not had this audit for 3 years right alibaba obviously the founder of alibaba is connected to the chinese communist party who in china who has money is not connected to the chinese communist party you have to be that's just that's just part of the deal it doesn't necessarily mean that you're advocating for the party nor does it mean that we are naive and say the chinese communist party probably wants good things for america i'm sure it doesn't really chinese communist party at its core once chinese excellence and china to be the world's greatest most vibrant and but i did that wouldn't you absolutely oh absolutely that's what the u.s. what its what the u.s. demands all the time american excellence american exceptionalism every country should one threat the idea that if a country is there for bad if it's not the united states with it once those things it's the same claim that's made about russia if putin is a nationalist then he's an extremist really but in this country if you're not a nationalist you're considered a traitor how do you know so right exactly it's just it's how you perceive it and the idea that we're wr

china? >> well, there's a whole bunch of them. the fact is communist china is dominated by a guy who happens to be the chairman of the communist partyina. behind him he's got a [indiscernible] that guides him but this guy is a major threat to the united states and instead of encouraging the rise of china, what they ought to be thinking about you if they come to town, is conferring with the men who wrote this book because they know what it's like. they helped bring down the evil empire, the soviet union for ronald reagan. xi jinping is probably very happy that biden is preparing to move into the white house with the backing of -- absolute power. he runs everything in russia and everything in russia is aimed at domination of the rest of the planet. the prc now has more naval combatants than the u.s. navy. the threat -- excuse me, the theft of intellectual property threatens our national security. that's how they got the navy they've got today. it allows tons of illicit drugs to be exported to other nations around the world. he has set up a global string of pearls going all the way back to 1980s. all of this has been done with these gu

any one of these things could have changed the fate of the communist party and the establishment of the people's republic of china, but at the with there dealing chinese comet's party today and we -- chinese communist party today and we can understand it better or we can basically pound our way into strategies that may or may not work if we don't fully understand where the other side is coming from. that's one of the things we try to teach the students at the command and general staff college, which is that you have to look at both sides of the issue and you have to understand the enemy, which is straight out of sun tzu. know the enemy, know yourself. there's a big argument that we very seldom know the enemy in a deep enough manner to make the key strategic decisions and pass plans and policies we need to make. so then, i should have stirred somebody up and i should have some questions. so camille? do.lle: that, you for everyone watching, whether that's through the facebook livestream or youtube stream, thanks to all of you have submitted questions. if you have not, please feel free to do so in the comments secti

comment part of china is about control china proper i mean and china is completely under the control of the communist party and they are very cautious in terms of allowing for much of school or any activities that were amongst to any challenge of authority of the chinese state now in macau and in hong kong they are actually willing to allow for more school of their kind of activities polite it those activities do not amount to any challenge who don't already of the communist party and that is where you have to distinction . in hong kong people asserted it much more and as a result of which a chinese government a communist party imposed very stringent control now in hong kong which it hasn't even holds in macau because the people of macau i'm what asserting that right so much so what we are is that you've the people of macau word to assert the individual rights promised to them under one country 2 systems mortal then they would face what people in hong kong face as well stephen vines if we're talking about china seeing macau as a model example of one country 2 systems let me ask you this does china see maca

mixed and i don't think we should go into this kind of communal divisions and assume that somebody born in china won't necessarily support the communist party system signifies a me ask you to expand our on what steve was saying there as well i mean is that a faulty assumption that because more of the population in macau were born in mainland china that they would have more sympathetic views toward the mainland. well i agree with that in principle but i think that there is a very important element to the hong kong protests which is due to the identity of people as hong kong is something which beijing dislikes very considerably they think that people in hong kong should just identify themselves as being chinese so it doesn't quite matter where people are born what does matter is the community in which they live and the community that's developed as hong kong has a very very vibrant civil society a society which prides in its identification with the car when the big slogans of the protest movement was very simple it said hong kong or and this in macau doesn't exist whether it's to do with where people are born i'm not so sure but it's the stat

