either rahami or tymoshenko from removing nestor shufrych from the post of chairman of the committee on freedom of speech, it is their full political responsibility or rather irresponsibility that he still holds this position during a full-scale war, it is voted by the verkhovna rada and the constitution is of no use here , and we have seen the draft law of the cabinet of ministers that proposes to deprive the mandates of deputies of local councils and there are several alternative draft laws, so they too they do not quickly consider that is, where the issue does not concern the constitution and it is possible to really work in the legal field and develop legislative mechanisms so that some progress can be made. well, the legislators do not they are in a hurry to do this, thank you very much for clarifying more. thank you for your comments. iryna fedoriv, ​​the editor-in-chief of the website of the movement, was with us, honestly, about why the deputies do not want to get rid of the deputies of pro-russian parties in the verkhovna rada of ukraine. let them get rid of what happened in the world of sports

revocation of citizenship mandates is being resolved, what is in the committees they are still working, we are not just working the committee yes shufrych i am the head of the committee on freedom of speechthe ukrainian parliament for the 11th month of the great war this yes, shufrych today speaks several times to the verkhovna rada, he tells us about european integration, some other menu. excuse me, i understand that it is politically quite comfortable that now the expszh votes there when necessary but fedir not somewhere to lie when we have a consensus when we really vote sorry on which one

of the state power committee under the eye, she headed the budget committee, some deputies changed the committee, but the question of shufrych and the fact that he heads the committee on freedom of speech is not raised at all, for example, i do not understand how they can pro-russian deputies to hold leadership positions in the ukrainian parliament, that is, if you are the policy of the authorities, while we are working out a mechanism as a legal way to deprive these deputies of their mandates. we should use those tools that allow us to limit the influence of pro-russian forces on ukrainian politics. according to a national poll according to which only 3% of ukrainians are ready to give these deputies a chance to serve until the end of their term, the rest are demanding or early deprivation of mandates lustration or the right to limit the right to take place again, i.e., in general, almost 40% of ukrainians demand active actions to cause the termination of the limited termination of the powers of deputies from the russian parties , there is a high public demand for this, but the ukrainian parliament does not work in the 10 months of the war, and accordingly the appeals initiated part o

as the head of the committee on freedom of speech, this is just some kind of bullying or some kind oftanding, one of two things, but and this and that need to be corrected somehow, it's already been almost a year since the war. that's enough to have such a defender of freedom of speech in the parliament , you know, it's enough even under yanukovych, they didn't do that just ms. venetsia, you can not answer the rhetorical question. glad to have it set the agenda, but i suggest suggest the next plenary session, we will thank you, you need to elect me first as the head of some committee and then i will be on the conciliation council, i will be able to propose what thank you, ms. oleni, in fact, for taking the time to talk with us ms. inno, thank you very much as well that's how we try to give the floor to various deputies on our airwaves, the rada tv channel for 120 million does not cope with its task, it's similar to the first one well, but this is yes, we are all here on the same information on the front eh so we are trying to hold that front, dear friends, air defense is already worki

deprivation of the mandates of collaborators of traitors, the second is to put on the agenda a resolution that a psg representative cannot head the committee on freedom of speech, he can only destroy freedom of speech, third, we demand that all laws that prohibit today, uh, the moscow kremlin priests, this is a challenge today and about which our soldiers at the front are telling you, this will be a normal agenda, not what is standing now

nestor shufrych, who today heads the committee on freedom of speech and the deputy secretaries of the committee, etc. that is, there are bridges, there are pedagogical ones, as the negotiators say, it’s very unpleasant to talk about it, but in wartime, when it comes to blood, political games continue, but isn’t it the time of political games and some pre-election campaigns when we have a war, well, i just know sometimes people say stop why are you now criticizing people who are close to power now is not the time, this is a war in our country, we should all be united, are these things in time ? very typical for the election campaign, for example, the same kyrylo tymoshenko, it turned out that he is the face of the year, i don't know what criteria he was selected for. but again, there was a story. the only news at this marathon is otar dovzhenko, a journalist and media critic. i noticed and took a screenshot even from the screen. where is kyril tymoshenko recognized as the face of the year? i don't know who else is on this list. if possible, show this photo so that i don't sound dumb .

