will moderate republicans susan collins and lisa murkowski support the effort, after collins once said she was confident justices kavanaugh and gorsuch would not overturn roe versus wade. rachel scott live tonight with the reality check on the votes. >>> the new tornado watches up at this hour. storms from texas to kentucky. at least ten reported tornadoes in just 24 hours. and then the east bracing. the storm system then reaching the northeast by week's end. and rob marciano will time this out. >>> another deadly attack near tel aviv tonight. at least three people killed, several wounded. erielle reshef, who just rode with israeli forces fighting against this new wave of attacks, on this again tonight. >>> the flight to new york's jfk forced to turn around after what they learned about one of the pilots. >>> also news on pope francis tonight. >>> and the new white house press secretary, history made. >>> and america strong. what so many of you did for ukraine. the milestone tonight for an american company. >>> good evening and it's great to have you with us here on a thursday night. t

one of them is senator susan collins. she voted for justices neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh, convinced they would not overturn roe. >> so a good judge will consider as precedent of the united states supreme court worthy as treatment of precedent like any other. >> one of the important things to keep in mind about roe v. wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years. >> reporter: at the time, collins said she was given assurances. >> he noted that roe had been reaffirmed 19 years later by planned parenthod versus casey and that it was precedent on precedent. he said it should be extremely rare that it be overturned. and it should be an example -- >> you have obviously full confidence. >> i do. >> reporter: but that draft opinion indicates both gorsuch and kavanaugh will vote overturn roe after all. collins now says that's "complete ly inconsistent" with what they privately told her. collins supports codifying roe versus wade wade as federal law. but today she declared she won't support the democra

expanded by including more in the direction of that collins bill? >> that was one of the open questions here, lawrence. at the start of the week, one of the things i was asking democratic leadership aides was, was the plan for this to fail in a bipartisan fashion with more people voting in favor of it than against it? or is the plan to just make it so that all republicans would be on the other side of this? and that republicans would have a more clear cut line to run on in the midterms? it is clear now, knowing the way today played out, the way that they chose to go on this, and the way that it was explained over the weekend by democratic leadership aides, was that they did not want to water down with they were voting on. they did not want it to be less meaningful to the base. instead, they want to put forward the strongest version of the bill that they possibly could, all the while knowing that it was going to fail. to them, they view this as a way to get people on the record ahead of the midterms and to hopefully energize their base. i do think th

emphatic about that. >> and susan collins will believe any lie, no matter how obvious. >> i'm susan collins, and i approved this message. >> announcer: it's "the late show with stephen colbert." tonight: plus, stephen welcomes: jose andres and ron howard legal emily bazelton and musical guests lucius, with sheryl crow and celisse featuring jon batiste and stay human. and now, live on tape from the ed sullivan theater in new york city, it's stephen colbert! ♪ ♪ ♪ ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: oh, my lord. thanks for being here. i like it. look casual tonight. sell the photos. best-dressed list. best dressed, baby. hey! how are you? thank you! i like it. ♪ ♪ ♪ hello! happy tuesday. hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello, hello. hello, one and all. wecome, everybody, welcome, everybody, to "the late show." i am your host, stephen colbert. ( applause ) well, (bleep), you know what gh're gonna be talking about i wantedbe talking about the met gala and their theme of "the glamour of the gilded age." instead, i've got to talk about another group of out-of-touch people in crazy outfi

they are not going to get murkowski and collins on this. what it is now going to be is 49 democrats voting for it. 51 other senators, joe manchin and republicans voting against it. then they are going to look to the states. at the federal level, i think all of us who are here know this, there's really not much more that can be done outside the halls of congress. even the white house is constrained on this. everyone who i talked to in reproductive advocacy groups, everyone says it's a battle fought in the states and that what it could shake out as is those more than two dozen states that have trigger laws are going to look very red, very restricted, very conservative after this court decision. other states that are a little bit more accessible are going to be places that see women and childbearing people flood to them. the haves and have nots are going to look stark on the map. >> senator mccaskill, your reaction to these likely no votes? joe manchin just now in the hallway describing his decision to oppose it. >> the bill we have today to v

