but it all depends on the dynamics in the commons. the lords listen to the commons all the time.e end, the commons decides. so the lords throws things back to the commons, asks mps if they are sure they want this thing, and if mps send a signal back, we're really sure, then generally, the lords will back down. so it all goes back to what the dynamic looks like between the government and its backbenchers. if there are concerns expressed by backbenchers during the debate or in the media that they don't think the commons is doing the right thing, peers could give it another go, but if the government and its backbenchers speak with one clear voice, i suspect that will be the end of the matter. given the size of the majorities in both cases, it would be quite a back down by peers, it? members of the lords are very appreciative of their role, which is to review, to invite second thought and to ask the commons whether it is sure about what it is doing. i think that was voiced very much in the debate. it has been voiced very much around the edges of the debate whilst this has been going

will go back to the commons and they will change it.is a similar debate and a similar scale over the rights of eu citizens. a huge debate for the government, as you say, what happens now is that the lords carry on and have the third reading, the final stage of the bill for them and thenit final stage of the bill for them and then it is passed over to the house of commons probably sometime next week. they to consider the changes that the lords have made. theresa may believes this bill should go through unchanged and she says that downing street believe it is a brief bill which does one thing, trigger article 50 which gets the brexit negotiations going on. they do not see it there should be anything else written but the lords see it differently. once theresa may has got her deal, they believe that parliament should have a say on that. i am joined parliament should have a say on that. iam joined by parliament should have a say on that. i am joined by the leader of the labour peers. another huge defeat for the government, what is your asses

the house of commons bus people. the house of commons bus people without amendment or change.people without amendment or change. narrative titles and lamentedlj will narrative titles and lamented.” will put that point straightaway to delete of the labour peers. as the house of lords overstepped the mark? i think that's a big argument. 0ften we have this process. the house of commons looks at something and then it comes to us. all we can do is ask them to think again. what i think is significant as the speeches we had from people that have been involved in negotiations, people that a senior lawyers from all parties, saying this is the right course of thing to do. not only morally but pragmatic. i would thing to do. not only morally but pragmatic. iwould hope thing to do. not only morally but pragmatic. i would hope that the house of commons looks at this seriously and we did rates. —— and read the debate, reconsider. the argument is that this does nothing to help the 900,000 british people living in other eu countries. by taking it off the table, it is no longer a priority for

commons business done at least on that.ee, quite a lot of parliament have left the chamber, you can see now, the house of lords which of course is where the debate is just which of course is where the debate isjust beginning. just which of course is where the debate is just beginning. just to clarify, having done their business, the mps, it is now back to the lords to consider what hasjust it is now back to the lords to consider what has just been effectively rejected by the commons? that is right, this is what is known as parliamentary ping—pong, it can go as parliamentary ping—pong, it can 9° up as parliamentary ping—pong, it can go up and down the corridor for several hours but the impression i have got from labour peers over the last couple of weeks, is that they we re last couple of weeks, is that they were wanting to make a stand at the beginning and they had long debates at the house of lords, they have asked the commons to think again, the commons has done that but they have rejected what the laws proposed to them,

earlier this evening, the government had a majority of 45 in the commons.if this house that the house of commons would change its view later this evening. for the liberal democrats, i have to say to the noble lady, for the liberal democrats to press this matter consideration, but in parliamentary terms, it is a completely pointless gesture. and i, for my part, icannot support it. they have voted, contents, 118. not contents, 274. so, the not contents have it. lord fowler. and that vote meant the bill cleared parliament, receiving royal assent later in the week. but if you thought that meant sighs of relief all round in downing street, anothercloudhad goggedug, ! somewhat unexpectedly, on theresa may's horizon. while westminster was busy watching its own political manoeuvrings on monday, scotland's first minister, nicola sturgeon, announced that with the brexit button about to be pushed, she would be seeking a second independence referendum between the autumn of 2018 and spring 2019. the last referendum in 2014? a question we put to polling expert professorj

