here to explain is that conard -- ed conard. ed, thank you for joining us.gratulations on the new book. what have we gotten wrong about inequality? why has it turned out to be good? thei think that we saw wages of the 1% with the middle class and we blamed one for the other one and they are really two completely independent anomalies. the success of the 1% is driving employment and accelerating growth, relative to other economies like germany, france, japan and the rest of europe. it is not responsible for the slow growth. joe: what is the evidence that the 1% has, the rise of the 1% and extreme wealth has not been a detriment to the overall economy? ed: there is overwhelming evidence. look at the entrenchment of the status quo, you see the fortune 500, you see ceos and their tenures declining. and if you look, there is turmoil, the largest companies of 2000, most of them are gone except for microsoft. there are new competitors emerging in that sector. if you look at u.s. growth relative to other high wage economies, we have accelerated and allocated resourc