldn't be surprised if democrats start eating they have to let this come to an end because now they have opened the door for their own investigations and real trouble. we call it the boomerang effect. joining us now, newt gingrich. let's start with comey wanting to pay the guy that came up with the phony dossier, let's start there. 50 grand. you can't make it up. >> you can't make this stuff up. there are two parts to it. one is how much of it is bad and how bad they are at being bad. you think if they are going to do this kind of stuff, they will be subtle and clever. this is stupid. here is the fbi director stupid. it is not complicated. here is hillary clinton being stupid. talk about a stup

if there's truly nothing there, who better to have clinton affiliated folks? president trumplf up, but either way. if it comes up that there was something there, then it's biased. that's how i see it. >> kimberly: if you can top that, i will give you the chanc chance. i am wondering about that. see >> greg: first to rip on his dog. >> jesse: i think you are exactly right. i think what he's doing is he's playing into the rigged system. the fbi investigation was rigged and it's all rigged, rig, rigge rigged. that plays into trump's army against the establishment. some people think regarding comey that it backfired. that comey said things that he otherwise would not have said. when he said that obama spied on him, that led to the unmasking scandal. he said something about nancy pelosi, and how we want her to stay there forever. that's like reverse psychology for the democrats. so that's what he does. and it works. >> if it launches an investigation against you, then i don't think it's working. i would not painfully agree with dana on this point. i would gleefully agree with dana

putin's direct involvement in the cyber attacks with one goal in mind -- make sure hillary clinton lost and donald trump won. also, a remarkable behind-the-scenes look at how then president obama did and did not respond, including a direct face-to-face confrontation between presidents obama and putin with mr. obama telling him to stop or else. joining us now is a staff writer at "the washington post." part of the team that broke the story. adam, thank you so much for being with us. this begins the story i commend everyone to read, remarkable account of an envelope delivered to the white house with intelligence inside about vladimir putin directing hacks into the u.s. election. >> right. so basically what happened is, the cia sent this very sensitive document by courier to the white house. it was clearly instructed to be given only to a select group of the president and his top advisers for their eyes only. after they read the document they were instructsed to put it back in the envelope, send it back to langley via courier as soon as they finished reading it, it was that sensitive. so sensitive, in fact

when we come back, that sizzling war of words between president trump and hillary clinton. >>> breaking news. president trump and hillary clinton taking aim at each over russia. and the former democratic candidate had a pretty stunning charge. listen. >> so, the russians in my opinion, and based on the intel and counter-intel people i talked to could not have known how best to weaponize that information unless they had been guided. >> guided by americans. >> guided by americans. and guided by people who had, you know, polling -- he dumps that on me on october 28th and i immediately start falling. but what was really interesting, since the mainstream media covered that as i say like pearl harbor, front pages everywhere, huge type, et cetera, i inherit nothing from the democratic party. it was bankrupt. it was on the verge of insolvency. its data was mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong. i had to inject money into it. >> hmm, so i want to discuss now with matt lewis, margaret hoover, kevin mattis as well as mar maria cardona. here we go. it's 2016 all over. first i want to get your react

tell me the difference between your conclusion as far as former secretary clinton is concerned and mr. trump. >> the clinton investigation was a completed investigation that the fbi had been deeply involved in. i had the opportunity to understand all the facts and apply the facts against the laws i understood them. this investigation was under way, still going whenn i was fired. so it's nowhere near in the same place, at least it wasn't when i was -- >> but it's still ongoing? >> as far as i know. it was when i left. >> that investigation was going on, this investigation was going on, you reached separate conclusions? >> no. that one was done. >> that investigation have any involvement of secretary clinton or any of her associate is completed? >> yes, as of july the 5th the fbi completed its investigative work and that's what i was announcing, what we had done and found. >> well, at least in the minds of this member there's a whole lot of questions remaining about what went on particularly considering the fact that as you mention it's a quote, big deal as to what went on during the campaign.

but hillary clinton and president trump are still going at it. at a tech conference yesterday clinton said donald trump helped the russian government spread disinformation about her. she also blamed former fbi director james comey for her loss and said the dnc provided her with poor data. on twitter afterward president trump fired back saying crooked hillary clinton now blames everybody but herself. >>> you may have notice our leslie for the soldier missing today. >> leslie was speaking this morning in college park for high point high school's graduation. here's her advice for the new graduates. >> do the work, despite the odds. the second is grit, character and resilience matter. and the third find your voice and use it. >>> leslie reminding students their journey today. >>> it is the first day of june. also the first day of hurricane season. for a little insight, i spoke with craig a meteorologist at our cbs affiliate. >>> let's talk about how forecasting has changed and how you go about warning your viewers. >> you talk about it being an above

