new scrutiny over clinton's time in the state department and gives impression that the clintons tend to play by their own rules. it instead went overseas. a private e-mail account and server could allow e-mails between then secretary clinton and foreign leaders to be permanently deleted. that's put new scrutiny on the clinton foundation a charity that is founded by the clintons to address poverty and gender inequally. >> look across the blue see all the challenges. >> the foundation is highly regarded among development experts and well-funded. since 2001 it has received nearly $2 billion from private donors and governments including saudi arabia and oman. >> despite limits, seven foreign governments in total while she was secretary of state. now those contribution he picked up after she left office and started her second bid for the presidency. >> the real challenge to democracy comes if the gifts to the nonprofits and the an anonymity they allow. >> there have been no specific allegation of misconduct against clinton other than this potential breach of e-mail protocol and the clinto

clinton speaking at the u.n. event about you -- about women's empowerment, i want to bring in mark from "with all due respect your quote -- "with all due respect." mark h: we will see how many questions she takes. they do feel pressure within her camp to deal with it. mark c: peter, mark just talked about the pressure within her camp. if you watched some of the sunday talk shows, some democrats have been asking mrs. clinton to speak out because they feel they have been forced into the position to have to defend her actions. what are they saying now? peter: i mentioned senator dianne feinstein, someone who has been aligned with hillary clinton. i have spoken with other democrats you don't think this will be a huge issue. at least that is what they say privately. but they realize it will become a bigger issue until she confronted directly. so there is pressure coming from democrats for heller jury -- for hillary, if you will to come clean. yes, she is facing pressure from democrats as well. mainly, it is republican

not unlike hillary clinton. but what the sources who i'm talking to here who are close to jeb bush are saying that they're looking for is her explanation of why she used that e-mail that personal e-mail exclusively, and why it took until now to release them when they think that they have a nice jux position between that and the fact that he on his own released hundreds of thousands of e-mails to the public just a couple weeks ago. so certainly democrats are trying to say, a-ha you see, jeb bush has a private server. jeb bush e-mailed on private e-mails. it's not only democrats, it's not only hillary clinton. but they're arguing it's actually a case study in how different kinds of politicians handle this issue in a very different way. >> we're looking at live pictures from the microphone over there. that's where hillary clinton will be walking over momentarily, we're told making a statement, then answering reporters' questions. we don't know if it will be one or two or three questions or a whole bunch of question

@blahblah clinton@blahblah clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@us.com. >regarding the use of personal e-mail to do government business changed in 2014, after hillary clinton left her secretary of state post. it is now officially illegal to use a nonofficial e-mail account to conduct public business. unless an employee copies their official e-mail account on the correspondence or forwards a complete copy of the personal account within 30 days. but agencies allowing employees to do business on nonstate department e-mail accounts had to ensure that any records were preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system. this is where it gets really murky. i think we would have faith that all of those isn't over to the archives. and when you add to that, that apparently mrs. clinton and her staff or her staff didn't automatically hand over those e-mails as required, but only after requested to do so, there seems to be a lot more questions still to come. let me know what you think, you can finding my take on my facebook page and at foxnews.com. >>> there's a

you worked in the clinton white house and worked for senator clinton, how do you answer? she doesn't see herself as above the line or different from everyone else. that is why she was following the rules as the previous secretary of state and is putting forward an e-mail which is going above and beyond. it and fascinating how people can read every view of her and in twine she was not thinking they would run for president again and the presumption of nefarious activity are just that presumption. >> and the rules were clear, the maims -- rules were clear, living up to the spirit and the letter of the law. is that in keeping with the spirit you do not turn these over while secretary of state when you leave as secretary of state you do not turn them over until two years of leave and after the state department lawyers confront you? >> that is also faster than any rest secretary of state has turned over e-mails. obviously she fund over the mail the previous secretary of state did not turn over. >> jerk josh uses the government e-mail so they are contemporaneously preserved. >>