law on lustration, which will not allow them to run for office in the future for us, for journalists. well, the presence of in the chair, more precisely, the head of the committee on freedom of speechshufrych and mr. mykola, i know that this issue was raised yesterday. include it in the agenda, was it supported, or not ? not only was the issue raised for the approval of the radius, even a draft resolution was signed on the recall of opposition representatives from all executive positions in various committees. oxymoron shufrych is the head of the committee for freedom of speech and i would like to say that yesterday during the voting in the hall, a voted decision was made, which was proposed by the preferential faction of the european solidarity and native gerashchenko, and the decision obliges the council to broadcast the meeting in the slot of the tv channel of the verkhovna rada, not only yesterday, but also the next session, which will be yesterday and the next day, when the verkhovna rada will hold its session. about the deprivation of the parliamentary mandates of the collaborators of the traitors who lost their citizenship, in addition to medvedchuk kuzmin, kokozik derkach,

positions in the parliamentary committees from nestor shufrych , who today heads the committee on freedom of speechputy secretaries of the committees , etc. that is, political games are taking place, political games are taking place, as the negotiators say, it is very unpleasant to talk about it, but in wartime when blood is being shed, political games continue, what is it, isn't it time for political games and pre-election campaigns of some companies when we have a war, well, i know sometimes people say stop why are you now criticizing people who are close to it's not the time for the authorities, it's a war in our country, we should all be united, or is it time for these things that are very characteristic of an election campaign, for example, it's the same kyrylo tymoshenko, it turned out that he is the face of the year, i don't know by what criteria he was selected but again there was a plot on this marathon the only news and

well, today is not a page. the head of the committee on freedom of speech, well, that is, we do not think that a person who represented the pro-russian camp throughout his political career today controls freedom of speech in ukraine, de facto this is unacceptable, but if we return to the visit of the director of the cia. indeed, i think that everyone noticed that this is the second visit, his first visit took place before the start of a full-scale invasion, and each of us can guess why exactly the director of the cia actually personally met with the president of ukraine and what he personally conveyed, we know that before the full-scale invasion, the director the cia demonstrated the plan possessed by the american intelligence of the invasion. and by the way, unfortunately, this plan fully corresponded to the actions of the russians that they committed on february 24, starting with the attempt to land an amphibious assault in gostomed and ending the directions of the main strikes, including on kyiv. therefore, i am convinced that the director of the cia did not just ride around like that.

we have a very important committee on freedom of speech, which is headed by a representative of the oppositione . of the opposition platform for the life of nestor shufrych, a person who can definitely be accused of treason, in order to remove him from this position, 226 votes are needed, why the party of the servant of the people, which has as many as 240 votes in the parliament, does not do this in 10 months, everything is finished, see for in order not only to remove mr. shufrych, but also to deprive us of dates, we need 226 more votes, when that's all, just a minute, i have another question for you, and these 226 votes must be voted in february. i urge mr. vyatrovych not to hide behind opzzh and write this and vote in february for stripped of mandates, then for sure we will not see that there is leverage in any committee , even we are the chairman of the committee. and yes , he will not even be a member of the committee, and then let the law enforcement agencies press him down, but the main task of these scum there should not be mandates in the session hall, they should not have them and t

committees of relevant people like shufrych. he even heads one of the committees for freedom of speech, what we are not working on this.t is, we are trying to deprive her of her mandates , meanwhile, the parliamentarians do not in any way push the story of their exclusion from the relevant committees, which is why this work is not carried out. well , in principle, it is very easy to do because quite recently, changes to the committees were made by a resolution of the verkhovna rada, and if they added there that nothing bad happened in the investigation, there was simply no desire for it and there was no need for it, because the same committee on state and local self-government, where the administration there, changed its head shuliak, in principle , shufrych could have been replaced in the same resolution, but for some reason this was not done, so the question arises, why is this happening and why is our majority tolerating it? accordingly , i think that the question of the so-called arif are like that of votes, because there are votes where everything happens literally right up against the border , they will vote, the

i think one of the reasons why you point out that people do not see how this psg is sitting there if frich, who continues to be the head of the committee on the state of freedom of speech and tells how he defended kyiv, well, they do not want to show this shame people, and that is one of the reasons why the rada is not being shown. i hope that we are the ones who decided it. however, i would like to say a few words. i have a simple experience. you said propan nazar, and i don’t know him. to be honest, there is still such an interesting rada on the tv channel. people volodymyr petrov and there are also such positive bloggers serhiy ivanov means this is a couple of them all petro ivanov er this is ivanov recently you told why it means petro well done and the fact is that in 2012 volodymyr petrov helped to join the verkhovna rada of ukraine ihor markov is still such a person, the party, the family, maybe someone else remembers him, we remember him well. maradona from odesa for a woman in 2007 was a person near the odesa administration only for the fact that a person was standing with a ukrainian flag who created russian television in odesa. who then fled to russia, and th

force, not only that, it is prohibited in the state of ukraine because they came to our committee based on the quota of this political force freedom of speechas already been mentioned once again that damned shufrych but nevertheless, he is nothing committee for freedom of speech according to the quota of political power well, to be honest, well, what other reforms are there, the peace party already has one, we already had one , the missile programs were closed, we all remember that well no, i'm talking about someone who has a short flash drive and doesn't have enough gigabytes or gigabytes on it, then we will remind you with the help of your tv channel with the help of other information resources that the eyes of freedom of speech have not been thrown out of our media space, they have not been thrown out of digital television, we have youtube, we have others resources we will fight equally against russian narratives in my country, all of them are good russians who flood our airwaves and generate propaganda narratives, they are not brought here with russia. nor have we even had our own home-dissolving pink ponies who talk about the twisting