susan collins said that the bill doesn't include so-called conscious protections. to perform abortions. and now if democrats push back on that, and say she is just creating a strawman, so she doesn't have to vote for the legislation, if i had to guess based on my reporting, joe manchin will be a no on this piece of legislation, that's my guess, but he hasn't said anything yet, nor has lisa murkowski, but senate democrats are far away from getting ten republicans, ten republicans they would need to get this bill through the senate. >> and yet there is some sense that with collins, with murkowski, there needs to be some sense of accountability on this issue. if it doesn't come through this vote, what's their alternate vehicle? >> they have their own bill. i talked to dick durbin yesterday the number two senate democrat who says he is not sure whether collins or murkowski bill will get a vote but all of the pieces of legislation fall far short of the threshold they need to get this through and no one has been willing to blow up the filibuster, to eliminate the 60 vote

collins did. and your denial of -- dr. fauci: well, the issue of the barrington document, if you let the virus run free in society, and only so-called protect the vulnerable -- and the question is, who are the vulnerable in society that you are going to protect? and most public health officials totally disagree with the barrington declaration. and in fact, if you did that, let it just run free and not try to protect the population general. we almost certainly would have many more infections, many more hospitalizations and many more deaths. with all due respect to the scientists who signed the declaration, i completely disagree with them. mr. cline: would you agree during the times of the lockdowns, the data we've seen following these lockdowns has shown that we have had increases in depression among young people? dr. fauci: there's no doubt that when you put -- mr. cline: answer the question. dr. fauci: there's no doubt that when you put stressors there is mental -- you need to save lives. mr. cline: has the suicide rate i

senator collins defense, it's insane supreme court justices can lie in their job interviews without anycussions. you couldn't do that at kinko. if you claimed you were expert at clearing paper jams and all you could do is load paper you would be fired. technically, democrats could legalize abortion through congress if they get rid of the filibuster. the only problem is, they don't have the votes to do that. although, who knows? susan collins is so gullible, you know, chuck schumer can probably get her to sign on to the fill burster reform by hiding it in a birthday card. "just sign here. it's a group thing. and everyone is going to like-- it's a janitor's birthday. we're all signing. sign here. his name is phil buster. sign here." ( applause ) now, what's really interesting about this story is while many people are upset about the decision itself, some people are only upset that we're hearing about the decision. >> i have never, as you said, seen a leak like this at the court in the years that i've covered it. it is astonishing that somebody would release a draft opinion outside of the

nevertheless, work is happening on that murkowski-collins proposal. here's durbin talking about that earlier. >> why have democrats chose not to work with susan collins, lisa murkowski and try to get a bipartisan result? >> i think that effort is under way. the votes today are important, baseline politically but we're going to continue to reach out and try to build whatever margin we have today. >> i think the underlying consensus here, katy, is democrats and the strategy they've chosen today that we'll see start unfolding in about an hour, they have chosen to go forward on this in a way in a will fail in partisan fashion effectively. 49 democrats voting for the women's protection act and 51 people, one democrat among all the republicans, voting against it. >> it's very interesting, jake, that senator casey says he's going to be voting for this. senator bob casey is not for abortion rights in general. he has not been in the past. what does that say to you about his position in pennsylvania or just the electorate in pennsylvania for a senator from in a

so far collins is wrong in that.ons the states have been passing for a long time, i mean basically republican legislators with republican governors, are all kinds of limitations that have nothing to do with protecting a woman's health. these are all limitations put in place to make it a lot, lot harder for a woman to make the decision. >> let me ask you about the testimony during the confirmation hearings of the signatories of this opinion. do you believe that when they talked about the precedent, respecting roe, that they lied to you and other members of the judiciary committee? >> i don't consider that they lied, but what they said was, sure, they will look at precedent. but we all know that the supreme court gets to undo precedent any time they have the majority votes. and for the longest time justice alito held this view about abortion, he said in his draft decision that roe was wrong from the moment it was decided. so he has long harbored this view. suddenly he is now not a dissenter with his view, he is now in