it was called inside the commons.both documentaries, we have two people who might well be called parliamentary insiders. sir david bemish has been chief clerk in the house of lords for six years. david natzler has been clerk of the house of commons for two years. welcome to the programme. what did you make of meet the lords? did you enjoy the programme? i enjoyed it. i wished it could have been more representative. behind the flummery, there were some good stories that did show the house doing itsjob, which, at the moment, with brexit going on, is very much in the public eye. i was delighted the public have an opportunity to see that for themselves. did it convey the house of lords that you know? i don't think it was exactly a cross—section. for example, the clip we have just seen of lord palmer, i don't think you would find many peers who share his view about the tv room. it was a little used facility. as he said, we did need the space. other parts of it, absolutely. some of the characters you saw, the ones i know we

the house of commons was in session.the leader of britain's house of commons says a man attacked a policeays the parliament complex is in lockdown.he says there are reports of further violent incidents neaby, and police say they have been called to a firearms incident on nearby westminster bridge.witnesses said a vehicle struck several people on the bridge, and photos showed a car plowed into railings.óóó3:05 p.m.the leader of britain's house of commons says a man has been shot by police at parliament. david lidington also said there were "reports of further violent incidents in the vicinity."london's police said officers had been called to a firearms incident on westminster bridge, near the parliament.a session of parliament was suspended after the incident.britain's mi5 says it is too early to say if the incident is terror-related. óóó2:55 p.m.a session of britain's house of commons has been suspended as witnesses reported hearing sounds like gunfire nearby.the commons' speaker suspended the session as police responded to an incident.journalists at the parliament building said they were

it's likely the commons will overturn that.conservative rebels, there weren't many last time around. the question is whether that revolt grows. the ones i've spoken to are looking for assurances from the government, and they sound like they are going to that. it seems likely those changes will be overturned. then it has to go back to the lords. i think there, it's down to what labour do. there it is a coalition of the liberal democrats, labour, a few conservatives and crossbenchers. are there enough of them. having spoken to people i didn't think they want to people i didn't think they want to block this any further. they've said publicly they don't want a frustrated, the question is whether they are willing to send it back to they are willing to send it back to the commons one more time. it could be done and dusted by midnight. the commons one more time. it could be done and dusted by midnightm it does get done and dusted, will article 50 then be triggered pretty much straightaway, will theresa may send butler said to brussels

and indeed inside the commons and indeed inside the commons of the immediate aftermath of this attack the conservative mp david davis was one of those who ca ptu red mp david davis was one of those who captured what was happening. stay back, stay back! is he coming? shouting. back, back, back, back! get back! let's get back! get back! somebody‘s underfire. came under fire down there. inaudible. come this way, guys. let's get over to the other building. stay where you are, ok? i'll come this way. don't try to get down there at the moment. can you get a view of what's going on? what's happened 7 stabbing. i'm trying to find out. scenes from inside parliament yesterday captured by the mp david davis. we are not afraid were the words that theresa may began her statement to the commons with earlier this morning. she spoke at some length about her thoughts and feelings, the government's response to this attack at the very heart of democracy here, and she also spoke about the individual behind the attack and what is known so far, although his identity hasn't been released yet, and she said t

but it all depends on the dynamics in the commons. the lords listen to the commons all the time.the end, the commons decides. so the lords throws things back to the commons, asks mps if they are sure they want this thing, and if mps send a signal back, we're really sure, then generally, the lords will back down. so it all goes back to what the dynamic looks like between the government and its backbenchers. if there are concerns expressed by backbenchers during the debate or in the media that they don't think the government is doing the right thing, peers could give it another go, but if the government and its backbenchers speak with one clear voice, i suspect that will be the end of the matter. given the size of the majorities in both cases, it would be quite a backdown by peers, it? members of the lords are very appreciative of their role which is to review, to invite second thought and to ask the commons whether it is sure about what it is doing. i think that was voiced very much in the debate. it has been voiced very much around the edges of the debate whilst this has been goi

