process of the commission?n caves projects up to code, had factors is she willing to consider? for approval. 10ent displace am factor in her decision and is show aware that planning is a dregzary body and if a project is code complying she is allow to reject it. upon commissioner tanner has been eloquent. >> thank you. go to remote comment. there are no parties in the chamber we will take our first public commenter on the phone line we have sick in line at this time. can we have our first phone caller? [inaudible] would you like to comment at this time? [talking] [inaudible] i -- don't know if this caller is aware hoe is on public comment now. go ahead and move on to the next call and come become. >> thank you. >> hello. my name is [inaudible]. and i business owner. i started the sudden fran cac and currently the on the san francisco african-american advisory committee. commissioner tanner has been instrumental in getting fruitful forward leading discussions in ways the [inaudible] and equity. we are in a momen

for our commission of sanitation and streets, quorum is a majority of seats on the commission, which is three and passage of items must receive at least three yes votes except for procedural matters. so, we always, in order to do business, we'll need at least three of you here and in order to pass anything, at least three people will have to be in favor of it. our general order of hearing an item is the presentation, including any clarifying questions from commissioners followed by a motion. then, public comment, discussion and debate and final a vote on it. if we could turn to slide 4, please. as i mentioned earlier, commissioners receive the drafted rules of order suggested by staff in advance of this meeting and they were published for public review and a notice of intent was posted publicly, at least ten days in advance of this meeting, so this commission is able to consider the drafted rules of order having met those requirements. the commission will -- may discuss any amendments raised. i suggest we discuss any amendments and then make a single motion to adopt all non-substanti

members of the public may address the commission on topics within the subject matter of the commission but not part of this agenda. comments specific to an item may be heard when considered. members may address the commission for up to 3 minutes and general comment may be continued to the end of the agenda if speakers exceed 15 admissibilities total for this initial general comment time. i will start a timer for them. members of the public who wish to make 3 minutes of general public comment may lineup against wall if present with us in the room. if you are call nothing dial 415-655-0001 then access code: 2481 309 1587 ##. then dial star 3 to raise your hand to speak. we don't have any members of public present. will sfgovtv is telling mow there are no members of public who have raised their hundred in the queue. we have no further public commenter and this concludes public comment. >> that does conclude public comment. we move on to item 5 mr. full are call that item. >> item 5 is the director's report. from public works inter~im director carla short here to present. this is an inform

for the commission. the experience that has been previously noted for director of public works. i can provide information about the current compensation level and range of compensation that is available for the public works director. typically then the commission would review a draft profile. prepared by the executive recruiter. they would speak with the commission. hear input and then appropriate a draft profile for comment and revision. i can provide to you initial background information about the descriptions existing in the past. once you move forward with a recruiter, should you chose to, they would work closely with you to refine that description. and make sure that -- the commission's goals in terms of what kind of qualities you are seeking in a director. what experience you are seeking from a director. would be clear in that description. would the commission interviewing the candidate sns >> yes. >> we would >> you would. if you -- in all circumstances you will be interviewing. you will see their

here we have members of the election commission here. how is the mood, how are the people the voting is great. the whole mood is very high, so we are satisfied with the result. all is well. we have. well, at eight from 8:00 in the morning the election commissions are now working, throughout this donetsk republic, almost 400,000 people actually voted. every fourth inhabitant of the board, including more than 100,000 voted residents of donetsk who are now in the territory. the russian federation is safe, because it is clear that donetsk and its guards are now. eh, not really safe. here for example, what do foreign observers say who yesterday also spent the whole day here in the donetsk people's republic and there are more than 100 of them, let's listen. because this is the first time we teach that i see such a capable. you just need a people called home. don't go anywhere, don't go far, don't risk your life. this is especially important. let me remind you that the referendum will last for several days, such is the format of house rounds, w

and that's why we have the commission. as to the limited carving out authority for street tree maintenance that was on slide 12, i understand naacp is buried in the ordinance at the board [inaudible]. and that is in the moving until we seat results of the november election. and i guess don't understand or -- disagree with that fully with deputy city earn on how a consent caliber works. anything on consent is subject to action and in the event that staff or a member of the policy body or the public wants to pull an item from consent it is pulled from consent, considered as a separate item at that meeting subject to separate comment and a vote on that item and in my experience there has been no need to continue the consent calendar matter to a subsequent meeting. if the votes are in the there to have the item this is different. in my experience there is no procedural reason why a consent calendar matter is pulld and discussed can't be discussed per and vetted on at that meeting despite being on the calendar as a consent matt