convinced this was the tipping point where china was bound to fall and go through some form of soft revolution that would see the authority of the communist party at the time because china shut down wuhan, nine, ten, 11 million people in it. and now the model of how china works is quite sellable, notjust in china, but outside, whereas the western model of how we've handled coronavirus, less so. the challenge for china .2 is that china and chinese state—owned businesses carry large amounts of debt, and whether it's sustainable globally in a competitive market is a very important question. and if they start to falter or. ..or lose the plot or go wrong, then there are consequences and so that growth isn't as easy to deliver as has been the case. and, in fact, one of the reasons why china looked outwards towards central asia and elsewhere along the belt and road initiative wasn't about china trying to explore new alliances, and it was about displacing excess infrastructure and displacing excess load that already existed because there were already too many bridges in sichuan province, as the governor of sichuan had said, and tried to find new ways,

rate than trumps usa or both scenarios brazil coming out of the show 42 years since the communist party of china voted deng xiaoping paramount leader of the people's republic paving the way for lifting 800000000 people out of poverty we speak to the britain who introduced foster care to the global superpower of the 21st century that is routinely defamed in the west for terminating us at your money to power and is the un predicts coronavirus may push of a 200000000 more people into extreme poverty we speak to a book along with the novelist about his portrayal of london's underbelly of ultraviolet crime arguably created by upper class political ideology and ask why politicians in the media get violent crimes so wrong all this more coming up in today's going underground of 1st as china looks to the stars after a successful moon landing and with its public health vaccine program looking to be the largest in history on top of lifting 800000000 people out of poverty will nations look to the people's republic not just for public health but for the organization of society itself joining me now is robert

is it really a matter of survival, given the aggressive nature in which the communist party of china is squelching freedom of speech and freedom of association? i guess professor ku, are you still with us? >> i am. i am. sen. cornyn: what do you think the consequences would be if congress does not act? >> i do think it's problematic. i think the u.s. is the country most able to take punishment from china, so to speak. it is much harder for a country like australia and canada and new zealand and places where hong kongers might typically emigrate where it may be, if the , united states is not able to act or is unwilling to act, and i think the leaders in australia and canada, i think, for instance who are already feeling a lot of chinese blowback will wonder why should they go out on a limb and take the blowback themselves when the u.s. is not willing to? it's not great to be punished by china economically and otherwise, but the u.s. is much better positioned to take that and if the u.s. is not willing to do that, it is a bad sign for other countries. i think it also shows other countri

capita rate than trumps usa or both scenarios brazil coming up in the show 42 years since the communist party of china voted deng xiaoping paramount leader of the people's republic paving the way for lifting 800000000 people out of poverty we speak to the britain who introduced force to kids of the global superpower of the 21st century that is routinely defamed in the west for terminating us and. and does the u.n. predict coronavirus may push of a 200000000 more people into extreme poverty we speak to a book along with the novelist about his portrayal of london's underbelly of ultraviolet crime arguably created by upper class political ideology and ask why politicians in the media get violent crimes so wrong all this more coming up in today's going underground of 1st as china looks to visto us after a successful moon landing and with its public health vaccine program looking to be the largest in history on top of lifting 800000000 people out of poverty will nations look to the people's republic not just for public health but for the organization of society itself joining me now is robert glover o.b.e.

