co-author of this draft law, the co-author, by the way, is also the chairman of the committee on freedom of speech and information, mr. yurchyshyn, regarding the regulation of certain, i will not call it correctly right now, i understand how to say it, but it is correct, maybe legally not expression, well, not telegram in general, but those platforms or those channels that pretend to be media and give a lot of information, but are not subject to any regulation, how are things now with persuading the deputies to take it up, support it? and there are many discussions active in society, in the media, in the public and in the political e-e spheres, at what stage is it now, well, the fact that this draft law was signed with me by the head of the committee on humanitarian policy nikita poturaev and the head of the committee on mass media yurchyshyn , as you rightly said, and other deputies say that this is actually a serious, balanced document, it was immediately met with bayonets. a lot of people for different reasons, because our social networks are actively used by someone for objective normal information, someone f

one. an initiative that is already being very actively discussed, you are the author, co-sponsor of this draft law, co-author, by the way , mr. yurchyshyn is the chairman of the committee on freedom of speech and informationrding the regulation of certain, i will not call it correctly right now, i understand how say, but right, maybe legally do not express, well, not telegram in general , but those platforms or those channels that pretend to be the media and give a lot of information, but are not subject to any regulation, how are things now with convincing the deputies to take it up, support it? and these discussions are very active in society, in the media, in public and in political spheres, at what stage is it now? well, the fact that this bill was signed with me by the head of the humanitarian policy committee, nikita poturaev, and the head of the mass media committee yurchyshyn's information, as you rightly said, and other deputies say that this is actually a serious and balanced document, he immediately met it. a lot of people for different reasons, because our social networks are actively used, some for objective normal information, some for manipulation of public opinion, because you can write an

they are authoritative, this should be worked on this, first of all, we have a whole ministry, there are two committees, freedom of speech, information andmittee on information policy, to deal with this matter, to monitor daily. there is a whole staff of the security service of ukraine who also has to deal with this, so here is a question directly from me, as a taxpayer, where are those who hide these taxes and do not a damn thing yet in this area. mr. mykhailo, we completely agree with you that we are a democratic country, and we have freedom of speech, but we understand that not everyone has the opportunity, not everyone has the desire, ability and various other things to analyze, accordingly so... such a simple way as it's just that people know who is saying what, and i am talking now about the openness of telegram channels, because there are telegram channels, we do not know or do not want to know who is behind them, we cannot actually reveal the origin of these channels , is it possible to do something in this direction, that is, to simply make it all clear, if different media or specific people have their telegram channels, then we

committee on freedom of speech was with us, and now it's news time on the espresso tv channel, and khrystyna parubiy, together with the team, has already collected the latest, most important informationready to share it with us, khrystyna, congratulations, you have a word. thank you, colleagues, it became known that valuable things were damaged by the drones of the occupiers, we will tell you about it. release, as well as about enemy losses in a moment, please wait. news on the air espresso, i'm khrystyna porubiy, i'll talk about the most relevant at the moment. mass shelling of the occupiers. kharkiv oblast, four locals were injured as a result of the attacks, oleg senigubov, the head of the region, said. in the village of metrofanivka, kupyan district, an enemy drone dropped explosives near two people. a man and a woman were hospitalized with injuries, the russians dropped a guided aerial bomb on the village of osynove. a local resident was injured, and it was also destroyed.

committee on freedom of speech, prepared a bill , which, it was already called a bill on blocking the telegram, is it really not so, and it is not about implementation for a platform that distributes mass informationonly one of them, approximately the same regulation that is established for a platform like youtube, and 72% of ukrainians receive news through telegram. we have to understand this, this is a huge audience, and in this audience anyone can influence our cities, and here is such an important thing: there is a telegram channel that has, say, a million subscribers, 2 million subscribers, 1.5 million, it publishes some information, and the espressu tv channel on youtube has more than 2 million followers there, but we are responsible according to the law, and we can retaliate for slander, for lies, for false information, for hate, for black pr, for the fact that we, say, disgraced someone, or to us can be sued if we, let's say... damaged someone's reputation, but we, well, we are governed by the law on media and information, there is a council, there is no one here, there is no one here at all, and here the question is that, here it is necessary to speak, because now a lot of hate is poured