good evening, commission. the youth commission last time we were here, we were asking for this standing agenda item. now we have it. so we felt that it would be important to, one say thank you because we think that young people often don't get included in the conversations in transparency, especially with the police, so therefore we appreciate the position. the other things we want to do is just state our priorities and things that we want to see. and then we go back, we talk about them. and next time we come, we ask more questions i'm assuming. so with that, some of our priorities, specifically from our transformative justice committee, are knowing your rights workshops for young people, people of color and undocumented people consolidating resources and knowledge to share for interactions with law enforcement building better relationships with police and young people, and believing in community care solutions that don't involve incarceration therefore we are closely involved with, like, the juvenile hall the

and everyone commission there, i was here, president brandon, commission kunalokis and commission katz, we had this discussion and it was tough. i can't see this putting this out to bid -- i mean, we have to own this. we signed off on it. i'm going to vote in favour because i agreed to do that. but to stop everything and then you want it back out to bid, i can't support that. we have to live with that and i hope we've learned something from this process. but i tell you where i'm at and if you're worried it's no good, you can't stand up to show who you are, if you support something, you need to show it then and i support it now. i agree with you, maybe the ordinance, skirting around this, so i will be voting support this. >> thank you, any other comments? >> i'm just curious, won't happen if we just to have more fumtime for discussion, won't happen if we don't vote today >> we're not doing anything illegal here, not about awarding a contract, so it is conforming. if it is illegal, i would not be voting for or in support of this. i think this is not necessarily deliberately si sir circum

it was adopted by the commission. so we started with the da commission. it was adopted september 12 2018. then we went to the reentry where it was adopted september 25 2018. then we went to the community corrections partnership. the executive committee and later the whole partnership endorsed it as well as the juvenile justice coordinating counsel. this is the last criminal justice body that we are presenting it to. the racial criminal justice racial equity statement says san francisco community corrections partnership juvenile justice coordinating counsel reentry counsel, commission prioritizes racial equity so all people may thrive. san francisco's criminal justice policy bodies collectively acknowledge that communities of color have born the burden of inequitable social, viabilitial, criminal justice policies practice and investment, the government actions have caused deep racial disparities throughout san francisco juvenile justice and criminal justice system. we further recognize that racial equity is realized when race can no longer be used for the

and i am hopeful because the commission has oversight over dpa that the commission is as concerned about this 180 response on the same officer on the same issue as the public defender's office is. having said that, i listen very carefully tonight to ms. hawkins presentation, which was excellent, i agree with commissioner mazzucco on that. and i listened carefully to commissioner henderson's report. and i heard a couple of things which would give me some pause. and one is there is new program and not all the cases have been run through the program. and the old data has not been integrated with the new data and there's brand new attorneys there and brand new investigators. and basically we are in a huge learning curve with dpa. that's fine. that should be understood by everybody including the public defender's office. however, i want, and i would expect the commission to set a deadline and its own expectations for how the dpa responds to records under sb1421. sb1421 is essentially an accountability by the state of california. all departments must comply. and we've met with nothing but resi

regular hearing commission for october 24th. it's being structured with pregnants by chris kern, the environment review officer, about the planning commissioner's role for new development projects. i'll be making a presentation covering the puc and water supply agency's role in that sequa process. so that should be a fairly comprehensive presentation on both issues that the planning commission has the best possible understanding of the overall process that is engaged in under law by both the planning department and the puc, as well. i'm working with staff now on what we may bring forward to deal with that issue and we may be able to make that on the 22nd. >> that would be good. the commission secretary would be a party to that. she's smiling at me. >> we may have to bend the rules. >> i would second that. i would like to see something on the 22nd, please, and ask the commission secretary to work with staff to make that happen. >> any other comment? i guess i'm a little unclear and i haven't looked at the resolution in some time,

