i'd like to support for continuance. >> commissioner: commissioner fong. >> is that a motion? >> commissioner: yes. >> commissioner: i'm not going to second just yet but to share thoughts, to your comments we need to look at the rezoning or take a look at how this area's being used and how these streets are being used and maybe review that. as you guys recall, there's been an excess number of financial services and battle over banks and atm machines and services battle and wasn't to clearly separate the business operator who seems great and the land use question that's in front of us. i may vote for a continuance but if we vote i'm going to vote aopposed not in favor of approving this based on the unfair competitive advantage it appears here. meaning that another retail store, business, may have looked at the location and decided no, that's a great location for a real estate office but i can't do it because it's not allowable and this person went ahead and took the chance and it's an unfair advantage and unfair to people who try to abide by the rules and stay in the rules and pay their fair s

commissioners? commissioner johnson? >> commissioner johnson: yeah. can you just summarize the second recommendation again? i didn't quite again that. >> yeah. so currently -- so now, in june, we set these tiers, so home-sf used to be 30%, you give us 30% affordable, and in return of the project, you get two stories. the whole idea, the intent, i think, was that we would set those now, see how they work, and when the attack, which is sort of looking at the inclusionary rates of all of our programs reconvenes, we would look at that, decide if the tier program was something we should keep, but really, the tack is where that decision was made. we're deciding rather than having this kind of hard deadline, leading the tack sort of do the work and sort of resetting -- yeah, resetting the rates and reconsidering the tier program after they've had a chance to really do the work. >> president hillis: commissioner moore? >> commissioner moore: as of last tuesday, there's another question, and that is should the supervisors pursue eliminating parking standards an

commissioners? commissioner norton? >> commissioner norton: thank you. i wanted to just ask a question about the school narratives -- first, i should say thank you for the report, and i really do appreciate that we have you twice a year to report on -- on your work. it's really important. but my question is how did we choose these four schools for the school narrative? >> yeah. so it's done in a combination of ways. so one, the research, planning and assessment team puts together a report every year about schools that are deemed at bright spots because they have shown outcomes that exceed the district average. we have a longer list of schools that we initially reached out to, so this is not to say that these are the only schools in the district that are doing positive work, whether it be chronic absenteeism, or other things, but these were the schools that we were able to have lengthy conversations. again, i don't want to give the impression that this was an exhaustive list. yeah, and then, we're also looking at school sites that have at least ten student

compromise, but that project has been completed. >> commissioner veronese: you were satisfied with that project? >> commissioner hayes-white: yes. >> commissioner veronese: chief, could you pull up that picture of the fire truck -- >> i don't want to mess it up, but i'll do my best. >> commissioner veronese: i just want to emphasize to the commission, if you take a look at that picture, there's two points i want to make about it. >> which picture did you like? >> commissioner veronese: the truck on market street with the extended ladder. >> yes, sir. >> commissioner veronese: right. so if the commissioners could take a look at that particular -- the truck on the left there, you've got those high-powered wires right above, correct? those are muni lines, and then, you've got a muni bus stop in the middle of the road there. if there had been any less lanes in that road, that truck would not have been able to access the top of that roof. this picture alone emphasized the importance of a really good relationship between san francisco fire department and sfmta because lives -- lives can be lost if we don't have access. and i -- in my opinion, sfmta i

on that motion, commissioner fong. >> commissioner: no. >> commissioner moore. >> aye. >> commissioner melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner: so moved the commissioner goes. item 18 for case 2017-007943cua commission authorization. >> if you're here for item 19, 20, 14th or 16th street or green street, those items have been continued. so we won't be hearing those today. >> we are now on item 18. 3848 24th street. >> good afternoon, president hillis and commissioners and department staff. the case before you is a request for conditional use authorization for the legalization of an existing real estate brokerage doing business as the agency. within an approximately 903 square foot tenant space of a three-story mixed use building. the proposed real estate brokera brokerage will operate monday through friday and 4:00 to 10:00 p.m. saturday and sunday and it was constructed in 910. the subject building is located within 24th street district and considered a historical resource class a per ceqa. the project site is a property located on the north site side of 24th street between vicksburg and noe

commissioner honda: okay. that's fine. >> okay. >> clerk: okay. thank you. >> thank you. >> clerk: okay. so this matter's submitted. >> vice president swig: commissioners? >> commissioner lazarus: i'm prepared to deny the appeal. >> vice president swig: commissioner honda? >> commissioner honda: as i've been corrected, we've only heard hundreds of these cases, but it feels to me they are thousands. but it does feel to me that a lot of this is boilerplate, and as our vice president has indicated, if their address is on there, i have to assume it was mailed to the address. at the same time, it does appear that it's fast-tracked, to a certain degree. i don't know if there's enough here for me to hold this particular permit up, but i'm just mentioning that to the -- so that the applicants are aware of it. >> vice president swig: commissioner? >> commissioner tanner: i can certainly understand the residents being frustrated and the error of the wrong neighborhood associations being noticed the first time, but a credit to the department, they did catch that and asked for notification to be sent double at the next opportunity in time, which the residents had opportunity to lo