communist party. >> well, this doesn't make any sense. slawell is part of the russia disinformation campaign against trump. we know that the communist party of china they can to kill our way of government and our way of life. and slawwell's got our most important secrets because he's on intelligence. so how can we -- i mean, this is so basic. nancy pelosi cannot allow him to stay on the intelligence committee and he's got to come clean with this. he won't tell us what his relationship was, if he still has a relationship. so let's get the facts. in the meantime, he needs to get off intelligence. he's got access to information that could hurt us and he's got a relationship with the communist party of china. it's as simple as that. maria: the same could be said for adam schiff. i mean, for four years adam schiff was all over the place, saying that donald trump colluded with russia and that it was in plain sight. he kept saying it's in plain sight. and now we know that schiff is refusing to disclose why he withheld details about swalwell's relationship with a chinese spy, he knew about the relationship. should adam schiff step down as well? >> absolut

rate than trumps usa or both are now as brazil coming out of the show 42 years since the communist party of china voted deng xiaoping paramount leader of the people's republic paving the way for lifting 800000000 people out of poverty we speak to the britain who introduced foster care to the global superpower of the 21st century it is routinely defamed in the west for terminating us. and is the un predicts coronavirus may push of a 200000000 more people into extreme poverty we speak to a book a long list of novelist about his portrayal of london's underbelly of ultraviolet crime arguably created by upper class political ideology and ask why politicians in the media get violent crimes so wrong all this more coming up in today's going underground of 1st as china looks to the stars after a successful moon landing and with its public health vaccine program looking to be the largest in history on top of lifting 800000000 people out of poverty will nations look to the people's republic not just for public health but for the organization of society itself joining me now is robert glover o.b.e. whose new

investigation into the apparent strong ties between the nrdc and the people republic of china and the ruling communist party of china. they showed this relationship had many criteria identified by u.s. intelligence agencies and law enforcement as putting an entity at risk of being influenced or coerced by foreign interests. the nrdc openly brags that we've been collaborating with a wide range of chinese and international partners to facilitate exchanges and learning and develop innovative policy tools. great. i'm sure those reeducation camps are models of low carbon living. but maybe. maybe. we're exaggerating. the importance of mrs. mccarthy's role. or not! "the new york times" is reporting in her new position mrs. mccarthy will be empowered to direct agency heads across the federal government to enact climate policies from emissions rules at the epa to financial rigs on companies. translation, your life is going to get more expensive. and then there's climate envoy john kerry who has a lot of practice selling us out to the ccp. the south china morning post noting that john kerry is a climate czar may cool

, he's got access to information that could hurt us and he's got a relationship with the communist party of china katie: that was senator rick scott, one of the growing number of republicans now calling for california congressman eric swalwell to be removed from the house intelligence committee over his contracts with a suspected chinese spy. others like house minority leader kevin mccarthy wonder why he was ever put on the committee in the first place. >> the intel community does not meet a normal chambers to protect from people listening in on what they are talking about. they are getting secrets that other members of congress never are able to see and now we have eric swalwell who has been swindled by the chinese, this man should not be in the intel committee, he's jeopardizing national security. >> katie: fox news has learned there was no heads up of outside officials to intel committee leadership about any concerns specifically regarding eric swalwell and nancy pelosi said she had no concerns about the congressman. he is now calling for an investigation into what was who leaked the informati

tony bobulinski revealed that hunter biden made deals with groups connected directly to the communist party of chinahe made those deals with the blessing of his father, explicitly.he the former vice president joe biden, who himself was profiting from those deals directly. >>. the former vice president said he had no knowledge whatsoever of his son's business dealings and was not involved in them at all. but this sounds like direct involvement. >> that is a blatant lie. when he states that, that is a blatant lie. obviously the world iss aware that i attended the debate last thursday, and did not debate he made a specific statement around questions around this from the president. and i will be honest with you, i almost stood up and screamed "liar" and walked out because i was shocked that after four days or five days that they prepped t for this that the biden family is taking that position to the world. >>> tucker: again, that was tony bobulinski, who was in business with hunter biden, who meant with joe biden to discuss that business with china. that is what he said on camera. and at the time, they

