go long. >>> 14 million people watched the debate. cnbc'sival, fox business, is hosting the next debate on november 10th. they've wasted no time piling on. >> cnbc never ask the real question, never cover the real issues. the real debate about our economy and future is only on fox business network. >> there's been a pile on. not just over on fox. all the media seems to be criticizing cnbc, but has it been fair? dan rather presided over a whole slew of debates. he knows as well as anybody what it's like to be caught in the glare of media attention. >> you've been on those stages so many time, how would you review the moderators of the debate? >> they didn't do it perfectly. it wasn't their best night. i think we have to see clearly what's at play. candidates on the right side of the spectrum, a large part loves attacks on the press. the moderators open themselves up. it's a very tough role to be there. i see this as strictly optics. by the time we get to the snow season of the primaries, a lot of this will be forgotten. it doesn't amount to v

what are your thoughts on that cnbc debate? was it such a disaster, like everyone said it is? >> well, i mean it was a a disaster for cnbc because you basically, you can be tough on -- and you should be, any moderator should be tough on these people because they want power over all of us, so you really have to put them through their paces. but when you're openly hostile, then it becomes, as cruz said, a cage mat. >> and then people get uncomfortable so you don't get enough information coming out. and that was a mistake that the cnbc people made. >> jimmy: but now it's a big deal. now they're signing letters. they're not gonna go. jeb bush wants to do telemundo then donald trump says no way. he's not gonna do it. it's like -- it's insane. it's great for us. great for comedy, but -- [ light laughter ] >> the next debate is next tuesday on the fox business channel. >> jimmy: yeah. >> so they're prepping now for it. i think you'll see a different presentation, but as we said in

moderators were unfair and biased campaigns felt the recent cnbc debate moderators were unfair and biased toward the candidates. now they want to negotiate with debate hosts directly... bypassing the republican national committee. on their list of changes... opening statements, a two-hour time limit, showing biographical information on the screen as they speak, and making sure everyone gets an equal number of questions. the party has already announced it's pulling out of the next nbc debate. the network says they're currently trying to work things out to avoid that. one of those republicans is in town today. ohio governor john kasich visits he'll host a town hall meeting with nationwide insurance employees. tomorrow hillary clinton brings her campaign to iowans. she'll hold events in coralville and at grinnell college. and bernie sanders may not be in town... but he's still finding a way into your living room. his first round of ads are about to hit the airwaves. the commercials start tomorrow in iowa and new hampshire. those are the first two states in the nominating process. sanders is

the candidates calling for change after last weeks highly criticized debate moderated by cnbc... which prompted responses like this: 21:56:03:23 sot- christie from debate we have isis and al- qaeda attacking us and we're talking about fantasy football? (cheers)" question and bite from trump: is this a comic book campaugn? no it's not,... and i think that's a very rude question." bite-- christie cnbc debate.. even in nj this is rude.... a sunday night meeting of representatives from nearly all of the republican candidates did not include the republican national committee...but today...republican party chair reince priebus says the candidates have the party's support. "what happened at the cnbc debate was a debacle"."the ability to sanction or de-sanction a debate is with the rnc." some of the candidates have already indicated what they want changed sot carson " we should have moderators who are interested in disseminating the information about the candidates as opposed to, you know, "gotcha," "you did this" and "defend yourself on that," you know. ted cruz from wnt pkg: if you have

vanity fair, how cnbc lost it own gop debate. atlanta journal-constitution, the spin room consensus -- cnbc lost the debate. redstate, cnbc dumpster fire debate. is some of that criticism fair? >> i think -- >> you were there? >> sure. they could have omitted some of those questions. a tone in couple of them were a little harsh. but if you look at the transcript, there were a lot of very tough questions posed to those candidates. and in several cases rather than answer the question they trashed the media. >> the right questions for the debate? >> i think some could have been omitted. there were also, a question posed to ben carson about a question to marco rubio, does he really like his job, and he didn't really answer it. why he would allow the debt ceiling to raised? >> how should the media react to this? >> what would the republicans have if not to have the media to some of the questions were gotcha questions. i think that the fox debate, the very first debate, was a real model, because those questions were substantive, they we