will he bear that in mind when we escape from the common external tariff?kes an important point and we do have some preferential trade agreements in place with developing countries from the caribbean, to buy sugar from them. these are arrangements we will want to maintain and secure, so we can support developing countries. the minister has talked about food prices falling but supermarkets are talking of the potential food prices to rise significantly busier, having a huge effect on every household. nearly half of our food is imported and due to the weak pound and inflation, prices are already starting to rise for the time in three years. what exactly is the government doing to help with the price rises in people's weekly food shop? as i said earlier in answer to this question, we monitor closely the amount of money people are spending on food. it has remained stable at 16.5% for the last decade. we continue to keep the issue under review. i point out, the greatest bike we had in food prices took place i point out, the greatest spike we had in food prices to

but previously, broadbrand had not been considered a common carrier service but that changed in 2015 when the fcc issued its open internet order and expanded title two authority over broadband internet access. since then, the ftc has been affectively nudged out of oversight of that part of the internet ecosystems. we have support over hedge providers and folks like that but the circle around who is the common carrier got much bigger by the fcc who is regulatory action and the open internet order. >> does that get confusing? >> i think it is confusing for consumers and i am concerned about that. a consumer who sees the internet may not understand, well, this part of the message is being carried by the isp so it is under one set of rules and edge providers can use this in different ways. >> host: let's bring brandon into the story. he covers tech policy. >> thanks for sitting down with us. to drill down on the broadbrand privacy debate here. when they decided to stay a portion of the broadband privacy rule you and he issued a joint statement saying the main thing you wanted to do was s

the commons‘ newest member. and that's it for this programme.p. until then, from me keith mcdougall, goodbye. well, a very blustery night out there for some of us, particularly across southern parts of the uk, especially the south—west, around the bristol channel. breezy inland too. and really, the weather is going to be very unsettled over the next few days. lots of clouds, lots of weather fronts out there in the atlantic, ready to come our way. this is what we've got through the early hours. here are the winds, quite strong in the south. some rain and hill snow across more central parts of the uk. and then we've got temperatures near freezing across the north, with some showers as well. now, the good news is that the winds will ease, eventually, through the course of the morning. it will still stay relatively breezy, and you can see there's a bit of cloud and rain again across parts of the midlands wales and the north—west in the morning. but i think by lunchtime, most of the uk should be enjoying fine weather. so this is a snapshot of thursda

the commons better get in line.n the bill comes back there. they better get on and pass it. also this isa better get on and pass it. also this is a message to the commons as well. i think, yeah. is a message to the commons as well. ithink, yeah. it's is a message to the commons as well. i think, yeah. it's the fact that he's a big beast. when he says something, we all write about it. that's really tricky for the government. because he's advising sajid javid, he is in a position like that and deifying a three line whip and working for you. as you say, he's a long, long time europhile. there you go. moving away from politics, onto the times. very sad story this, this is vince the white rhino. he was shot three times in the head and had his horn, one of the horns taken off with a chain saw. he was not in the wild. he was ina zoo saw. he was not in the wild. he was in a zoo in paris. it's the first such attack seen in a western facility. when you compare that poachers in africa killed over a thousand rhinos in 2015, whi

we will see what happens in the house of commons. let's remember that the house of commons approved unconditionally the to line brexit bill as an indication of article 50 by the end of march by prime minister theresa may, and yes, it is the second defeat, in the house of lords, one that the government really aims to reverse and will fight. will the majority in the house of commons disappear? in parliament be problematic? i would say theresa may's government is not happy at all and will be slightly nervous when it does get back to the house of commons. we do not have a confirmed eight but we think we know that it might be next monday and we also know that it might be in the house of commons in the morning and the house of lords in the afternoon. what we believe is that if this does go through the house of commons in the morning, we will have to see if the house of lords will again vote other amendments to block this. they have said all along they would not block brexit. we think the british government is still on track for the self-im