of his own. the democrat is cozy with china's communist party, even received compensation from the chinese state backed media outlet. as the free beacon just uncovered on twitter, ossoff encouraged everyone to follow the news propaganda outlet for the communist party of china. joining us now with reaction is kayleigh mcenany. welcome to the show. thanks for joining us. these are revelations tonight about jon ossoff. we have known raphael warnock's history. i don't need to say about raphael warnock. listen to raphael warnock talk about raphael warnock. how do you gauge the state of the race? do we have a decent shot in either or both of the races? >> yes we do. you cannot get worse than jon ossoff and raphael warnock. the things that you listed should be disqualifying but on top of all of it, especially with raphael warnock, top of everything you just listed you have a guy who invited fidel castro to come speak at his church, praised marxism and praised jeremiah wright who has had anti-semitic and anti-american things, has said you cannot serve god and the ine military. any one of those things is

show a list of some of the deals that we've talked about in the past and these deals include deals with china and of course, we've been talking all about how the chinese communist party tries to bribe and blackmail people in the u.s. so that they can approve laws that are positive to china. are you expecting a potential incoming administration that changes policy against china because of all of these deals that we hear about we just saw the billion dollars that hunter had taken from the bank of china to try to come up with a hedge fund to invest in chinese company, senator. >> it's a huge concern. let's face it vice president biden has not been honest with the american public. he had to know about hunter biden's business financial foreign entanglements and particularly china. he shook hands with jonathan lee one of his business partners and now we found out that hunter biden wrote an e-mail to his landlord asking for keys for joe biden, james biden, gong wong don, the science was supposed to reflect hudson west which was the cefc usa subsidiary and that's that chinese company that was taken over by the state in 2018. its chairman just disappeared, and this is an indi

of this. the chinese communist party comes in, offers wonderful terms for organizations on campus to teach the chinese language and teach about china's extraordinary world historical culture. but under the supervision of the chinese communist party deals are extracted with university campuses to tow the party's line back in beijing and tin the spirit of the propaganda arm of the party back home. these are some of the examples of the techniques, the programs the initiatives the chinese use to co-op and exercise coercion around the world. i'm sorry i'm going on so long. we're still only on part ii of the paper. >> we have some sometime. >> good. we also discuss the ways in which the chinese are attempting to introduce distinctively chinese standards and norms into international organizations by rewiring them from within and even though -- and i hope i emphasize this before, i'll emphasize it again. even though the chinese represent a very different sort of challenge from the soviet union, the soviets relied primarily on their military. nevertheless, the chinese are developing -- as aput they put world-class military. they aim to comple

will be ho do you stand up to china and what you do for the two biggest threats to world order in my view are the irani and ayatolla hughes of religious and they communist party of china at tha is despicable in every fashion when it comes to human rights and economic activity. they cheat, they enslave, they are a threat to world order, an i hope we get 50 too republican senators so we can kill or at least push back against efforts to appease china by a biden. >> in the wake of big tech egregious censorship of the hunter biden scandal, you have come out with new legislation that is going to repeal section 230 on january 1st of 2023, unless congress acts sooner. tell us about that because i think a lot of folks want this to happen like yesterday. >> number one, president trump was right, there are two threat to conservatism here at home, meal in boating, and the abilit of big tech to control the full of information. to stop stories like the new york post at regarding hunter biden before the election. section 230 prevents. they have the ability commit they are unregulated, they can' be sued, they have the biggest effect on the flow of information than any privat

and on top of that, the chinese communist party has launched a massive international this to try ton campaign deflect attention on china's role in spreading this virus. out, we are just on the cusp of getting vaccines to the american population, and china announced probably six months ago that they had already begun production of a vaccine. you can't do that unless you have intimate knowledge of the scientific makeup of this virus. so we don't know. clearly, there is a lot of circumstantial information. i know that the intelligence community has information about china's covert biological weapons program. i reported on this extensively, and i think hopefully before the trump administration the office, we can get some answers on what really happened and what the origin of the virus is. host: rochester, minnesota, joan is a democrat. good morning. i just wondered about this gentleman who i'm sure is a republican, but trump denounces china most of the time, but yes, his daughter works extensively in china, does a lot of business with china, and that never seems to come up, it seems to get covered up. and i think that china