the problem with the cnbc debate was that the mod rarts didn't seem to take conservative debates seriouslyfriend of donald trump, but the question about him running a comic book campaign was meant to be disrespectful. it was meant not to elicit information, it was meant to be disrespectful and there was a lot of questions like that. it was very difference from, for instance, the fox debate, which had tough, challenging questions which were all meant to elicit information and advance the debate. i think that was the difference. i don't think this is likely to go anywhere. ultimately, you have ted cruz and marco rubio who have proven themselves to be good debaters. trump has made clear that he wants to keep the debates shorter. they don't have common interests, so unless the rnc is really running this show, it's unlikely they'll come to a group consensus. >> charles? >> the republican candidates should quit while they're ahead. they won this debate against the media. the debate about the debate is over, and they crushed the media. there is a general consensus, including in liberal media, tha

number one in every debate. even cnbc said the last debate, it was their debate, they said i won the debate. i like the debates -- >> let me ask you a very important question. >> i like the debates. i don't really care that much, to be honest. this is more of an issue for other people. the networks are making a fortune with the debates. i think they should give money to the wounded warriors and to the veterans. they are making a fortune. they used to have 2 million people watching. now they are having 24, 25 million watching and even though it's because of trump and i won't say that, 24, 25 million people watching, they should give some of the money to the wounded warriors and to the veterans. >> let's say you become president. let's talk about the first 100 days. what would you do specifically on the economy? what would you do on health care, the borders, what would you do about putin and this horrible iranian deal? walk me through those 100 days how fast you think you could act and get on that path, as you say, to make

the moderators of the cnbc debate were almost universally criticized for the tone of their questions d letting the debate get out of control. what we saw from the moderators on fox business, it was a more controlled debate. there were only a few times it seems like the candidates took over. one of those times was when donald trump, himself, acted like a pod rater. here's what he said about jeb bush. >> they moved a million-and-a-half people out. we have no choice. we have no choice. >> what about to my questions? >> governor, a couple things here. first of all --? you should let jeb speak. >> no, it's unfair. >> so that was the most tweeted about moment of the night t. second most commented moment was actually involving a debate about the tax code. there was a lot of substance at this debate. we'll see how that dranz lates to viewership. these debates have been incredibly high rated. i think largely to donald trump. we seen 10 to 1520 million people watching the debates earlier this summer. into the fall. this will get at least over 10 million viewers. which will mean the debate seaso

the problem with the cnbc debate was that the mod rarts didn't seem to take conservative debates seriously. i'm not friend of donald trump, but the question about him running a comic book campaign was meant to be disrespectful. it was meant not to elicit information, it was meant to be disrespectful and there was a lot of questions like that. it was very difference from, for instance, the fox debate, which had tough, challenging questions which were all meant to elicit information and advance the debate. i think that was the difference. i don't think this is likely to go anywhere. ultimately, you have ted cruz and marco rubio who have proven themselves to be good debaters. trump has made clear that he wants to keep the debates shorter. they don't have common interests, so unless the rnc is really running this show, it's unlikely they'll come to a group consensus. >> charles? >> the republican candidates should quit while they're ahead. they won this debate against the media. the debate about the debate is over, and they crushed the media. there is a general consensus, including in liberal

republican national committee yanked a scheduled debate from nbc to punish the network for the cnbc debate. but no candidate has talked about not participating. quite the opposite, everybody wants to play and grumble about the proceedings. more from michael shure about tonight's debate. >> the way that the republicans were united, how it was at fix, we all don't like the way that the cnbc debate happened. we want to revolt about the questions and how they put it on. but when they got to the table, and we want to figure out how to make it better, they all had different ideas, and they all didn't sit down at the same table. ben carson, his reason for being there was to get more time and more statements. and chris christie said ask me anything, and i'll answer. and jeb bush wanted more time to answer substantive questions, and they all came with different ideas and all left unhappy. nothing happened there, and donald donned said that he would negotiate directly with the networks themselves. but when you talk about the debates, you talk about having nine debates, only nine debates. last time,

vanity fair, how cnbc lost it own gop debate. atlanta journal-constitution, the spin room consensus -- cnbc lost the debate. redstate. cnbc dumpsterire debate. is some of that criticism fair? >> sure, they could have omitted some of those questions. a tone in couple of them were a little harsh. but if you look at the transcript, there were a lot of veryough questions posed to o ose candidates. and in some cases rather than answer the questio they trashed the media. there were also, a question posed to ben carson about justifying his tax proposal and he didn't answer it. a question to marco rubio, does he like his job and he didn't failed to justify why he would allow the debt ceiling to raised? >> how should the media react to this in. >> what would the republicans have if not having the media to bash? some of the questions were got gotcha questions. the fox debate the very first debate, was a real model, because those questions were substantive, they were really tough, too, the toughest thing aboutt cnbc the moderators didn't hav