committee. and i'm not talking about kevin. >> democrats say it's maga extremism. republicans say it's overdue oversight. >> freedom of press freedom of speech every one attacked in the last few years. >> committees are part of a one-two punch as republicans also roll out a series of bills to take on democratic spending. monday night in a party line vote, the house passed a bill to rescind $71 billion democrats sent to the irs to hire 87,000 new employees who republicans say will go after the middle class. >> they don't even know what. >> senate democrats say they will block the bill pointing to a congressional budget office survey which shows the legislation will actually reduce revenue by 185 billion and add 114 billion to the federal deficit over a 10-year period. >> it's absolutely absurd. what the republicans are doing, plain and simple, is helping their friends, the multi millionaires, the wealthy cooperations who pay no taxes from being audited. >> house republicans are ready for a fight. >> it goes both ways they can't ram a bunch of things down our throat like we can't to them. if we have to rock the boat to bring change i'm there for it. >> trace, there's a

nestor shufrich will be removed from the position of the head of the committee that is supposed to take care of freedom of speech, and so on. and when can we expect a final verdict of this or that, and what are the ways to achieve it? i am absolutely sure that it will happen when i think quickly enough today, by the way, shufrych and surkis were removed from the national olympic committee and that's all that they are for everything that they tried to catch gradually we squeeze them out and if there was no social consideration, if we had not introduced the resolution of the deprivation of mandates, i am the first author. my aryan colleagues are of the same opinion, the authors of the e-e resolution about taking away all the money from you , today there would be no decision about medvedchuk and the cossacks, and others with them, i am absolutely sure that there was no such thing the petition on the president's website that i submitted, which gained 25,000 votes in record time in 12 hours, was not included in these decisions , so friends, our task is to put pressure on, we need not only to defeat russia, we also need to go ab

with that we were complaining in that committee, i personally, stood on the floor and complained to democrats that they're violating all of our rights of freedom of speechng censoring of conservatives. we need to make sure we're not accused doing the same. there are legitimate concerns but that is not the way to address. these people have to be able to defend themselves and make their case. they would have to make a decision. neil: congresswoman, thank you very much. you speak your mind very eloquently. victoria spartz, indiana congresswoman who separated herself from kevin mccarthy and others in republican leadership in the house ostracizing democratic members even though she finds them equally repelling, this tit-for-tat is counterproductive. meantime, tesla owners on fire, not because their vehicles are on fire, new buyers were getting big cuts in prices and they never were. they're letting it be known after this. ♪ at adp, we use data-driven insights to design solutions to help you manage payroll, benefits, and hr today, so you can have more success tomorrow. ♪ one thing leads to another, yeah, yeah ♪ hi, i'm katie, i've lost 110 pounds on golo in j

nothing not the committee for freedom of speech according to the quota of political power opzho well, to be honest, well, what other reforms are there enough, the peace party, we already had one , the missile programs were closed, we all remember that well no, i'm talking about who has a short flash drive and not enough gigabytes or gigabytes on we will remind her with the help of your tv channel with the help of other information resources that freedom of speech has not yet been thrown out of our media space, digital television has been thrown out, we have youtube, we have other resources, we will still fight against russian narratives in my country the good russians who fill our airwaves with propaganda narratives are no longer brought here from russia, nor do they bring their own home-dissolving pink ponies who talk about the downing of anti-aircraft missiles and about the dnipro. we will not spoil this holy place thanking came after that, no. today, of course, the government gathers applause. i emphasize once again that all these applause are applause for the armed forces of ukraine in the ukrainian people , volunteers and the ukrainian spirit . i have an opinion, but loo

committee. staying on the topic of domestic terrorism, i am of the belief as you are that no matter who you are on the left or the right, if you are espousing violence, that's where your freedom of speech ends. and you should be held to account no matter what your views if you are threatening or using violence against other american citizen. but there is also a ladder of escalation that people climb short of violence that is indicating behavior of a problem. in michigan, we have had double the number of anti-semitic incidents in the past year. my own synagogue had an incident last week where men stood outside and screamed death to jews. this is the place where my grandparents helped build this lace. when the police officers pulled him over afterwards, as long as he didn't have a weapon, he was good to go and he went on his way. we are having a huge community conversation about this tomorrow.3 when i go to understand antisemitism and the rise of incidents in my state, i don't go to the department of homeland security ina, i go to the adl or other organizations. tell me what production you have done on things that may be short of violence but are indicators that violence is on the increa