clinton and his office. office get taxpayer money as all former presidents do. i have talked to democratic source hostel me a little new information that actually the server was paid for by bill clinton out of his own pocket. so that would suggest a taxpayers do not own it. >> the problem with that when they do it privately and use their own money and own server, you can't access that stuff through foia. there is a shield. in order to get that information you really need a federal subpoena. >> right. but a subpoena through congress as well is possible is all i'm saying. now you have at least two different republican chairman saying they are trying to get at. there was another big disclosure today with jen psaki that i think is new as well. she said look it wasn't until this past february that we started automatically archiving emails for state department why is that significant. former secretary hunk a lot of this on the idea okay i used a personal account but i knew i was emailing my aides who had state dep

jeb bush said good for you, you got bill clinton. he normally will not talk about the clintons. can see he is looking for the jugular. >> and not a big political attack, just an elliptical thing. when is hillary going to take shots at jeb? here is what the clinton camp is actually concerned about. it's the gray lady herself on a scale of one to godzilla how big of a problem is the times for hillary clinton? >> a pretty big problem. the clintons and the new york times have had a historic nemesis like relationship going back to the whitewater stories. the last time hillary ran for president there was a huge blow up over a story about the clintons personal life. there was a big reader backlash about in that story. i do not trust the new york times. there is evidence the new york times is going to put a lot of reporters on this door it can be >> investigative reporters, certain columnists -- put a lot of reporters on the story. i know if there is an irony, that the republicans best friends when the times writes an investigative piece about the clintons, it harkens back to the age wh

neera you worked in the clinton white house. you worked for senator clinton.ow do you answer mark? >> i would say that she doesn't see herself as above the law, and that's why -- or different from everyone else. that's why she was following previous secretary of states and now she's going above and beyond. i think it's fascinating how there is people who can read every view of hillary. i was talking to hillary back in 2009. she didn't say she was ever going to run for president again back then and i think that she's presumptions of nefarious activities are just that, presumptions. and now we'll know because she's putting forward her e-mails -- >> this is i think, what bugs people. that the rules were pretty clear. your e-mails should be preserved. you really think when they wrote preserved, i'm not talking about breaking the law. i'm talking about her spokesman said living up to the spirit and the letter of the law you think that's with keeping of the spirit if you don't turn these over while you're secretary of state you don't turn them over when you leave as

and where bill clinton's head is at?> her head is that it's her term. that's the major rationale. i've paid my dues and put up with a lot of crap. i've put up with bill. bill says she is my wife and gives me the opportunity to be in the white house again. those were great times. let's do it again. for bill, it's like the rolling stones doing a tour at age 70. he wants to go back on the road. >> if she runs, you want her to be the next president. >> absolutely. whoever the democrat is, i want them to win. >> have you heard from other democrats about what you said? >> several indicated that she needs to be tested. if she gets through a tough primary and wins, fine. this entitlement, this anointment, this coronation is not good for the party. i had lunch with a woman today that said it's time we had a woman and you shouldn't be attacking hillary and made it very clear that she thought i ought to back off. she is entitled to her opinion and i'm entitled to mine. >> mr. chairman, thank you for joining us. wax thank you. you w

clinton helped. related but you and i both know otherwise. according to "the wall street journal" secretary of state clinton arranged numerous sweetheart deals with foreign entities on behalf u.s. corporations. that's not necessarily a bad thing. but what happens next is. according to "the wall street journal" many of these companies followed their clinton broker deals with donations to the clinton foundation. consider this, mrs. clinton lobbied the algerian government for ge to build power plants after a multi-billion dollar deal was done ge donated heavily to the clinton foundation. then there's boeing which dropped $900,000 into the foundation after securing a $3.7 billion deal with russia. again, thanks to lobbying from clinton. in fact, at least 60 companies lobbied the state department during her tenure donated more than $26 million to the clinton foundation. the clintons nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to them. they've always thought they were bigger and b

