members of the new standing committee of the political bureau of the central committee will meet chinese and foreign reporters. the art of the 20th national party congress has opened a press center, which will organize press conferences and group interviews and make full use of the internet in one and other technologies to provide services for reporters and facilitate their reporting on the congress. shall now i will be happy to take questions from you regarding the 20th our national party congress. thank you. and that causes you weren't georgia. she jenkins ball burns lagossi. when you got the floor is now open for questions. please identify your media affiliation before asking the question. chin, don't shoot. chem hurt. so what's the, our way to let you sit here june. she had drunk on board and shoots on. patty did you wet that chanting drawer? don't walk on, come down to leave. i don't care about asia. she the means on sure with you. she sounds she i she did it wrong and she got say, i don't. why bab, you shan't shania didn't himself come? sure. which number one is out here? we're the

>> the january 6 committee's case against trump. >> this committee will demand a full accounting to every american of the event of january 6th. it is our obligation to seek donald trump's testimony. >> in a historic move, the january 6 committee votes to subpoena former president trump. >> everybody on the floor is putting on the gas masks to prepare for a breach. >> releases dramatic, never before seen video. >> stunned by violence. and stunned by the president's apparent indifference to the violence. >> and reveals testimony about trump's actions in the days surrounding the attack. >> any future president inclined to attempt what donald trump did in 2020 has now learned not to install people who could stand in the way. >> the committee sounded the alarm on ongoing threats to american democracy. next. >> this is washington week. corporate funding is provided by. >> for 25 years, consumer cellular's goal has been to provide wireless service to help people communicate and connect. we offer a variety of no contract plans and a customer team can help find one to fit you. visit consumer cellu

the think is a partisan committee — committee. the think is a partisan committee. our— committee.rce the existing - isjust reinforce the existing narrative _ isjust reinforce the existing narrative and _ isjust reinforce the existing narrative and that _ isjust reinforce the existing narrative and that blunt - isjust reinforce the existing narrative and that blunt of i isjust reinforce the existing. narrative and that blunt of all isjust reinforce the existing - narrative and that blunt of all the impact _ narrative and that blunt of all the impact this— narrative and that blunt of all the impact this is— narrative and that blunt of all the impact this is going _ narrative and that blunt of all the impact this is going to— narrative and that blunt of all the impact this is going to have. - impact this is going to have. it comes— impact this is going to have. it comes to _ impact this is going to have. it comes to going _ impact this is going to have. it comes to going to _ impact this is going to have. it comes to going to have - impact this is going to have. it comes to going to

in the area of intelligence sharing with committees it goes beyond the intelligence committee -- to some extent, information is treated as not shared. and we are in a -- we have to move fast. and you cannot do that if you are siloing information. in your experience, you have seen congressman debates going on and you think this person does not have the full picture is that a danger? >> it is a danger i can only remember one instance where members of the armed services committee came in to listen to what was being said they are. i know there is always a time crunch every day a full schedule however, some cross-pollination of this information is important because we are in a nation competition now we cannot just focus on our division of silos. and let me put one other thing on the table if i can at the risk of being hopefully constructively controversial. i think in terms of goals you mentioned the intelligence community -- community and you mentioned -- methodology and i think we need to figure out how to counter foreign disinformation more constructively. i think it will be one of the har

i think the committee itself is not sure. they are billing this hearing today as the final investigative hearing. we will certainly get another hearing around the report and as the recommendations the committee will make to try to make recommendations about how to prevent another january 6 from happening. but, members and at council on the committee are treating this hearing as the final investigative one where they will show new things they have uncovered, new pieces of information, new evidence that appears to connect donald trump to january 6. host: what new threats are revelations or you expecting today? we have had so many questions about the documentary that follows roger stone, ginni thomas, the wife of supreme court justice clarence thomas. what do you think could be news we hear later today? guest: the committee said yesterday, and in my reporting over the previous weeks, they want to step back and take a wider look at threats to democracy as a whole in today's hearing. they want to chart how a lot of the ideas and s