>> senator collins is surprised.brett kavanaugh and justice -- now justice gorsuch told her that they respected precedent, that that was something she could depend upon. >> right. well, i mean, it's going to be up to what she wants to do about this. i mean, is it possible that the congress may move to do something else? it's possible. >> like impeachment? >> i don't know how she's going to vote. no, not like impeachment. no. >> okay, so what is your suggestion? >> what do you mean? what do you mean by that, victor, like impeachment? what do you mean? it's going to be up to her to decide, and again, i want to go back to the fact that if, in fact, the court rules this way -- >> up to her to decide what, senator? governor, what are you saying? up to her to decide what? >> if she wants to do something in federal law or whatever. i suppose there's going to be things that are going to be explored, options that will be explored. we're just going to have to wait and see how she acts on that. i'm not a fortune teller, victor.

susan collins at this today. if this leak threats decision -- it would completely inconsistent with towards courses and cabinets in their hearings are medium office. obviously we won't know he's just a decision reasonable supreme court officially announces its opinion in the case i guess the question is. yes congress does, could do it. and i've heard a lot of people, there's a lot of anger out there, lot of people think of the democrats, semi fundraising you know about this. i'm going to lose my mind. like you have power, i need you to wield it so what do you say to that? >> so, i say this. first of all, let's all acknowledge. we do have the power to get this done. and so, our first step is going to be next week. we're going to vote this in the united states senate. and 50 votes, plus the vice president, that should be enough to do with the people of the united states want us to do by a margin of more than 2 to 1. however, we're going to face the filibuster. head on. and this is going to put it to everybody who t

but, first, to the white house and our kaitlan collins. our chief white house correspondent. the president is due to speak next hour from a family farm in illinois. what do we know about his plan to fight high food prices? >> reporter: it will be about boosting food production. you've heard it from officials here at the white house saying they have deep concern about the shortages that are happening not just here in the united states but also globally. so that is going to be a big focus. the president biden has that today at the farm in illinois talking about what he believes u.s. farmers can do to try to help alleviate some of these shortages. things like making sure they have better access, better insurance, and they plant a second crop in one year. making sure they have better access to technology to reduce the reliance on fertilizer. also boosting production of fertilizer at home. that's going to be the focus of what they're talking about today. the big question, of course, is whether or not those things make a real notable difference in what we've seen in the numbers tha

wade precedent, in order to get susan collins' vote, which he did.of us who were following the kavanaugh nomination knew that it was all a lie. that kavanaugh was being put on the court to overturn roe v. wade because that's what president trump said that's he was doing. but somehow, susan collins was convinced by this charade. and voted to confirm him. and now we see, apparently, what the results are. >> jennifer, i don't know exactly what was said behind closed doors between justice kavanaugh and senator susan collins. but his testimony right there, he did not say i will never vote to overturn roe v. wade. he just said that precedent is important. and precedent upon precedent is even more important. >> right, which means absolutely nothing. the impression sa dent of the supreme court is the precedent of the supreme court until it decides it's not. they said something that you can point to that is actually technically a lie or perjury or anything like that. what they really did is say a whole lot of nothing which is what you have to do to get throug

lisa murkowski and susan collins, but they don't like this draft of the bill.ters on the hill she believes it doesn't have enough protections, for example, for catholic hospitals who may not want to provide abortions. she says that language does not go far enough. and chuck schumer was asked, why don't you try to work with these two republicans to come up with a compromise? and he made it pretty clear this is a messaging bill. this is a bill that is to show the public that democrats are the party that would protect abortion rights, and they want to make that message clear to the public. this isn't about legislating. not about policy making and they don't have a majority just amongst themselves. joe manchin, obviously, we talk about him a lot on the show, he does not support abortion rights and he would not support this. >> let me play devil's advocate. wouldn't a more effective messaging bill if that's what schumer is trying to do, be able to get the votes of susan collins and lisa murkowski and fail but have 51 votes. it's a bipartisan bill. >> you would think

as for that more narrow proposal, the alternative bill to codify roe proposed by senator collins and mark haske. senator collins put out a statement today saying, she will continue to work with colleagues on legislation to maintain, not expand or restrict the legal framework for abortion rights. it is unclear if that bill would be brought to the floor in the current senate. democrats say, it's too narrow expect this will be an ongoing battle. natalie, thank you. >>> the other big story this evening is four years past all. a lot of gold out there. >> that is commitment. >> the first fans showing up and having a good time. the big crowd is expected to watch the warriors and grizzlies in 90 minutes in memphis. big night for the warriors as a team. just one when away from the conference finals. >> we have more on the push to close out the warriors surveyed tonight, vern glenn? >>> elimination game night. acting head coach mike brown is usually the one overseeing the warriors defense. what has he done the last couple of days. he is under the hood tinkering with the offense. >> i feel like