>> well, the tone was very, very different from what we saw late last month about with the cnbc debate. as you eluded to before, there was a lot of criticism for how the moderators handled that. fox business network and "wall street journal" who hosted this one said they really wanted to focus on policy and i think we did see that tonight. >> what about the candidates? anyone have a breakout moment or a significant moment for you? >> i didn't see any in the main stage debate real single moment that stole the show. i do think in the undercard debate, we saw chris christie, who are recently been demoted to that junior varsity stage have a couple of moments that looked really good for him. >> if -- if anybody believes the stuff they heard from that democratic debate a few weeks ago, there is nothing for free. what they forgot to tell you was that -- >> so we are just seeing a little bit of chris christie right now. you know, i wondered whether or not being on the undercard stage would actually help him? because there are fewer candidates, despite the fact that fewer people will probably s

the backlash comes after angry candidates complained about so called gotcha questions at the cnbc debate. >> that debate was a really weird debate because you didn't get a chance to continue on. i literally got cut off by three -- all three of them saying, you know, next question, next question. >> we have too many people on one stage and too few on the other. i don't mind being asked hard questions and challenging questions. i think some of the questions have been downright silly. and this thing has gone on too long. >> harry truman couldn't get elected explaining united states of america's health care plan in 30 seconds. >> we should have moderators who are interested in disseminating the information about the candidates as opposed to, you know, got ya. >> there has to be consequence when the debate process is abused in the way that cnbc did it. >> among the proposals on the table, a two-hour limit, equal speaking time for all of the candidates and a 30-second limit on opening and closing statements. so, let's talk a little more about this. with me now republican presidential candidate

. >> reporter: donald trump that focused on substance than the cnbc debate last month. >> i thought the moderators did a great job. the kept was good and no fantasy football stuff like last time. >> reporter: there was a lot of speculation that the tension between marco rube on yo and jeb bush would spill over during this debate but the two did not take jabs at each other. there was a notable performance in bush's performance after he hired a media trainer and performance analysts say will carry him right to the next round next month. weijia jiang, cbs news, milwaukee. >>> for more on last night's debate we are joined from chicago by hunter walker. good morning, hunter. thanks for joining us. >> thanks for having me. >> let's get right into it. what stood out to you about the debate? >> well, the tone was very, very different from what we saw late last month about with the cnbc debate. as you eluded to before, there was a lot of criticism for how fox business network and "wall street journal" who hosted this one said they really wanted to focus on policy and i think we did see that toni

you saw it last week on the cnbc debate. frankly now so many members of the leftist media don't even pretend anymore. there's no more pretense of even trying to be fair. the bias is out there in the open and now in large part thanks to donald trump who has gone in there and fought back against the influence of the mainstream media, against the length of the debates, against, frankly, the influence of the rnc. i think this is all to the good. they should all be thanking trump and now that they're all together in one big force, i think you're going to see serious changes. >> the amazing thing, peter, is they would never treat hillary clinton this way. >> oh, my god. >> never. >> and that brings me to carly fiorina. she is dropping behind enemy lines this week and going into "the view." a courageous conservative warrior. >> i agree. >> she's taking the fight to the people that defamed her and made fun of her and say i'm not afraid of you. i'm not afraid of your silly comments. i'm going to debate you on the issues and beat you.

so there you go. >> that sums it up. >>> also the way the debate ended with donald trump taking credit for forcing cnbc to have only a two-hour debate, sxaending to three, and there were days of stories about how the campaign with you pushing back by the way, "new york times" asked its read es to post online the most ridiculous comments, got 600 responses. what happened? only for the republican debate, and i think that's the kind of thing that just makes people skeptical of the msm. >>> ahead we'll go to our media microscope. our new technology that zeros in on what's moves, move this prompter, moving the needle. when we come back, bob woodward weighs in on donald trump, hillary clinton and how today's journalists are covering the campaign. >>> bob woodward will also be renown for his role for blowing watergate open, but can those reporting methods also be applied to the 2016 campaign? i sat down with the author of the new book "the last of the president's men" here in studio 1. welcome. >> thank you. >> in the coverage of this campaign, do you feel more than any other that maybe substance and policy i