so this shows that the committee is really powerful in that sense. all right, that is t w's carrying that she boy in washington dc. now nigeria is face the one of the worst floods in decades. heavy rains have led to the lago damn to overflow into neighboring cameroon. a number of state in the country south east is one of the most affected. millions of people have been displaced to w flourish to cora. has this report? ah, this is what the rainy season usually looks like and i'm rusty's in se elijah and this is what the same community looks like now. swollen rivas, have inundated numerous towels and villages across nigeria, cause in 1400000 people to flee their homes for camps set up on higher ground. 27 out of 36 states have been affected. and ambrose, these is one of the, was heaped. one 3rd of the state is now on the water. we are suffering, but suffering is better than stealing. that's why we are here in this condition. the close that i'm wearing at the only ones i have left, the flood carried away all our belongings. lujan, all our schools have be

is a political committee.re are not any republicans that were approved by the leadership of the republicans in the house. and so therefore there is no legitimate, legislative purpose for this committee. obviously they've lost that argument a couple times. but here the committee goes ahead and points it out once more just in case this goes before a different judge and then they say as likely obvious from the topics identified, we are considering multiple legislative recommendations intended to provide further assurance that no future president could succeed at anything even remotely similar to the unlawful steps you took. this is them prebutting what they expect the former president and his legal team to go big on, which is that this is a political committee that has no real purpose. >> we'll be watching for that response, elie honig, gloria borger, evan president, thank you. >>> some of the documents recovered from donald trump's mar-a-lago estate include highly sensitive intelligence regarding china and iran

well, we can see that the committee is far a far more, more than just this, a special committee on the attack on the capital in january 6. and they have the power to refer specific cases. so the justice department and these cases and the, the person accused in a case like that by the committee might even end up in jail as we have as seen today in the case of c panel. so this shows that the committee is really powerful in that sense. all right, that is t w's carrying that she boy in washington, d. c. let's take a look at the mother stories making years around the world. abraham torrie has been sworn in as booking of fossils, interim president, he had a 2nd coup in the country in less than a year caresses. his main task is to fight t hottest insurgence. an election is planned for 2024. the un security council has adopted a resolution demanding an end to violence in haiti. sanctions are being imposed on a gang leader whose group has been blockading the islands main oil terminal. 2 weeks ago. haiti's prime minister appealed for international help in dealing with the crisis. britton's conse

we will have to wait and see how the committee had suspect, let's clear is that the committee and dojarate tracks on pat. >> joy, so we don't actually know what the investigation is looking like when it comes to the doj's january six investigation. someone i spoke to an air yesterday said that when it comes to accountability, there might be recent believe that if there is more there when it comes to the dialogue documents, it may be a choice of moving forward with that first kind of any criminal liability with january 6th considering all that we've learned so far with the documents you sent mar-a-lago. >> the problem the doj ultimately face here is that the mar-a-lago prosecution maybe v. sphere one. it is simple, or more of a straight line. the evidence is relatively easy to compile. as opposed to the fact that january 6th is still the sort of gelatinous mass. it's not entirely clear whether there was linkage between the former president and some other groups like the oath keepers and the proud boys. doj we know the answer to that. we haven't really seen that clarified in public. but

knowledge of the committee, suggested the committee was not pursuing evidence aggressively enough. wrotemitt spokesperson, the committee has run down the leads, digested, analyzed the information that arose from his work. guest: i think there is a typo. i am just kidding. i think when you see something like that, i think they were worried. i have been doing this type of work well before january 6, a lot longer than anybody on the committee. i started to do it afterwards because people who continue this analytical work. my knowledge of this goes beyond what the committee even has. our technical teams are still supporting it. the teams i have built. when you look at millions of lines of data, that is not something that is possible by these investigators. you have to have a unique set of skills or teams we had that are experts in -- and open source intelligence. i thought the committee did a great job. i do not care about the political backroom washington stuff, people seem to know i have a problem sometimes with -- i do not want to say authority, but i have a problem with not being a

ron na mcdaniel, chair of the republican national committee testified before this committee that presidentarse the process of casting their fake votes. >> when i received the call, again, i don't remember the exact date, it was from the white house switchboard, and it was president trump who had contacted me. >> and did president trump have anyone else on the line with him? >> he introduced me to a gentleman named john eastman, so i vaguely remember him mentioning that he was a professor and then essentially he turned the call over to mr. eastman who then proceeded to talk about the importance of the rnc helping the campaign gather these contingent electors in case any of the legal challenges that were ongoing changed the result of any of the dates. >> these fake electors were ultimately part of the president's plan to replace genuine biden electors with trump electors on january 6th. as part of this plan, the false electoral slates were sent to the national archives and to the capitol. the fake electors plan was also tied to another plan, the coercive pressure campaign to make vice presid