the ones where he had lucrative arrangements with companies directly tied to the communist party of chinall, possibly it's because joe biden himself was directly involved in those deals. and has been lying about them. we have been telling you that for more than a month, and now it is obvious. one of hunter biden's former business partners already presented documentation proving that. the reason the press corps and their allies in silicon valley did everything to bury that story is that they knew perfectly well that more evidence was coming. and it has arrived. that is evidence that they can't suppress. this weekend, "the daily caller" obtained new evidence, emails from hunter biden. here is one. september 2017, hunter biden wrote to his building manager in georgetown washington, d.c., and he wrote this "please have keys made available for new office mates: joe biden, jill biden, jim biden, the brother, chairman of cfs fc emissary." oh, so the new office mates included the former vice president, his doctor wife, and dong was reserving a 10% equity stake for joe biden. the man that dong rep

given the aggressive nature in which the communist party of china is squelching freedom of speech and freedom of association? i guess professor ku, are you still with us? >> i am. i am. >> what do you think the consequences would be if congress does not act? >> i do think it's problematic. i think the u.s. is the country most able to take punishment from china, so to speak. it is much harder for a country like australia and canada and new zealand and places where hong kongers might typically emigrate and where it may be, if the united states is not able to act or is unwilling to act, and i think the leaders in australia and canada, i think, for instance who are already feeling a lot of blowback will want to watch and should they go out on a limb and take the chinese blowback themselves when the u.s. is not willing to take it, and we are just so much -- it's not great to be punished by china economically and otherwise, but the u.s. is much better positioned to take that and the u.s. isn't willing to do that, then it's a bad sign for other countries and i think it also shows other count

my beef is not with the chinese people or chinese americans, obviously, it's with the communist party of china. but i think the implementation left a lot to be desired. it was kind of a hammer, hammer, hammer and i think they were right, for example, to move on huawei. but because we didn't do it with any framework, when the trump administration moved to tiktok, there wasn't a case made. we haven't made the kind of efforts around standards, rules, protocols, we need to have a comprehensive theory of the case. and congresswoman underwood's comments, some of that has to rely on basic trust in our institutions. i think it was a huge mistake that we didn't move on any ramifications for sloppy actors in the private sector. 160 million of our american's personal data got stolen from equifax and there was no penalty? they could have weighed in there. it's been interesting the administration -- i think it's important the fact that we're four years in and we don't have privacy legislation around our platforms is crazy. and, you know, we've not done anything -- a series of bipartisan bills, trying to ma

bloomberg has done such an incredible job of reporting, it is how governments around the world are scrutinizing tech companies, whether it is in china with the communist partychina looking at jack ma, but here in the united states, there is a process. you have democrats arguing there should be some antitrust investigations, and you got republicans arguing that there ought to be a look at how some of these, the communications decency act is looked at. but there's a process here in the united states that is playing out, and i would anticipate that that regulatory forecast and he conversation around that is going to continue regardless of the upcoming georgia. a perfect always process, but is a process, which is a good thing. kevin cirilli, the hardest working man in washington. coming up, we are going to check in with eric nelson, wells fargo macro strategist come at you talk a little bit more about the market trade. it is really quiet. you can see s&p 500 futures just up about 12 points, but we continue to see some records and some of those big tech names like apple. we will see what he has to say about the outlook for 2021. i'm carol massar, along with matt

number of politicians, and according to reports, while we now know she was working for the communist party of china, the same woman who funneled huge amounts of money, campaign donations from swalwell, well, she also placed an intern in his office. i wonder if the intern was to spy. anyway, swalwell sits on the ever so important house intel committee, and he knows secrets and nobody else is supposed to know. about china. was there any pillow talk? now, let me be very they are, i don't give a rip about his personal life. the real question is, is he compromised? by the way, while we are asking that question, i wonder if joe and hunter are compromised by china. did he reveal secrets? did she use his computer, perhaps when he was sleeping? the new york toilet paper times does not ask any of these questions. they have not cover the story at all, not one single report, nothing. pretty disgusting, but always predictable on their part. according to foxnews.com, as of yesterday, fake news cnn, msdnc, spent only five total minutes on the scandal. does that shock you? abc gave a whopping 2 minutes. that is be

