on that commission. it johnson used similar set of strong-arm tactics on the chief justice. johnson settles on warren as the only man who can run this investigation. when warren gets the invitation, he turns it down flat. he says there is a terrible history of supreme court justices serving an outside investigation. he does not have the time. johnson settles on warren as the only man who can run this investigation. when warren gets invitation to surf, he turns it down flat. he thinks the commission is a fine idea but it should but not be led by him. when johnson gets word that warren has turned down the invitation, warren is summoned within hours to the oval office. and unfortunately, we, to the best of our knowledge, there is no recording, but apparently the president tells warren in no uncertain terms that the assassination may lead to a nuclear war that would kill 40 million americans. and that if that happens, it may be the responsibility of the chief justice unless he serves on this commission. an a

commission report. they can look at the original fbi files. the lab files of the lab technicians and scientists who worked at the fbi. the ballistic testing and fiber testing and all of that. those records are all part of the collection. and some could look through them. >> but even when you said earlier, that is the rifle that oswald used to kill the president there are people, listening to this that would say that is not true. >> that's right. what i am saying actually is the opinion of the warren commission. i should state that i have no opinion one way or another on this. but that is how it is identified in our records. and so that is how i will identify it to you. >> this is a gray zipper jacket. and the interesting thing, this also ties oswald to the murder of tippit because the warren commission, according to the warren commission, this jacket found near where tippit was killed. near where they saw oswald taken after the killing of tippit. marina, oswald's wife, verified that this jacket was oswa

commission report. in order for something to become a commission exhibit, it would have been discussed in one of the testimonies taken by the warren commission or referenced in the warren report. >> so 50 years later, are there still classified items and how does the declassification process work? martha: that was taken care of in the act itself. the assassination records review board had a unique power. they had the capability of overruling the agencies, even on classification. the only appeal the agencies had was to the president of the united states. while the review board was in business, they made a final determination on the records. >> when the board reviewed these records, we found little reason to continue to protect these records. many of them we found should not have been protected during the 1960's. but, we do have to remember the era in which this occurred, an era in which national security concerns were heightened. and caused the suppression of these important files. martha: however, there

a couple of commissions on the warren commission. the commissions conclusions where that lee harvey office walled was alone assassin, they phone no evidence that lee harvey oswald or jack ruby, who shot lee harvey oswald, were involved in any kind of conspiracy, domestic or international, they did not rule out a larger conspiracy, they only said that they were unable to find evidence of something like that existing. let's start again, some questions for you, how many of you accept that the main finding of the commission, namely that us wall alone shot kennedy. wow. i am surprised. that is not with a recent gallup poll shows. let's reverse it, how many of you do not believe that oswald acted alone, that either he did not do it or someone -- there were more than one shooter? more than one shooter, was well didn't do it or us walled was one of many. okay. third, the commission concluded that jack ruby also acted alone. that's when he killed us while, how many of you accept that? >> how many of you think ruby was part of a conspiracy, ba

commission members plea respond. commissioner brackett. >> here. >> commissioner scott. >> here. >> commissioner rosales. >> here. >> chair bustos. >> here. >> all members are present. next is item 12. announcements. next regularly scheduled meeting will be held remotely january 5, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. please be advised a member of the public has up to three minutes to make public comments unless the commission adopts a shorter period. viewers are instructed to dial 415-655-0001 and enter access code 146 996-6099. press pound sign twice to enter the call. press star 3 to submit a request to speak. when you dial star 3 you will hear the following message. raise your hand to ask a question please wait to speak until the host calls on you. when you hear your line unmuted provide public comment. you will have three comments. please speak clearly and slowly and you will be placed back on night when done speaking. you can stay and listen or choose to hang up. if you are planning to provide public comment today it is recommend

commission makes available. if y'all are interested in more comprehensive view of the commission data view sources and in particular the dashboards, that's something that i'd be happy to come back at future meetings. but let me switch over to screen sharing. and show you share. there we go. this particular application that i'm demonstrating today is available on the portal, data.sf.org/campaign [underscore] finance. and it shows the data from the past november elections specifically, the contributions to primarily formed candidates and committees. it's designed by tyler tech to be very approachable and presentable to the general public. it starts here by searching for candidates or by name or the office that they're running for. in the interest of time i will just highlight one contest that recently occurred. the board of supervisors district 3. so a search for the candidates -- well, i searched by the contest name but you can search by candidate and they pop up and then this dashboard over here shows a geograph