we have a common stance.oo, weetary said it, have a common basis where we want to find common solutions, and we have come to a common understanding that we both want to stimulate global growth , and that werld need global solutions in order to challenge -- tackle the challenges ahead of us here and i thk we have established a good basis today. of course, we have not found an answer to all the outstanding questions. i think that would be asking too much, but certainly, we have come to common understanding, and have paved the way for further discussions to be held during the g-20 meeting. back?the very in previous g-20 communiques, there was always some language on preventing and avoiding protectionism -- that there is a need to prevent protection. is there something you talked about during your bilateral, and if it is something that will be communique, in the or will be excluded this time? minister schauble: the answer is yes, we did talk about it, and we have a common position, that there will be others in --

the government and the commons have rejected our call.or the rejection is that it the only reason for the rejection is thatitis the only reason for the rejection is that it is not a matter that needs to be dealt with in the bill. presumably the government have no other rationale for saying to those here, you must wait to know about your future until the 27 others have agreed how they will treat uk nationals. but that could take months, if not years. we are hearing from brussels that, although citizens' rights will be high on the negotiators' agenda, it could take years for the final deal — as i believe liam fox and david davis confirmed yesterday, reflecting on the normal practice of nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. we regret this delay, and we lay the blame for this hiatus fairly and squarely at the door of number ten. but we will also campaign for an early resolution to the plight of those caught up in a legal neverland not of their making, and we will continue to press the government to move on this, and to provide the cer

we don't have authority over common care yores -- carriers. but previously, broadband internet access service hadn't been considered a common carrier service. but that all changed this 2015 -- in 2015 when the fcc issued its open internet order and extended title ii authority over broadband internet access service. so since then the ftc has been effectively kind of nudged out of oversight over that part of the internet ecosystem. we still have oversight over edge providers and handset makers and folks like that, but the circle around who's a common carrier got made very much bigger by the fcc through its regulatory action and the open internet order. >> host: does that get confusing? divisioning? >> guest: well, i think it's confusing for consumers, and i'm concerned about that. so a consumer who's using the internet may not understand, well, this part of the message is being carried by the isp, so it's under one set of rules, and edge provider, they can use this information in a very different way under the ftc's approach. that's one of my ma

tomorrow the bill goes back to the commons.ets through the commons without the amendments, things go as the government plans. if the lords decides to step in again and put forward more amendments, potentially that could delay things, but if things go as the government hopes tomorrow potentially it could be in a position to trigger article 50 by tuesday or wednesday. turkey's president erdogan has warned the netherlands it will "pay the price" for barring one of his government ministers from addressing a rally there, and forcing another to leave the country. and he's again accused the dutch government of "nazism and fascism". he was speaking on turkish tv after a further escalation in the diplomatic row between the two countries. earlier, protesters gathered outside the dutch consulate in istanbul, while in rotterdam, dutch police broke up a pro—erdogan demonstration with water cannon. the dispute centres on the turkish government's attempt to campaign abroad in a bid to win the support of turkish expatriates for sweeping consti

those amendments were defeated in the house of commons. 385—287 was the final vote.voted against the amendment guaranteeing the rights of european national ‘s living in the uk. and mps also voted to reject the amendment that would have given parliament a vote on the final brexit deal. the brexit bill has now gone back to the house of lords in what is called ping—pong in parliamentary terms, the lords are debating it now. let's ta ke the lords are debating it now. let's take a look at what is going on in the house of lords. for the people do have a final say on the outcome of those negotiations but i can say that there were two things also on my mind when i went through the lobby. the first was that the government were making it crystal clear, even at that stage, that they would concede nothing with regard to the amendments, and the second thing i had the amendments, and the second thing ihad in the amendments, and the second thing i had in my mind was that the noble lady, lady smith of basildon, had already indicated that if the bill we re already indicated that if t

our look at the best of the day in the commons on the lords.is programme, another spanner in the works for ministers eu departures planned, peers vote for one more alteration to the government ‘s brexit bill. it ensures that parliament has the critical role in determining the future that we will bequeath to generations. i find it quite extraordinary that your lordship is spending hours here and basically what is an effective amendment. ministers are urged to reconsider the ending of their policy to give lone refugee children sanctuary in britain. they are pulled to our shore for safety. closing the scheme will not stop that pull factor. and labour criticises the ending of automatic entitlement to housing benefit for 18—21—year—olds. this will make significantly more young people forced to rough sleep in our country and will make them increasingly vulnerable. first, the brexit bill has cleared the house of lords but with two significant changes made by peers, the bill that starts britain's eu departure process must now return to the house of com