messaging as the coronavirus was beginning to spread around china without any intention of keeping their citizens home? >> right. well, the communist partyopulation are, not inform them. and that's what these dock units show, a fairly sophisticate canned bit of trade craft on china's part where they sought to control the content on the internet to try to create a false is the is the of data which would indicate that china was keeping the virus under control, that the authorities were very confident in terms of how they were dealing with this health crisis and that there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to panic. of course, we know that's not true. china con schooled the onis the of the pandemic as well as its severe few. and that caused, obviously, a global health pandemic. >> i want to share this quotement this is from "the new york times"es propublica report, it's their piece that sort of details these documents that have now come to light. this is obviously pawing homage to the doctor who is initially the world-famous whistleblower who tried to draw attention to this in chew that. they ordered news web sites not to issue push notif

connections with the chinese persons who have connections with the people's liberation army, the communist party of china which i think the main stream media would have paid attention to before the election. this is a mess. under the biden administration, it's a bigger mess, it's not going away. >> you know this week you held the final hearing as chair of the homeland security committee. what's the future of the hunter biden probe on capitol hill? will there be hearings in the next congress? >> it depends on what's uncovered. it's now in the hands of the justice department. i hope this is a legitimate and real and rigorous investigation. the only reason i say that, i have no suspicions one way or the other other than we did the investigation to the scandal, that was an investigation to hillary clinton's e-mail scandal. that was not an investigation designed to uncover the truth leading to conviction, it was an investigation to cover up the truth and exonerate hillary clinton. hope it's not the same for hunter biden. >> how difficult will it be with this hanging over the whole process. >> it's a question

that is the business and individual who had ties to the communist party of china and the liberation armyng business with, and joe biden, according to toby by belinsky, was totally aware of. >> sean: by the way, please send your colleague senator grassley, i know he recovered fully from covid, and you did, as well. i want to hone in on this very, very closely here. if you don't have experience, and you're getting paid millio millions, and then you have your father bragging on tape he leveraged a billion taxpayer dollars and gave them six hours to fire the prosecutor investigating the sun making millions with zero experience, how is that not a quid, and a pro, and a quote. i would be quid pro quo. >> it is. it's obvious to everybody except the mainstream media, and of course, we found out now, the mainstream media had far greater influence and interference in our election than any russian interference ever could have hoped for. the fact of the matter is there have been pulls out now, a mclachlan for max of 36% of biden voters have never heard of the hunter biden story because of censorship

of today's hearing is something that all americans should be concerned about. that is the chinese communist party's continued encroachment on the fundamental rights of the people of hong kong. in 1984, china and great britain agreed when hong kong reverted to chinese sovereignty, it would maintain a great deal of latitude. that was the deal struck in 1984. the u.s. affirmed that understanding when we passed the united states hong kong policy act of 1992 with bipartisan support. that act recognized that china would exercise sovereignty over hong kong, but under a one country, two systems framework, hong kong would retain it's systems for at least 50 years. in fact, we said in that legislation that we must safeguard human rights in and of themselves. i would be remiss if i didn't know, by the way, that our current majority leader was the sponsor of that legislation and our colleague, the incoming chairman, perhaps, of this judiciary committee cosponsored it, chairman grassley. over the last six years in particular, china has reneged on that deal that they struck in order to gave sovereignty over hong kong. when you make a deal, you sign the agreement, you stick to it. china hasn't only gone