our committee's report documented. made it public but donald trump knew from sources, the justice department's own investigations and his own campaign. donald trump maliciously repeated the nonsense to a wide audience over and over again. his intent was to deceive. president trump's plan involved trying to course government officials to change the election outcome in the states he lost. he reached out to numerous state officials and pressured them to take unlawful steps to alter the election results in those states. his actions, taken directly by the resident himself, made it clear what his -- president himself, made it clear what his intentions were to prevent a orderly transformation of power. at the time this call occurred, president trump had already been told repeatedly by the u.s. apartment, by his campaign and advisors that his allegation of fraud in georgia room fraud. -- george were fraud. >> i just want to find 11,780 v otes. we will have more and more. i only need 11,000 votes. i need 11,000 votes. give me a

this committee was created.were assigned a bunch of topics and then there were some things that we decide to work on that we weren't assigned. the approach we took started with five chairman graves, very different than what most committees in congress have done. in that we decided what happens when you first of this committee is that they get there for half the money, democratic uses their money to hire people and put on blue jerseys. relatives hire people who cannot read jerseys. the spending of the time fighting with each other. i approached -- before it kicked up and i said, crazy idea, which we don't do that? what if we just collectively hire one staff, some can be republicans, some can be democrats. both hired institutions. he said great, let's do it. to their credit he said, bracelets keep doing it. if you watch one of our committing hearings on c-span, you probably have too much time on your hands. if you watch one of our hearings on c-span, you will notice a few things. we function very differently. we d

for the committee and trump. for trump a disadvantage is he could say something not true while he's under oath since he says things that are not true under oath all the time when he's not under oath. the advantage for trump he could get his side on the record, something he's been complaining about for a long time, this is a one-sided committee, why aren't they showing the evidence, as he puts it, of what he has alleged without evidence that he's provided, is widespread fraud. that would be aver an advantage for him. for the committee, an advantage would be get him on the record and ask him questions which they clearly wanted to do, even acknowledging he is not somebody who is forthcoming or honest about what he has done himself. the down side for the committee is the risk that donald trump turns this into a spectacle, and i'm not sure they want that. >> you said he's worked up about other legal fronts right now. he is looking toward a deposition here coming up very soon in another case. >> yep. that's right. he i

at how damaging _ committee, are nil. at how damaging do _ committee, are nil.il. at how damaging do you think- committee, are nil. at how damaging do you think it i committee, are nil. at how damaging do you think it isj damaging do you think it is that we have had on tape steve bannon and roger stone openly talking about stealing the election before the votes are even counted?— election before the votes are even counted? when you think about who _ even counted? when you think about who they _ even counted? when you think about who they are _ even counted? when you think about who they are in - even counted? when you think about who they are in the - even counted? when you think. about who they are in the trump orbit, steve bannon... i think those are the two most influential political advisers. stone, his long—time and bend his long—time strategist in his current term. it is pretty damning and in particular it puts the lie to his emphatic insistence to this day that he is somehow won. he had obviously decided this in advance, that win or lose, he would declare

we shall clearly see that the committee is far more than just a special committee on the attack on the capital and generally seeks. they have the power indeed to refer specific cases to the justice department and this cases and the accused people there might indeed as we have seen today, and i've been in jail. and so that is, i think, the very clear message that we can learn from, from today to w corresponding colina tomorrow in washington. thanks currently. 3rd is a nigeria or a warning of the looming hunger crisis. the worst flooding for a decade has killed at least 600 people and left more than a 1000000 homeless. even before the floods head, the government was battling high inflation and food shortages and the un warren of catastrophic levels of hunger. this is what the rainy season usually looks like in an umbrella. these in southeastern nigeria. and this is what the same community looks like. now. swollen rivas, have in on they said numerous house on villages across nigeria cause in 1400000 people to flee their homes for camps set up on higher ground. 27 out of 3060 have been aff

