cohabitation is just the norm now. >> yep, everybody is cohabiting essentially. >> everybody?everybody. there's a select few who don't. those with strong religious c convictio convictions. >> it is astonishing how quickly it's changed in a big way. >> yes. so we had 400,000 couples in 1960 cohabiting. in 2013, about 8 million couples. i've talked to a number of young people who say they would never get married unless they live with the person first. that it would be stupid to do so. >> i must say that makes sense to me. the celebrities we showed, some of them never got married, but many live together for, what, a year and then get married? >> right. overall, about 50% of cohabiting couples end up getting married. about 40% break up and 10% remain cohabiting for a long time. >> does it make a difference what socioeconomic group you come from? >> yes. for example, we think of out of wedlock births. we know it is very high in the u.s. right now. 60% of those are taking place to cohabiting couples and not to single women. >> it's not what we think of as out of wedlock. >> correct.

that no cohabitation law was illegal.or trigamy, i don't know what it is with you -- [ laughter ]. john: who are you married to officially? >> legally married to arena. getting multiple marriage licenses is illegal. i can have as many consensual relationships which is all i wanted is to be decriminalized. john: some people say polygamy is a scam, let's people get away with what animals do. spread his seed. male animals fight for the right to impregnate the whole herd. >> what about that? >> there's many men out spreading seed without taking responsibility. i'm simply taking responsibility for raising children and loving multiple women. i don't think there's any harm in that. john: are you sex slaves or you get to say no? >> well, we're all -- it's like i have a relationship with just him. she has a relationship with just him. the dynamics of our relationship is between he and i and we work that out like a monogamous couple. and no, to answer your question, we're not sex slaves. john: i noticed from the animal kingdom this

cohabitating relationships end early.ey are three times as likely to see the parents break up before their 5 years old. oo is a just by getting married you are less likely to he can bra up. >> when you get married you are making a decision this is what i am going to try to do. doesn't always work out. but cohabitating tends to be an arrangement that people slide into where they haven't decided together to make the commitment. >> nearly half of young people ages 18 to 39 have a step sibling. so what they get parented by he more people. more love better. >> more than a third of the marriages break up. usually the father tends to disappear or tends to fade out. there is a new man in the house and this often creates tensions between the mother, the father and new man. he maybe finds a new love and has a child with that terne. it is hard to maintain and it complicates people's lives. >> with boys children are more likely to have trouble in school, more likely to have behavioral problems, they are in such an environment they ac

marriage is a license to cohabit sexually at the enforcement of this method eventually defeats the originalect. is the common experience among married women who live together strictly according to the marriage covenant for 5 to 10 years that they are sexually estranged. she would say this all over the country and people would gasp and everything and they both decry the economic dependency of women that could contracting repugnant marriages. century and a half before the term date rape was going to victoria packed houses about domestic abuse. night after night there are thousands of rapes committed under cover of this occurs license, and millions, i say it boldly, millions of poor, heartbroken, suffering wives are compelled to ministered to the luxury of in satiable husbands and this is the line of thought was interesting, knowing the way the laws were she was probably right. nothing except marriage in debts men with the right to debauched women sexually against their will. and the whole double standard routine, i say that the prostitute suffering and sells herself to some man for a few hour

confabulator in the year with all the top bishops and cardinals talk about the contraception, cohabitationvorce, same-sex unions, maybe he is telegraphing there are changes afoot. >> i think the tonal changes are different than changes to dogma. it's not going to change. pew research of catholics think the change from the last pope to francis is for the better, and 50% of noncatholics think that. this is a man who is beloved by the media -- >> because of this -- his views on gay marriage or because he washes the feet of sinners and -- >> lived with the poor. >> in the -- he has done a lot of real -- relating with human beings. a, it is what people like and it's what the media likes. he'll have a pass for a longtime with the media because he is open with them. he has given interviews without the vetting of the vatican. in "the rolling stone." multipain piece. and when you engage in social immediate -- >> media can be very, very fickle, and i think -- the one thing is that here is the fear, that the mainstream media can praise this and then suddenly take it away. especially a view that goes

objection to scholarly projects but i don't think they are substitute for the social experience of cohabitationwhich it is i believe the basis. >> i would answer that quickly in terms of the sharing of power from my own limited vantage point i think the fundamental problem of poor people in general is lack of people in particular is too much poverty and not enough self-love. you only respond by the sharing of power because its privilege and power at the top and of course that is the conclusioconclusio n that dubois reached the move from an enlightened point of view. he read karl marx always the book of fire for her which one must pass. it's not a question of discipline. you have to and gauge plutocrats corporations big banks profit-making and that's the kind of society and world we live in. that is what marx was talking about and you might reject his conclusion that he's talking about how can we reach a point where everyday people share power as opposed to being dominated. and what it means to be dominated instead of subjugated and that's true for women and and and transgender and so forth but