but the house of commons has been suspended. journalists in parliament have been told to stay in their offices. we do not know if there's an all clear. and the press association is saying that two people were seen lying on the grounds of parliament. lying on the ground when you hear gunfire wouldn't be unusual. doesn't necessarily mean people have been shot. >> that's a pretty tight area. i've been around that area quite a bit. you know, everything is going to reverberate off the buildings. and you may hear one shot that's coming from an armed officer and you could think, you know, whether you're in parliament square or walking down the thames, you may think that you are hearing two or three shots. and that's a very interesting -- i was just looking at the view that we have on the bridge where you see that cluster of officers there. that's most likely where the assailant was engaged. that's pretty far down the bridge which means british security saw this individual from way far out. about other incidents, we won't know until we

in the commons, the leader of the house set out next week's timetable.ion of lords amendments to the european notification of withdrawal bill, followed by a continuation of the budget debate. tuesday 14th march, if necessary, consideration of lords amendments. mr speaker, i note on the business paper there are three days set aside for consideration of lord's amendments if necessary, as this government attempts to ping that pong that is coming from those heroes who are continuing to stand up to the government. i note that this only goes on until wednesday. what happens if we still have these paddles out and we are are still at the table? is the government going to enforce the parliament act? how does this impact on the article 50 process and will he clarify what is going to go on? but can we encourage the people's aristocrats to battle for that remain cause? it's perfectly routine for the government to announce provisional buisness in case there is a need to debate lord's amendments. the house of lords has a perfectly proper role as a revising chamber, bu

to ask the commons to think again.ng those negotiations between her and her backbenchers. if the backbenchers are satisfied, she will get her way. she may need to offer them more assurances in order to get the bill through. theresa may will ask mps to overturn the peers‘ amendments. and it is plausible she might not win both of those votes. her majority is currentlyjust 17. and that's why the lords can trouble the government so much. they complain, oh, we haven't got the majority, well, this is the first conservative government never to have had an automatic majority in the house of lords. but no labour government ever had a majority in the house of lords, you win your case, you persuade, you articulate, you make that case. and that is what the government needs to understand and needs to do. but some tories want a quick election. they say it could mean a bigger commons majority. and peers don't pick fights over items once they've been put on a manifesto. but at least for now, the government is grinding on. and, once th

>> again i think they need to find a common line or common sheet of music here. and the president is absolutely right when he says that nato cannot be more important to the americans than it is to the europeans and the europeans need to meet their spending goals. that has been the position of american administrations going back many years. but the president is wrong when he suggests that this is some kind of a gift to the european whens t when the americans commit to nato. nato is central for tto the uni states of our own security policy. and so nato is important to us. it's important to the europeans. and i think it was very good news that both the chancellor and the president recommitted themselves to this nato which is central and as you suggested with threats coming from moscow and other areas of the world, we don't have the luxury of quarreling amongst ourselves about the importance ever this allege l of this and i lie answer. >> we can't have time to get into the claims of wiretapping, but quite frankly, there is nothing to talk about. there is no evidence.

so no wayne rooney common anthony marshall, so rashford, he has travelled. rooney says you can't afford to be killed. how stretched is this united squad, they have played 12 more games and chelsea this season, that is something that mourinho pointed towards conte, no european football which is partly mourinho's faults? the fixture list has been cruel to them, russia on thursday, they played against a russian side on thursday and samet in between that a massive game. if i was a player i would be loving the big games, but forjose mourinho, he has got to juggle forjose mourinho, he has got to juggle the side and pick which competition is best suited. up until now he has attacked every competition comedy said that he europa league make take preference later on because it is a champions league qualification. he will want to win this tie, he will not want to lose to chelsea and he will want to win another trophy. you had been with us pretty much for every round, you have sampled the spanish football as well. we all say it is really special. you have sampled the co