team clinton says no big deal. everything federal law and regulation mandates is preserved safe and sound, they say. but critics wonder whether to trust that answer, whether her way was a deliberate strategy to delay or defy legitimate requests for documents about taxpayer business and whether her way puts sensitive materials at higher risk of hacking. so ron fournier, you've covered clintons for a long time. team clinton says, listen, you're blowing this out of proportion. it's a media feeding frenzy. critics say, we don't know zsh. >> it's not critics say, it's anybody with a brain in their head and isn't in the tank for the clintons. this is a very clear violation of the regulations. it's a very clear violation of the spirit of the regulation. those are our e-mails. she never should have tried to skirt it. it's not even a matter of debate. this is an issue she's created. it's an issue she can solve. i'll go back. let's go way back to two weeks ago to the foundation, the fact that the foundation was taken foreign

clinton: the system we used was set up for president clinton's office. it had numerous safeguards.t was on property regarded -- and guarded by the grid service and there were no security breaches. john:, you just talked about the questions you feel she satisfied. what were those that you feel she did not satisfy? market: there were plenty. did she consult the state department? even the documents they put out said they cannot say who they consulted with because it is a matter of security. number two, this question of the freedom of information act and subpoenas. there is some indication that if she e-mails someone outside the government, she made an effort to archive that. but it is not comprehensive. that is one of the most serious things about it. and the last big thing that she did not address was, what was her plan for turning these things over before the state department asked? john: and she assumed the server was secure because it was the same one her husband use. she asserts there was never a security breach. i don't know that is true, or that she would even know whether it w

clinton. >> since then the end justifies the means. we are seeing it here with taking foreign donations from terrorist supporting countries that suppress the rights of women and setting up a secret e-mail account to dodge transparency regulations and potentially expose sensitive e-mail information to foreign threats. >> reporter: clinton warned the next 20 months to election day will probably be harder than ever and slammed republicans for proposing tax cuts. >> we're not buying that old trickle down economics that didn't work before and can never work again. >> reporter: last year's book tour attempt to rework her image got lousy reviews. she was ridiculed for saying she and her husband were broke after presidency. while she was secretary of bill clinton raked in $38 million for speaking fees. former have been raising millions in organizing volunteers for more than a year. lawsuits alleging that have already been filed. a candidate's character and past can often decide a race. these are probl

clinton is they show a trend.n she left the state department she was the most popular politician in america. she's lost that edge. and that's going to come back to hurt her. she's losing the edge without even a campaign against her. and i think it signals trouble ahead for mrs. clinton. >> now, leslie when you heard her today saying that she wasn't going to let anybody look at her server what popped into your mind? >> well bill i'm probably in the major minority here because i know a lot of democrats don't even agree with me on this, but i don't feel there's any there there. i don't feel this is going to take hillary clinton down. i don't think that she and certainly her husband are that stupid. and certainly you can retrieve the e-mails on servers on the other end. i'm not going to work for google tomorrow, and i don't think hillary clinton was either when she was secretary of state. but i don't think this is going to take her down. and i don't think this is as big an issue outside the beltway as the poll you jus

are. >> yes, the clinton foundation. and we should not be accepting money. it's considered bribery. it's considered they're buying time. they are publicly executed in the streets of saudi arabia. women aren't allowed any rights whatsoever. education, they're educating them but not allowing them to drive. what type of human rights is this? she had said in 1995 in beijing that human rights are womens rights and womens rights are human rights. i would like to ask mrs. clinton where have you been since thousands of women, especially in the middle east have been mass slaughtered, our young girls are being sold into sex slavery, we're being beheaded, they're being treated like worse than animals. where have you been if you're an advocate for womens rights? i believe those are just words. i do not believe anything she says. i do not believe she's a human rights advocate. i don't believe a lot of things she says. and honestly accepting millions of dollars worth of foreign donations is horrible. and she's contributing to these cr