collin: it is very difficult. when you talk about a real level, that is the question we get.a 10-year treasury yield below 3% when inflation is at 8%, a real yield of -5% is not very attractive. we think that tips are one way to address the inflation situation, especially with real yields moving into positive territory. if you look at tips with maturities of seven years and beyond, you can actually earn positive yields for the first time really tense the pandemic began. what we are focusing on with our clients is not to take additional risks. when you talk about the pain trade, where we see more pain ahead is likely in the junkiest parts of the market like high-yield. you were showing headlines before about single names especially in the retail sector read coming into this year we were concerned about corporate profits. we don't look at single names. we look at it from a high-level standpoint. when i look at specifically -- what i look at specifically from the corporate bond market is all of the corporate info, the small, medium, private. corporate profit growth is really slo

senator collins, spare us. you heard them say that they would regard roe v.and some other senators were eager to accept that and not be skeptical of those dubious claims. we have seen the spectacle over the last couple of decades of nominees for the supreme court going into senate confirmation hearings, under oath, being asked about roe v. wade and saying, i think it's settled law. i wouldn't try to strike it down. they made stronger assurances of that kind to senators in private, as senator collins has affirmed. we now know that it was the intention of at least some of those people to strike down roe v. wade as soon as they got on the supreme court or a couple of years later. those of us who have children, we have children in our family, we are trying to raise them to be good people who tell the truth. what message does did send if people who are going to be on the supreme court of all people go before the senate under oath, say things that are obviously the opposite of what they really believe, demonstrate that that is true? it's an insult to democracy. it'

senator collins certainly has made it known that she felt misled as well as senator murkowski. you make a really good point that we need to have a check on what these people are saying when they show up and they raise their hand and take an oath. host: the other big story besides the vote in the senate was the information on inflation in this country. inflation hit 8.3% last month, compared to one year ago. the headlines from the washington times today, biden looks powerless in the inflation blame game. what can be done despite inflation? guest: well, everybody wants to fight inflation. let's be clear about that. i think the president is at the top of the list. so, what he is doing is he is relying on the federal reserve, which generally is the body that tries to regulate our economy. they only have certain tools to do that. we are dealing with two things that are directly affecting inflation. the pandemic and the war in ukraine. and as everybody knows, one of the big parts of inflation is the price of gas. and the price of gas as just skyrocketed, largely because of the war in

so senators manchin, collins and murkowski did not vote for this bill, the women's health protection act because they say it goes beyond codifying roe v. wade. for example, they say it would not allow states to have any restrictions on abortion whatsoever. democratic leaders say they wanted a messaging bill to put everyone on the record. so the record is going to show, ultimately, bipartisan opposition to your bill. so was the strategy a mistake, do you think? >> jake, frankly, that's just an excuse on their part. all of those three have never exactly said what they would support. but the women's health protection act the senate is voting on, that doesn't allow all abortions. it codifies roe v. wade, and roe v. wade puts forth a pretty clear framework on what's allowed and what's not allowed. and so, this is just an excuse on their part, and by the way, the bill that susan collins says is a narrower bill that codifies roe v. wade, it has a poison pill in it because it allows abortion providers to just refuse to provide abortions if they don't want to on a conscious claus. so it's rea

kaitlan collins. thank you so much. let's take a look at where access to abortion, legal abortion, already is restricted and what we should expect going forward in a post-roe america. let's bring in tom foreman. what are you learning about what abortion rights will look like on a state-by-state level if this becomes the law of the land and roe v. wade is undermined? >> all of these red states, jake, will be certain to ban abortion. the states in yellow likely to ban abortion. that according to a progressive group that follows this kind offend thing. the degree of banning it could be outright. it could be 15 weeks, could be 6 weeks. various degrees wherever you go, but under this plan, the institute says 58% of the women in this country of likely child bearing ages would live in a state that has a hostile attitude toward abortion rights, and in any event, the states protecting abortion rights, far fewer in number. >> so overturning roe will obviously unleash new legal and legislative fights over just how far anti-abortio