but commissions from the pope or spots here giuliano must have given him the commission of which leonore their rights enclosed to say. leonardo was to paint a painting to comfort little politics. it badly you set or your motto to paint may have pictures of a mother that i can gift to my some as an image of his mother sat at daulat am you're free. as your measurement how a portrait of a mother shuttle flight leonardo painted the painting that we call mona lisa today a little that. it must have been a great challenge to paint an image of a mother for politics. since he suffered a similar fate because of politics. he too was an illegitimate child who was recognized by his father. his mother didn't die in childbirth she was his father's maid and he probably used her dependency on him for labors of love as had giuliano with his mistress friend danny. pollock. shared a similar fate in this inspired leonardo to paint a painting that i've held the memory of a mother and. the painting should lend comfort to younger politician who himself never saw his mother. and down to painted the image of. an

which was adopted by this commission in july 2020. in august of 2020, we published our 2019 annual language access report which addresses d.p.a. language access complaints and key d.p.a. language access projects and goals. we also collaborated with sfpd on the expanded use of force reporting and appropriate control technique in light of george floyd's death. we also recommended -- we made recommends with regard to revisions of the department of general order. as the commission is aware, there is a quick schedule of turnaround that the department trying to obtain in terms of revising many of the department's general orders. in the 3rd quarter, we made new recommendations for several d.g.o.s. i want to talk about the process that happened. we were approached by the department with the list which was relatively ambitious of d.g.o. they wanted to provide. with input from the department was to separate the recommendations into tiers. there was one tier of d.g.o.s where d.p.a. agreed we were not going to make any recommendation. there were

we are the commission and you did not deliver anything to us. we are the commission. i have yet to see what you prepared yesterday. you violated the law in that. it was a pretty clear violation. ends whenyour role the determination you made is filed formally with the commission, and the commission isn't the commission staff and eight is not you. -- and it is not you. it is us. , it should have been filed and recorded. delivered, filed and recorded, your role is over at that point. it is very clear. 7.705p where it says the commission shall prepare for the governor's signature. the commission has prepared nothing for the governor's signature. didit happened that you your little dog and pony show yesterday and then forwarded something onto governor e verse , which her evers signed and then told the world he had done his duty, it was wrong and a clear violation. i am going to make a few points here. i am going to call for your resignation as chair. we will need a new chair and i think you should think about that. i'm going to ask that on one of our next meetings we have

which was adopted by this commission in july 2020. in august of 2020, we published our 2019 annual language access report which addresses d.p.a. language access complaints and key d.p.a. language access projects and goals. we also collaborated with sfpd on the expanded use of force reporting and appropriate control technique in light of george floyd's death. we also recommended -- we made recommends with regard to revisions of the department of general order. as the commission is aware, there is a quick schedule of turnaround that the department trying to obtain in terms of revising many of the department's general orders. in the 3rd quarter, we made new recommendations for several d.g.o.s. i want to talk about the process that happened. we were approached by the department with the list which was relatively ambitious of d.g.o. they wanted to provide. with input from the department was to separate the recommendations into tiers. there was one tier of d.g.o.s where d.p.a. agreed we were not going to make any recommendation. there were

there is no record of a commission to leonardo in the entire trade register. there is also no mention of such a valuable painting in the inheritance. you can imagine how desperately i searched for clues of a commission or payments. not even in the testament is there mention that this painting existed. i think francesco would have certainly claimed it since it was a painting with a rising and secure value the whole thing is incomprehensible you know city of you should. just go would have most likely shown the portrayed by the famous painter publicly and would not have risked a bent toward tax evasion. in leonardo's records there is also no trace of a commission by francesco money apparently didn't change terms. from just goes testament is archived in florence is a key view to start up there in there is also no mention of the great masters valuable artwork. leonardo apparently never delivered the painting to francesca. bizarrely writes about an incomplete portraits of the mona lisa and the louvre however is completed down to the very last detail. i mean the year

generally after that creates a commission, a memorial commission and designates that commission to now follow through to find a site, to find a design, to collect the money, and then to build the project. they center to go back and seek their advice. they did either choose a site outside the national mall, in which case, they have a lot of lee way but if they want to be on the national mall itself, they are very restricted. they have to -- it has to be a preimminent importance to the nation to be in the center and of national significance to be beyond. once they consult again, it begins the process that often takes three, five, even ten years they have to review before the commission of fine arts, the national planning commission, the advisory council on preservation, the d.c. preservation office, the office of planning and so forth and so on. essentially this is what takes so long. they go before the entity, they explain their design, their site selection, then they go from government entity to government entity, federal, and d.c. and they finally got their approval in fall of last ye

