commissinoner antonini: 25%. we have been through this with some other places that have special use districts. what is the rule about conformity? must they conform, per the code, to the special regard allowance -- special rear yard allowance of the special use district? >> the dolores' height special use district is one of the few that imposes -- the dolores heights special use district is one of the few that imposes that. as a planner who works in this neighborhood, i have had to build three rear-yard variances in the last 18 months. commissinoner antonini: it has been represented at the variants was granted earlier in this case and is still in effect. >> a variance was granted, yes. commissinoner antonini: i guess my final question is do we still do rear yard averaging? the project sponsor has said, "we are appropriate because we are averaging," which we have done in the past with mid-block open space. is it a question of how far out we are allowed to go? >> by code, it is not permitted in the special use distr

commissinoner antonini: may be the architect? why don't you show us what is happening. >> this is the photograph of the existing condition. we have a deck -- >> we are talking to the staff here. commissioner moore: i think they have clarified it. president olague: mr. smith, is this what you were describing? >> that is exactly what i was describing. commissinoner antonini: to continue, it sounds like that would give them less than they now have. i do not see what we are gaining with that. as far as the roof deck is concerned, i am not sure -- architecturally, i am not sure if it's what i see in the other pictures. but it is a right. it is something they can do. i am not sure if i necessarily want to remove that deck. commissioner sugaya: i am ok. vice president miguel: i would not want to remove the roof deck. i think it is perfectly compatible with the neighborhood and i see no problems with it at all. as far as an additional notch in the building, you are notching a deck. commissioner moore: we are nudging the building. vice pr

commissinoner antonini: aye. 'commissioner fong: aye. commissioner moore: aye. commissioner sugaya: aye. vice president miguel: aye. president olague: aye. >> the motion passes unanimously. [applause] commissioners, just for the record, i will restate that for item 12, case 2,010.0911d, the dr has been withdrawn and this matter is no longer required for your consideration. you are now on item 13, a case 2,010.0758d, for 454 greenwich street. president olague: i do not know if staff is here for this item. we will take a five minute recess while we are waiting for staff. that is probably the case. >> the commission is >> 454 greenwich street. >> good evening, planning staff. the project before you proposes that one-story horizontal extension to an existing partial third floor of a single family residential structure. it would expand 24 feet closer to the yen witch frontage, and would leave a setback to the front of the building. a new roof deck is proposed and would be situated on the roof of the newly configured third floor. an interior remodel, window rio window