it just seems to me, again, susan collins ran for reelection in 2020. people like me and most in washington thought she was in big trouble and she was going to lose because of her vote on kavanaugh. she won by nine points in a state that joe biden won by nine points. chuck schumer is upset at susan collins and people don't want to give her a vote. they're cutting off their nose to spite their face. if you simply codify roe where it is right now, will murkowski go, where would collins go, where would manchin go? if you listen to what they are saying, if you look at them talking to democrats about a possible compromise bill, but again you're just codifying roe. why wouldn't you want the republicans to stop debate on a bipartisan bill instead of a gesture that once again swings for the fences and only pleases the base? >> and that conversation isn't even on the table. they know they're not going to win this. they'll send a signal to democrats that we're trying our best and the only recourse we have is to elect more democrats in the fall and control the sen

kaitlyn collins standing by in alabama ahead of remarks from the president who is going to talk about ukraine and weapons being sent there from the u.s. h. but thank you for the update as the president is facing more and more questions regarding the leaked draft opinion. thank you jessica. for more on this, let's bring in constitutional law professor, gloria browne-marshall. she's the author of "she took justice". also with us gloria borger and joan biskupik. gloria to you first. i want to read a part of this that stood out. the conclusion is a right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation's history and traditions. what is your reaction to that line? >> there are many rights that we enjoy today that are not deeply rooted in the country's history and traditions. for example, racial justice is not deeply rooted in the country's history and traditions. and so equality for women is not deeply rooted. the word privacy is not in the constitution. and so when we talk about our privacy rights, we're talking about rights that are created. court created based on how the u.s. supreme c

so much at least you know, i measures that do know going to different ok collins. so you have a president with kelly who has been saying for quite some time that it's because of his policy. his approach is toughness. when it comes to dealing with guns and gun crime, that there's been this decline, but really you have this string of crimes taking place over the weekend. do you see it that way that the government has failed to address the root cause of the problem? or, i mean there is one theory which is a website has come up with in fact it does, he reach to deal with the gangs to lower the levels of buyers for certain privileges. and that this is broken down. the counter spike is always the library and i know i probably have it, but it does sound quite plausible because certainly the merger come down dramatically since you know, since it was the. ready the world around 2015 was down, her much love figure last year. but i think it's director of the previous because it, the root cause is whether they maybe have not really gone into having spent lavishly, which is the

we just want to listen in to senator susan collins. >> yeah, she of course -- sorry to interrupt john there, of course key because susan collins in her vote for justice kavanaugh had said at the time that she had assurances from him that he would not vote to overturn roe. based on this decision, he would be on the side to do so. but sorry, john, back to your point on the white house reaction. >> let me just read president biden's statement. i believe that a woman's right to choose is fundamental. roe has been the law of the land for almost 50 years, and basic fairness and stability demand that it not be overturned. if the court does overturn roe, it will fall on our nation's elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman's right to choose and it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this november at the federal level. we need more pro-choice senators and a pro-choice majority in the house to adopt legislation that codifies roe, which i will work to pass and sign into law. the house has already passed legislation, the senate has not. they don't have the vo

you mentioned potentially getting murkowski or collins on board. they do have a piece of legislation that is narrower that would codify roe or planned parenthood versus the casey decision. not going farther than that, potential getting joe manchin on board that would effectively get them 52 votes when they need 60, with the filibuster. it's not clear whether democrats view as a political strategy, worth while to say they have manchin and collins on board with the plan. maybe they want to give them the vote, they haven't said they do. ultimately, this is going to be a messaging issue. this is going to be a talking point. having more and more of these votes are bound to end in the same result here which is failure. >> okay. we will continue to keep an eye on this vote, bring you the results when it happens, abby, gloria, manu, thank you saul. >>> cnn has new details about the public hearings on the january 6th insurrection, the testimony will begin in just under a month. >> sources tell cnn that people may hear from members of the trump family, not l

susan collins is pro-choice.nts to codify roe before the supreme court has an opportunity to over turn it. democrats are not taking that bill up as of today. to me, that either means they don't want to take the issue off the table during a midterm election or they don't want susan collins to get credit for it feels like they are playing politics with an issue that's deeply concerning to a lot of women not just on the left but in the middle and some republicans. >> david, you want to respond to that. >> i don't need to respond. i believe that mitch mcconnell and some of the more sober republicans understand that they are the dogs that caught the car. this is not a good issue for them. i think they were surprised that the supreme court was willing to go as far as as they are based on that draft opinion and they know that's not politically helpful to them in the fall. on the democratic side, s.e. is wright. murkowski and collin who is want to forge some sort of compromise here. senator tim kaine says he's in discuss