those are serious and real questions that this committee, committee refuses to even ask. >> jim banks just raised some very serious questions that should be answered by the january six commission. but they are not. >> but those implications are absolutely false! and steve calais, out of all people should have known better! because look on your screen, right, there that is him! on the left -- right next to nancy pelosi, as she was desperately calling for help on january six. with that, let's get smarter with the help of our lead off panel tonight! jackie alameda, who has pretty much worked for 20 hours today. investigation reporter for the washington post and an msnbc contributor. so is peter baker, chief white house correspondent, -- new york times, and coauthor of the new book, the divider. katie benner joins us, pulitzer prize-winning justice department reporter for the new york times. and daniel goldman's here, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york, he also served as general counsel for the house intelligence committee, during the first trump impeachm

>> i think the committee wants it to be a warning. other thing is senz a message about is you can't get these subpoenas and not make an effort to engage at all. we saw other witnesses like dan scavino, mark meadows who had more engagement with the committee behind the scenes and ultimately the justice department decided not to pursue criminal contempt charges against either of those men. i think what they saw with steve bannon is an effort someone who didn't pull documents together or make an effort to negotiate much of a date for his testimony. just decided he was covered by executive privilege and that didn't fly with the committee, it didn't fly with the jury and now he's facing a sentence. so, i do think they want to send a signal you can't sort of ignore this. >> you know, preet, what is the trump attorney's response we just learned accusing the select committee of flouting norms, what does that say about how aggressively trump could actually fight this? >> he fights everything very aggressively. i smile for a moment because the

we did something on our committee. we started our planning retreat with three hours in which we brought in someone with expertise in conflict resolution and we just talked about it. we had an honest conversation about it which frankly i don't think has happened anywhere else in the united states house but it happened in our committee. at the start of this congress i sat down with everyone of the committee members and of the 11, 8 mentioned i am worried about how january 6 is going to play into the work of our committee but three years from now when you can agree on what to have dinner gets thrown back in your face. so i thought it was important that we should just have a conversation is a committee about it. so that brings me to the general point. i think we have to get better as a country about having to conversations about things that we don't have full agreement on. i had two things happen earlier that have last fall. and into the winter. first in my district, unfortunately there was an attack on a religious institu

we need answers from this committee. we need answers from the heads of the law enforcement agencies. why is it that the head of the fbi's washington field office right after january 6 said, infamously, we didn't have intelligence indicating violence was potential. yes, they did. in fact, it looks like they all did. we need to know why. i continue to have concerns about the safety of vice president pence, even more so here. why knowing what they knew, why wasn't there an enhanced detail on the vice president that day? let's go larger in terms of future recommendations from the committee. why wasn't the electoral college ratification designated a national security super event? why didn't we do it to prepet ate our democracy? lots of questions. >> i imagine we will from now until the end of time. let me show you the testimony from adam schiff. let's listen. >> on january 5th, a secret service open source unit flagged a social media account on the donald.win that threatened to bring a sniper rifle to a rally on january 6. th

because the committee is a total bust. that has only served to further divide our country which by the way is doing very badly. a laughing stock all over the world." it's important to note too, wolf, that he has directed, trump has, some of his aides not to cooperate with his committee. the committee also indicates they would investigate potential allegations of obstruction to deny some witness testimony before the panel. >> manu raju up on capitol hill. thank you very much. let's discuss all of this with our senior justice correspondent evan perez, cnn chief national affairs analyst kasie hunt, defens defense attorney shan wu and our chief political analyst gloriaberger. what is the message the committee is sending with this unanimous vote to subpoena former president trump? >> i think part of it is theatrical. i don't think any of them expect the president's going to comply with any kind of subpoena. and that would involve a lot of court action, et cetera. but i think there was also a clear message to the american public

and remember, the committee has laid out what some committee members have argued to have been violations of the criminal code. violations of statutes, rather, by the former president and by others. and so i do expect that there could be a referral. i just don't know exactly what form that takes or when. or with the sort of vote on this committee looks like. >> tally, that is still take as a journalist. i want to take your tate as the prosecutor. is a criminal referral likely? and could you give us a sense of what the prosecution would look like in a case like this. >> my take as a prosecutor, alicia, is that it does not really matter whether or not the committee makes a credible -- criminal referral. just a realistic matter, this entire proceeding, all of these hearings have been a criminal referral. they've collected lots of information that points towards criminal prosecution. and i think it's made a lot of progress on some of the harder aspects of prosecution. -- were so many miles away from where we were around january 6th and win this committee started to get going. when we used to