jeb bush didn't like a graphic up during the cnbc debate. is there precedent for this? are they reasonable? >> yes, they're reasonable and sort of modest in scope. we know the ben carson campaign was looking for some pretty extreme demands heading into that debate, demands that would have turned the debates into something more like forums. asking for time limits, a certain amount of time to answer questions, these aren't radical concepts. in a way, the media descended on alexandria to get the drips and drabs coming out of this debate was somewhat disappointed. to get to your point about equal time, how do you measure that, gauge that, ensure that happens, the key word coming out of the meeting was parody and integrity. they don't just want equal time on questions. they want equal substance on questions. that's the gist of what's going on here. they're looking for more substantive debate or claim to be looking for a more substantive debate. >> who do you think controls the substance more, the candidates or the questioners? >> that's a great question. let's look at the cnb

going to stay focused on it. >> i am sure you know there has been at love controversy over the cnbc debate. did you think it was fair? >> i think they lost control over it. the only unfair part was they said it was going to be a certain kind of debate and it wasn't anything close to what they said. all i want is just to know what the rules are and people will apply those rules correctly and faithfully and fairly. i don't think -- i think they lost control. >> in recent days we have learned that another american of iranian dissent has been taken into custody in tehran. if you are president of the united states, we have got four other americans, a pastor, a marine, a journalist and a former fbi agent. what would do you? >> it's outrageous. i would reengage 'our european allies particularly to reimpose sanctions as best we can. and i would confront iranian ambitions in the region i would continue to support as we always have had in the past support the ambitions of those who want to be free. there are all sorts of tools at our disposal if we are serious about doing that that's what we ought t

there you go. >> that sums it up. >> are done. >> way the debate ended for donald trump forcing cnbc to having a two hour debate, and hardwood said no, no, it was always two hours but there were days of stories on that. >> and they asked the readers to post the most ridiculous comment from the republican debate and there were 600 responses. what happened at the d debate? they did not ask for the most ridiculous, only the republican debate so that makes people skeptical of the msn. we go do our media microscope and our new technology that zeros in on what is moving the needle for the candidate who only come back, bob woodward weighs in on donald trump and hillary clinton and how the journalists cover the campaign. >> bob wood board will be known for his role in blowing watergate method but can that be applied to the 2016 campaign? i sat down with the author of "the last of the president's men," right here. bob woodward, welcome. in the coverage of the campaign do you feel more than any other that maybe substance and policy is aching a back seat to personality and polls and insults? >>

. >>> president obama cheerfully mocking republican candidates and complaints about the cnbc debate. the president tried out comment timing at the democratic fund-raiser in new york last night. >> have you noticed that every one of the candidates say obama's weak. putin's kicking sand in his face. when i talk to putin he's going to straighten out. just looking at him. and then it turns out they can't handle a bunch of cnbc moderators. [ applause ] i mean let me tell you if you can't handle -- if you can't handle those guys, you know, i don't think the chinese and russians are going to be too worried about you. >> that was funny. the president is the least of the republicans worries this morning. their efforts to put up a united front for more control of future debates is starting to fall apart. this as a pair of new polls paint a confusing picture of the gop race. cnn's sara murray has the latest. >> reporter: good morning, alison and miguel. a new poll shows it is not donald trump leading nationwide. ben carson is the frontrunner in the new nbc news/wall street journal poll. trump s

after a not so strong cnbc debate for iowa's latest poll leaders ben carson and donald trump. >> ben carson and donald trump are still leading in iowa so we don't know yet what impact their performance last week at the debate may have on their poll standing. jason r.: it is too early to say , with 3 whole months before the iowa caucuses and the fact polls can shift a lot in that span of time. political analyst dennis goldford says the engaged crowd on saturday definitely isn't a bad sign. >> it's good to have a warm reception, but the question is how long that in fact will persist. jason r.: goldford says from here on out for cruz and rubio , it is about maintaining their momentum. >> they could well catch up in the polls cruz has a pretty good organization and iowa. rubio is still building one they -- still building one. they need to capitalize on that or else this can be the latest flash in the pan among the republican candidates. eric: goldford says take saturday's warm reception with a grain of salt the gop event had -- grain of salt. the gop event had roughly one-third the crowd

we saw this in the cnbc debate as well.sy tactic to take on the republican side, if you face tough questioning turn it on to the media. but i think that any candidate at this level is going to face scrutiny about their past and questions and if he doesn't want to answer those questions, if he's constantly deflecting on to the media, i think that at some point voters are going to stop and say, you know, like every other candidate faces these same types of questions. why does ben carson think he doesn't have to answer them? >> you write about carson's devotion to the seventh day adventist church. how much of the world view is based on his religious beliefs and the doctrines? >> i think that's a large part of the whole world view. i think he's shaped very much not in the way he approaches politics, sort of the role of government, but how he thinks, you know, the history of the world some of the things he said about his world view is the literal interpretation of the bible. but he's always been able to reconcile both sides of t