. >> what is going on with susan collins?ey were sitting in the hearings to be justices, they said one thing to susan collins and turned out doing another thing. susan collins is signaling she would oppose a bill by democrats to codify abortion rights. she says it's too broad. without that legislation, what's the answer here? >> susan collins, the republican senator is an independent where mitch mcconnell doesn't need ore vote. she could vote for justice jackson, judge jackson. mitch mcconnell really needed her vote to get brett kavanaugh through. she was willingly bamboozeled by brett kavanaugh. every one knew that brett kavanaugh and neil gorsich and amy barrett were put on the court to over turn roe v wade. some song and dance from the people in their private conversations and now she is shocked they are voting to overturn roe v wade. anyone who looked at their records going in knew this is where they were heading but she was doing mitch mcconnell's bidding when he really needed it. >> this is the supreme court abortion ri

with us tonight, the very reporter, ben collins himself.he covers this information and extremism on the internet. ben, tell us more about this false idea, because it's not just being pushed in the united states, it's around the world. >> yeah, in fact, the specific person, this person who tried to emulate, this weekend, the logic behind the christchurch attack. the shooter from new zealand shooting that killed 51 people a couple of years ago, it's basically, basically a copy and paste job of that manifesto. these people are clearly anti immigrant, and this guy was very mixed up. he was anti-immigrant, targeting black people, because he believed they were part of the invasion of this country. there's an antisemitic conspiracy theory, above all, in part because he believes, you know, jews are trying to bring in people to change the electorate in the united states. and that's what this is about to him. largely, what we have noticed over the past couple of days here, i've been combing through his discord, which he posted shortly before the shoo

murkowski and collins have put out their own narrower bill that would codify the protections of roe ve exemptions which reproductive rights advocates say are gaping loopholes that weaken this to the point where it's no longer a robust protection. so their view is that if congress wants to codify roe v. wade do it in a narrower manner, don't add additional protections on regulations and providers, which does go beyond precedent but that does not seem to have more than two votes. democrats want a more aggressive version of this bill and murkowski and collin, as they are in the past, are likely to vote with the rest of the party to block this from going forward. >> thank you very much. coming up, what one west virginia mother is trying to do to revive the child tax credit. plus, whether you're flying or driving or staying home, summer goes prices are going to hit you hard. how much higher will they go? next. how much higher will they go next [bacon sizzles] ♪ [electronic music plays] ♪ woo! bipolar depression. it made me feel trapped in a fog. this is art inspired by real stories of bipo

joining us will be stan collins, who will be here to discuss some of the issues young people struggle with. also, the warriors on the brink of advancing to the nba finals. buffers first, we are tracking the monkeypox -- but first we are tracking the monkeypox that is spreading across the globe with over 200 cases right now. we are so used to talking about covid with you dr. rutherford. dr. rutherford, i am not getting any audio right now, so i am having a hard time hearing dr. rutherford. i think this could be on my end. we may need to take a quick break. i am going to ask you a quick question. my question to you is very simple. let's talk about monkeypox. if you could explain exactly what it is. >> monkeypox is a poxvirus, like smallpox. it is from a group of very large dna viruses. it causes a rash. as opposed to the other ones, it is quite benign. they rarely cause a serious disease. it has characteristic lesions, with adept in the middle -- a dip in the middle. fever, swollen lymph nodes, that is about it. it is transmitted most efficiently by person to person contact, meaning rub