stone testifying before our committee. [video clip] >> did you speak to president trump on his private cell phone on january 6 or january 5? >> i assert my fifth amendment right to respectfully decline to answer your question. >> this is general plan walking with oath keepers in december of 2020. [video clip] >> did you talk to president trump at any point on january 6, 2021? >> here is john eastman, fraudulently instructing tens of thousands of angry protesters that the vice president could change the election outcome on january 6. later the same day, dr. eastman acknowledged in writing that donald trump knew that what he was attempting was illegal. here is john eastman testifying before our committee. [video clip] >> did president trump authorize you to discuss your january conversation with him? do you have an agreement with the president of the united states that you will not have discussions with this committee? >> plead the fifth. >> here is jeff clark, who conspired to corrupt the department of justice. as you can s

we saw the committee vote live on tv today. can the committee do this on its own? work out and at what point does it eventually end up in court? >> yeah, well, the committee will go through the house of representatives, and then we have the right to issue the subpoena, as we have done for lots of other people, like scavino and navarro and steve bannon. steve bannon, of course, has been criminally convicted on contempt of congress for just blowing off the subpoena. i don't recommend that to the former president or the moms and dads of the country, if your kid gets a subpoena, that is something that you can't just hide under the couch, you know. that's something that you have to respond to. so, look, we have every reason to believe that he will come forward the way that the vast majority of patriotic americans come forward. if he doesn't, well, that creates a different set of problems. we don't have a lot of time to act on it, but there are criminal ways of enforcing criminal subpoenas. there are several ways of enforcing subpoenas, and then also, we have the inheren

center committee. and i was elected to continue as the general secretary of the center committee just now of c p. c. the central committee held is 1st plenary session and they elected the new central leadership. i was re elected as the general secretary of the c p. c. central committee sion there now and that that i want to introduce you. other 6 members of the standing committee members and my 6th colleagues who have also been elected to the political bureau standing committee. these younger, mr. cameron with the john lee chung charlotte dillinger. com rate. joe la g a t y, honing tom j. com rate a one call knew you. had heard from blue. comrey. said she he thing his younger comet kings. sure. chung. the sheet on trip comrade lee. she b family away. the toner, 6 out of 6 of the members here. miss comrey toyota, dollar g, and the comment to me while honing while members night things. diana put co bureau of the standing committee, others of comrades, charla g politico bureau, members of a 19 session fun

we have the january 6th committee. we've been watching, we have the state of georgia, fulton county, georgia, going after the president. this is an enormous gang-up going on right now. i think the january 6th committee has made its point. they made its point all summer. the point being that so many of the rioters of the capitol came there at the behest of donald trump. they thought they were doing what trump wanted them to do and trump approved of what they did. so it's been pretty clear what the story is. one last thing on the subpoena though. andy pointed out a lot of the procedural defenses that trump would have. but look at how this committee has used witnesses. they have never put anybody on live when they didn't know exactly what was going to happen. they call witnesses, they do video taped depositions with them. in very few cases, they have called a witness before a live hearing to repeat to the committee a few excerpts of what they already said on tape. the idea of a live witness is foreign. it's not part of th

committee. >> those in favor will say aye. >> aye. >> reporter: unanimously voting to subpoena former president trump for testimony and documents after the hearing and continuing to make their case that trump is a clear and present danger to democracy. >> the central cause of january 6th was one man, donald trump, who many others followed. none of this would have happened without him. >> reporter: the committee unfailed never-before-seen footage of house speaker nancy pelosi scrambling to safety as protesters breached the capitol. in the hours that followed, anger and disbelief from pelosi and senate majority leader chuck schumer. >> they're putting on their teargas masks. >> i'm going to call the f'ing secretary of dmv. >> they're breaking windows, doing all kinds -- they said somebody was shot. it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the united states. >> why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capitol, mr. attorney general, in your law enforcement

