program services as part of that expansion. to the extent we are able to keep program services funded, that is a very important piece. the community programs section is also a big issue. working with adult probation, we think that we have a fairly good plan, and with the a.b. 109 moneys as the proposal is to distribute them, it appears there is an opportunity to use those resources to expand capacity at this juncture. but certainly, there could, time when for whatever reason capacity becomes available -- there could come a time. supervisor mirkarimi: since we are one of the few areas in california experiencing under crowding, has there ever been any internal discussion about us bringing in prisoners from other jurisdictions? is that something that san francisco would be poised to help alleviate in terms of budgetary reasons? >> we have been approached by at least one department in san mateo, and they have had ongoing crowding issues in the last several years. we had not had serious discussions with them, but we have that as a possibility, and we are also aware that they get a 30-day notice in case they needed it. they have to find

things and say to the business community, we want to match you up with training for people who need training. and i'm not talking about massive expansion of school programs for 50 minutes once a week, but serious training programs where people aren't serious things to become -- learn serious things to become employable. that makes sense. it ought to be modified to achieve that. on the infrastructure bank, i a -- i have a totally different proposal. i would combine an american energy plan with a very large infrastructure program and have the new royalties from american energy -- for example, if you develop offshore south carolina, the revenue from that, you have at 12.5% revenue going into both acquiring conversation land and infrastructure, and then you could tragic -- dredge the charleston harbor which needs it. at no tax increase for the american people, you could begin to rebuild the infrastructure. which we do need to do. you go to china and elsewhere, we are rapidly decaying in terms of infrastructure. but i would like to see a grand coalition that everyone who wants infrastructure and energy comes together to pass a bill which uses the american ene

say to the business community, we want to match you up, for training with people who need training, so, it is actually -- not talking about a massive expansion of various school programs, for, you know, 50 minutes, once a week, i'm talking about actually having serious training programs where people learn serious things, to become employable. that makes sense. and, i think it ought to be modified to achieve that. so that is how i'd approach that. on the infrastructure i have a tote toll different proposal. i would combine an american energy plan with a very large infrastructure program and have the new royalties from american energy subsidize it. if you develop offshore south carolina. if you took the formula webb and warner developed you have a 12.5% revenue going into both acquiring conservation land and infrastructure you can dredge the charleston harbor which needs dredging, using the money you are getting from an offshore development, so, at no tax increased to american people, you could begin to rebuild our infrastructure, which we do need to do. there is no... you go to china and elsewhere, and we are rapidly decaying, in terms of infrastructure. but i'd like t