commissioner haney? >> commissioner haney: yeah, that's -- i -- i was on the student assignment committee for the last, i think, four or five years with commissioner merase, so i know that this will be a big challenge for you all, and you know, i -- i had a meeting early on to talk to the superintendent about this. and i was communicating to him my thoughts on it, and he said well, how come the board hasn't called the question on this? how come they haven't put something forward? are you sure that the board is actually on board with moving in a new direction? and i think one of the things that i'm really -- what's really important as a part of this is i think the board is n unified in going through this process, in looking carefully at what we're doing and what other districts are doing and seeing how we can better accomplish or goals that we have collectively. i think this current system that we have now, you know, set out three primary goals, and i think that we on the student assignment committee and the rest of the commissioners have been pretty clear that we're not accomplishing, and that if we continue to just go down this road with this all

peskin, i'd like to make a motion. >> chair peskin: motion to rea-appoint commissioner hogue, seconded by commissioner yee. commissioners, can we take that same house, same call? [ gavel ]. >> chair peskin: can we have a motion to continue the district ten seat, made by commissioner mandelman, seconded by commissioner yee, and we'll do that without objection. [ gavel ]. >> chair peskin: next item, please. >> clerk: item five, allocate approximately 25 million in proprop k funding for tax requests. this is an action item. >> chair peskin: mr. quintanilla. >> today, we are before you for a request for about $25.8 million. these funds were identifies during the prop k strategic plan update, and along with two additional fund exchanges will direct 21 million to help backfill the regional improvement funding gap that we have now, the rest of this gap is going to be split by sfmta and m.t.c. in this allocation request, we're also reflecting the delays caused by the mining in the chinatown station. >> chair peskin: that's not. clerk: s, i just wa -- that's news, just to inform my colleagues. [inaudible] >> -- this facility ser

commissioners? commissioner johnson. >> commissioner johnson: thank you. so i am very familiar with this corridor area. i remember the loss of real foods and have watched and seen this space sit vacant and always just kind of wondered about its potential. i think in taking into context not only this parcel, but the surrounding corridor, we frequently actually talk about the commercial corridor in this area and what we can do to kind of support it and the small businesses around it. one of the -- i had the opportunity to chat with the project sponsor, and, you know, in thinking about changing this use from a grocery store to a more diverse use, i know that is a real concern, i think a valid concern, of the community and i just wanted to call the project sponsor up and just ask for you to share what is in our packets in case other people, members of the public, have not been able to read these pieces about the exploration that you have done around the potential of a grocery store tenant. >> my name is alex paddock, and i'm going to try to pull up a couple of

crack has. >> commissioner makras: -- commissioner makras. >> commissioner makras: you said it is scheduled for march or april of 2019. your previous answer suggested you are not bringing up all of the piers. what do you envision? do you envision two piers at a time over a year, five years? give me an idea how you see the request going on the street? >> for myself we haven't brought this yet. i think we were thinking of a palette. we want one, two, three that we can handle from a capacity standpoint. if there is interest in more we are talking about expanding staff capacity. that is sort of like how the port with manage more. how would the advisory group and members of the public react to more piers? i don't have a distinct answer for you now. we are considering a small number and large number and phased in overtime. >> you shared the light industrial use. walk me through an example how that would work. >> how we would contract for that? >> what do you see as light industrial, does pdr apply? >> this is not an analysis where we came up with the intermediate

and november 1, 2022. >> president mccarthy: so commissioner lee or warshell, who will give the update on that? commissioner lee, you're ready. >> commissioner lee: commissioner moss and commissioner warshell and i met -- what was that, last week? and the nomination committee and we reviewed the current members of the access appeal commission and decided to reappoint all four members who had seats expired or will be expiring this year back on to the commission. and that would be commissioner.r walter park, and learner, and alice brown, and william scott-ellsworth. >> i believe that some of our members may be here. >> commissioner lee: i think that we need to recommend that the full board approve as well. so i make a motion that b.i.k. appoint these members back on the commission. >> second. cb.>> clerk: are all commissioners in favor? any opposed? and congratulations, the members will be reappointed. if you're present and would like to come forward. >> i would like to thank you all for the service that you provide to our city. this is a really important function in making sure that we have access to buildings and we can do it in a way that m

commissioner johnson, commissioner koppel and commissioner moore. we expect missioners melgar and fong to arrive shortly. item one 1621 diamond street discretionary review to continue december 21, 2018. further commissioners there are a number of additional continuances under your regular calendar. first item 15, upper terrace, 4500, 17th street, the declaration has been withdrawn. the project entitlements are still remaining on the agenda. item 19 for case number -- large project authorization is proposed for continuance to december 6th. items 20a and b, conditional use authorization and variant are proposed for continuation to january 10, 2019. under the review calendar, item 23 case number 2017-00245, discretionary review is continuance to january 17, 2019. i have no speaker cards. >> any members of the public that would like to speak on the items proposed for continuance? >> president hillis and commissioners i'm the applicant and property other than of 1621 diamond street should be the first on your agenda for continuance. in response of request

