i will stop now for comment and questions. >> commissioner john's? i think your suggestions are really very good. i would just on your second suggested, i'm sorry your first suggested new policy to encourage the study of nrm -- energy use and so forth, i think studying it should been encouraged but also should say we should encourage the implementation. when we work with trying to revitalize the old minute, -- mint, by paying more attention to the building as was originally designed to work, we could save a vast fortune. i would say encourage the study of energy use for the projects throughout the city as a means of better understanding and implementing the environmental or and achieving. >> commissioner pearlman? >> i'm not quite clear on this one. because what commissioner john's talked about was a specific project. are you suggesting, i'm not sure -- encourage the study of use throughout the city, is that promise on going, historic projects on going, is that all projects. can you give me some background where this came from? >> yeah, our thought w

. >> [calling roll]: commissioner highland, commissioner john, commissioner matsuda and pearlman. >>> commissioners first on your agenda is general public comment. at this time the general public may address subject matter jurisdiction. with respect to agenda items your opportunity to address the commission already -- already afforded when the item is discussed in the meeting. i have no speaker cards. >> any member of the public wish to speak on items not on the agenda? yes. please come up to the podium. >> good afternoon. my name is bradley courthouse. -- krourz, disabled veteran, soccer player. i'm here today bringing up for the benefit of the city and good are the order at this time to request a new historical review assessment of candlestick park. the reason is we are seeking a nomination for candlestick park as a national landmark. candlestick park at this moment qualifies for registry into the national landmark historical registry and historical registry and national historical landmark. on that note and because of this reason, i'm before you for today in the benefit of the publ

because what commissioner john's talked about was a specific project. are you suggesting, i'm not sure -- encourage the study of use throughout the city, is that promise on going, historic projects on going, is that all projects. can you give me some background where this came from? >> yeah, our thought was to encourage the study of energy use for all projects, not just historic preservation related projects because you need a comparison. so both for new construction projects, adaptive reuse projects and for rehabilitation projects that meet the standards. it would be a broad approach. the idea for collection of a broader study. we weren't actually thinking of it in terms of individual project use but, energy audits are an important part of sustainable design and part of that methodology. so i will have to think more about the difference between that broader application and a more individual project application and if the policy should can address both. >> i had one other thing because in the next one encourage the use of sustainable materials etc. i th

. >> commissioners? johns? >> i don't know whether i should call her commission johnck but she has been teaching a class at the university of berkeley and the particular subject that was discussed when i attended out in the marshes, i guess was two weeks ago, where it was the history and the development and i guess that you could call it the restoration of the salt ponds. and that commission professor has written an extraordinarily interesting article on the history and the development of salt and salt production in the san francisco bay explains among other things the movers and shakers behind it. the historic events in alaska, and in nevada that precipitated the development of it. and so i suggest that if anybody is interested, they could perhaps ask the commissioner to send them a copy of the article. but it is just extraordinarily interesting. >> thank you. >> commissioners any other comments? disclosures sha that we need? >> i recently took my class on a field trip out there and it is a fascinating piece o

>> commissioner john? >> on seven, initially i thought it was probably best to expand 7.1 and eliminate 7.3. however, i have rethought that a little bit particular fully light of your comments. so i think it would be a good idea to have 7.1 focus on buildings and 7.3 focus as u suggested. then going, i think your suggested new policies 1 and 2 are good. as to the third one. that requires i think some analysis. i think it's a good idea to support educational efforts of public and private institutions dedicated to the collection of documents and artifacts. i would suggest after the word artifacts we insert the words in presenting programs. in the museum world collections of documents and artifacts is becoming somewhat pass ae museums no longer see themselves as collection of objects. now collected much more object stories presenting programs otherwise engaging people. there is less interest in going to a room of chip and dale furniture than there was in my grandparents day. then what we must revise to elimin

commissioner highland? >> yes. >> johnck, yes. >> johns, yes. >> matsuda. ye. yes. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz. >> yes. >> 7 to 0 and places on you item 9, 2014.0424 a. at 2319 webster street, request for a certificate of appropriateness. >> and good afternoon, commissioners before ally starts i wanted for take a moment to introduce you to ally, she is a planner on our northwest quadrant team and she was an intern working on all things preservation for some time in our office and we were delighted when she applied for a permanent position with our office and we were able to hold on to her and her great expertise. ally is a graduate of uc santa cruz with a degree of art history and when she came back she had recently graduated from colombia university preservation program, and so with that, so i welcome here to the pac and that is it. >> good afternoon, department staff, the item before you is a request for a certificate of appropriateness for the proposal of 2319 web ter street, located in the landmark district, the two story single family residence was construc