they're going to go back to the whole illegitimacy of this committee, this committee is the worst.en any more. and this were two fake republicans on it. as a cheney and kinzinger republican, i have to be honest, i don't think these republicans can work their way out of the box. >> thank you guys so much for the conversation. i want to make two programming notes. watch abby phillip on "inside politics" sunday morning at 8:00 a.m. eastern. and here in just a few hours, senator bernie sanders, in primetime, he'll be talking midterms and more on "cnn tonight" with jake tapper at 9:00 eastern. >>> so next, hear from one of the three jurors who voted against the death penalty in the parkland massacre, and why she says the day of deliberations was one of the worst days of her life. (terry) [coughing] -excuse me. (ray) if it's under 20 degrees out, i can't go outside my house because it feels like i'm inhaling broken glass. (ted koppel) 30 million americans have copd, half don't yet know it. (bill) when the doctor told me you have copd...what's that? (ted koppel) people struggling with cop

clark testifying before our committee. >> mr. car, when did you first talk directly with president trump? >> the fifth. >> did you discuss with president trump allegations of fraud? >> fifth. >> other witnesses have gone to a lengths to avoid testifying. has been tried and convicted for contempt of congress. he is scheduled to be sentenced for this crime letter this month. criminal proceedings regarding peter navarro continue. mark meadows, donald trump's former chief of staff, has refused to testify based upon executive privilege. the committees litigation with him continues. mr. chairman, the department of justice may well honor the fact that these and other witnesses are currently, but our duty today is to our country and our children and our constitution. we are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who set this all in motion. and every american is entitled to those answers so we can act now to protect our republic. so this afternoon, i am offering this resolution that the committee direct the chairman to issue a su

therefore, it may be that the onus is on the committee.trump to show up, it is not enough for him to default. you have to actively go after him. trump's lawyers are going to be looking at that within -- >> okay. one more quick question with a preview of what happens tomorrow. trump organization isn't going trial for the large tax crimes in the u.s. supreme court. when you're on the lookout for? >> i am on the look at for how long george elections going to take, first of all. i've been advised by sources close to the investigation that the story's election is not going to be an ordinary jury selection. both sides are going to be looked at very closely, can judges be impartial here? this is a situation where particularly in new york state and new york city, folks do not to donald trump out. not so easily. they're gonna be looking for impartial jurors which will take a while. the thing i'm looking at, alex, is weisselberg's testimony. he doesn't have a lot of room here to avoid -- he has no remit. all he's already pled guilty and one this ste

committee and public safety minister marco testifies before the house of commons standing committee of public safety. this discussion includes steps taken to stop trafficking at the border and strengthening red flag laws. -- this runs one hour. >> i call this meeting to order. welcome, everyone to meeting 36 of the house of commons standing committee on safety and national security. we are meeting on the traditional territory of the algonquin cape. today's meeting is in a hybrid performance -- format. members are attending in person and remotely using the zoom application. the second hour to answer questions from members. i welcome you all and i now invite mr. mendicino to make an opening statement. >> thank you, mr. chair. , i'd like to thank the members of the committee with the good work they have done with respect to bill c-21. i am accompanied by my team from the stewart, the deputy minister, and others. we have chief deputy commissioner kelly larkin and the commissioner. >> the scourge of gun violence which has been impacting our country for many years. signaled to this committee

so the committee is trying to get things done here as fast. and as soon as possible, and for them, it's a race against the time. and how likely is from to cooperative it's very unlikely or a he law that will mean he would testify on november 14th and give the committee the documents they are asking for november 4th, that means in 2 weeks from now at the same time as you know, and as you mentioned, that the committee has collected overwhelming evidence including from a former staff and appointees of donald trump, which means that donald trump would be confronted with this evidence during the hearing term would have is his back against the wall then. and the other option he has is that his legal team can try and negotiate with the committee, trying to submit some of the documents, but not all of them. and his legal team will, of course, try to keep him out of testifying and 1st place. but the committee will probably not engage into any kind of negotiation. and the 3rd and last option donald trump has, is he could refuse and say he's not going to

