attorney mercedes colwin, fox news analyst.et me start with you, try for. $3.7billion, could he make more of a shambles of his response abilities as president? >> of eager to the legalities. the problem i see with this is he has a due process sort of channel for all of these kids coming through, but what they have to show is if there are get to these deportation hearings, which we are paying all this money for is that if they go back to their home country they will be abused, there's a humanitarian concern. first of all, they will not even get to the deportation hearing. they will not show up. lou: you are saying that as a matter of fact that if they go home they will be abused? >> no, they have to make that point improve that point. >> they are seeking asylum in this country and they have to say they are in imminent harm in their country otherwise-- lou: the reality is this, those children are being handed over to custodians, a phone number often not a name. the don't have an address and secondly not having the address and nam

. >>> let's get to mercedes colwin now. fox legal analyst. woman is married, she's 20. >> right. >> she's married to a marine. she goes on a date. >> hunting. >> hunting trip with another marine who has his own baby and his own wife to celebrate, and she never comes back. >> exactly. doesn't it sound like these wagons are circling and the fly is the ointment is the lover's wife who comes forward and says they'll never find the body. doesn't that just tell you, one, probably she's complicit in what happened to this young woman. and two, that she knows a lot more than what she's saying. >> when she said you don't have a case without a body, she's not far off. >> well, but -- >> i mean, you do, but -- >> it's harder to prove because there's always -- what's reasonable doubt? some juror can say, you don't have a body. you can't tell me how she was killed. you can't tell me definitively who killed her. and without that body, you don't have those ballistics. that's one thing about jurors. they have that csi effect. they always look for all the evid

our legal panel joining us to discuss, fox news legal analyst mercedes colwin and trial attorney rebecca rose woodland joining us. great to see you. were you surprised fact she was getting a new trial no into i was. there overwhelming evidence. you have her on tape and script. they had the little tape for the jury. when you have this concrete evidence you don't normally see a reversal at the appellate level, especially because if it's a close call, the body wasn't found or there is circumstantial evidence. but here you have her specifically telling undercover cop, i'm 5,000% sure kill my husband, kill my husband. the jury had no other choice but to convict. uma: this has to do with interviewing jurors ahead of time which caused the situation now to go into a different direction. >> right. the direction is basically the appeals court, higher court than trial court you have to have a new trial. she has not been found innocent. there is nothing like that here. she has to go through a new trial. the appeals court said the judge in that trial court didn't allow her attorneys to question indiv