country agree with that, something on cnn, we should chop off to donald trump's head, let me say one more thing, chelsea clintona clinton, even she called this vile and disgusting. >> this is abhorrent language, we need the first amendment the most when it comes down to the language we don't like. this is kathy griffin playing to her base. did she go too far? most likely. that spurring violence? i highly doubt it. the rhetoric against barack obama. look at the rhetoric they are palin put out with the crosshairs around certain congresspeople. rob: both sides are guilty but that doesn't make it right. one final thought. >> you can't cover yourself in the first amendment, it does not give you the right to incite violence. we should have comedians who are classy, lucille ball, charlie chaplin, hollywood has gone so far left, people like stephen colbert, no class, no balance, no sense of proper debate and fairness. it crosses the line and absolutely wrong. >> you we appreciate your time. coming up on "fox and friends". >> reporter: being democrats and republicans came together to express their outrage and disdain co

a new war of words between president trump and hillary clinton. this is "cnn tonight." have thought you heard it during the campaign but the president and hillary clinton are doing battle all over again tonight on russia. >>> plus a cnn exclusive, sources say congressional investigators are now looking into whether jeff sessions had another private meeting with the russian ambassador during the campaign. more on that in just a moment. >>> first i want to begin with the breaking news that brand-new war of words between president trump and hillary clinton. the former democratic candidate with some strong words at the code conference today. joining me now, kara swisher, the executive editor of recode, and cnn's chief political correspondent dana bash. good evening to both of you. kara, i have to start with you, hillary clinton made a pretty remarkable charge today at your conference about russia's influence, and it has caused a war of words tonight between hillary clinton and donald trump. i want you to listen to this. >> so the russians, in my opinion, and based on the in

in the hall of fame ♪and the world's gonna know your name♪ lou: hillary clinton isn't finished explaining her loss to donald trumpclaiming her campaign tried to tell people about russian interference in the election, but no one would listen to her, despite the fact the democratic national committee denied access to the serve the f.b.i. told the democratic party had been hacked by the russians. clinton accusing the trump campaign for weaponizing data. >> they came to jared kushner and basically said we'll marry our operation, which was more as it's been described, psycho graphic sentiment, a lot of harvesting of facebook information. they married content with delivery and data. and it was a potent combination. now, the question is where and how did the russians get into this. and i think it's a very important question. lou: where did that question come from? all of a sudden the question is the russians? joining me now to talk about the latest attempt to spin a narrative on her loss, the dnc was the first known intrusion of the russians in presidential politics and the f.b.i. was denied access by the dnc, fan with

we'll hear from hillary clinton, president trump, senator bernie sanders, congresswoman mia love, former acting attorney general c.e.o. meg whitman and the director of the national institutes of health, francis .ollins we start with hillary clinton who delivered the commencement her alma mater, else withly college, where she was the first student commencement 1969.r in [cheers and applause]

now focus not on donald trump 2016 challenger, former secretary of state, hillary clinton who has steppedack into public life in a big way. she is now talking candidly about her election loss and what she thinks about the trump administration. should she be and what should hillary clinton do next is the question we have for you. what is the best postelection role for hillary clinton? republicans call us at 202-748-8001. democrats at 202-748-8000. the line for independents is 202-748-8002. reach us on twitter @cspanwj. on facebook at facebook.com/c-span. hillary clinton has leveled criticism at the target she blames for the donald trump victory, including russia, james comey, unfair media coverage, sexism, and james novak, a commentary writer for cnbc agrees, saying that hillary is right, her bad decisions are not why she lost to trump and the donald trump may not be very persuasive either for millions of americans but he is a lot more persuasive than hillary clinton which is why those who think hillary clinton should run again for national office are fooling themselves. as long as the sys

dallas county voted in the november election 2-1 for clinton over trump. we now know in retrospect that hillary clinton wasn't going to win texas. she ended up losing the state overall by about, i think it was nine points. but there's been discussion during the presidential campaign ing leading up to the election that maybe hillary clinton might have a shot in texas. some people thought it was a pipe dream, or clinton looking cocky. but there was a case to be made for it. she really did campaign in texas. and the democratic party didn't really work hard there. and they spent money there. and, you know, if they weren't just bluffing, if they ever really were going to have a shot at winning texas, it would come because they really ran up the vote totals as big as they could in the blue counties in the state. in the places like, you know, dallas county. the two most concentrated places in that state for democratic votes were harris counties where houston is, and dallas county. there were hundreds of thousands of democratic votes cast in just those two counties

and the democratic senator, she is running for reelection, she get very close to hillary clinton. trump'soters are engaged and i think you will have a hard time. >> i'm just proud if she wins tonight, she didn't even body slimy reporter. [laughs] that's a big a compliment. >> a lesson that we could all learn. >> price when this district less time with 52% of the vote. i think handel, looking good right now. >> it's tight. >> but the ideas, let's say she wins by one or two or loses by one or two, there will be this great hee haw about it. >> what you mean by hee haw? >> yes that's exactly right. but the democrats are going to make a big deal if ossoff wins and the republicans if handel wins, and i actually -- i don't know. >> can you imagine of hollywood liberals carried as much about national security or job growth or the economy as they do about -- cybersecurity -- as they do about a seat in georgia? something to think about. >> they must have money to burn. >> they need a hobby. >> a lot of money. >> all right, next. will the trump administration take action against north korea? senator