you have collins and murkowski who have made their proposals that go far into codifying, and restrictions, but democrats don't want to entertain that right now. that is the problem. it could be bipartisan legislation, but even if it were to pass the senate, which i am not sure if it will and running up to the midterms everything has political consequences, but the house, those are democrats, especially aggressive, can get testy and may not support legislation that doesn't go as codifying roe v. wade. host: of go to robert, petersburg, virginia, on the independent line. caller: i want to say something about the judge and the thing going on and kavanaugh making the statement that he did about the important thing. then you have amy barrett saying that her religion will dominate her decisions. also about the guy who killed all those people. if you watch tv, every other commercial, you see a man and a woman and it will be a black man and a white woman. this is not going to get better, it is only going to get worse. people are just pushing things too hard and too fast. host: on the comments abo

so for susan collins, to say oh, i'm shocked that that's going on.ople are pro life, after they were told repeatedly, after women's groups implored them to look at the facts, look at these people's records. for her now to say, oh, i was fooled, who knew? i'm very disturbed. i'm very concerned. it's really kind of pathetic. if they want to write that wrong, they have three options. first, they can do away with the filibuster and vote to put roe v. wade in law. they can hold hearings and they can decide to impeach these justices. or three they can go out and induce the states and encourage the states to have a constitutional amendment. they're not gonna do any of those, because they've been lying to the american people along. they're looking out for their own political skins. they don't have the interest of women at heart, and voters have every right to feel resentful and cheated. >> jennifer reuben, we thank you. we're gonna have much more on our special hour, life after roe. up next, breaking ruse, saying women children and the elderly are now out of

why didn't senate democrats just take up a more narrow bill that senators collins and murkowski could have gotten behind and perhaps senator manchin? >> that was one of the questions at the start of the push for democrats was how they wanted this bill to fail. no matter what, they weren't going to get 60 votes to actually overcome a filibuster on this. the way in which the bill failed would have been bipartisan in the positive direction had they gone with a bill that was narrower in focus and, frankly, more conservative in ethos in the protections it gave, specifically, a bill pushed by collins and murkowski, that they are talking with democrats at this point about but at the same time democratic leadership in the senate said they didn't want to make this first vote about that because they wanted it to be meaningful and because they wanted to have that stark contrast going into the midterms. to them, this was a way to energize the democratic base ahead of november. at the same time, i also think that the thinking around if a more conservative bill had come up, would the vote have been

. >> reporter: republicans remain opposed to the bill and that includes moderate senator susan collins of maine, who said she will vote against it. >> senator collins and lisa murkowski have proposed a more narrow bill to codify roe v wade that keeps protections for help providers who oppose abortion on religious grounds. >> we are not looking to compromise something as vital as this peer >> reporter: states and legal experts are already anticipating what could be the next wave of legal battles. >> i think it brings up a lot of new questions. there are states that are trying to say, not only can we ban abortions within our state that we are going to try to ban our residents from traveling into another state. >> reporter: signing supreme court justice draft opinion on roe v wade, republican state lawmakers in louisiana advanced appeal to the house committee to criminalize abortion. classifying it as a homicide.natalie brand, cbs news. >>> stay with us for developments on the abortion- rights front. we have recovered on-air and online at kpix.com and streaming lo outside on this friday.

let's bring in kaitlan collins who is live in alabama with the! president.ng their children javelin and javelina, how important to these fights have these javelin missiles been, are they still? >> they are incredibly important and continue to be. they are making a huge difference on the battlefield. thousands of russian tanks have been knocked out. 2,500 mechanized vehicles have been knocked out, and you can bet a large majority of those have been knocked out by the javelins and artillery as well. it's wonderful to see the president down there honoring those people, those americans that are providing their sweat equity, their labor to make this system the success that it is. that kind of technology takes years and years to grow, thousands and thousands, billions of dollars have been spent and when that technology is needed like it is in the] of ukraine, it's got to be available. you can't wait a couple of years to develop it. the russians are finding this out. they're behind. we have a technological edge, we need to maintain it, and it's wonderful to see the