clinton's benefit at all., partisans on the left will vote for her no matter what but there are millions of americans in the middle. the exception now is that hillary clinton is not a standup person. she does not put forth the whole truth and nothing but the truth it is true that mrs. clinton has at times been treated unfairly. overall she has been the beneficiary of soft treatment by the media however, that's beginning to change. the email situation has embarrassed the press which largely supported her in the past. it's safe to assume that mrs. clinton will not get the same treatment by president obama hot press continues to idolize. therefore, her road to the white house will be more difficult. that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. as we predicted last night. there will be lawsuits in the case. today the associated press filed suit in washington d.c. demands will state department turn over emails from tenure secretary of state especially concerning ben laden raid. the being stonewalled by the state

foundation while hillary clinton was secretary of state. we know that that fund took in hundreds of millions of dollars, some of it coming from foreign donors. our next guest is trying to find out exactly what was going on. matt whitaker is a former u.s. attorney and executive director of the foundation for accountability and civic trust a self-described watchdog organization. matt, thank you for being here. a column this week said basically follow the money, he'd been told by a close clinton confidant that that's what you need to do according to a clinton source follow the money to figure out why there's an e-mail controversy why they're missing in the first place. that's what you're trying to do. >> right. we know that the clinton foundation has disclosed most of their donors. we know that while secretary clinton was at the state department she -- the foundation raised millions of dollars from foreign sources including $500,000 from the country of algeria that was in contra vengs of the agreement she had with the state department not to r

clinton wiggle room there. intent behind the law for someone as smart as hillary clinton is obvious. we want integrity in the record-keeping process. the gate keeper should be the state department, not the individual who is working for the u.s. taxpayers in this case, of course mrs. clinton. so the problem with the analysis is it's the transparency, it's for historical purposes. it's for congressional year sight purposes. that the individual who is subject to the regulation is not determining what emails are preserved and what emails are not preserved. >> if she chose to go private, which she did, i think collin paul did some of that too when he was secretary of state. she had to preserve them all. i don't think there is any debate about that. but the clinton people say she did. and has handed over everything. >> we don't know. >> and da'da da'da da. >> we don't know what she has preserved. we don't know what she wasn't preserved. that's the reason that any smart person and she went to yale law school. top lawy

clinton. we are right back. rma. checking your credit score is for chumps. i have great credit. how do you know? duh. you know those change, right? tattoos don't change. try credit karma. it's free and you can see what your score is right now. aren't you a little bit curious? i just got my free credit score! credit karma. really free credit scores. really free. i have got to update my ink. i take prilosec otc each morning for my frequent heartburn. because it gives me... zero heartburn! prilosec otc. the number 1 doctor-recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 9 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals antioxidants and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™. in my world, wall isn't a street. return on investment isn't the only return i'm looking forward to. f

bill clinton and donated $1 million to the clinton foundation. he says hillary would be a good president if she runs. he's still a conservative. he runs news max and plans to support gop nominee, whoever it is. this gives unique insight into clinton critics and how she can counter that. joining me from florida, good morning. >> brian, good to be on with you. >> i know people are always fascinated by the evolution in your relationship to the clintons let's say. how do you explain it? >> well it's a long story. i was very close friend with ed koch former mayor of new york. he introduced me to bill clinton i really started to warm with bill clinton after he left the presidency when i started seeing what his foundation was doing and work he was doing as a post president. he really reinvented the job of being a post president. and i think, and i'm still a very big supporter of the foundation bill hillary, chelsea foundation. they are doing amazing work. i have always found it to be very, very nonpartisan. they have extremely competent people. there's

e-mails that clinton decided they should get. >> clinton turned over about 55,000 pages of documents. >> i think 55,000 is a pretty big number. >> it is a big number. there are bigger. >> day two of the trial of the boston bombing suspect, dzhokhar tsarnaev. >> six witnesses called by the prosecution wednesday. most victims of the bombing. >> there was no cross-examination by the defense. >> the jury saw footage from a sporting good store, a window shatters victims flood in. people grab clothes to use as bandages. >> well, here's the deal. we're looking at snow and ice. it is a mess. >> a delta plane skidded off the runway. >> a plane that originated in atlanta. >> laguardia is going to be seeing very limited operations all day today. >> icing is going to continue to be a concern. >> i wanted to build a snowman. >> can you talk us through the fashion of this snowman. oh, no! >> bad roads and airport delays galore. >>> a new 2016 presidential poll taken before hillary clinton's e-mail controversy shows her in a statistical tie with jeb bush within the margin of error, and with a clear