last january, 2020, you might recall that the commission approved a bylaws change that the commission be meeting on the second friday of each month except in the case of unavailability of commissioners [inaudible] and of course over the past year with the shelter in place and the public health emergency orders limiting public gatherings, the commission resumed its monthly meetings in approximate august remotely, and that is, for the foreseeable future, is what we anticipate remotely, until we have been given the notice that we can meet again in public buildings. so this schedule that we've given you is still based on meeting the second friday of every month remotely. so if this is amenable to the commissioners, we would ask for your approval on this item so we can post materials and updates accordingly. >> moderator, would you please proceed with public comment? you're muted, ronald. >> clerk: okay. i'm going to need some more caffeine in me. madam chair, we are checking to see if there are any callers in the queue. for those on the line, please wait until the system indicated you hav

commission members plea respond.er brackett. >> here. >> commissioner scott. >> here. >> commissioner rosales. >> here. >> chair bustos. >> here. >> all members are present. next is item 12. announcements. next regularly scheduled meeting will be held remotely january 5, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. please be advised a member of the public has up to three minutes to make public comments unless the commission adopts a shorter period. viewers are instructed to dial 415-655-0001 and enter access code 146 996-6099. press pound sign twice to enter the call. press star 3 to submit a request to speak. when you dial star 3 you will hear the following message. raise your hand to ask a question please wait to speak until the host calls on you. when you hear your line unmuted provide public comment. you will have three comments. please speak clearly and slowly and you will be placed back on night when done speaking. you can stay and listen or choose to hang up. if you are planning to provide public comment today it is recommended that you

i mean my take on it i want the commission to have credibility and don't want to make the commission look like we are not in touch with the other side of the balance sheet. >> that point is well-taken. i am not -- i see this document as a guiding document for our advocacy as a commission to the folks making the decisions on behalf of this community, the next question after someone gets this. how much? as long as we seem to have a good answer to that question if asked. if it is you commissioner or director how much money does the community need? great. if we did want to add language, which i am not necessarily proposing. it could be something to the effect of the san francisco venue coalition estimated the amount needed to fully plug the hole to be in the estimated $48 million. something like that. it is not the small business commission but passing off work done by the coalition last week saying the san francisco venue coalition estimated the amount of relief they require would be $48 million. at least, you know, if a member of the board of supervisors takes this to the budget commit

commission makes available. if y'all are interested in more comprehensive view of the commission data view sources and in particular the dashboards, that's something that i'd be happy to come back at future meetings. but let me switch over to screen sharing. and show you share. there we go. this particular application that i'm demonstrating today is available on the portal, data.sf.org/campaign [underscore] finance. and it shows the data from the past november elections specifically, the contributions to primarily formed candidates and committees. it's designed by tyler tech to be very approachable and presentable to the general public. it starts here by searching for candidates or by name or the office that they're running for. in the interest of time i will just highlight one contest that recently occurred. the board of supervisors district 3. so a search for the candidates -- well, i searched by the contest name but you can search by candidate and they pop up and then this dashboard over here shows a geograph

once had the human rights commission, a real commission. have you ever asked why the contract monitoring division no commission? the city administrator and the mayor and they may being all of the decisions. have you thought this or do i have to do the heavy lifting? thank you very much. >> thank you, caller. madam secretary, no more call ins the queue. >> that closes public comment on item 5, communications. >> several callers raised some very specific points differing with the analysis in 5e. that may beings this a little difficult and we talked about it last time was that cmb is not p.u.c. entity and we rely on their work. given the importance of the issue and the tenderness of the times, i would appreciate the city attorney's review of the representations made in that memo from cmd. to make sure that the interpretation of when certification was required and what the effect had to be. i guess one of the issues is whether the terms of the contract documents supersede the administrative provisions of the cmd. i think it would be appropriate