commissioners, commissioner covington. >> commissioner covington: thank you, mr. president. t we have this on the agenda. i know the time of the day was not the most opportune time and so many people expressed to me they couldn't be here today, but of the few people who did speak to us spoke eloquently and very specifically. i very much appreciate your comments, and i took notes. thank you. >> commissioner hecommission. >> commissioner veronese: this is an opportunity to choose somebody to take this department to the next level. i am a little disappointed. maybe this is not the right way to do this we didn't hear from more members. i know the fire department like members of the police department are never short of an opinion, and those opinions are really important to this commission. we as a economics before we decide need to figure out a way to really gauge the temperature and the needs of the members of the department because this clearly didn't work. there weren't enough opinions here. i thank the people that did take the time to show up. i don't think it is a very good c

i just left a project labor agreement meeting with commissioner safai, so if we could have a motion to excuse commissioner safai, made by commissioner ronen, seconded by commissioner stefani, and we will do that without objection. [ gavel ]. >> chair peskin: next item, please. >> clerk: item 2, citizen's invoicesory committee report. this is an action item. >> chair peskin: mr. tennen. >> peter tennen, vice chair of the c.a.c. all of the action items were unanimously approved, and i'd just like to pass along a few comments on two of the items. the first is your item six, to direct a motion of support to direct staff to advance the work and seek adjustment for pras stu pras -- project study update. motorized vehicles would be charged, but scooters and bicycles would likely not be charged. and how would network transport companies be charged, and staff replied that since t.n.c.'s were not a factor in 2010 when the last study was done, there'll be more study on this topic. and then, someone raised the issue that what would be done in areas of high housing population and seniors, especially along laguna street that would be affected by

commissioner haney and commissioner walton and incoming supervisor gordon mahr make comments to that and i just want to ask you to fight hard for our incoming students. thank you. >> good evening. i'd like to say good evening to the president and the superintendent and the commissioners -- all right. all right. okay. so my name is elaine meriwether, and i'm currently serving as vice president of united educators of san francisco. i know last year, before the implementation of prop g, we saw a vast number of our educators and paraeducators struggling in the city just to make ends meet. and also, many of them left because they couldn't afford to live here, so that was a crisis for sfusd. but within my current role, i get an opportunity to talk to parent educators and teachers priet often just to see -- quite often just to say how they're doing. many of them are excited about what prop g has done for them. it has changed many of their li lives. we know people who have decided to come to san francisco to teach here because of prop g, so prouz because -- because of this, we were able to recruit more teachers to teach in this district than ever before. so uesf is committed to our students and our educators, which is why we will continue to work with the district and the sc

>> commissioner honda: i hate making the motion on this. >> commissioner lazarus: i'll make it. >> commissioner honda: go ahead. l>> commissioner lazarus: mov to deny the appeal on the basis the permit was properly issued. >> clerk: okay. we have a motion to deny the appeal on the basis the permit was properly issued. on that motion >> clerk: okay. welcome back to the december 5, 2018 meeting of the board of appeals. we are moving onto item seven. [agenda item read] >> clerk: this is permit number 18-wr-0063, and we will hear from the appellant first. you have seven minutes. >> richard fall speaking for the clayton street neighbors. everything we have to say is in the document. i thank you for your time on this matter. >> commissioner honda: is there anything in particular that you'd like to explain, other than what's in the brief? >> the only thing novel might be obviously, you've heard tons of these cases, the indemnity issue, we put the copy in the -- >> commissioner honda: in the brief? thank you. >> thanks. >> clerk: okay. next, we'll hear from mr. nagle. >> commissioner honda: i've seen t

commissioner koppel: second. >> clerk: very good, commissioners. there on that motion -- [roll call] >> clerk: so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously, 6-0, placing us on item 12 for case at 3060 fillmore street. this is a conditional use authorization. >> good afternoon, commissioners. chris may, planning department staff. you have before you a conditional use authorization request to allow a change of use from a general grocery use, which is currently vacant, formerly occupied by real food company, to a formula retail and restaurant use, doing business as shake shack, a gym use doing business as rumble fitness, and a specialty use doing business as sup app. since the departure of the real foods in 2016, the subject property has remained have a can't and both the -- vacant and both the current owner and property manager have made attempts to lease it out without success. a third party analysis made by the project sponsor concludes due to a number of factors, it is not economically feasible for a grocery store use to operate at the property while at the same time providing the owner with an economical r

commissioners? commissioners pappas. >> commissioner pappas: maybe i missed it. is this independent of san francisco food bank or is it in conjunction? is there any relationship with the food bank? >> so, with the home delivery groceries, we will present the requested amount for modification and the san francisco food bank is one of them. they're actually our major player provider in getting this program operating because they're able to get a lot of the food donated from the different sources. >> commissioner pappas: thank you. >> president serina: commissioner loo. >> vice president loo: linda, i would like to get a copy of your summary. >> okay. do you not have the commission memo? >> vice president loo: you -- it's more detailed here. yours is brief. >> okay. we will be happy to. >> vice president loo: the other question i want to ask is do you have the average of the cost of the meals from the highest to the lowest both for the congregate and home delivery in i'm curious. i was going to do it myself but i didn't have the time. >> yes, we have that information