do i say i'm the commission on the environment, san francisco environment commission? there is the same kind of i think, problem that we see here is you've been seeing in the department is that there may be an opportunity to see a change and be more consistent about how you're talking about yourself now, i think it's great work. congratulations. >> thank you mark for a great presentation. one question relating to vice president stephenson's comment. does the city charter sort of dictate the name of the department and/or the name of the commission? >> of the differ to, i think we did investigate that. >> i can address that question, thank you for the question commissioner. so the city charter and what is in the city charter does dictate what the official name is for the department. and that is the department of the environment. that does not change not even with the branding refresh, this is the public facing on how we're connecting to the public. we're not changing the official name. for city purposes and all of that, and that this is stylist take. and also a reference

e, members of election commissions received members of precinct territorial commissions received, personala was published. uh, these rooms where the voting will take place, uh, there were constant threats. rocket hmm rocket attacks, but uh, no matter what, all our colleagues. uh, rallied mobilized all their efforts. uh, they showed courage and heroism and still went to their voters, so that they can express their will. for which they are very grateful. uh, our law enforcement agencies did everything they could to ensure the safety of both the members of the commission and our voters. we are the same as our colleagues. so i heard from the luhansk people's republic we had a reserve room. we had an algorithm of actions. when. if something doesn't go according to plan, so uh, we worked it out really well thanks. thanks to our law enforcement agencies for their work. electoral commissions for not being afraid and yet they held a referendum on the territory of the kherson region. yes, there were moments when we had to urgently, in order not to raise a panic, uh, make decisions to transfer pollin

of the commission. more, about the structure of the commission. at times, the state has failed to fill its six spots, which impairs the ability of the commission to get its work done. additionally, very few recommendations of the commission actually get and plummeted by the state, or congress. because of this, individual members of the commission and tribes get frustrated and questioned the purpose of the commission. based on these experiences, i have several suggested edits for the committee to consider in making as 2097, but seeing my time is short, i went to mention a couple. the language should be reviewed to make sure that it encompasses the schools identified in volume one of interiors report. the bill seems to only include schools that were directly operated by the federal government, or churches, versus schools that meet the full criteria. the members of the commission are all appointed by the federal government. which will likely minimize trust in the commission's work. direct mind revising the

, uh and election commissions, election commissions. also , hmm, they came to the voters and made such er, door-to-door house-to-house rounds and voting. it was just carried out in this way, but today it’s all happening in such a face-to-face mode with us in touch with the ambassador of the lugansk people’s republic in russia rodion miroshnik rodion valeryevich we greet you. yes, good morning. and good morning. i’ll quote hmm just the head of the cycle of the lugansk people’s republic, kravchenko, who declares that she is sure that it will be possible to sum up the results of the referendum on joining the republic to the russian federation by the end. e of this day. uh, she made this statement this morning and the news agency is quoting it right now. what are the conditions for this final day of voting. the final day of voting, that is, the five that we had within the framework of the referendum, this is the most classic, that is, and, unfortunately, the most dangerous, because polling stations have now opened in our country, people are

tomorrow, full-fledged precinct election commissions will already be working.all those who did not vote can come to the polling station and , uh, vote in the traditional way, that is, dropping their ballot in the ballot box in front of everyone, as he wants, there will be tomorrow too. and there are festive events in energodar. although safe, of course. now there are questions about how to secure these polling stations, because they try not to name the addresses, in order to avoid sabotage and all kinds of provocations studio. thanks to how the referendum on joining russia is going in zaporozhye, our special correspondent olga kurlaeva told. now we are in touch with the head of the administration of donetsk, aleksey kulenzim. alexey valeryevich hello, voting has been going on in the region for 3 days. here's what we can say from the preliminary results. continues following the results of three days, about 80% of the residents took part in the vote, despite the incessant shelling, people actively vote meet a member of the precinct commission now push mobile grou

commission.ion on a boarding school policy. it is s-2907. these are efforts for the united states to step up to address and acknowledge the dark history. also, we go further than that. we want to bring healing to native people. we have a great panel here this afternoon. i am looking forward to that. at the appropriate time, a second panel, mister chairman, i would like to be the one to introduce and welcome miss liz. she is the president and ceo of the alaska institute. she has been instrumental on so many of these issues. i will speak to that at the appropriate time. just know that i appreciate a interest of the full committee -- >> thank you. senator cortez has an opening statement. >> thank you. thank you. thank you for holding this important hearing. i want to welcome secretary deb haaland for joining us here. this hearing could not be more relevant. i want to take a moment to highlight the reason we are done in the state. >> there is the opening of the school in museum. that is not far from