communist party of china is a tele tehran party that wants to control the world including the united es, no apps, no products made in communist china, they are not our friend, they become our archenemy. stuart: how about president trump running again in 2024? >> he's had a good four years, he ought to do it again, that's what he wants to do i agree with his policies and look at the economy we had before covid, the economy is coming back, if you look at the deregulation and the reducing tax i believe in these things. stuart: if he did not run would you? >> i am not planning to run i'm a new senator working on my job at the senator and trying to make sure to take care of everybody in florida. stuart: if you do announce, do it on this program please. great guy, when god you are doing well. this next guy does not need any introduction, tim tebow is next. it's moving day. and while her friends are doing the heavy lifting, jess is busy moving her xfinity internet and tv services. it only takes about a minute. wait, a minute? but what have you been doing for the last two hours? delegating? o

the safe harbor i found here, i have grown to be a fugitive and a thorn in the side of the communist party of china. with your action and support the american dream can become the ccp's worst nightmare. thank you. >> thank you. mr. lar, are you with us virtually? >> yes, indeed. >> please proceed with your statement. if you keep it to five minutes then we'll get to miss yang and we'll take a brief recess so we can go cast our votes on the floor. please go ahead. >> sure. >> thank you, chairman connor, ranking member durbin, senator menendez for having today's hearing. it is my honor to testify in front of the committee about the security and immigration. the title of today's hearing is supporting hong kong's pro-democracy movement through u.s. refugee policy. i think this is exactly the stance that we should take. as we all are aware, the hong kong we used to know is gone now, after a year-long protest and the authority, the confidence of hong kong people toward the one country, two system frameworks has basically vanished. with the draconian national security law, beijing has the power to detain,

to be a surrogate for the biden family, this is a company, the chairman had ties to the communist party of china. the people's liberation army. and this company that had $33 million of income in 2013 just went proof, and the chairman just disappeared. these are the people that hunter biden and the bidens had foreign financial entitlements with. what else, what other connections that it have to china? we may only see just really looking at the tip of the iceberg. >> martha: some people listen to that want to know why there was not a more forceful subpoena process, why were they brought in front of congress or your committee before the election? >> well, again, subpoenas are only as good as people are willing to honor them, and congress has very little input or power to actually enforce them, so we were first trying just to uncover and dig up the information. that was difficult enough within these agencies, and so, we issued the report. we are not prosecutors. we are not here to determine whether something is legal or illegal. we are here to gain information. quite honestly, i needed support from

of china. the chinese communist party prevents that freedom of expression and the results, the risks to americas a result of that are real and we're going to respond to them. maria: will the u.s. back taiwan, should china go into taiwan? >> there's a long history there. you know the story, each time i speak with my chinese counterparts we make clear the commitments that we made to them, as far back as the reagan administration and we stand by the commitments. the chinese communist party told me they will as well. we have every expectation they will live up to those commitments. i work nearly every day with partners around the world who understand that the risk that is presented from the chinese communist party, whether it's my australian counterparts or partners in europe, they have come to see the risks to their countries, to freedom, democracy, the rule of law that is presented by the chinese communist party and we're going to lay out a detailed plan to make sure that we protect the american people. president trump has been serious about this. and has taken important measures to protect the a

the impact that it has on our democracy when a conservative camp can't say much, but the communist party of china can do whatever they want. what do you think the impact of that is on our democracy. >> would you like me to answer -- it is laughable, of course. they have them coming in, ayatollah. if you look at his twitter feed now, three quarters is sensocen. what is not is that it is marked with advisories. this is getting through to people outside of washington, outside of new york, outside of los angeles, people see it is a farce. they understand that not just the media, they understand social media and that the game is tilted get them and people are getting angrier and angrier. i think it is obscene that they let the iranian lunatics, the islamics post whatever they want and american conservatives are thrown off for something ridiculous. it is laughable, right? the serious thing is happening in the real world off of twitter, americans are seeing what is happening. >> i feel like i looked at this issue quite a bitt and there is danger in the notion that sometimes we say why aren't you sensori