on the democratic side, it is hillary clinton.ho is very capable of getting into a political fight when she wants to. right now there is no one for her to punch. we haven't really seen anything like this before in modern politics so no one really knows what will happen, no one knows how you do this when you have the whole field to yourself and you don't really have primary opponents, how do you campaign for the presidential nomination? well, turns out we're learning the answer to that question is mostly you just don't bother. other than her paid speeches not open to the public or press, she has done a grand total of two public speeches in the entire year of 2015 so far. the first was a week ago at a women and tech event in silicon valley. the second one is tonight. which is why we're paying so much attention. why this is a live feed of what is going on at that event. that is gabrielle giffords and her husband mark kelly there. it is notable and news worthy because of the fact that secretary clinton has not been doing political spe

hillary clinton finally talks about her private e-mails. but the controversy over that arrangement only intensifies. >> i opted for convenience to use my personal e-mail account. i thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal e-mails. >> if she wants somebody to show her how to put two e-mail accounts on one phone, i'm happy to do it. >> we'll talk with a man spearheading efforts to get all of clinton's e-mails. chair of the house, trey gowdy. is this just a personal spear? we'll have a democrat on the committee adam schiff. >>> then a fierce backlash after 47 gop senators send e-mails to iran's leaders questioning a nuclear deal. >> i think it's somewhat ironic to see some members of congress wanting to make common cause with the hard liners in iran. >> we'll discuss the tug of war between the white house and congress with two members of the senate foreign relations committee, john barrasso and ben cardin. >>> plus two ferguson, missouri, police officers are ambushed. reigniting racial tensions. >> th

this is different if you're hillary clinton. you have a history of office-gating, hiding things and being hyper protective. this is going to be a big problem for hillary. this is not a scandal yet. this is not a candle physical they find something out in these e-mails. >> i want to get back to your point that hillary clinton and the clintons themselves have been under investigation dating back to the white house and white water. is there anybody in washington or in the political circle that believes that knowing that everything they do and say is really under the microscope that she would be so foolish would be the worders to put word, to put something in an e-mail that she would need to erase. >> you would think that if anyone was sensitive to this woulden hillary clinton, but she does not have to public opponent. she's not in the race herself. she is protective, private and wants no transparency, this is a jumping point of that for her. she tried to hide that part of it but making news, as you alluded to, del talking about the

>> bill clinton did not. he instead focused on the purpose of the event, which is bringing about 1,000 students from around the world to talk about philanthropy and especially their projects. they each have specific projects they're pitching to clinton foundation trying to get funding. he was on stage earlier today to talk about dealing with the national debt instead of talking about the e-mail controversy or other controversies that have kind of defined the last two weeks for the clintons he focused really more on his record in the white house and on these projects. he said, you know fixing the deficit and the debt isn't that hard and it's only difficult because it's become extremely politicized to deal with that. >> did he take any question from the audience? >> he did not take any questions. it was a short, ten-minute speech on stage with five students and there were no questions. the media was there, but no questions were allowed or we weren't even close enough to ask questions. >> okay. so that's the dif

hillary clinton gets 52% in the suburbs, president obama got 48%. when you look demographically she does better than him among some con 12i9 two went, especially blue collar white voters. she holds together most of the obama coalition. she's up on the hill. she has a fortress on the hill. even if they have equal armies, hillary clinton and the represent kachb, they have to go up a hill to take her. >> for republicans, there's two things they have to do, one, knock her on her credentials. another is to quite frankly drive down turnout for people who were on the obama coalition. she'll focus really hard on not just having an advantage with women and minorities but in maintaining that turnout level that obama had. >> the other thing that struck me, 29% hadn't heard of rand paul. 48% hadn't heard of scott walker. it's easy to think that most of america doesn't know who these people are. they have time to define themselves. >> there is a huge hole to fill in their biography and portfolio. you have to deal with the demographic challenges. the republicans