commission.ume that the department sees the subpoena power as necessary for the commission? is that something that you want to see included or are there perhaps other options that could be used to gain the information, absent subpoena authority? >> we support the bill as it is written, vice chairman. >> okay, good. since senator schatz is at the vote, we will turn to senator smith. >> thank you very much. i appreciate that, vice chair murkowski. secretary haaland, it is so wonderful to welcome you to the committee. i also just want to send greetings to representatives and leaders of the nabs liters that are here today. i see sandy there and all of you. it feels very meaningful to have you all in this committee room, since the last time i saw you was when secretary haaland was coming to visit in minnesota and we went to the native american boarding school healing coalition -- it was a powerful meeting. so, i am very grateful to be able to have you all here today to address the tragic history of th

commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing 4. 2022-002108cua (m. langlie: (628) 652-7410) 414 columbus avenue - east side between green and vallejo streets; lot 015 in assessor's block 0131 (district 3) - 5a. 2022-000936dnx (n. foster: (628) 652-7330) 235 2nd street - east side between tehama and clementina 5b. 2022-000936cua (n. foster: (628) 652-7330) 235 2nd street - east side between tehama and clementina are there any questions? seeing none, the recommendation is to approve. we have a motion and second >> [roll call] so moved., commissioners, that item passes unanimously 5-0. >> this places us under commission matters. >> c. commission matters 6. consideration of adoption: san francisco planning commission thursday, september 15, 2022 notice of hybrid hearing & agenda page 7

both on the completely nonpartisan nature of the commission. because of that tone of course was set at the top by senator king and representative gallagher. they've really made that clear from the outset and model that in the way they are related to each other and the way they ran the commission. and i actually think some credit needs to go to the leadership he made the appointments to that commission. they really did appoint people who came to this without partisan but with a common purpose to improve our cybersecurity. i would make a little plug i would like to see leadership make this kind of appointments to the senate intelligence committee more frequently. senator kaine that same type of temperament is critically important. not how much we managed to get done, relate senator king it is because we have these members who have the respect of their colleagues. they are seen as real experts on these issues at worked tirelessly they have worked and continue to work to get their colleagues to see the importance in senator king and congressman par

without acknowledging the commission. i think it's important when we are establishing the inspector general position that we do have some input from the community but also it's an unbiased means of doing so. i was glad to go to the conference and i was glad to see director henderson and am i didn't expect to see there. i served for almost that years on the california democratic party executive board. i'm still a lead cochair of the pot from committee. i'm proud of the work we have did especially with our criminal justice plank and doug case who served with nackle for a while, and he's on the san diego police commission and he's my designee for the criminal justice plank chair so we've worked very collaboratively, the most important thing we tried to eliminate choke holds and i think we've always been (indiscernible) when the pot from committee because when we put something in the pot form, that means it actually becomes law or it goes to the ballot box. i also am active with the asian national pacific bar and i have been

and the chairman of the central election commission, lapamfilova. today said that in the period from june 1, yes, today to eight in the morning today, september 10, about 30,000 different ones were recorded. attacks of attempts to hack into the website of the central election commission also recorded 94,90 attacks during this time. well, over the past 90 days it has not been like that. during the first day of voting, a large volume of various requests was recorded in the deka system from abroad, including 15 potentially dangerous impacts of a high degree of criticality, about a third of the suspiciousness of network traffic was filtered out on the way back on the main communication channels by geographical indication from about 13:00 to 16:00, the system was actively scanned and attempts were made. so, at the application level from the baltic states, the protection system worked out regularly from 14:00 to 15:00, attempts were made to massively guess passwords for accounts of a unified information system. yes, so identification authentication attemp