if it does not come back, before the commission, the commission is definitely recommending not to support the legislation as written. >> correct. >> the simple way of saying it we do not support the legislation is currently listed -- written and then the rest of what you are saying. that's what i said the first time. >> should i made the motion. -- you should have made the motion. [roll call] the motion passes 6-0 with 1 absent. >> thank you. >> item five. approval of draft meeting minutes. action item. >> has any -- everyone read the draft meeting minutes? any members of public want to make comments on the draft meeting minutes? do we have a motion. all in favor. and opposed? >> congratulations for finishing the minutes. that is a monumental achievement. >> director's report, update and report on office of the small business and the department programs, policy and legislative matters, announcements from the mayor, and announcements regarding small business activities. discussion item. >> good evening commissioners. -- good evening, commissioners. at the beginning of my report i want to c

it is much different than appeals to the entertainment commission or by way of entertainment commission decision to the board of appeals. it is handled administratively. you will see the pre-hearing statement we developed to support our citation and issuance of it as well as response to the appellant. we had the hearing last week. we are waiting on a decision from the controller. it is over a minor infraction of $100, but, you know, we will keep you appraised where that appeal process goes and whether or not we win. do you have any questions? okay. >> one comment on the previous item and just pointing out that in the executive directive from the mayor the actions are taken by the entertainment commission and staff. i just wanted to take some -- i want the entertainment commission taking credit for moving forward and laying the groundwork for the special events work being done. i am glad you are representing us in that process, and i hope it makes things easier for all of our applicants and people looking for permits. i am glad you are involved. >> as we all know, our department as well

the proposal would be on occasion, the commission secretary may miss a meeting at which time the commission secretary with the concurrents of the port director will attend the meeting in his or her place. we will delegate to another staffer if necessary. we request approval of the resolution attached to your staff report and director forbes legal counsel are available to answer questions. >> thank you. >> is there any public comment on in item? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner? >> yes, thank you for the proposal and i think it's probably time for tos us to revt the rule. i think limiting alternates is not a good governance procedure but it gives us all continuity that you have mentioned in your report and that's my position. thank you. >> thank you gillman? >> thank you. amy, can you just enlighten me, i know in the staff report you talked that most commissions don't have term limits. >> most commissioners, that's correct. the only ones that do have them because i called around and found out, so at the moment, the san francisco municipal transportation agency and the plan

from the commission? any questions or comments from the public? hearing none, may i have a motion to approve? >> all in favor? any opposed? the motion carries. item b., requesting to modify the existing grant agreement with entries for the citywide nutrition, education and counseling service programs during the period of september first, 2019 through june 30th , 2020 in the amount of $48,858, plus a 10% contingency for a total amount not to exceed $347,186. welcome to laura. >> good morning, commissioners. my name is lauren and i'm a logician it -- nutritionist with daas. this item was presented during the september commission but i'm happy to answer any questions you have at this time >> thank you. are there any comments or questions from the commission? any comments or questions from the public? may i have a motion to approve? >> so moved. >> any further comments? all in favor? >> aye. >> thank you. the motion carries. >> item c., review and approval of california department of aging supplemental nutrit

of the commission and do not appear on the agenda.ou will have opportunity to address the commission. i have one blue card. deborah joseph. >> thank you. i live next door to cabrillo playground in a house that my family has lived in 70 years. i see and hear everything on the playground. in fact, i'm the founder of the friends of cabrillo playground and as you know, we have a beautiful new playground that opened in 2013 and we're usually rated top in the city. it's a wonderful, wonderful, playground, thank you very much. but we're beginning to have a problem with skateboarders. as you know, skate boards do a great deal of damage to playgrounds. and we talked to them, we tried to dissuade them, but what it really comes down to is they need a place to skate. and in august our supervisor sandra fewer held a meeting about outside lands for our community. and along with the regular complaints about the noise, the traffic, the parking, a few people said, well, wait a minute, i live here, i have to put up with all this, what do i get out of i

it's only for the commission to be able to see whom is proposing what. then the panel does their work -- well, either way. the panel does their work first, and then they present to us and then we get the recommendation. so at least we are aware of why they are recommending whom they are recommending, and we've seen it. so we can either skip seeing everyone and let the panel duoto work and come with their -- go to work and come with their recommendations and we can put a commission review in there somewhere. so those are the two choices. where we review it. if we review it up front, you have the concern, the public comment will affect the panel. if we do it afterwards, you are saying there's no purpose that we see it, that we know why the panel is making the recommendation that they are making. >> well, one of these -- that they influence our ultimate decision on approving the final recommendation. that would be the gain of seeing them all. >> but that's second-guessing the panel. >> it's just building additional confidence in the panel's recommendation.

