but as a result of the information that congress discovered during the investigation, congress passedthe national security act of 1947. and this act did a major reorganization of the military branches and in national intelligence. so it created aÑ< the first permanent intelligence agency and it also reorganized all the military services to be under one department of defense. just before the united states entered world war two, the senate created the special committee to investigate the national defense program. this committee was was created to oversee billions of dollars in appropriations that congress had just made for war preparation. this committee was led by senator harry truman and of missouri, and it investigated reports of fraud and inefficient c in war preparation. so the committee uncovered numerous instances of corruption and mismanagement and profiteering. it set a standard for congressional oversight operations and was widely praised for its effective work, saving billions of dollars of taxpayer money. it also made senator truman a national figure. the truman committee's

congress could have said yes or no. there's nothing about law really hently in the question of should the monitors on the boats be pr by the owners or the government. so step one is has congress in the statute swed that question. when we say no, everybody agrees that'not in the statute, then we say the agency can make that determination so long as they so in a reasonable way. so, for example, here, the question is whether or not monitors on the boats have to be paid for by the owner of the boat. i see that as a policy question. congress could have said yes or no. there's nothing about law really inherently in the questi o should the monitors on the boats be paid for by the owners orhe government. so step one is has congress in the statute answered that question. when we say no, everybody agrees that's nohe statute, then we say the agency can make that rmination so long as they do so in a reasonable way. and the -- and courts sort of police the boundaries of reonableness, but whether or not the monitors are paid r not re

dean of the congress.curity. speaking on afge for members, and on the oversight committee, he stands up every day against untruthful allegations by the majority. please welcome representative maxwell frost. >> thank you. how is everybody doing? what's disgusting? unionbusting. what's going on here? am i at the right rally? what's disgusting? >> unionbusting! >> hello, afge. it's a blessing to be here this morning. thank god it's not raining. this year, it's not raining and i want to first off thank you all so much for doing your jobs and doing a damn good job at that. and now we need congress to do the same, we need congress to do their jobs. we got this week, then we go home for a week, three more days, and then the government shuts down. i had heard zip from my republican colleagues on the plan from last week on how we will make sure you all stay in work and the government continues to function for the people which is why we were sent here in the first place. we cannot let the government shutdown. and he

i don't think congressou do that. in the same way th cgress couldn't tell the president how to exercise the veto power or the pardon power, it can't tell courts how to do interpretation and to defer to someone else. justice ga thank you. chief justice roberts: justice gorsuch? justice gorsuch: do we have to dedehat constitutional question? martinez: i think it makes sense to decide the constitutional question. i thinyocould -- justice gorsuch: that wasn't -- do we ha t martinez: i think you could resolve this case undethapa, and we would ctaly welcome an -- an ieretation of the apa that comes out our way, especial iit's informed by constitutional avoidance principles that i think have a lot of salience here. justice gorsuch: are -- do anything in your argument suggest or depend upon thede that judges should make or decide policy qutis about ai or anything else? martinez: no. we -- aundred percent agree that judges should not do pocy. we just think that they should do law. anth's in -- chevron is about legal questions.

congress could have said y no. there's nothing about law really inherently in thqution of should the monitors on the boats be paid for by the oor the government. so step one is has congress in the statute answered that question. when we say no, everybody agrees that'not in the statute, then determination so long as they do so in a reasonable way. and the -- and courts f reasonableness, but whether or not the monitors a pd for is not really a legal question. martinez: i think the question of whether or not the law allows the agencyo to force the monitors to be paid for by private industry is absolutely a legal question. e with you that when congress -- justice jackson: but isn't at the same question as to whether or not -- i't that just another way of saying, can this policy determinae made by martinez: no, i don't think so. i think therence is when the -- when the -- when the policymaker, whether it's congress or the agency, sitting there and trying to figure out, like, what the best policy is, would the world be a

it is not defeasible by congress.nforce constitution when itay can't appear on our ballot if you've alrerved two terms as president. the same goes -- justice yor: the same if they are under age when elected the same if they aotmrhell: they are not -- well, the same if they are not a u.s. citizen for sure. the age is a little more nuanced because you can imagine a scenario where the person is 34 years old at the f the election, but he turns 35 before inauguration day. jusotomayor: well, then that would come up -- a could not -- stice sotomayor: -- that would probably come up to us at some the state would make a decision and say he's ineligible but my point is so what -- adding qualificato what term limit -- mr. mitchell: you are -- justice sotomayor: -- is your argument based on? mr. mitchell: you are changing -- justice sotomayor: i'just confused. mr. mi: okay. with respect to the -- maybe i will start with the agple. justice sotomayor: mm-hmm. mitchell: if a state like colorado says you can't on our presidential ball