we are expecting the prime minister to make a statement to the commons and we will ring that to the commonsre we expecting from mrs may this morning? the prime minister's speech gave last night i thought was incredibly moving but powerful. reiterating what british values are all about, reiterating that people who try to twist religion, or try to make an attack on our values and the people in parliament, will always fail. and that we are supported, and we are very lucky to be supported in this country by police and intelligence services who are some of the best of the world, and many governments have invested in their capability. i would just reassure your viewers, the counterterrorism strategy is about not just the counterterrorism strategy is about notjust catching people, it is about preventing people being radicalised, and about delivering all over the united kingdom, radicalised, and about delivering all overthe united kingdom, in scotland, lancashire, where i represent, and in the capital and in the very iconic buildings we see here. it is about making sure people understand that the b

if the lords doesn't back down, it could go back to the commons in a process known as ping—pong. labour insists it will fight for the amendments to stand. what we say to the prime minister, and i wrote to her on friday and said, "reflect on what the house of lords has said. by majorities of nearly 100, they have sent back two really important issues, this issue of the eu nationals and the issue of the vote. reflect on that. don'tjust have this obsession with getting article 50 triggered this week". the prime minister has been doing the legwork with her eu partners ahead of triggering brexit, but some are worried that there isn't enough planning going on for the prospect of no deal at the end of it all. if there is going to be no deal, that is going to have serious implications for businesses and individuals and the government needs to make sure we have planned for it. but the brexit secretary says he has got a plan. the simple truth is, we have been planning for the contingency, all the various outcomes, all the possible outcomes, of the negotiation. including a proper plan for n

we all have common interests. iraq is not begging for support and is not asking for support from a position of weakness. but we all are asking it all together all in the same boat all on the same ship facing this terrorism. and we fight side by side on the ground and we benefit from all the logistical support and all the air support that is being given to us and to our forces as we move forward to the next phase to protect our borders and rebuild our country. we have the means to deal with that. we have absorbed and are working with all the components of iraq. i can't tell you we resolved all our issues. these problems go back to many years in the past when saddam and the bathe regime oppressed the iraqi people and disturbed the means of iraqi people and the heinous terrorist attacks who came from countries from all over the world. we have to cooperate to contain and destroy the terrorism and terrorists and prevent them from expanding their efforts and not containing isis but destroy and decimate daesh. thank you,

, a common civilization.ommon experiences that bind us together. we went through a real assimilation. from about 1924 until the mid-'60s because our leadership in congress understood we needed to have a time to bond back together and become americans together again because of the high immigration that we had in the previous 20-30-40 years. we are at this place now where we people marching in the streets, pushing back against american culture and civilization. it is troubling to me that over the last 25 years, we have essentially phased out the promotion of assimilation and promoted instead of multiculturalism and diversity as if it were our strength. they're using it now to divide us and that is what barack obama did throughout his presidency. >> tucker: everything he said is defensible and probably right, the problem with the tweet was it suggested there is a racial component to american identity. do you think there is? >> there is a racial component and all of our discussions here in america. it must be tha

if it is redraw the lines, but it would give us oversight over common carrier activity. that is what we have asked. is the advantage of the ftc having authority over a common carrier, rather than the fcc? ms. ohlhausen: i think the advantages that it will increase the level playing field not just for businesses, but for consumers, said the same rules apply no matter who is holding your data, based on the sensitivity of the data. that is what we base our framework on. consumers are not necessarily concerned on the chain of custody of the internet. their messages are passed back and forth. they care about how sensitive the data is, what promises have been made about it, and how you are going to use it. it is going to be used in a way that will injure me. i think that creating a consistent approach and oversight is good for consumers, and also good for businesses. also, the ftc has a lot of expertise in this area. we have good lawyers, that economists, good investigators who know how to bring these cases. ofhave brought hundreds privacy security cases, so i believe we have