. >> commissioner john's? >> i think we should have this issue placed on the agenda to get the proper focus that it needs and there may be some folks in the p be who would have some suggestions or some observations about how this really should be accomplished. >> commissioner hyland? >> this is a question for staff. in your staff report you said the one fte that we requested had not been additional. >> that would have been in addition to that and we were hoping that was going to be dedicated. >> that's the question i keep asking. >> so there is one existing ft exterior wall that -- f te that has been budgeted for the last three 3 years. staff requested one additional fte that was granted and working on solely one dell nation. -- designation. we are working on our finance and admin team to find responsibilities around to achieve that without adding another person. i think at the september 17th hearing we'll be able to give you more concrete information on that. >> maybe that's where we can take it up. >> i do t

. >> [calling roll]: commissioner highland, commissioner john, commissioner matsuda and pear

commissioner johns >> move to approve. >> move to continue. >> sorry. on that motion to continue. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 7 to zero and places you under your consent calendar calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 2 case at 19 through 28 clyde street request for condominium conversion and next at 39 alamed billboard and case four at 499 laguna street request for kwufrgs third reading >> any public comment on the consent calendar seeing none. commissioner antonini >> move to approve items 2, 3, 4. >> second. >> on that motion to approve ail matters under content. commissioner antonini. commi

. >> commissioner johns? >> i so move that we adopt the staff's recommendation for approval with conditions. >> second. >> thank you, and before that one last comment, i will comment on the placing the gate in the retaining wall. it is all the way down at the end of the property at the edge, if it was in the middle it might be different. but we do this for garages quite often in very prominent and very high preservation status buildings and i think that this is a minor intrusion in that wall and so i am in support of that. we have a motion and a second. do we have comments? >> if we could call the roll. >> commissioners there is a motion and a second to approve the certificate of appropriateness with conditions, on that motion, commissioner highland? >> yes. >> johnck, yes. >> johns, yes. >> matsuda. ye. yes. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz. >> yes. >> 7 to 0 and places on you item 9, 2014.0424 a. at 2319 webster street, request for a certificate of appropriateness. >> and good afternoon, commissioners before all

. >> good afternoon, commissioners john from the yerba buena i apologize. i i was outside when i called my name i have good news. first, the settle time are our museum i

. >> good afternoon, commissioners john from the yerba buena i apologize. i i was outside when i called my name i have good news. first, the settle time are our museum is set for final approval this tuesday it provides the safety improvements we've requested and second since the eir hearing six or seven weeks ago we had an important discussion about exactly what the things it can be done and the city made it clear they want to move forward there's a technology cattle the biggest part is widening the east side of the effort sidewalks from howard to market there are a series bottleneck that can't be part of the moscone but picked up in the environmental clearance and should follow after that so this case we're definitely on the right track so thank you >> thank you. >> sue hester my office has on on market since 1980 i know when a conference is in town by the pedestrians on the street right in front of my belief i submitted comments on the eir and wanted to bring them to attention right now a couple of the of the years for multiple days howard street is close

(clapping.) >> good evening commissioner i'm john. i'm here representing the san francisco latino democratic club. we're here to state our full support for the resolution in its desirability and we thank for this step in the right direction >> okay. my turn? finally. good evening. commissioners. president fewer and commissioners you met with me over an hour in the month of june, i went to hindu demurs i called christina we've been meeting and in regards to thanking you especially commissioner haney for this resolution we completely support i have colleagues of mine from mission high school it's one the new comer pathway high schools. we all want to speak to the support for those children but how it will lookn