debate saying the republicans can't handle a bunch of cnbc moderators at the debate how do you expect to stand up to putin. your response to president obama? >> well, my only problem with the cnbc debate is i thought they wasted an opportunity to ask questions about the economy. that was my issue. i don't care about the other stuff. i anticipate we are going to get asked tough questions. >> some of them were irrelevant questions. >> by point was it's the only complaint i had was we had a debate on cnbc where we had an opportunity to go in depth or taxes trade, all the global issues going on in the economy and they were barely touched. i thought it was a missed opportunity. i know most of the candidates had prepared for in-depth economic discussion and instead we got things that had nothing to do with the economy or the future of the country. i think that was the disappointment from my perspective. i don't have any other complaints. debates are supposed to be tough. they are supposed to be difficult. and i anticipate that as a conservative they are going to be even more difficult becau

they are coming together for a rare weekend strategy session in the wake of the cnbc debate debacle. the outcome to change the format of future debates. kristin fisher is live for us to breakdown the propose tal and they also may leave the republican party out of it all together. hi kristin. >> hey, heather. last night after a two-hour long meeting representatives from almost all of the presidential campaigns agreed to a series of demands that would give them greater control of the debate. they want a two-hour time limit mandatory 30 seconds for opening and closing statements equal speaking time for each candidate and editorial control of all on screen graphics. >> the structure is not leading to the best candidate coming out of the debate. i would like to have smaller groups all of us be heard equally ask better questions if we do that we will get the best nominee to win an election we can't afford to lose. if we continue with this process it will hurt our chances of winning in 2013. >> this meeting with the director of the debate. the chairman of the national public committee alread

>> one of the reasons i was excited to have you on tonight is lost in the reaction to the cnbc debate is the fact that the idea behind the cnbc debate is that it would be the debate focused on economic issues. >> and they had little of that. >> it strikes me that essentially the central domestic policy plank of the republican party now is the same as when george w. bush ran in 2000, which is lots of tax cuts, which will distributionally benefit the wealthiest the most. is that a fair -- >> sure. except the difference now is tax cuts are bigger, they're less responsible, and the claims being made for them are even more extravagant. so bush looks cautious and statesman-like compared with the current crop. >> really? >> yeah. no, it's amazing, actually. we are -- i'm starting to look back and i said boy, that was a sane party in the bush years by comparison. this is crazy. you know, marco rubio, who is now sort of emerging as the establishment candidate, $6 trillion of unfunded tax cuts which he claims will pay for themselves, which is deep voodoo. and that's amazing that a major party h

they are considering boycotting the upcoming nbc debate after they say the cnbc debate was not up to standards. but right now, here's a look at across eastern iowa. highs today will generally be in the 70-75 range from northeast to southwest. plan on a southwest wind of 10-15 mph. overall, it's tough to beat this in november! this pattern should continue through wednesday, with a storm system set to move across the area later thursday and especially thursday night. rain will likely accompany this system into friday conditions for the weekend. have a great day!today: mostly sunny high: 71-77 winds: sw 10-15 alo: 73 dbq: 70 iow: 74tonight: mostly clear low: 45-51 winds: s 5-10 alo: 45 dbq: 45 iow: 48tomorrow mostly sunny high: 68-74 winds: s 10-15 alo: 71 dbq: 70 iow: 71tomorrow night: mostly clear low: 47-53 iow: 50 thanks kaj. bad burritos. health officials found ecoli at a popular mexican 'to-go' style restaurant. that's coming up in , after saturday's tragic airline crash that killed all the passengers returning from a resort town in egypt. president vladimir putin declared a natio

it spans the cnbc debate last week. candidates' performances in that debate are not baked in. we'll have to wait for future polling to get a clearer sense how the performances are playing with republican primary voters. still this new poll, the new numbers, suggests that last week's poll from cbs and the "new york times" that also showed carson in the lead was not an outlier. i should mention trump is still out front in the latest poll in new hampshire. a key early voting state. that poll from monmouth shows trump leading carson by 10 points there. you can also see marco rubio is in third place. again in that poll his support haza has tripled in september. >>> ban the box. no more asking about criminal convictions on job applications. the goal so to help inmates integrate back binto the workforce. even? >> reporte >> this is the hard part of the criminal justice reform plan. helping thousands reintegrate back into society. president obama want companies to change how they hire to help criminals get hired. and they can as