i've been on the commission for a bit.e served and continue to serve as president of the commission. what i'm looking forward to, as we move forward, is the request to align both the first five and the office of early childhood education, which is going to be essential to put the work of the city and county for our kids together in not siloed departments. the goal really is to focus this alignment on evidence-based practices, not just what we think might work. so our focus for this alignment is on the whole child, both early education, health, behavioral health, and mental health, which has become an increasing need, always has been, but it is now very much at the forefront. and our goal is for prevention, also in these areas at an early age. so for these reasons, i do request re-appointment to the commission to be able to move this vision forward. thank you. >> supervisor ronen: thank you so much. and thank you for all of your service all these years. it's much appreciated. no questions. for seat 9, lynn merz here? miss m

just on the commission, they have calendar -- agendaized, rather, reports back to the commission each week. my reports, i incorporate community policing. it -- we do quarterly -- you know, the bias audits, we report on, the e.i.s., we do quarterly. so there's a lot of updating and regular status updates on pieces of the work, but our last agendaized one was may of this year to the commission. thank you. >> president yee: okay. thank you, chief scott, and debra. now, if anybody from the public would like to make comments, you have two minutes. please lineup to my left, and comment on item 21. okay. come on up, francisco. >> so supervisors, this issue is very, very -- >> president yee: okay. francisco, one minute. so we're going to have public comment now. if you wish to speak, go out of the chambers. go ahead. >> supervisors, i want to say i've attended over 278 funerals. now, the way i look at this report is that i have to look at two other reports. number one, the grand jury. number two, the blue ribbon report; and then, how this report is made out, it's convoluted this way. the usdo

>> good afternoon, regular to the regular meeting of the ethnic's commission. commissioner ambrose. >> smith. >> gray. >> lee is commissioner lee is excused today, she has a conflict and is unable to make it. agenda item number 2, public comment on matters appearing or not appearing on the agenda there being no public comment we'll go on to agenda item number 3 and 4. the consent calender. draft minutes september 20, 2019 regular meeting and the agenda item number 4 proposed stipulation, decision and order in the matter of it's our time sf women supporting london breed for mayor 2018 ethics complaint 1718-134b. call for public comment. no public comment. any comments from commissioners. i'll move for a motion to approve agenda items number 3 and 4. >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor. aye. so, agenda items 3 and 4 are unanimously approved. agenda item number 5. an informational presentation on new ethics commission data dashboard tools for the novembe. >> h. i good afternoon, commissioners. my name is tyler field. i am a information systems engineer. i just

this is the building inspection commission. we are on item number 7. 7d. we convene in open session to vote on whether to disclose any our all discussions held in closed session. >> can i get a motion on that? >> we have a motion and a second. we will reconvene and not disclose. we are on to item 8. discussion and possible action on the annual performance evaluation for the director. 8a public comment on all matters pertaining to the closed session. any public comment? seeing none, 8b, possible action to convene a closed session. is there a motion? second. all commissioners in favor. we are now in closed session. this is the building inspection commission. we are on item 8d, motion to reconvene in open station to vote on whether to disclose any our all discussions held in closed session. >> move to reconvene and continue the item until next month. >> second. >> there is a motion and second to reconvene the item to the next meeting. and not to disclose. >> all commissioners in favor. >> item 9 is adjournment. is there a motion t

the commission does not tolerate any outbursts. please satellite your mobile devises and when speaking before the commission, state your name for the record. i would like to take role. we would expect commissioner richards to arrive shortly and commissioner moore to be absent. we have a propose for continuance. item one, residential care facilities, planning care amendment is moved to novembe november 7th. the second is proposed for continuance to november 14. item 3rds,aa belcher strategy, proposed ford you continuanc fo. item 4, conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance to december 5th, 2019. item 5 at 16 seacliff avenue, discretionary review has been withdrawn propert. item 18, 2019-0050cua at 2934 caesar chavas street, conditional use, i have received a request to continue this until november 21, 2019. item 20, 19-012253drp at 463 castro street, discretionary review must be reviewed due to a noticing error, proposed for continuance to october 24t october 24th and i'm pleased to inform you that item 22, 9175 drp,