or we can see that the committee is far a far more, more than just this special committee on the attack on the capital in january 6. and they have the power to refer specific cases. so the justice department and these cases and the person accused in a case like that by the committee, might even end up in jail as we have as seen today in the case of c panel. so this shows that the committee, it's really powerful in that sense. all right, that is t w's carrying that she boy in washington dc. well, idea is facing one of the worst floods in decades. heavy rains have led to the largo down to overflow in neighboring cameroon. a number of states in the countries, se is one of the most affected. millions of people have been displaced to dublin fourish to cora reports. this is what the rainy season usually looks like in a number of these in southeastern nigeria. and this is what the scene community looks like now. swollen weavers have inundated numerous towels and villages across nigeria cause in 1400000 people to flee their homes for camps set up on higher ground. 27 out of 3060 happy and affec

and even the central committee in march 1944, the secretary of the central committee of the communistlic a in khimovich noted in the name of the central committee of the vkpb . calls were sent through the regional committees of the all-union communist party of bolsheviks and the land authorities with a request to send specialists to our disposal, and only 246 people who were credited for 850 arrived, and specialists from the saratov region are especially bad regions, where there are still 43 people, penza 26 gorky and chkalovskaya 28 people, we ask you to give instructions on whom to the party to speed up from sending agricultural specialists to our disposal. but there were no complaints, people worked selflessly in the hope of reviving, the village to help the army and the country, the republic was raised by the heroism of the people, as kirill mazurov later recalled this period, the first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of the republic, the leadership did everything to support the peasants in those difficult conditions various loans for farms subsidies from

well, something starts to depend on you when you are a member of the central committee.e also a member of the central committee. the membership is a comrade. it will be up to us, the central committee, to decide. they will take you by the arms and take you out, and it is not known where and what they will take you to. i think they brought you home in zletav, i hope. and they may not bring you home. you are there, but considering that our comrade is a great anti-corruption fighter, you know that all these authoritarian populists are fighters. with corruption, because for them the fight against corruption is the opportunity to shoot all the assets, they don't like it because the party nomenclature is all corrupt, as a rule, you just choose someone, someone today, this person will be shot tomorrow, this person you calmly steal and all the beautiful life is cloudless, but it is cloudy for us because we are close to these countries and because we have a lot of people in our country who do not even understand the danger of china and the fact that the chinese, unlike the russia

but beyond that, and the committee has awarded the relevance of civil society. and that goes beyond the 3 countries, the shrinking space for critical voices inside countries all over the world. no matter what an author crises, or in democracies, and therefore disintegrate the message. and how, how significant is it that the committee has decided to a jointly award those 3? well, in that sense, it's also sends a message to whatever the solution will come and it has to come sooner or later to then put things war in ukraine. the future has to be something that links together better space for living with their live liberties in all 3 countries. and that therefore there are declined and in whatever it has to come next. what do you make of the fact that the, the chair of the norwegian nobel committee speaking just a moment ago, she was asked a question by journalists and she responded by saying we give a prize to someone not against someone i think that's, that's, that's very relevant. it's frequent that some regimes if somebody living under a regime authoritarian in

we've seen it if four times already with this committee. steve bannon was charged and convicted, being sentenced next week. peter navarro, his trial is next month. doj elected not to charge mark meadows and dan scavino. so the doj will have to make a difficult decision on what to do about donald trump if the committee decides to pursue this. >> what is the work of the committee now? >> they'll be issuing a written report. the question is whether they'll show the world a draft of that before the midterms. we'll see it soon. it will be part of the historical record. will they legislate? they said our purpose here is to look at legislation. they're looking for reforms to the electoral count act, the way we count votes. and finally will the committee make a larger criminal referral for the january 6th coup attempt over to doj. it has no legal significance but it would up the pressure on doj to take action here. >> we'll be watching for that, eli, thank you. >> thank you. >>> we'll speak with the documentary team that followed roger stone for mo

november 4th and to come in and sit for a deposition with committee staff and some members of the committee on november 14th. and they say that the former president of course was at the center of a historic effort to overturn the 2020 election. in justifying this subpoena, they point out, and i'll read you a part of the letter sent by the chairman and the two chairs of the committee. they say in part, you're at the center of the first and only effort by any u.s. president to overturn an election that would obstruct the peaceful transition of power culminating in a bloody attack on our own capitol. they're asking for a broad range of documents. i'll read you part of the list. they say they want any calls and any calls that were made by or directed by him on january 6. they're asking for records of calls to members of congress. records related to the proud boys and the oath keepers. communications that were looking to block certification of the 2020 election. communications about mike pence and of course anything related to the destruction of materials. and as part of these communications, on