commission comments and questions. commissioner moore. >> i want to acknowledge the public about their concerns regarding immediate or spending projects. i would like to ask when you write that you please write closer to the date at which your item is being heard. there is a significant amount of e-mails we all receive. sometimes things that are important get lost in the large stream of other e-mails. when it comes to the date when your project is being heard, we may have forgotten a e-mail came in three or four weeks. i would ask you write to us closer to when your item is being heard. thank you. >> let me just echo commissioner moore's comments. we have enough to deal with weekly and it is a lot helpful for us if we have the official packet completed that we can reference while we are talking to members of the public. i am in full agreement with that, commissioner moore. >> very good. seeing no further deliberation from the commissioners we can move on to department matters. item 6. directors announcements. >> no com

there is no record of a commission to leonardo in the entire trade register. there is also no mention of such a valuable painting in the inheritance. you can imagine how desperately i searched for clues of a commission or payments. not even in the testament is there mention that this painting existed. i think francesco would have certainly claimed it since it was a painting with a rising and secure value the whole thing is incomprehensible. print just go would have most likely shown the portrayed by the famous painter publicly and would not have risked event or tax evasion. in lynn on his record there is also no trace of a commission by francesca money apparently didn't change terms. from just goes testament is archived in florence's arche view destructo there in there is also no mention of the great masters valuable artwork. leonardo apparently never delivered the painting to francesco. bizarre he writes about an incomplete portrays the mona lisa and the louvre however is completed down to the very last detail. i mean this year story here except of the commis

commission president's report, commission's report and commission announcements and schedule of items identified for consideration at future commission meeting. >> i see nothing in the chat. >> thank you. i don't know what this is now. i think we talked about it before. i did want the bar association to have an opportunity to present to us regarding the police union contract and the issues -- they wrote us a lovely letter about. i like to schedule that as soon as possible. i know that process is still going on. >> the bar association has been meeting with the department. we'll reach out. i'm not sure where they are in the process. i agree they should present. i'll see they rather do so now or later on in the process. we're happy to follow up on that. >> thank you. i am going to ask that we calendar bgo5.3. the working group will be meeting on the 14th. we should be able to have information or wrap up the loose ends on the 14th and have this calendar on december 16th. other request, i'm going to ask that the we agendize or perhaps, director henderson can provide an update as to the dan

riation and park commission. and president buell, additionally, i'll be wacking over over and bringing you a proclamation from mayor breed which declares november 19, 2020 as tom harrison day in san francisco. >> whew! >> good job. >> i got a day. [applause] >> i'm going to stand behind him. from the department, we have a few gifts as well. of course, we talk about your role in shaping the park system. today we call commissioner harrison the commissioner harrison department. this is for you. [applause] >> great. >> and then in honour of your tenure on the capital committee, and the good work you did that has enabled us to pass [inaudible], a t-shirt -- all right. and then finally because this is so much about your legacy, this is christopher pollack's book published on the 150th anniversary of [inaudible] park and all the places that you stewarded. >> well, thank you. thank you very much. i will give you an elbow bump and then go back to my cave. >> and the commission resolution -- and the won from mayor breed. >

there is no record of a commission to leonardo in the entire trade register. there is also no mention of such a valuable painting in the inheritance. you can imagine how desperately i searched for clues of a commission or payments i mean not even in the testament is there mention that this painting existed. i think francesco would have certainly claimed it since it was a painting with a rising and secure value the whole thing is incomprehensible begun as you have you should. just go would have most likely shown the portrayed by the famous painter publicly and would not have risked a bent toward tax evasion. in leonardo's records there is also no trace of a commission by francesca money apparently didn't change terms. from just goes testament is archived in florence's are key of you to start up there in there is also no mention of the great masters valuable artwork leonardo apparently never delivered the painting to francesco. mazhar he writes about an incomplete portrait of the mona lisa and the louvre however is completed down to the very last detail. is what

and then the board room commission. and we have seven sections that are separated out into 18 strategies and these strategies have been put into 82 actions that must department must complete. there's an implementation template for each action which i will discuss in the next slide. so this is an example of the implementation template. each section allows the department to include department specific goals and actions as needed. it is important to note as debbie has said that this is a living department and that the departments will be working on the actions over a period of time. it's also important to note that some of these actions are part of our purview so we're working collaboratively with the resources and other city departments and the office of racial equity. the actions and samples indicated were prepopulated by the department of racial equity and the department was to fill out the blank sections, including resources committed to the action, implementation steps, timeline for completion, and data completion (in