the russian president goes off script with lengthy remarks about president trump, hillary clinton and what he calls hysteria fueling the russia investigation. is putin trying to prevent any probe from reaching him? i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." >>> we're following break news. president trump is said by top aides to be weighing whether to take the extraordinary step of invoking executive privilege to block testimony by former fbi director james comey. he's scheduled to appear before the senate intelligence committee on thursday, and he's expected to testify that the president urged him to drop the investigation into fired national security adviser michael flynn. meanwhile, the white house is refusing to answer any questions about the russia investigation. the press secretary sean spicer once again referring reporters to the president's outside counsel saying he cannot and will not comment on the probe from now on. spicer and other top administration officials are also refusing to say whether president trump believes whether climate change is real. following his deci

the study shows 61% of greens would have stayed home rather than voted for either donald trump or hillary clinton of those that would go out to vote, over one-third of them would have voted for donald trump. so wishing that pigs fly doesn't make pigs fly. so democrats might wish and they might assume that they own green votes, but they don't own green vote it's. candidates have to earn our votes. and hillary clinton did not earn the votes of greens. and hillary clinton and donald trump did not earn the votes of neither greens nor 45% of the american people who responded to vote for either of these two candidates who are the most distrusted and unliked candidates in recent history. people were clamoring for other choices. go ahead. >> but you can understand, looking at that data, you can understand how will would be an analysis that says vladimir putin was reading the tea leaves in the united states and thought, bring jill stein to dinner. i know you had a meeting as well with sergey lavrov and that you went into red square and recorded those moments. meaning anything he can do to give you promine

we will hear from hillary clinton, president trump, bernie sanders, ceo meg whitman and the director for the national institute of health. we start with hillary clinton, who delivered the commencement address at her alma mater, wellesley college, where she was the first commencement speaker in 1969. applause] ms. clinton: thank you. thank you so much. [cheers and applause] mrs. clinton: wow. thank you. thank you so much. thank you very much for that warm welcome. to be year back at wellesley, especially for president johnson's very first ,ommencement and to thank her the trustees, families and friends, faculty, staff and guests. andunderstanding perpetuating the importance of this college. for, what it has meant, and what it will do in the years ahead. and most importantly, it is wonderful to be here with another green class to say congratulations to the class of 2017. applause] now, i have some of my dear friends here from my class. 1969.n class of and i assume, or at least you can tell me later, unlike us, cheer.ually have a class wellesley -- [laughter] yearclinton: get another wit

their was tremendous frustration with all candidates that they might pay lip service as clinton and trump did durin g the campaign, but it has already vanished. i haven't heard anyone talking about this in recent months. why do politicians not engage on that issue? mr. brooks: drug abuse is hard, because it is not clear what to do. that is why we are putting policy together to give suggestions to policymakers. without that information, policymakers can ring their hands. they can go to the hospital sent console the parents of the constituents, but it seems like there is little more that they can do. when there are more and more people addicted to opioids, and it is connected to the medicaid system where most people who are poor are getting opioids for pain prescriptions and cheaply. there are a lot of angles. our job in this policy infrastructure is giving people solutions. politicians say, tell us what we can do, and we say we will tell you, what the medicaid prescriptions can do differently, how we should separate pain clinics from pharmacies, all of the policies and things we can do. an

donald trump should've started with infrastructure. he did what bill clinton did in what barack obama did, they spent the first year of their presidency wasting their time on health care. it's too complicated to get done , they rushed something through and they all suffered for it. and so has donald trump. you should've started on infrastructure. host: "buyer's remorse," your latest book. do you have another book? guest: i do. i'm working on the final edits on a book that comes out from saint martin's press in march or april. host: do you miss "crossfire,"? "crossfire"ld do every day. it was a great show. larsone bob novak and 10 -- tucker carlson, they are all great friends of mine. it was the best political debate show ever on television. host: bill press, thanks for stopping by. guest: i say that in all modesty. bill press show.com. host: thank you for being with us. karen jeffries will be joining terry jeffrey' will be joining us. europeexpert on relations, all ahead on c-span's "washington journal," on june 4. on american history tv, we are on the road to

we hear from hillary clinton, president trump, senator bernie sanders, congresswoman mia love, former acting attorney general's delegates, ceo meg whitman, and the director of the national institutes of health, francis collins. we start with hillary clinton, deliver the commencement address several modern, wellesley college, where she was the first student commencement speaker in 1969. [applause] ms. clinton: thank you. thank you so much. [cheers and applause] ms. clinton: thank you. thank you very much for that warm welcome. ms. clinton: thank. thank you very much for that warm welcome. i am so grateful to be here back at wellesley, especially for president johnson's very first commencement. and to thank her, the trustees, families and friends, faculty, staff, and guests for understanding and perpetuating the importance of this college. what it stands for, what it has meant, and what it will do in the years ahead. and most importantly, it's wonderful to be here with another green class to say congratulations to the class of 2017. [cheers and applause] ms. clinton: i have some of my d