, in particular, for the members of the conciliation council from other factions of the groups all agreed with the decision to take such a decision now.. i believe that there was no need for this, moreover, according to our calculations, if the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on in the verkhovna rada hall today or tomorrow, there would be at least 240 votes, and i am surprised by the decision. conciliation council, surprised, i hope that they will explain to us all, both mr. oleg and mr. mykhailo, what were the motives, what were there. act, what was the explanation for it, that they all voted unanimously to consider this law only in the month of august, so i would ask, mr. serhiy, this is not a claim, i understand that you are working there with the information that you have, but i asked you to place the accents correctly, so wait, you have a majority in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, if you cannot with your majority... make decisions on bills without participation of the european solidarity of the motherland or with their participation,

and i am surprised by the decision of the conciliation council. surprised. and i hope that we will still understand... both mr. oleg and mr. mykhailo, what were the motives, what were the reasons, how was it all explained, that they all unanimously voted for to be considered for this law only in the month of august, so i would ask, mr. serhiy, this is not a claim, i understand that you are working there with the information you have, but i would ask you to place the emphasis correctly, so wait for you. there is a majority in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, if you cannot by your majority make decisions on bills without the participation of european solidarity and the motherland, or with their participation, then you must admit that you have some problems in the faction, if such a fateful law banning the moscow church, your faction cannot vote, well , there are definitely problems, can other factions of the group vote on this one without us? the law, no, they can't, so let's still treat the majority with respect, because 150 deputies are the vast majority of th

not have the will to go on vacation either, and this is a question for the members of the conciliation councilticular members of the conciliation board from other factions of groups. so they all agreed with the decision to take such a break now? i believe that there was no need for this, moreover, according to our calculations, if today or tomorrow the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on in the hall of the verkhovna rada, there would be at least 240 votes today or tomorrow, and i am surprised by the decision of the conciliation thank you, i am surprised and i hope that everyone will explain to us after all. and to mr. oleg and mr. mykhailo, what were the motives, what were the reasons, how was it all explained, that they all unanimously voted to consider this law. only in the month of august, so i would ask, mr. serhiy, this is not a claim, i understand that you are working there with the information you have, but i asked you to place the accents correctly. yes, wait, you have a majority in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, if you cannot make decisions on bi

, in particular, the members of the conciliation council from other factions of the groups, why all agreed with the decision to take such a break now, i believe that no ... there was no need for this, moreover, according to our calculations, if the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on in the verkhovna rada hall today or tomorrow, there would be at least 240 votes today or tomorrow, and i am surprised by the decision of the conciliation council, i'm surprised, i hope we are mr. oleg and mr. mykhailo will explain to everyone what the motives were, what the reasons were, what it was all about... it was explained that they all unanimously voted to consider, which means that this law will be considered only in august, so i would ask, mr. sergey, this is not a complaint, i understand that you are working there with the information you have, but i asked you to put the emphasis correctly, so wait for you.

this is a question for members of the conciliation council, in particular for members of the conciliation council from other factions of the groups. why did they all agree with the decision to take such a break now? i believe that none. needs for this did not happen, moreover, according to our calculations, if the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on today or tomorrow in the hall of the verkhovna rada, then today. there would be a minimum of 240 votes or tomorrow, mr. dmytro, what prevents the current government from putting the dots on this issue, i don't know, i'm not invited to the conciliation council anymore, because they don't like intelligent questions there, and let them sort it out among themselves , because it resembles a terrarium of like-minded people and the behavior of spiders in a jar, because even well, it stands out representative of the monomajority, chairman of the entire committee. let him decide on the position of his faction, with the leadership of his faction. styfanchuk, when he talks about the finalization of this bill, he sho

conciliation council from other factions of groups.ll of them? agreed with the decision to take such a break now, i believe that there was no need for this, moreover, according to our calculations, if today or tomorrow the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agencies were to be voted on in the hall of the verkhovna rada, then today would be would be at least 240 votes or tomorrow, mr. dmytro, what prevents the current government from putting the dots on this issue, i don’t know, i don’t know... they invite more to the conciliation council, because they don’t like intelligent questions there, and they let them sort things out among themselves, because this resembles a terrarium of like-minded people and the behavior of spiders in a jar, because even if it is the representative of the monomajority, the head of the entire committee, let him decide on the position of his faction, with the leadership of his faction, stefanchuk, when he talks about finalizing this bill, well, i should have known that the time for submitting amend

