your time in town and a town dynasty china surely never imposed anything any other country because confucius thinks you live the way you live i leave it where i live. diversity is a precondition for civilization to advance we all can make mistake together then you can think right maybe five hundred years later could be totally wrong so you need to pee poor lift the weight differently to preserve the diversity and you can argue that this is a form of checks and balances that americans like so much you have different ideas different mentalities and love them you know continue with each other lead them discuss their differences openly rather than imposing one particular right way but coming back to the game theory this reference to you know one zero sum game or what the chinese call win win was also stressed last month when the chinese president xi jinping visited the united states and i guess such references are good for diplomacy but i wonder whether there is anything more to it because. what essentially. the chinese are asking americans is to abandon america's all sometimes very arrogant way

you know the confucius notion the notion of the unity man of heaven is particular to relevant to today's discussion of stand ability i think we may have to redefine the relationship between humanity nature the notion of unity a man to have been these far more advanced irrelevant for full humanity in particular compare with the notion of may is measure all things we place our self to high priority but that's one reason why we get ourselves into deep trouble into persistent ability but in terms of chinese ways of seeing global governance is again coming back to confucius notion unit diversity is a precondition for for for harmony so one china was number one child was number one for many centuries you know and then china should be a member pursued it had money tried to impose a political system a religion in a country so we truly believe that we may be the way we leave you deeply and we shouldn't cherish this disparities and diversity and there understand you correctly that one of the reasons why china did that and tough to install here this huge damage is not because it couldn't do that bu

sustainability but in terms of chinese ways of seeing global governance is again coming back to confucius notion you need these diversity as a precondition for for for harmony so one china was number one child was number one for many centuries you know and then china truly never pursued it had money tried to impose a political system a religion in a country so we truly believed we be the way we live you leap to play you leave and we should cherish this disparities and diversity and there understand you correctly that one of the reasons why china did it then tough to install here this huge damage is not because it couldn't do that but because it thought that it was not the right in the right thing to do in practical way to is the right thing for everybody use the same systems you need to encourage the diversity because we always there's always a possibility we can't collect we make mistakes we owe our wisdom always limit it whatever to. you're talking about so we got allowed this diversity the differences so this is very sensual you know for chinese philosophy and cultures well now. during

bit different i think the one central element of chinese way i think about global governance is confucius notion of diversity is maybe the precondition for how money so one china was the center of global economy global civilization you and the town dynasty china truly have never imposed anything any other country because confucius thinks you live the way you live i leave it to id. diversity is a precondition for civilization to advance we all can make mistake together then you can think right maybe five hundred years later could be totally wrong so you need to people lift the weight differently to preserve the diversity and he can argue that this is a form of checks and balances that americans like so much here have different ideas different mentalities and love them. you know compete with each other let them discuss their differences openly rather than imposing one particular right way but coming back to the game theory this reference to you know one zero sum game or what the chinese call win win was also stressed last month when the chinese president xi jinping visited the united states

. >> the problem comes down to some great philosopher, i think was confucius who said never picture pik by the barrel. >> neil: you own the barrel? >> that is what jeff thinks. what he is going to find out he doesn't own the paper. >> neil: going to turn? >> probably not. >> neil: when they said, sam, what did you do? >> what are you going to do? if you don't have a thick skin, i can't be on your program. >> neil: with all your other real estate holdings, guys, we are losing money fast. we need to fix it. what is the incidents between telling those guys and journalist guys? >> because journalists think they are doing good's work. that is a different standard than where everybody is economically tied together. >> neil: do you think they are stupid or arrogant? >> arrogant is a much better word. difference between newspaper people and academics is very small. they all both run in the same scenario of thinking that they are doing -- they are very educated and done very well. >> neil: did you take business courses? >> based on my experience, they had a lot of trouble adding and subtracting.

. >> the problem comes down to some gat philosopher, i think it was confucius toaid, never pick a fighth a guy who buys ink by the barrel. and so -- neil: you on the barrel. >> that is what i thought. that is what jeff bezos thinks. what i found out and what he is going to find out is he does not neil: that will turn on him? >> probably not. neil: what did you do? >> i laid there until i got better. if you don't have a thick skin, i can't come and be on your program. neil: with all you other real-estate holdings, were you saying, we have to change things, we're losg money fast. was a difference in telling those guys and journalists guys? with the journalists think they're doing god's work. therefore that is a different standard than where everyone is economically tied together. neil: did they think you were stupid american? >> arrogant is a much better word. the difference between a newspaper person and an academic is small they'll both run in the same scenario of thinking that they're doing -- after all, they're very educated and have done well academically. neil how many business cour