but the entry was commissioned in rome by julian or demitted she is. as a result of an affair he had with a woman from the will be no reality made you figure brand our name or. rather your passion to get. 'd 'd a new name surfaces made it to. the ruling family of florence this name is most associated with the renaissance period they were rich scrupulous obsessed with power and patrons of the arts. giuliano domenici was one of the 2 brothers that lived during the time. he was a womanizer and a squander. he was charismatic had a powerful name and an influential brother. his brother lived in rome his name was jim varney dimity chain and he had high aspirations later he became cardinal and finally pope. as pope clear the tent he made history as a sensitive our patron as well as a scrupulous and powerful politician. he strengthened the clergy's power and influence over the battling italian city states and had a weakness for the beautiful things in life. some . giuliano his extravagant brother arrived in or be no but he was a guest of the blood so to college

the painter a was commissioned in rome by giuliano dimiter. as a result of an affair he had with a woman from will be no reality made you figure brown danny or. rather your big question to get. 'd 'd a new name surfaces made it to. the ruling family of florence this name is most associated with a renaissance period they were rich scrupulous obsessed with power and patrons of the arts. giuliano domenici was one of the 2 brothers that lived during davinci time. he was a womanizer and to squander. it was charismatic had a powerful name and an influential brother. his brother lived in rome his name was given me to many change and he had high aspirations later he became cardamom and finally pope. as pope lear the tent he made history as a sensitive our patron as well as a scrupulous and powerful politician. to strengthen the clergy's power and influence over the battling italian city states and had a weakness for the beautiful things in life. some . truly honor his extravagant brother arrived in or been or where he was a guest of the plot so to col

but the commission missed a vital piece of evidence. they smile. it is a hands annotated plan prepared by an official council during the site visit in 1949 that morning them to a group found in the archives of the irish ordnance survey. and it specifically describes an area along the side of a wooded path leading from the main house towards the fully as a children's burial ground. but could unmarked graves still be physical decades after they were dug a grave never settle. you listen to ground it never fills back in exactly the way it was. so when you get what. you also create an. educational defenders you can see the impressions in the ground i could be any. the greatest president of farmable. we are in the realm of an area where thundering on how. am i often on the basis for a. thing that we don't feel heard and. we send the drone up to get a better view. we could see a couple of old fetch to build beds. but something else as well. smaller rectangular patches. we took our images to tony. they are regular a rose. by name with much to find for an i

i am fortunate to have the relationship with my commission. that is why we were able to do what we needed to do without obstruction. thank you. i hope you give the same to sally who will be in my absence. i am a phone call away. i will call on you. we need to replicate the work in detroit. thank you. i love you all. i appreciate it. >> thank you. may god give you strength and courage and love on this next phase of your life. >> thanks to my colleagues for giving me the opportunity be to serve and for supporting me and the board of supervisors as well. >> thank you. >> madam secretary, please call the next item. >> agenda item 5e. comely approving an amendment to the skimatic design for rincon center at 101 speer street to convert approximately 67442 square feet of ground floor retail use to office use. rincon point south beach redevelopment project area. discussion and action. resolution number 39-2020. >> thank you. through the chair. i want to just emphasize the timing is meaningful. this project, as you know, will be presented upon the proj

i want to commend the commission to address the recent corruption scandal. three years ago, we engaged with this commission around behested payments process that looked at elected officials and the commission and the board ultimately adopted a disclosure law rather than a ban. we see a process where our health and human service nonprofit with being caught up in something where we are not the problem. we continue to urge a careful nuance approach that is necessary to ensure that we don't hamstring the city's ability to support its nonprofit partners who are providing direct services and affordable housing particularly in the middle of a pandemic. the report that i just saw for the first time today, it would propose a major expansion of restrictions and we don't have a specific position. i think it needs a cautious look and we look forward to the ongoings discussion. the devil is always in the details with these things. what happens with public appeal, can an official be on the host committee. what about nonprofit boar boardf directors who will be classified p

does that sound like what the commission intends or are you looking for more planning commission input on that determination? >> vice president moore: other people do want to weigh in on that question. because it would still modify the motion. >> if i heard that correct, city attorney stacy, the proposed amendment would be to add a condition that after one year the facility may add 12 additional chairs pending verification by staff that the transportation plan is effective and reported to the commission at an informational update hearing. >> that's correct. rather than pending, i might say provided that traffic measures are implemented and planning staff in consultation with two other city agency have determined that the traffic implementation are effective. >> commissioner tanner: that sounds pervertible to me. vice president moore, you said you were not in agreement? >> vice president moore: no, i am. >> commissioner tanner: it's presentable to me as well. >> commissioner diamond: i'm amendable to that. >> if there's nothing further, there's a motion that has been seconded to approve