the government will try to overturn these in the commons tomorrow. succeed, the bill returns to the lords almost immediately, and if they give way, the final stage of royal assent could be completed tomorrow night. so the government has parliamentary hurdles to get over this week, but ministers seem confident that theresa may will be able to stick to her original plan. formally telling the rest of the eu, that the uk is ready to start negotiating its exit, and attention is turning to exactly what kind of deal, if any, the uk can get. the prime minister has said publicly that no deal for the uk is better than a bad deal, but that would mean tariffs on exports under world trade organisation rules. my fear is that what this is really about, is us deliberately, not the prime minister, but others deliberately ensuring that we have no deal. and no deal pretty soon, and in that event, wejump off the cliff on to wto tariffs and nobody in this country, the people don't have a say. mr davis admits the government is preparing a contingency plan in case there is

with the scale of the deaths and casualties still unclear, inside parliament the commons chamber wasked down, meaning mps were unable to leave. 15 minutes after the sitting was suspended, the leader of the commons updated mps. events have been moving rapidly and i want to emphasise that the knowledge that i have which is definite is so far very limited. what i am able to say to the house is that there has been a serious incident within the estate. it seems that a police officer has been stabbed. that the alleged assailant was shot by armed police. an air ambulance is currently attending the scene to remove the casualties. there are also reports of further violent incidents in the vicinity of the palace of westminster, but i hope colleagues on all sides will appreciate that it would be wrong of me to go into further details until we have confirmation from the police and from the house security authorities about what is going on. the shadow leader of the house stood up. can i thank the leader for the statement and just to say that our thoughts and prayers are with the police officer. a

he's been shot by the security people at the house of commons. and we hear that there's been other incidents involving a car outside the gates. >> when you hear "other incident," what does that mean, that the individual who was shot by police, the individual who stabbed a police officer, there is a separate incident related or unrelated, involving the car that we've been seeing? >> i can't confirm that, blitz. in the house all that was confirmed to us was that somebody managed to get through the gates in the house of commons, the main entrance into the parliament here in westminster and that that individual attacked a police officer and was subsequently shot by the officers. there were reports of a loud bang outside. perhaps that's related to the incident with the car which some of us obviously through social media have seen pictures of. but currently, along with my colleagues, we're all locked down in the house of commons, in the chamber itself, and the lobbies around it whilst the incident is resolved. >> so you're there on lockdown right now.

standards, common practices and common execution. so with usdi and the rest of the enterprise, what we are focusing on now is establishing that common understanding of what standards are, what trade craft practices are and institutions and mechanisms for doing that are. we mentioned earlier, the defense analytic trade craft counsel and the vehicle to bring all 16 members together to discuss trade craft standards and establish consistent trade craft standards and communicate those trade craft standards and we also use that as the vehicle for establishing the ombudsman review process. >> let me ask, is that a process that has just begun now as a result of what's happened and as a result of these reports? was it the case there wasn't a consistent set of standards previously? >> yes. the defense analytic trade craft council was revitalized. it was established some years back but essentially lain dormant. it was revitalized as a result of this situation, and we re-established it to invigorate commonalty and standards. that's what we recog

i think it falls in the category of common sense. it's common sense that necessarily comes from each person's own unique life experience. even judge gorsuch acknowledged this when he told the committee i am not an algorithm yet he wouldn't tell us as a human a nonalgorithm he would uniquely approach a case. when it comes to the application of the law that empathy, that mercy, that humane element of common sense as the truck driver put it, that is the most important judicial trait of them all because ultimately the law is abstract but the people and situations are real. the task of the judge is to apply those abstract legal doctrines to very humane, sometimes very messy situations. it's a hard thing to do to bring fairness and justice to a world that's too short on both. i'm reminded, mr. president, by the words spoken by porsche, the great lawyer in the merchant who spoke of the blessedness and necessity of mercy in implying the law. he said the quality of mercy is not strained. upon the place beneath it is twice blessed. it blesses