we need congress to appropriate. >> congress controls the purse strings.ant to ask you about a criminal case that has become a political rallying point. you heard donald trump use this phrase migrant crime. a 22-year-old nursing student, i know you've been following this, laken riley, in the state of georgia was murdered allegedly by an undocumented venezuelan migrant. the suspect had been detained by border patrol upon crossing, released with temporary permission to stay in the country. he then went on allegedly to commit crimes twice, once in new york for driving a scooter without a license and once in connection with a shoplifting case in georgia. did those states and their law enforcement communicate to the federal government that this had happened? should this man have been deported? >> a few thoughts. first, margaret, first and foremost, an absolute tragedy and our hearts break for and our prayers are with the family. number one. number two, and importantly, as a prosecutor, having prosecuted violent crime and other crimes for 12 years, one individua

your big point, we got to look at 1934, we got to look at what congress wrote, why would congress have drawn that distinction in 1934? >> because they wanted to get the fully automatic weapons who had the push triggers. and if you use pull of the trigger you are not going to get those devices. so they had to say function of the trigger to own expos those forms of weaponry, as long as the conventional cover push and pull? >> how should it be defined, in your view, to cover bump stocks? in other words, tomorrow congress said, mr. mitchell, how should we write the statute to cover bump stocks since function of the trigger in your view doesn't do it? >> i'd have to ask them what else do you want to encompass besides bump stocks? >> just bump stocks. give me a sentence that you think would cover bump stocks. >> i would provide a statutory definition of bump stocks that tracks as closely as possible to nonmechanical devices that mr. cargill has. >> it's not a great statutory language. you got anything better than that? [laughter] >> i think you can say any device, and this may be a little to

people are writing to congress, calling on congress. blacks and whites, pleading for help around that. the violence that's taking place. and so in particular over the franchise and the vote is where congress sees that they can intercede and so congress is going to pass a series of enforcement acts. the third being the ku klux klan act all around this idea of, you know, trying to find some way to federalize, if you will, these violations on southern's civil rights and political rights, in particular, black southerners, civil and political rights. and one way that they're going to do that is they're going to form the department of justice, which the department of justice initial one of their initial ideas is to actually investigate this this violence in this klan activity is to investigate terrorist organizations and congress very quickly realizes that they cannot ignore the reports that the department of justice is coming up with. and so they decide that they're going to create a commission to organize and investigate what's happening in

the commiee petitioned congress to allow it to mission into. association of the north americans for the preservation, their rights and liberties. congress responded by commissioning the first continental marinehree days later. this gentleman, samuel nicholas, that you see depicted here on november 5th, samuel nicholas became first and therefore the senior marine officer when president of the continental congress at the time. john hancock signed his commission. many mistakenly to this as designate nicholas as the first commandant ofbut that's not becs did not bestow that title on the commandant until 1798, during a quasi war against france, after the american revolution. nicholas was a 31 year old philadelphia native. he was born a quaker and his father died when he was seven years old. he attended the academy of philadelphia. became the future university of pennsylvania. and graduated at a of 16, after which he became a merchant and owner of contest omega wagon tavern in downtown philadelphia. starting a trend of marines being affiliated with a

guest: kick in after april if congress failed to pass congress already has technically kind of triggeredust hasn't taken effect yet. there's also a lot of confusion as that would take effect if they were to do something like a year-loto bill which isn't really possible but is something that conservatives wanted. that is different w after april 30. but how me is it would take us across the board and it would be kind of indiscrimat it's not like if you work for the education department i'm god decide how this is going. , it would be program by program but there are still a lot of diffe around how this cut would be implemented if they were to come to more deadlines, that potential for 1% across the board cut. what does it all mean politically for speaker johnson right now? guest: people talk to conservatives even about this, he is doing the best job he can right now. the bells that are coming out are more in linethat is in linet was already brokered byand kevi. i think after a certain point people feel like the writing is already on the wall. m>some conservatives have alreay written off the

coming up fridayning, arkansas republican congress talks about the impending deadline.nd the e.p.a. on tailpipe emissions. and we'll continue u.s. aid to israel and ukraine with kathy manning. c-span's "washington journal" join in friday morning on'bn noe mobile app or c-span.org next, r hakeem jeffries speaks to reporters on efforts to pass adds 1.2 trillion government friday's midnight deadline to avoid a partial government shutdown. also he talks about benjamin netanyahu addressing congress and continued support for ukraine. this is about 15 minutes. h? >> head's up. afternoon. from the beginning of congress, the republicans made clear we'll find bipartisan ground on our colleagues on any issue wherever possible in order to take care of the business of the american people and make life better for everyday americans. we've repeatedly done it from the beginning of this congress and c it once again in order to make sure the final six appropriation bills are passed in the house, sent over to the senate, and on a path to be signed into law by president joe biden. under no