thank you, commission chair ambrose. this report is a third in a series of public integrity reports -- public integrity reports to assess policies in wake of city's attorney investigation stemming from alleged wrongdoing by former public works director. the reports as you know from previous meetings are conducted with the city attorney's office issued with the goal of highlighting areas where laws need strengthened to avoid a future similar circumstances to prevent abuse and fraud in the city. the controller's report was issued the end of june and was we had the controller's staff here to present its findings and recommendations regarding conflicts of interest. the contracting and procurement processes. second report was issued in september and that addressed gifts to the departments through non-city organizations and creation of risk of pay to play. that report was also presented to the commission at its meeting last month to provide opportunity to provide input. just last week the controller's office issued the third i

commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. we should open public comment. members of the public, if you wish to submit testimony for items not on today's agenda, please press star, three to be entered into the queue. seeing no members of the public requesting to speak, commissioners, general public comment is closed, and we can move onto department matters. item 1, director's announcements. welcome, director hillis. >> director hillis: good afternoon. thank you, jonas. just a couple of announcements. one, i wanted to announce that liz accepted my offer to be our new director of current planning, and liz is here today, so just to congratulate her and let you all know that that's happened. thank you. liz is obviously no stranger to the planning department and the historic preservation commission. she's been with the departm

so, stlins were elements that required commission approval, the ordinance itself required commission approval. this one does not blend elements to chapters. it's only in that chapter that does not require commissioner approval. >> so it is entirely possible then that the board of supervisors -- we can provide our input to the board of supervisors, but there is no -- they could or could not take it. >> that is correct. yeah. and that is why the recommendation is still -- procedurally a little odd because it's difference than every other policy project that we've done. but i will say that i have been working very closely with courtney mcdonald, a legislative aid to supervise source haney and she is here today. so she's prepared to talk with you and answer questions that you have. but thus far they have been very, you know, open and responsive partners on this. so she can talk about the supervisor's plan moving forward with legislation. but i would hope that that relationship would continue as it has been. >> thank you. >> all right. commissioner bush, then, if you want to ask your ques

and generally after that, they create a commission, a memorial commission and designates that commission to now follow through to find a site, to find at isn't, to collect the money and then to build the project. after congress passes the bill, though, the sponsor has to go back to the national capital memorials commission and seek their advice about site selection. they can either choose a site outside the national mall, in which case they have a lot of leeway, but if they want to be on the national mall it's self, they are very restricted. it has to be a preeminent importance to the nation to be right in the center, and it has to be of national significance to be beyond. but then, once they consult again begins the process that often takes three, five, even ten years. they have to go to review before the commission of fine arts, the national capital commission, the office of preservation, the d.c. preservation office, the office of planning, and so on and so forth. essentially this is what takes so long. they go before the entities, the explain their design, and site selection. then th

we will move to commission matters.president's report announcements,. >> no report this week. >> item 4. consideration of adoption draftments from november 4, 2020. we should take public comment. members of the public if you wish to comment on the minutes from november 4th this is your opportunity. public comment is closed and the matter is now before you. any comments or motion please. >> i move that we approve them. >> second. >> thank you. on that motion to adopt the minutes for november 4, 2020, commissioner black. >> yes. >> commissioner foley. >> i wasn't there. >> doesn't matter. [ inaudible ] >> adopt. >> thank you. [roll call] commission president hyland. >> yes. thank you so moved. that passes unanimously 7-0. placing us on item 5. commission comments and questions. >> i don't see any. we can move on. >> that places us under consent calendar. there is one item on the consent calendar. that matter listed here constitutes the consent calendar. it is routine by the historic preservation commission and will be act

this measure came about when i was a member of the post commission evaluating the head of the coast commission, that was about 2.5 years ago, and it's made its way through the paces, and mr. president, thank you for holding our clerk, the only person that this body actually appoints, to a process that we should go through, and i would like to be added as a cosponsor. >> president yee: thank you. thank you. supervisor -- supervisor? madam clerk, roll call. >> clerk: on item 64 -- [roll call] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president yee: the motion is approved. >> clerk: mr. president, you touched my heart. >> president yee: you touch all of our hearts. >> supervisor peskin: we haven't gone through the process yet. >> president yee: oh, well, you know. i'm going through it in my head. so, madam clerk, will you please read the in memoriams? >> clerk: yes. today's meetings will be adjourned in memory of the following beloved individuals. on behalf of supervisor preston, for the late mr. dave grushell. on behalf of supervisor walton and supervisor preston, supervisor peskin, for the late lamar wil