, planning commission, the 1960s to the port commission understate law, and in those cases as one of san francisco's best attorneys said today, that really is the end run around the legislative check and balance around the board of supervisors and that is troubling. when you are a member of the public and going to the planning commission and you think you are getting a fair hearing but it turns out that maybe if a commissioner votes the wrong-way, not that they even need to be told how to vote but because they have that over their head, people are left with less trust in government and that is a problem. then the even more troubling ones and those are the adequacy judicial bodies where they are really tantamount to court. as a matter of fact, when i was president, i appointed mandel man to the board of appeals and that was a legislative body and when i recommended to president walton, and he spoke of his ability to be fair and unbiased. he is a member of the bar. he understood the role of a quasi judicial and he went out of his way to emphasize that he would be independent of his app

this is up to the commission. you know, we do believe that it is a useful threshold and we -- for a few reasons one is consistent with the previous behested payments reporting regime in place, which required reporting from parties and amounts of 1 thousand dollars or over. the state regulation guess up to 5 thousand. i think a thousand dollars was a workable number locally and it will help to alleviate the administrative burden in terms of need to vet small donations if the department received a box of ppe they would need to first what it is a complex vetting process that has to go on for every behested payment under this ordinance. there are a number of categories and interested parties the categories need to be checked. someone needs to run down whether well is a contract in issue or someone is subject to permit. whether they lob ed the department and so on. and that does create work for staff and the city attorney and may be ethic's staff if they need to be advised on trickier situations that require a thorough

commission makes considerations. second low, a key part of conversation is in the the building and not the programming no, sir the building the ways which that programming affectless the cultural heritage of the neighborhoods. castro cease displacement of culture and when i hear another planet talking about bring nothing a new demographic or certain demographic, i know what they mean by that they mean rock concerts with straight people who get drunk and 1400 on the streets of the castro. according to the chronicle in 2019 they made 2.9 on tickets for outside they don't qualify to be here. i urge you to with draw this resolution however it got here and recognize the city process of considering historic preservation and heritage that is first commission. i will call several names and if you can line upkeep this moving efficient leave. michael, matthew and steven bracko. apology fist i mispronounce. i'm asking you to delay the vote i'm going to stop. timer is not work i need the timer so i know what is going on. here pl

when i was asked very done, sibley, what will the commission do in this house? i was grilled so many times and i had to a repeat while we do not have any tool in hand. and he cannot act of and we see something wrong happening in hungary or it it ball land or we had an issue in slovenia. ah, we see some negative trend in many other member states and are, you know, like you a reply and 9 times i cannot do any thing. and the don't dance thyme you are willing to re fit it any more. so the solution is the european law. i will honestly try to convince everybody that this is a good thing. we will have may be difficult, legislative process. papa, everybody has to admit that the media are not protected enough in europe. are talking about hungary. well, this legislation has immediate effect on hungary, for instance, on media owned by oligarchs, close to the government. of course it's going to be used. it's are actively, sorry, i'm a lawyer, so i have to mention that. but this law sets the criteria for which will be used for the assessment of concentration of media ownersh

the commission will discuss and possible low take action to approve applications. presenting today we have richard kurylo with office of small business. >> welcome, richard. >> good afternoon. commissioners. staff and public. i'm richard kurylo program manager. i like to acknowledge michelle reasono who is helped with markets and communications for the office of small business. michelle was instrumental in reruing and process the legacy business registry applications before you today. >> sfgovtv i have a power point. before you are 5 applications for the legacy business registry includes a staff report. draft resolution, application itself and a case report and resolution from planning. application submitted to planning on july 20 and heard by the historic preservation commission on august 17th. 2a is out post studios the business is inspect post production and recording studio in the embark defero opened in october of 96. out post studios provides affordable recording services for music, pod cast, tv and film. the only fully stage in san francisco the reproduction

also in the 1990s was dealt with by a special bilateral commission.gue even offered to replace the territorial concession with a cash payment, but warsaw rejected this option, however, when the crisis was on the verge, and the soles of the chairman of the ruling party were literally glued on their boots. time to collect stones will not be superfluous neither land nor money the other day yaroslav kachinsky demanded a trillion euros from the frg for the nazi occupation amounted to the amount. it was presented as the sum of the losses incurred, the most limited conservative it can be significantly increased this 6 trillion 200 billion zł from the german point of view and considering that such compensations are paid decades before the german economy. this is a feasible amount of german reparations porsche refused in the fifty-third year. what germany once again reminded its neighbor of, so the success of this adventure is now approximately zero , another thing is the political dividends that kaczynski's party does not miss the chance to collect again by a