, the conciliation council is the leaders of precisely the faction groups, therefore... this is the whole parliament, it will be somewhere at the end of august, at the end of august you will start considering this bill, well, it will be the second half of august, obviously, and there is a certain certain understanding that until august 15 there is such a time-out for that , so that everyone is calm, without of unnecessary emotions, they looked at the text again, communicated, including in the west, by the way, in my opinion, the communication is not enough, what is russia doing in the temporarily occupied territories? and then i saw that you were also in the states and you and your colleagues, journalists, if i understood correctly, were talking about how ukrainian churches are being destroyed in the occupied territories. absolutely all denominations, except the russian orthodox church or the moscow patriarchate. we, we talked about it, we are now, we will get to the states now, and there is something to talk about, but accordingly, after august 15, we still expect from this

from... the cream and for the members of the conciliation council from other factions of the did they all agree with the decision to take such a break now, i believe that there was no need for it, moreover, according to our calculations, if the law banning the russian orthodox church and its agents were to be voted on today or tomorrow in the hall of the verkhovna rada, then today there would be at least or tomorrow 240 votes, mr. dmytro. i don't know what prevents the current government from putting the dots on this issue, i'm not invited to the conciliation council anymore, because they don't like reasonable questions there, but let them sort it out among themselves, because it's on... terrarium of like-minded people and behavior spiders in the jar, because even, well, this is the representative of the monomajority, the chairman of the entire committee, let him decide on the position of his faction, with the leadership of his faction, stefanchuk, when he talks about the finalization of this bill, well, he should have known that time the submission of amendments and proposal

and petro poroshenko, after the meeting of the conciliation council, went to the people's deputies, who are blocking the tribune with the demand to vote on the law banning the russian orthodox church in ukraine. our tactical victory. today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, if they do not pass, and they do not pass a law on the church, there will be no meetings of the verkhovna rada. second, according to our demand, which was supported, the first law to be considered at the regular meeting of the verkhovna rada will be the law on the defense of the russian church. the third, before the meeting of the verkhovna rada, is a working group will work on several questions, only in these questions. we have to start the meeting of the verkhovna rada with a law on this, and why it became possible because all the factions in the parliament united, except for the opzzh, and it cannot be said that the servants of the people did not unite, because a huge part of the real patriots, supporters are among the servants, also came out and took part in this process. they blocked the tribune and tried to

after the conciliation council with the leaders of the factions, the head of the verkhovna rada, ruslanpanchuk , announced a break in the session. on the sidelines , they say that such a break will probably last until the end of august. and if the document is not brought to the hall, the podium will continue to be blocked, and even if the matter starts to move, the process will still be slow, there are 1,200 edits, at least, which will be put for confirmation by the representatives of the former opzhz, now actually the remnants of this structure, and that is why it is such a long process, the chairman of the bru later announced that parliamentarians will not rest, but will work in committees, in particular. and on the draft law on banning the uocp. the latter will be put to the vote of the parliament after collecting 240 votes in his support. and at the same time, according to the latest april survey of the kyiv city institute of sociology, ukrainians are more unanimous on the issue of the moscow patriarchate. 63% of reviewers are in favor of its complete ban. kateryna galko, yulia bels

after the meeting of the conciliation council, petro poroshenko went to the people's deputies, who are blocking the tribune with the demand to bring to a vote the law on the prohibition of the roc in ukraine, people's deputies expressed a clear position on why the russian church does not have the right to exist in our country and why it is important not to postpone this decision in a distant drawer? our tactical victory is the first, today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. if they do not issue, and they do not issue a law on the church, there will be no meetings of the verkhovna rada. second, according to our demand, which was supported, the first law to be considered at the regular meeting of the verkhovna rada will be the law on the defense of the russian church. the third is that before the meeting of the verkhovna rada, a working group several questions will be worked out, we are only working on these questions. we have to start. to say that the servants of the people did not unite, because a huge part of the real patriots, the supporters are in the servants, also came out and