we made a very conscious choice as a committee, at the beginning of each congress, our committee hasbipartisan planning retreat. we actually brought in somebody from the library of congress in each instance to talk about the history of these reform committees. i listen to these historians talk about, well, in the failed efforts of this year. you're, like i don't want to be one of those. and one of the key takeaways with committees that had the most success, they really focused on implementation. as an example, let me give an example of some of the things we've gotten across the finish line. certainly most of the former members of congress will agree, a lot of the success and progress made in the institutions is a consequence of the capacity of staff. we really rely on having capable people who are able to solve problems for the american people. and you have the institution really struggling to recruit and retain and have diverse staff. so, among the recommendations that we've made, there's been one, to boost capacity, make sure we're doing a better job of providing adequate compensat

do you believe that the committee accomplished what it needed to do? >> i think the committee did a spectacular job of informing both itself and the american people up a grave ongoing danger to the survival of democracy. this final hearing made even clear than the early ones did. day-by-day, detail by detail, how the former president of the united states in engaged in a premeditated plot to seize the election regardless of the outcome. he made clear and his accolades people like roger stone, steve bannon made clear. the committee enabled the american people to hear how they made clear that they were planning and plotting that no matter what the votes were the president, because he knew that the way votes come in, you look like he was doing well on election evening would proclaim himself the winner and then when future votes came in, the ones that have been cast on time but hadn't been counted yet he would say it's all phony and that was the plan. it was the plan that under the federal statutes is a seditious conspiracy and the committee made it clear t

stone testifying before our committee. did you speak to president trump on his cell phone on january 6 or generally fifth. >> once up and i will assert my fifth amendment right to decline to answer question. this is general michael flynn walking with old keepers on december 12 2020. here is general flynn's testimony before our committee. >> you general flynn talked to president trump at any point on january 6, 2021? >> here's john eastman fraudulently instructing angry protesters at the vice president could change the election outcome on january 6. later on the same day dr. eastman acknowleed in writing that donald trump knew what he was attempting was illegal. here he is testifying before the committee. >> president trump authorize you to discuss publicly the january 6, 2021 conversation. so direct conversation you had with the president the ad states, you will not discuss those same conversations with this committee. >> yes. >> here is jeff clark who conspired with donald trump to corrupt the department of justice. presi

pursuant too the order of the committee of today, the chair declares the committee in recess for a periodith that recess, nbc news can now report that the january 6th committee plans to vote to subpoena former president donald trump during today's hearing. sources familiar with the committee's plans tell nbc news, with members wanting to put this historic move on the public record, despite multiple members previously acknowledging how difficult or even unlikely it would be for the former president to comply, and this subpoena would expire with the current congress. this has been noticed to the speaker of the house, speaker pelosi has been notified of it. it would not be unprecedented. we understand that, from our former correspondent pete williams, writing notes to this effect, that thomas jefferson, richard nixon and bill clint written all subpoenaed by congress. jefferson refused to comply on documents. nixon with the tapes resigned instead. and bill clinton agreed to testify from the subpoena. but this would be an extraordinary step. and there has been a lot of other testimony today th

did eastman testifying before our committee-— eastman testifying before our committee. , , , committee so. and here is mr clark testifying for our committee. when did ou testifying for our committee. when did you first — testifying for our committee. when did you first talk— testifying for our committee. when did you first talk directly _ testifying for our committee. when did you first talk directly with - did you first talk directly with president trump?— did you first talk directly with president trump? fiith. did you president trump? fifth. did you discuss with _ president trump? fifth. did you discuss with president _ president trump? fifth. did you discuss with president trump allegations of fraud in the 2020 election?- other - allegations of fraud in the 2020 election? fiith. otheranswers have election? fifth. other answers have also one election? fifth. other answers have also gone to — election? fifth. other answers have also gone to a _ election? fifth. other answers have also gone to a normal— election? fifth. otheranswers have also gone to a normal slings to avoid testifyin