not really understanding the dialogue that our commission had around the draft eirs. that's what started about asking for more diagrams, more images. this is all we got six years ago, one page, and it didn't articulate. it was be the massing. this is evolving. i think that they're looking to us for advice and that's what we're getting better at doing. >> i just wanted to reel look at this in a dus different way, ths the only building in that area that according to the owner and commissioner john's didn't actually even look like this. all of the buildings around it, the one next to it is a 1980s building. the one to left of it, as you're facing it is a 1980s or 1990s building. across the street is a parking garage, as i understand. so what are w pray pra preservi. have a building that isn't there at all, like the 450 ofarrell. if it's not really much of a historic resource, propose a project that doesn't have it there. because that would be a full dem lugs. demolition. >> even though a building has been changed from what it was originally, alterations after the fact be

commission commissioners. commissioner richards. >> move to approve except item 6. >> second. >> thank you. on that motion to approve item 6 under your consent calendar. so moved tht passes unanimously 5-0. placing us item 7 consideration of draft minutes for october 10, 2019. >> would any members of the public like to comment on the draft minutes. >> seeing none public comment is closed. commissioner moore. >> move to approve. >> second. >> thank you commissioners on that motion to adopt to minutes for october 10, 2019. [roll call]. >> that mows passes unanimously 5-0. we are on item 8 commission comments and questions. commissioner moore. >> hour questions. -- four questions. >> i read in the paper that ucsf has plans to expand. we have looked at the institutional master plan and thought it to be stable. i read in the paper. i do not know the originator. that is it not true. i would like to hear from you in the upcoming weeks of what our position will be on that matter my second question is walking through t

i asked the planning commission to task with this assignment.i was at a meeting yesterday with a district eight supervisor , and other members of the san francisco land-use coalition. he discussed his proposal for d.b.i. a supervisor mandelman is planning to meet with members of the planning commission to develop a solution. i urge the planning department and planning commission to support supervisor mandelman's efforts. these are my comments, in addition to the comments i made on august 29th. on august 29th, many planning commissioners expressed frustration at being asked to address demolitions d.b.i. should have addressed. the citizens of san francisco have lost confidence in the department of building inspections, in this crisis of confidence has spread to the planning commission. how does the building inspection commission plan to address this problem? thank you. [please stand by] for these situations where either an error has occurred on the part of the project sponsor. two demolitions are needed at intake, the tearing down of structure, an

when this commission came into power, we reviewed decisions in the past. previously argued we didn't have authority on cybersecurity. if congress says, we would like lead onthe fcc take a cybersecurity, i would do what they ask. they have enacted statutes and given authority to a further -- given authorities to other federal agencies. that.t override i have to respect the decisions they make. if they change that, i will be a full partner in whatever they would like to do. we do look at 5g as part of our process. i'm sorry, we do look at security as part of that process in some capacity, but we don't cybersecurity role given our lack of authority. it would be challenged in any respect. i respect former chairman tom wheeler's viewpoint, but he and i have a disagreement. he has created pieces in the statute that don't exist. peter: are you frightened of huawei? commissioner o'rielly: i am frightened of no provider. ahave concernspeter: about situation, they come from a chinese company, with their government, so we are mindful of that and looking through what

next item, please. >> line item c commission report, commission reports will be limited to a brief description of activities and announcements. commission discussion will be limited to deciding whether to calendar any topics for future meetings. >> any reports by commissioners at this time? commissioner mazzucco. >> on sunday commissioner hirsch and i attended the annual police and fire mass. and it was an honor to be there with the firefighters and police officers, the men and women who serve this city. there was an accident sermon given actually by heely about compassion and how our firefighters and police officers deal with the homeless and those in mental health crisis and a good talk given by lieutenant michael about the career of those who choose law enforcement and fire fighting and public service. so it was great. commissioner mish and i along with the mayor and the supervisor so thank him for attending and the mayor and it was good there to be there to support our officers. >> thank you yes it was. my first mass in 23 years, i should say. not being catholic. >> next item, please. >> i