. >> i don't cohabitate with other people too well. that was the only one person i did.y man. so it's best to keep me happy. i will drive these [ bleep ] people crazy. >> for now, goodell might have bigger concerns than causing trouble. his sentencing is only days away. he's agreed to a plea deal up to 45 years in prison for strangling his 21-year-old former girlfriend, viviana tulli. goodell hopes to convince the judge to give him less time. today he'll run some of his ideas by jan philips. a case manager. a division of the county court system. >> my job is to meet with every defendant, whether they're found guilty at trial or accepted a plea. my goal with this client or any client is to provide the court with a full input from the defendant, so at sentencing time we're not just looking at what the offense was but a more rounded version or vision of what the defendant is. >> i did write a letter to the family that i would like to read. >> this is your words to the family. okay. what i want from you is anything about you. do you want the judge to know about you? what hap

objection to scholarly projects but i don't think they are substitute for the social experience of cohabitationwhich it is i believe the basis. >> i would answer that quickly in terms of the sharing of power from my own limited vantage point i think the fundamental problem of poor people in general is lack of people in particular is too much poverty and not enough self-love. you only respond by the sharing of power because its privilege and power at the top and of course that is the conclusioconclusio n that dubois reached the move from an enlightened point of view. he read karl marx always the book of fire for her which one must pass. it's not a question of discipline. you have to and gauge plutocrats corporations big banks profit-making and that's the kind of society and world we live in. that is what marx was talking about and you might reject his conclusion that he's talking about how can we reach a point where everyday people share power as opposed to being dominated. and what it means to be dominated instead of subjugated and that's true for women and and and transgender and so forth but

the entire -- the western and eastern cohabitation that allowed us to overcome the cold war, at least in its most dangerous phase, was based on the 1975 helsinki founding act, which said that you do not change. everyone agreed. all countries agreed, including the soviet union, which was then now a successor state, you do not change borders, except through negotiation. that is the fundamental principle of the whole founding act. that no longer applies. the justification for annexing or reinfluencing ukraine was based on the 1990 cse charter that says that each country has a right to make its own decisions. on top of that i say that -- just to correct the thing about what you said, paul, all that ukraine was trying to do was get an association agreement. i mean, an association agreement basically allows teachers and students to, like, go and study elsewhere in europe. we signed our association agreement about a decade before we ever joined. when i was in the european parliament, i was there for albania's association agreement, and that was ten years ago, and they're far, far, far away f

is mostly spouses and people who have cohabitate it.he truth is we are expanding to include other folks involved in that domestic abuser category. we also built on the partnership between the federal and state government. we provide grants so states can create laws that allow law enforcement to get a warrant to remove firearms from the possession of any individuals who are a danger to themselves or others. we have heard most recently in the/tragedy in santa barbara a parent informed law enforcement they had concerns about their son. killed a number of people. what we want to do is make sure when there is a concern expressed that law enforcement is educated, they know what is available to them, and there is a process through the warrant process to be able to take guns away from those folks to ensure that they don't do any harm for themselves or others. i want to point out there are two states that have this. connecticut and indiana have a form of this. actuallyething we can see some real on the ground results from. we temporarily prohibi

right now it is mostly spouses, and there are only spouses and people who cohabitate. but the truth is we have expanded it to include other folks who fall into that domestic abuser category. it also -- we also build on the partnership between the federal and the state government. we provide grants so states can create laws that allow law enforcement to get a war to remove firearms from the possession of any individuals who are of danger to themselves or others. recently ind most this last tragedy in santa barbara where a parent informed law enforcement that they had concerns about their son. , killed a sadly number of people. and what we want to do is make sure when there is a concern expressed that law enforcement is educated, know what is available to them, what tools are available to them, and there is a legal process through the warrant process to be able to take guns away from those folks to ensure that they do not do any harm to themselves or others. and i want to point out there are two states that have already this. connecticut and indiana have a form of this.

expand on that too include the mistake of users and right now it is mostly spouses and people who cohabitate but the truth is we need to it include other individuals who fall into that abuse or category. we also built on a partnership between the federal and state government. and we provide grants so states can allow our law enforcement to get a warrant to remove firearms of the possession of any individuals and those who are a danger to themselves and others. we heard this last tragedy in santa barbara where parents informed law enforcement that they had concerns about their son. their son sadly killed a number of people what we want to do is make sure that when there is a concern expressed, they know what is available, they know what tools are available and there is a legal process and a warrant process to be able to take guns away from those folks to ensure that they don't do any harm for themselves or others. there are two states that are to have this come about connecticut and indiana and it's something that we can see some real on the ground results from. also temporarily prohibiting t

february cool leaders along with the western media were quick to pin the blame on president going to cohabit elite police officers but investigators in the ukrainian capital now evidence that contradicts those easterly reach conclusions are to take a piss cannot explain. the footage that shook ukraine and the entire world many say this was the point of no return protesters being shot one after another with live rounds during february uprising showing images of riot police firing their weapons and many media outlets were quick to accuse them of being behind the massacre images of snipers in central kiev flooded the internet along with more accusations of the authorities while several western officials fanned the flames people who stood up against night burrs firing at them from the rubes who are fighting against the tyranny of having political opposition put in jail where you have some of the ukrainian ambassador and london this morning to register our emphatic protests at the event and to call for immediate and far reaching trying to end the attitude of the ukrainian the power to. ukrainians