. >> what you see are the clintons behaving badly. it is always something with the clintons. they have roles which they describe before they get into something, and then they decide they don't have to follow their own rules. i will be talking to one nominee about the mistakes i made an suggesting things here she should do differently than i did. that's pretty straightforward. campbell: you what it said it differently? >> i don't think i've lost any votes. campbell: is it good to have met romney hovering over this campaign. mark: he can rev up the base. there is something here that makes me a little nervous with those answers that he might make the prospective nominees nervous. campbell: i think he is nothing but outside -- upside. he was demonized during his campaign. when you saw him your member the documentary, they took him outside of the campaign context. mark: the downside is that if he does not like the person who is heading to be the nominee and he intercedes, that could throw the planets alignment off. campbell: there are voters who have buyers remorse now. his presen

clinton. >> that is true, james. now, what about the time line for her declaration going for the presidency? is that going to be affected by the fund-raising scandal and the e-mail scandal, james? >> well, we have heard -- we heard a week or so ago that she was going to announce in april. we haven't heard anything to contradict that. i'm not sure what she'd gain by postponing an announcement other than it allows her to lie low and avoid questions. i would guess she announces in april as we have heard. unless she decides at some point there's a tipping point and she's not going to run at all. >> why am i absolutely convince we will return to this subject on numerous occasions in the future? >> because it's the clintons. >> so right. >>> when we come back, an impassioned plea from benjamin netanyahu as the deadline looms for the iran nuclear agreement. did the israeli prime minister change any minds on capitol hill? and can congress move quickly to keep the administration's deal making in check? >> the greatest danger

hillary clinton is a known commodity.le who like her are going to like her whether she turns over the emails or not. but it is the 20% in the middle that are going to make the call on who the next president is. and i think the email thing is going to resonate if there is more stuff here. >> it's going to resonate because, look if there was a good answer to the email question, they would have answered it last week. we are now the tenth day into this story. today the cnn reports that hillary clinton will answer questions about this within the next 48 hours. to me that says that they are still trying to figure out not only how to answer the first question but it's the second and third questions that they might not be able to answer. and then you are talking possible real problems, maybe even illegal issues surrounding these emails to moo that's fairly black and white. that guess downtown the trust factor. people may like her very much. that 20% that may be persuadable. >> what else kicks in jennice is you get exhausted, the

the funding of the clinton foundation. now you have the cbs news report which says that enterprises pledged $2 million in 2013 to clinton foundation's endowment, the chinese construction and trade conglomerate run by billionaire wenliang. basically it is tied directly to the chinese government. >> it's a big issue. there is a lot of other ways the chinese government and saudis and other ways to help the world if that is what they want to do. they want something out of it. what i really want to see in the e-mails, any e-mail that mentions the foundation and one of the donors. i am really prouded of you for giving james carville such a pass. what carville did was give up the goods. he admitted this was not a matter of convenience. he admitted the reason she did this was so she didn't have to comply with the oversight of the house and with the natural laws of transparency. he gave up the goods. he sold her out. >> charles? >> the chinese donation is particularly troublesome because democrats in the previous campaign implying

of clinton aides has moved on. some of them are still around, but the next generation just grows up in it. look, they're absolutely secretive. they absolutely want to fight over everything. and they want to sort of muck every issue up. and so, you know, that's what we're going to see. >> braines is a famous person in that world, extremely smart, charismatic guy, working with the clintons for a long time. he's sort of hillary's press person. he today, an amazing thing happened in which this story is going on and he just picks a fight with like nine different reporters. you're seeing more and more of them on the record. >> including my editor in chief. >> including your editor in chief. and he had to retract. which was just a little bit of a window into this. he basically makes a factual case. his point was, if you think we set this up to avoid requests, you're absolutely out of your mind. that's crazy. we would, of course, never do that. he actually is persuasive, i think, certainly in that thread. but in the substa