. >> this is from senator susan collins this week. if this leak at draft opinion is a final decision and's reporting is accurate will be completely inconsistent with what justice gorsuch inc. dustin kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office. what you say to that? >> well, you cut off my question because i asked judge kavanaugh would you consider challenges to roe v wade? would you listen to both sides? would you apply the doctrine but would you shut the party trying to overturn the decision out? this has not been well accepted by the public for the public has been divided since 1973. ask your next guest who is a good friend does he want the court to reconsider citizens versus united versus campaign finance laws when he welcome a revisiting of the heller decision where the courts of the second amendment was a personal right? right liberal friends do not mind the port overturning decisions i don't like. they very much are against overturning decisions they agree with. so you cannot bargain your way into getting o

collins said she will vote against the abortion rights bill. does not provide an exemption for healthcare providers who do not want to perform abortions because of religious objections. >>> meanwhile, the two new york times reporters who wrote the new book "this will not pass" are releasing more audio of republicans reacting to january 6th. jonathan martin interviewed senator lindsey graham on the day of the capitol attack. the senator from south carolina praised joe biden and then criticized donald trump's behavior during the insurrection. >> we will actually come out of this thing stronger. moments like this reset. people will calm down. people will say, i don't want to be associated with that. this is a group within a group. what this does, there will be a rallying effect for a while, the country, says we're better than this. biden will help that? >> totally. he'll be maybe the best person to have, right? i mean, how mad can you get at joe biden? he's misjudged the passion. he plays the tv game and he went too far here. that rally didn't hel

the votes of lisa murcowski and susan collins in the word of susan collins or lisa murcowski they were mislead with gorsuch and kavanaugh, their testimony doesn't match in terms of their action right now. even with them, they don't have enough democrats to end the filibuster and certainly not to guarantee the right to an abortion nationwide. so all eyes from this white house, frankly, and the president's aides, allies and democrats are focused on november. >> peter alexander, we will get to you, before we get to yamiche. for what you are seeing outside the supreme court. >> reporter: a little of what i am seeing. right before this, there was a heated exchange between folks for abortion rights or against abortion rights. that has now dissipated. the protesters are felt here. you see some science here, abortion is essential healthcare, my body, my choice. let's walk towards the steps of scottus here. if you are not outraged, you are not paying attention, a lot of women out here all throughout the day. i am here as well. i want to speak with you, charles, come with me so i can show her th

up next on treatious, susan collins and lisa murkowski were stunned that she was apparently lied to by court nominees and all the rest us saw this coming and now that roe is on the way to being overturned there's a whole lives other rights that conservatives can't wait to roll back. "the reidout" continues after this. wait to roll back. "the reidoutco" ntinues after this allergies don't have to be scary. spraying flonase daily stops your body from overreacting to allergens all season long. psst! psst! flonase all good. no matter who you are, being yourself can be tough when you have severe asthma. triggers can pop up out of nowhere, causing inflammation that can lead to asthma attacks. but no matter what type of severe asthma you have, tezspire™ can help. tezspire™ is a new add-on treatment for people 12 and over... that proactively reduces inflammation... ...which means you could have fewer attacks, breathe better, and relieve your asthma symptoms. so, you can be you, whoever you are. tezspire™ is not a rescue medication. don't take tezspire™ if you're allergic to it. allergic reactio

. >> we were raising concerns to senator murkowski and collins about the last two nominees. they said they believed precedent was important and they would uphold under those circumstances. clearly, they were not accurate in their answers and responses. the consequences to that is the fact that we are now facing a complete overturn of a law that we have held as a protection of our freedoms for 49 years. >> what do you do next? >> we mobilize. we have seen since the confirmation of the last two supreme court justices, we have known this has been eminent. we have been planning on the provision side in relationship to providing care. planned parenthood along with other organizations have come together to make sure that not only are we focused on how we provide care but also how we mobilize and ensure that people understand what's at stake. as recently as a month ago, we were talking about something called the believability gap. 80% of the americans believe roe should be the law of the land. 30% believed that roe would be overturned. what we have last night is a clear indication

remember how significant susan collins' position was when it came to brett kavanaugh in 2018. was unclear whether or not he would have the votes to get confirmed. but after collins had spoken with brett kavanaugh, after she heard the testimony about allegations of sexual assault against kavanaugh, which kavanaugh denied, and after he assured her on the issue of abortion, she came out in support of kavanaugh and later joe manchin supported him as well. she said today, if the leaked draft opinion is a final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what justice gorsuch and justice kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office. and i asked her if he misled her in any way, if kavanaugh did. she did not respond to that, saying she wants to stick to her statement. she did say she wants to move on legislation to codify a right to an abortion, but there's no path for that being approved in the 50/50 senate where 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster and not all democrats are onboard with changing the filibuster rules.