plus the president's insta poll, what didn't you hear at the cnbc ke debate that you would like to hear on the fox business >>> an outraged rnc says they have suspended their partnership with fnc because of cnbc's handling of the third debate. joining us is someone who knows a little bit about behind one of those podiums, presidential candidate and business has herrmann kaine. to the rnc says that they will not take part in the fnc debate. do you think he would have done this without the candidates's approval? >> no, he would not have. and the good news that came out of that debate is that the candidates won and the moderators lost. and i'm glad that the chairman dared to say that we're not going to take that blatant liberal bias that they displayed the other night. so that's positive. but one thing that came out of this is the democratic biasa came out of this. they were able to give some substance to the american people, but they had to dig to be able to do it. >> what does ry co-do they haveo make sure that this is going to be a fair debate. >> allow the candidates and the -- we knew

from the rnc which many of the candidates have criticized for sanctionsing wednesday night's debate on cnbclearned that ben carson's campaign will make this pitch tonight, two-hour debates where each candidate gets five minutes for opening and closing statements and with 14 candidates on the stage, that means more than half of the debate would be given to individual statements leaving three or four minutes for each candidate to actually debate. by the way, that is if you have no commercials. joining me now, cnn political commentat commentator ryan lizza. you got interesting feedback from some of the campaigns who are going tonight and some who are not going. >> yeah. one thing i learned is that the carly fiorina campaign said they are not going, they are not sending anyone, which is interesting because debates have really been a friend to her, at least the first debate. the rubio campaign noted that debates have been great, according to rubio, which are undisputedly true for him for the last debate. he was one of the big winners. they, like everyone else, says they want the debates to be mo

greg: last week during the world series there was a debate on cnbc and apparently they totally blew it, not the candidates although jeb bush did totally blown according to the experts. those who ran the debate, cnbc, full of gotcha questions and all about style and a horse race and not enough. marco rubio won it they say. anyway, the republicans had a major meeting with nbc and said we are not going to do this. rosanna: we will tell you about the changes theed. two canyons won the 45th new york city marathon. every year the canyons when the new york city marathon. we need to find their secret. what is their secret? at one point on first avenue ladies from america were in front of the canyons but then somehow or another when they passed first avenue is also the back. greg: all right, what else is going on? the marathon was clinched by the world series. rosanna: so much going on between the halloween parade, the mets, the marathon, did we mention american pharaoh ran again and won the breeders' cup. that was the swan song. greg: this was tough to take, extra innings, late in the night. y

and as far as the debates are concerned president obama joked about the situation at a fundraiser last night. >> it turns out they can't handle a bunch of cnbc moderators. at a debate. if you can't handle those guys? [ laughter ] you know, then i don't think the chinese and the russians are going to be too worried about you. >> the gop candidates are all looking at brand new data from nbc news. the a new poll the front runner and in a very big way chsmt candidates are waking up to good news this morning. >> no question ben carson has pulled out there. but also people are still concerned about the economy. still number one issue for most voters and they are split on whether democrats or republicans should be in charge here. >> new from our nbc "wall street journal" poll, americans are frustrated. just over a quarter think we're headed in the right direction. more than half think the the deck is stacked against them. well over half would fire their member of congress. >> you can't just tell congress you're fired and go to commercial break. the biggest surprise, ben carson at 29%. the biggest lead of any republican so far. what you are seeing r

they want more say over future debates after last week's cnbc debate. more on these new demands. >> i was very disappointed in the moderators. i think it was one got ya question, one personal low below after the other. >> those words from rnc chairman after last week's cnbc presidential debates, setting the stage for days of withering criticism of the network. rnc pulling out of the republican debate schedule for february, and the campaigns coming together in virginia, sunday, to draft a list of demands for future debate. >> convened by ben carson's campaign manager, barry ben it, the 14 campaigns sought greater control in setting the terms for the debate. >> we are burdened by the fact, and i think they also have a chance to speak, we will figure out what, if we can come to some concensus how they do that. >> in a sign of dissatisfaction with the republican national committee, the campaign specifically did not include the rnc in sunday's meeting. instead inviting republican lawyer and debate negotiator ben ginsberg as impartial facilitate or. >> the in