hillary clinton has been doing these as well. secretary clinton spoke twice in canada.winnipeg and then in saskatoon. she spoke at events paid for by a canadian bank. what secretary clinton has not been doing a lot of this year, even as she has continued a pretty robust schedule of paid speeches to make money, what she has not been doing a lot of this year is campaigning for president. and this is one of the really big differences between the republicans and the democrats right now, at the top tier of national politics. all of the republican 2016 hopefuls they have been de facto campaigning at events like cpac where they all gave speeches or did q&a with conservative media celebrities. have they have been appearing at events like steve king's anti-immigration palooza in iowa, they've been speaking at koch brothers, they are speaking to all of the richest public donors. making unfortunate foreign policy flubs. they have been everywhere, right? the republican candidates for president, there are a lot of them right now and they are frequently, every day, multiple times a d

column "clinton burned the tapes," saying if rich around nixon handled watergate the way hillary clinton has handled this he would have survived in the presidency not to compare the crimes of watergate and next on white house to what we know so far here but doesn't he have a point that she deleted 30,000 mails and we do not know if she destroyed the hard drive but she has rendered at the -- a lot of the discussion moot. >> even if you believe the clintons and how they have describe their process the key word searches and they deleted e-mails that were not from doc.gov mail addresses it does not solve the problem. director point that the questions you asked adam schiff there is not just the form oh-109 but 1904 has to be certified by a state department official that the person who removes this has permission. where is that form? was that signed? was it requested? there is all this documentation she hasn't provided in addition to her server in addition to the missing e-mails and until she does these are questions that will follow her around. >> we can agree there are a lot of good tinges,

more bad news for hillary clinton.he associated press" filed a lawsuit against the state department. they're attempting to force the release of e-mails and documents related to hillary clinton while she was secretary of state. the lawsuit comes after several requests filed under the freedom of information act. the news comes just one day after hillary clinton's press conference on her private e-mail server. republicans are still jumping all over hillary on this. i must be a clinton cheerleader all of a sudden. i thought she cleared the air yesterday. i thought she answered all the relevant questions that were pertinent to the issue of her personal e-mail. you might not think that as a liberal or conservative critic. that's just me. here is the chairman of the house select committee on benghazi earlier today. >> i'm not sure how setting up your own private server is more convenient than an intern adding an e-mail account to your smart phone. she said we went through the documents. i have no idea who "we" is. >> so what

clinton's chances? campbell: it is not going to matter in the primary, because her people have nowhere else to go. core supporters talking about the e-mail scandal -- they can real ethical concerns about that. they never said, we are going to look at the republican. they do not even know who martin o'malley is. in a primary, it is irrelevant. in the general, i think it is background noise unless it is really huge and new. i think her bigger problem in the general and the bigger impression is, what is her vision for the country? she has yet to lay that out and talk about what her agenda is. i think that will dominate more. mark: there is a reason clinton scandals do not break through the way they might. the bar is pretty high if it does not involve impeachment. get back to us. cleanse operation, even now which is not fully formed, is very good at dealing with these things saying, that is an old story. the american people do not care about that. they are good at damage control. something has to be big to

now. >> another scandal for hillary clinton. >> future president hillary clinton may have to pardon former secretary of state hillary clinton. >> clinton's only public comment to quell the firestorm over her private e-mail system came wednesday on twitter, quote, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. clinton turned over 55,000 pages of e-mails to the state department in december. and according to aides, that's 90% of all e-mails she sent. critics say it was left to her and her staff to decide what was released and that may have been the point. meanwhile the e-mail story is playing into every negative stereotype about the clintons and their supporters that they follow the letter of the law, but not its spirit. >> nobody has disagreed with me as a lawyer that what she did was lawful, lawful. now all the what ifs suppose that, that's not fact. that's speculation. >> but the story plays into a narrative that when it comes to transparency, the clintons drag their feet. >> late tonight, senator a