and as i had just mentioned the community commission -- the commission on community investment and infrastructure this last tuesday approved and took several actions that approved the development. included approvals of the redevelopment plan amendments, also changes to the ownership -- excuse me -- the ownership participation agreement, which sort of acts as a d.a., requires the project sponsors to participate in creating the infrastructure for mission bay. and then amendments to the application. so, again, before you are simply making general plan findings for the mission bay south redevelopment plan amendments that are required before the board of supervisors, to take action. and approval of the office development authorization. and when we looked to formulate our recommendation to you, staff looks to plan code section 321b and those findings for the authorization and, of course, the general plan in general for the redevelopment plan amendments. we are recommending approval of this project for the reasons that we have stated in our staff report, and in the draft motions. and in general we belie

but commissions from the pope was boss here giuliano must have given him the commission of which leonardo rights including. leonardo was to paint a painting to comfort a little politics. it badly you said earlier motto to paint may have picked are of a mother that i can give to my some is an image of his mother that at daulat am you're free to enter as you imagine how a portrait of a mother shuttle flight a mere nado painted the painting that we call mona lisa today a little that. it must have been a great challenge to paint an image of a mother for upon attack. since he suffered a similar fate because of politics. he too was an illegitimate child who was recognized by his father. his mother didn't die in childbirth she was his father's maid and he probably used her dependency on him for labors of love as had giuliano with his mistress friend danny. and leonardo shared a similar fate and this inspired leonardo to paint a painting that up held the memory of a mother and. the painting should lend comfort to young politician who himself never saw his mother. he undoubtably painted the image

so, stlins were elements that required commission approval, the ordinance itself required commission approval. this one does not blend elements to chapters. it's only in that chapter that does not require commissioner approval. >> so it is entirely possible then that the board of supervisors -- we can provide our input to the board of supervisors, but there is no -- they could or could not take it. >> that is correct. yeah. and that is why the recommendation is still -- procedurally a little odd because it's difference than every other policy project that we've done. but i will say that i have been working very closely with courtney mcdonald, a legislative aid to supervise source haney and she is here today. so she's prepared to talk with you and answer questions that you have. but thus far they have been very, you know, open and responsive partners on this. so she can talk about the supervisor's plan moving forward with legislation. but i would hope that that relationship would continue as it has been. >> thank you. >> all right. commissioner bush, then, if you want to ask your ques

which was adopted by this commission in july 2020. in august of 2020, we published our 2019 annual language access report which addresses d.p.a. language access complaints and key d.p.a. language access projects and goals. we also collaborated with sfpd on the expanded use of force reporting and appropriate control technique in light of george floyd's death. we also recommended -- we made recommends with regard to revisions of the department of general order. as the commission is aware, there is a quick schedule of turnaround that the department trying to obtain in terms of revising many of the department's general orders. in the 3rd quarter, we made new recommendations for several d.g.o.s. i want to talk about the process that happened. we were approached by the department with the list which was relatively ambitious of d.g.o. they wanted to provide. with input from the department was to separate the recommendations into tiers. there was one tier of d.g.o.s where d.p.a. agreed we were not going to make any recommendation. there were

commission president's report, commissions reports and commission announcements and schedule of items identified for consideration at future commission meetings, action. >> commissioner hamasaki: i have two items that i want to cover today. i thought sergeant youngblood read that out before. i wanted to thank the black community organization for sitting down with commissioners cohen, elias and myself last friday. it was a very productive and thoughtful discussion. we learned a lot from the group. we had some tasks we needed to get on top of and issues we need to address. i wanted to thank them for their time. the issue is that these cases are now in hat criminal justice system. for us to comment on them as commissioners, even they aren't discipline matters for the chief, i think that puts us in position that we have as members of -- chief does or as commissioners, have inside knowledge that might be able to sway jurors in the ultimate matter. that is something that i do want to deal with. again, i don't think there was any ill-intent. i understand the chief has to support his members.