today at the conciliation council, the servants united with the two formers groups, current groups and the former opzzh and did not contribute this one, actually contributed 8371, we have such and such news that... a new coalition between servants and pro-russian parties appeared in the 10th year of the war, but we have what we have , they chose such servants, and former servants of the people became servants. previously, it was assumed that it was not considered because there were not enough votes in favor, however, the parliamentarians assure that there is support for the initiative even among the people's servants. there are enough votes for this draft law, the only question is to put it on the agenda. and since servants block its introduction to the agenda, then , unfortunately, we cannot consider it, i am sure that if this law is in the hall, then at least 250 deputies will vote for it. in addition , people's deputies could be frightened by conditional anathema, they say, they already have threats that they will receive personal western sanctions in case of supporting the initiati

at the conciliation council. it is a pity that we have a new coalition between servants and pro-russianthe 10th year of the war, but we have what we have, they chose such a servant, they were servants of the people, they became servants. previously, it was assumed that it was not considered because there were not enough votes in favor, however , parliamentarians assure that there is support for the initiative, even among the people's servants. dear enough for this bill, the only question is to put it on the agenda in order, and since the servants are blocking the introduction to the agenda, unfortunately, we cannot consider the consideration, i am sure that if this law is in the hall, then at least 250 deputies will vote for it. in addition , the people's deputies could be frightened by the conditional anathema, they say, they already have threats that they will receive personal western sanctions if they support the initiative. according to the people's deputies, the relevant letter came from an american law firm that acts on behalf of the ukrainian orthodox church. on the contrary, oth

today, at the conciliation council, the servants united with two former groups, or rather, current groupsnd the former opz, and... they did not bring this down , they actually brought down the bill 83-71, we will send such and such news, it is a pity that we have a new coalition between servants and pro-russian parties in the 10th year of the war, but we have that we have, they chose such a servant, they were servants of the people, they became servants. previously, it was assumed that it was not considered because there were not enough votes in favor, but the parliament... assures that there is support for the initiative even among the people's servants. there are enough votes for this draft law, the only question is to put it on the agenda in order, and since the servants are blocking its putting on the agenda, unfortunately, we cannot consider it. i am sure that if this law is in the hall, then at least 250 deputies will vote for it. in addition, the people's deputies could be frightened by the conditional anathema, they say, they already have... that they will receive personal western

petro poroshenko after meeting of the conciliation council went to people's deputies, who are blocking the tribune with the demand to vote on the law banning the russian orthodox church in ukraine. and the people's deputies expressed a clear position, why the russian church has no right to exist. in our country and why is it important not to postpone this decision in a distant drawer? let's see our tactical victory. first: today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, if they do not pass, and they do not pass the law on the church, there will be no meetings of the verkhovna rada. the second, according to our demand, which was supported, that the first the law, which will be considered at the regular meeting. we have to start the meeting of the verkhovna rada with the law on tser and why it became possible because all the factions in the parliament united, except for the opzz. and it cannot be said that the servants of the people did not unite. because a huge part of real patriots, supporters are in the servants, also came out and took part in this process. law on banning the activities o

continues, and either the council will be dissolved, and such rumors from the conciliation council are now being heard. today, i mean, and then there will be no meetings tomorrow, because we said that we will block the tribune until we achieve the adoption of the bill on banning the activities of the russian church in ukraine, and those who do not want this consideration can most likely dissolve the meeting, and then they were going on vacation, going to go on vacation, and then this the process will drag on until september, because we said that we will not vote for other draft laws, we are european solidarity, a voice, a homeland, a significant part of the faction for the future, a significant part of trust, and a significant part of the people's servants, i.e. the majority that requires the adoption of this project. mr. mykola, is there an opportunity, is there still a chance now to actually rally and try to see the matter through to the end, because we have to wait more than a month until september, and it is not known what will happen next, because there may be new challenges,

was put on the agenda several times, and including, it is implied, it was proposed at the conciliation council to put this issue on the agenda in order to vote on the second reading, since the committee already past completed everything, all the corrections were finished and there were no problems with it, therefore, since the leadership of the parliament... was known to drag out this process, and when we went to the podium, and i will tell you that there came to the podium, including a large number and representatives of the servants of the people, who are also in their faction, those who support this law, they said that they will not vote on all subsequent laws until we go into consideration of this draft law, i remind everyone, this is the cabinet option, we really talked to you that was my draft law, in march 2022 it consisted of five points, to clearly prohibit and close parishes if they move and refuse russian subordination, then the communities decide how to proceed with this, but the following were the draft laws, there was the draft law of other colleagues , then there were bills from