there's no getting out. >> the house of commons was in session. they're being kept in the same area? >> yes, all of the lawmakers will have been told the same advice as us to go to the safety of their offices. wednesday is a very busy day in parliament. we have theresa may talking about article 15 next week. there's a sense here that, a, it is a very populated time to be in westminster this week. and you get the sense, yes, people have had to be moved to positions of safety from where the main incidents happened. >> camilla, we're glad you're safe. thank you for calling in. please let us know if the situation changes there. i want to go to jeremy bash right now, phformer chief of stf with the department of defense and the cia. jeremy, would there be any kind of intelligence that would point to this or is this one of those inspired attacks that just doesn't pop up on the radar? >> the internal security service in london is tearing apart any potential evidence that they have. they are looking at the vehicle. they're running the plates. they are taki

christopher, you were at the commons at the time, and members of his family have spoken now. the commonsamily have spoken nowm the commons at the time, and members of his family have spoken now. it is back to normal at the house of commons, but they moved the gates near to where the attack took place. it has really shocked the country. personally, i feel sorry for her, for janet personally, i feel sorry for her, forjanet ojoa. personally, i feel sorry for her, for janet ojoa. it personally, i feel sorry for her, forjanet ojoa. it was brave for her to speak up this way. rowena, is there a sense that have gotten back to normal? people carry on their daily business, the house of lords and house of commons business is carrying on as before. but people are still sad and traumatised by what has happened there. it is incredibly grim and sad for all affected. we saw people die outside my office window. there were bodies therefore many hours stop its unbelievable, not what you expect. others went through to try and save lives, and it was worse on the bridge, but it is a difficult time. absolutely

so the symptoms, the most common symptoms are?> well, they range, so food allergy is when your body rejects and attacks actually a food protein, and once you ingest the food, triggers a violent reaction where your body releases histamines. symptoms can be mild, itching, localized hives, or can be very serious, wheezing, difficulty breathing, loss of consciousness, in some cases sudden drop in blood pressure. it is important for people to understand food allergy can be fatal. >> you have to call 911 right away. >> exactly. >> talk about the epi pen in a moment. we have to take a quick break. they'll stay with us another segment, talking food >>> welcome back to beyond the headlines. we're talking about the rising rate of food allergies across the country. a northern california family wants to warn others about the dangers of severe food allergies after their daughter died during a camping trip this july. 13-year-old natalie georgy was with her family in the national forest when she had a severe allergic reaction to peanuts. the car

the leader of the house of commons, david lidington, confirmed that the house of commons has been adjourneday but the house remains on lockdown with no one to leave. one person we know is safe and is not in the building is prime minister theresa may, the government spokesperson confirming that, and that she is safe. in terms of some of the other details, an air ambulance has arrived and the london ambulance service confirming that a number of other ambulances had been sent to the scene. you can see in those yellow van-type buildings in that shot -- van-type shapes in that shot there. parliament haey square has been cleared of all traffic. you can see parliamentary square there. and what would be 500 to 1,000 typical people walking through there, tourists and others at this time, they have been cleared of the area. westminster tube station has been shut. now, to recap what we believe has happened based on reuters, sky news, and other sources, is that an suv drove along the pavement of westminster bridge, that a number of people were injured during that process. that is the shot of the suv th

mps were told to stay in the commons chamber, where the leader of the commons updated them on what hadd, and mps agreed to suspend their sitting for the day. in view of what i sense to be the mood of the house and the situation in which we find ourselves, i beg to move that the house do now adjourn. the question is the house do now adjourn. as many of you say, "aye". house: aye. the ayes have it, the ayes have it. but that was not the end of what turned into a very long day. mps were held in the commons chamber for hours before being evacuated to westminster abbey, along with peers and staff. they were eventually allowed to leave later in the evening. that night, the prime minister made a statement outside downing street condemning what she called the sick, depraved and appalling attack. and theresa may vowed that parliament would meet as normal the next day. and so the commons gathered on thursday morning at 9:33, and held a minute's silence. order. colleagues, and respectful memory of those who lost their lives in yesterday's attack, and of all of the casualties of that attack, we sh