margaret was a former director the colman advocates who is responsible for many of the children and families here in san francisco much he served as director. including the another and leader of a campaign that results in a children's fund to provides funding to 220 program ares and serves 30 thousand children each year. margaret is a passionate person. she just came back from a trip on around the country and we are very happy to have her here. thank you margaret. doctor tom wenz, he's is an expert if anger management and substance abuse treatment and has worked with with many youth throughout his career. he came to me through george anderson who runs an anger management firm. they have taken the science of conflict mediation and made it into an accessible discipline for trainers, people who are working with young people throughout the state and throughout the county. do you know that there's only, i think now one state that mandates anger management in the school and it was texas. and it's only been within the last year. doctor wenz is an advocate. he's also a vietnam veteran who saw many p

commissioner fewer: michelle, but i know michelle well because she worked at colman. i cannot believe your term is up. with young kids, i know how hard it is. as the parent leader who wrote the resolution and brought it to the board, it was the vision of a group of parents that said we needed to have the parent voice. never did i think it would come to this. as a person who helped to seek out the continual funding to have this happen, i think that where the pac is now is a reflection of the volunteer work that has happened from past members. but i did want to also mention it is, i have to say -- it is troublesome for me as a past parent advocate, being on the other side of the podium, trying to get this advisory council resolution passed when other board members were not going to approve it, and then finding six or seven years after we started it -- i am hearing in your report a little disappointment, and i guess the lack of trust and confidence in the district, and probably in the board. that is somewhat disturbing to me. i hope that in the future that as a board, or

a look back at the original material shows that he crafted a colman detailed response to the loaded questions. he left the press conference half an hour later as originally planned. >> i never said you had put this in the constitution. >> shortly after the station aired its misleading report -- >> always have the feeling to defend a government. >> the head of the journalists' union, an editor himself, was outraged. >> it is about our prestige, honor, our professional integrity. they have not denied it. it tells me it probably happened, and that is unacceptable and these persons will decide who will stay on in the news department. >> the story was broadcast word for word on hungarian radio, as well as all channels owed by the public tv broadcaster. the government had synchronized the news by putting all public broadcasting departments under single state run media holding group. the organization's spokeswoman said structural reform was necessary to ensure quality journalism. with regard to the misleading segment on tv, she said he had simply acted within the bounds of reasonable interpretation

government's apparent response to dealing with the obama administration or the president is famous for his colman manor. it strikes me that in this realm, when it comes to security, president obama has been just as prone to a sense of a "how dare you challenge my authority" than in any predecessors. it is bad politics for him, a bad bet for the country, so this is suggesting a tragic likelihood that any president will just take on the mantle when he is in office. the trail of the good news, so the glasses all -- is all .0001 full. even with that .0001 left, you coudl do damage. if you have any exposure, even if there is cynicism, there will be a large number of people who are outraged, angry, want to kill people in authority, so there will always be enough people. >> there will be more than 0. therefore the leak of possibly damaging information is the same as saying the wowrld is full of nuclear weapons. we need perfect attention. >> can i chime in with a further notice of a gloomy? i am on the gloomy side of things. surely they have detected progress of optimism in the hope that citizens could b