whether he can bring it to the hall according to his own. by their own will, and not only by the conciliation councilwhere the majority have servants, and accordingly everything is blocked, so the speaker has the opportunity to put this issue to a vote, in particular, if it is raised by people's deputies, if the majority of deputies in the session hall are ready to vote and consider it, then there is no problem with it, it is considered in the hall, is included in the agenda, the speaker has been blocking it for several months in a row. the second is the blocker, which i understand is david arahami. and those deputies with whom he communicates, or to put it mildly, whom he controls, and the third issue is directly the hop company of the former opz, no matter what they are called there today in the parliament, and they are both in the parliament and outside the parliament, and work very actively, in particular on the international environment, vadym novinsky pays millions of bills to lobbyists, so-called lawyers, such as robert amsterdam, who... especially at the level of the united states of america,

as two fragments of the former opzh opposed and blocked the inclusion of this issue in the conciliation council on the agenda, despite the fact that that there is an absolute consensus in the parliament that this issue should be on the agenda, and among those who blocked were representatives of all political parties, including servants of the people with the exception of the former pzj, i.e. here we have the fact that, unfortunately, the leadership of the majority party plays completely into the hands of the absolute smaller, pro-russian minority in the parliament, i.e. there are not so many of such die-hard russophiles in our parliament, but you see, they have the opportunity to impose your agenda and make sure that bills that are very important for the country are not included in the vote, because i am sure. if this draft law appeared on the agenda, it would receive a sufficient number of votes, and look, here is a question of such a plan, the fact that vacations were announced for the verkhovna rada, then the chairman of the verkhovna rada, stepanchuk, began to explain that the work would be

called to join our initiative, other political forces will not be allowed to vote, after the conciliation council with the leaders of the factions, the head of the verkhovna rada , ruslan stepanchuk, announced a pause in the meeting , on the sidelines they say that such a break... probably until the end of august, and if the document they will not bring it into the hall, the podium will continue to be blocked, and even if the case starts to move, the process will still be slow, there are 1,200 edits, at least, which will be put for confirmation by the representatives of the former opzhz, now actually the remnants of this structure, and that is why it is so long process, the head of the verkhovna rada later announced that the parliament... will not rest, but will work in committees, in particular, on the draft law banning the uocp. the latter will be put to the vote of the parliament after collecting 240 votes in its support. and at the same time, for according to the data of the last april survey of the kyiv city institute of sociology, ukrainians are more unanimous on the issue of the moscow pat

well, of course there is, because there are two people from our faction in the conciliation council, they are david rahamya and andriy mytovylovych, well, only one of them has voting rights, of course, who is present there, yes, because one person from one faction votes or groups, and at the morning meeting of the conciliation board, unfortunately,... well, i don't know who was present there, david or andrii, initially voted against the fact that this the law was put on the agenda, uh, and that is why the final decision was made to hold this action, a protest action near the rostrum of the verkhovna rada, and it was an inter-factional, inter-group protest action, uh, well, yes, of course, there is nothing here to hide, we were ready for it, that is, we discussed such a protest action. before that, well, you were preparing, i see, you, you banners, there were slogans prepared, yes, well, the banners, that’s how i understand them, were already prepared right when it started, because at first they weren’t there, no, we were preparing, well in principle, and we said that we will support

and blocked by the ruling party of the servant of the people, therefore we will talk at the conciliation councilill see, but... these are the blocks of issues that will be considered, there is a large block of personnel issues, which is discussed for a long time and gossiped about in the media, but so far neither real candidates nor real dates are known, because i i think that after the return of the president and his team from washington , these issues will generally be raised and considered. thank you, ms. yulia, yulia klymenko, people's deputy of ukraine, was on the live air of the espresso tv channel, talking about the results of the nato summit and about... about the agenda of the parliament session, says mrs. yulia, that the most priority issue remains how we survive this difficult winter, as the enemy continues to bombard our energy industry. well , my colleague, anna eva melnyk, who has prepared fresh information for you with the news editor, is ready to announce more news. my friend, i give you the floor and ask you to let me know what you found out. thank you, marta, for your work, the