truly bias aside, this commission is the best youth commission in the world. i mean, it's a huge statement and i will back it up, don't worry. um, for the past five years alone, i can name so many achievements that have pushed san francisco towards a more just and equitable future. for example, mayor breed mentioned pre-muni for youth and the next thing is the 2020 ballot that lost by one percent and maybe we'll try again in the near future. we closed down juvenile hall. we created a participatory town hall that had over one hundred youth voices. i mean, how many commissions in the world can say they've included youth in which they are truly seen as equitable partners? and in san francisco, we have. and so that is because of your leadership and that is why i want to share, i promise to make it brief, a few of the lessons i have learn here for the past two years. to commissioners, staff and adult allies are here to support but do not be afraid to push for your belief. in this nation, we've seen the black lives movement. we've seen the moment for social justice

and should be a huge wake up call for the commission. i urge the commission to drop the lawsuit against the state water board delta plant and work with the state to ensure flows in the river are consistent with the in stream flow adopted by the state. measureers needed provide spring flows high to get water on flood plains, provide flows to the midwragz inauguration of fish and maintain water temperatures low enough to support a cold water fishery the nonflow measures in the green light in the absense of sufficient fles will not work. the commission water management centers relies on a conservative 8.5 year design drought. modify it to be valid. today the commission has been unresponsive to newellous requests for information from a concerned public. we care about the environment. we look to the commission to be responsible stewards ever river by increasing flows in the river. thank you. thank you for sharing your comments. next caller. 2 minutes. >> good afternoon. i'm martin. and i would urge the sfpuc commission to push sfpuc staff to

and territorial election commissions interfered with them. knowing their journalistic duties, the authorities explained that indeed journalists, uh, who were accredited through the cec, are all allowed. and this just here made for such noise. and of course, now the closest attention is paid to security systems both in ordinary polling stations and in electronic ones. and the chairman of the central election commission, lapamfilova. today she said that in the period from june 1 to 8:00 in the morning, today, september 10, about 30,000 different attacks of attempts to hack e were recorded, the website of the central election commission was also recorded 94 types of attacks during this time. well, over the past 90 days, this was not the case during the first day of voting, a large volume was recorded various calls in the system for abroad, including 15 potentially. hazardous impacts of a high degree of criticality, about a third of the suspiciousness of the network schedule was filtered out even on the way on the main communication channels on a

and tomorrow here already to work, a full-fledged precinct election commission.nd everyone who has not voted can come to the polling station and vote in the traditional way olga kurlaeva, vladislav mirzayan, zaporozhye region. we will continue talking about referendums and now the head of the administration of lugansk, manole spelavov, is in touch with the studio. good afternoon, how is the referendum going in your city and what is the turnout today? good afternoon alexandra, the referendum is taking place at the highest level, we must pay tribute to our blessings that remain devoted to their ideas, which they still laid in the fourteenth year, therefore, the turnout is very high , more than 70%, we, uh, voted today for another day. i think that, in general, in connection with such an e with such a wish of our residents of logon to vote. well , i’m even afraid of such a number, but i think that it will definitely be under 90, therefore, i am very grateful to my countrymen for the fact that they are, despite any, uh, intimidating uh, slogans that ukraine throws, t

, the recommendations of the european commission are to be considered in three months at a meeting ofes of the european union have to make decisions by a qualified majority vote procedure, i.e. 55 % of the state members of the european union must vote for it, which in total must correspond to 65% of the population of the european union. and here exactly urban and calculates that precisely because of the sensitivity of the european union regarding the need to preserve the consolidation of the member states around the condemnation of russia's aggression in ukraine, he can negotiate a certain, let's say, compromise line to fulfill these demands of the european union. moreover, there is a lot of criticism that the european commission is quite long held these negotiations with the hungarian government, these negotiations were not good and, in principle, did not cover all the issues regarding which there is criticism of hungary, that is, if after all, it is about some certain compromises that mr. orban can act on, so it turns out that he will be the winner in this game on the chessboard , n

the commission's j.w. is to analyze president qualitative and quantitative criteria and hear from the public and have a context of the benefit benefits of a project. but -- we are not body not planning. and that regardless of how it decides and how you decide today, it is the planning commission's responsibility to weigh the interests. you are weigh nothing on the impacts as it relates to the park. and were you to find that the shadow does have an adverse impact you would instruct the department to share that with plan and the planning commission debateings these issues. you don't we in directly on a development project. you are offering input and advice to the planning commission. and what i would propose, since the debate feels so genuine from all sides that commissioners, if you like, regardless of the vote our staff can send we can send a letter to the planning commission not just summarizing your decision but the different points of view expressed so they have the most robust input they could have as