congress punts. congress doesn't help. congress sort of gives him some ambiguous responses, leaves it in his hands and he handles it for grant. as a as we were just talking about grant tax back and forth and zigzags depending on what congress is giving at any point. sometimes gives him power with the enforcement act. sometimes congress takes it away when they de-fund the military and start mustering people out. grant doesn't try to go his way. he doesn't try to keep the military in the field. he doesn't try to use funds from another to pay for things he says. all right. that's the will of the people i to respect that and taft to the same extent is trying to work very carefully with congress and of course with the courts some of the best for taft respecting separation of powers is, of course with the supreme court and the 16th amendment, with the personal income tax that congress had initially wanted to check the supreme decision ruling, personal income tax, unconstitutional. 1895 congress wanted to respond with a law diffe

we need congress to move.ed the acp extension act. $7 billion of funding at the fcc would have immediate access to gd to be ableo kee all of these families connected. this has got to be the way forward. it's the only piece of legislation that has any st as s and getting signed by the president. i know there are some who think that usf reform can happen in the next six weeks, and had to tell you that's just not going to happen. usf reform is like rewriting the 1996 telecom act. so guys i worked on the 94 telecom act, didn't pass and 94, right? i was a young law student back how many congresses into the '96 act we were at that point might before actually pastor is going to te o complete the reform use f and are a lot of different equities. we've been urging congress, you cannot rely on the usf reform effort is it acp. you have got to give the financing for acp so we can keep the program going. and yes, we continue to talk usf reform. >> one thing was also seen in the last couple of months is the sec beginning to

come on, congress. wake up. guest: are you taking action in that in congress? guest: we have bill proposals. we haven't been able to get a vote on it and hoping we will and hoping viewers and people away the country start saying hey, wait a minute, this hasn't been adjusted in more than 50 years? and this is what people are actually making? 28 million americans and that's the only thing they have? and five million americans pro have worked all their lives and get below poverty checks from the federal government for social security. it needs to be corrected and the00 ought to be demanding congress take action. we have something called social secured 2100 and does all those things, has an across the board increase, repeals, n.g.o., make sure the disability system of social security, more veterans rely on that than they do on the v.a. this is not an entitlement but an earned benefit. this is not anything you'll get from the private sector. i'm from one of the insurance capitals of the world and went to the aetna school of insurance. they talk about three legs on t

for generations, his family has voted for the congress.bir feel the party is not doing enough. translation: nothing| will change if they don't raise other issues. rahul gandhi needs to roar, like other politicians. he's a good man, but that's not enough. if he speaks with more conviction, it will be good for him, for the party and for us. since india's independence, the congress party dominated the country's political landscape. from 400 seats in parliament in the 1980s, they were down to 52 in the 2019 elections. to counter the bjp�*s rising popularity, in july last year, opposition partiesjoined hands to form a united front. translation: if this alliance wins, our country will win. . but in less than a year, there are cracks in the alliance. key partners have left, joining the bjp, and others are bickering over seats. you're not worried about these differences? i'm not worried. these are differences. we have to recognise they are differences. | but a divided house isn't... it's not a house divided. we are a house - with multiple voices.

congress punts. congress doesn't help. congress sort of gives him some ambiguous responses, leaves it in his hands and he handles it for grant. as a as we were just talking about grant tax back and forth and zigzags depending on what congress is giving at any point. sometimes gives him power with the enforcement act. sometimes congress takes it away when they de-fund the military and start mustering people out. grant doesn't try to go his way. he doesn't try to keep the military in the field. he doesn't try to use funds from another to pay for things he says. all right. that's the will of the people i to respect that and taft to the same extent is trying to work very carefully with congress and of course with the courts some of the best for taft respecting separation of powers is, of course with the supreme court and the 16th amendment, with the personal income tax that congress had initially wanted to check the supreme decision ruling, personal income tax, unconstitutional. 1895 congress wanted to respond with a law diffe

i would like to take this opportunity and invite you to the next rsp congress, which we have plannedyour participation. at this congress we just wanted to determine the current ones. priorities based on development strategy countries, moreover, we have discussed all these issues over the past weeks, we are holding a russian business week forum before the congress, we recently held 14 forums and they, too, the recommendations of these forums were included in our proposal for the congress, we prepared a draft resolution, we got 100 points of our resolution. they called it 100 steps to economic leadership, and i hope that if members of the government, the administration, legislatively, carefully before the congress, we have a month ahead, will look at our proposals, then the discussion at the congress would be more fruitful and constructive, i would like to convey these proposals to you, thank you, and we, with your permission , will present them to the government, to the administration, in order... to really get answers to our questions posed within the framework of the congress. vladi

i asked them what their message to the congress party is.won't get votes just by waving at crowds. he has to find a way to listen to our problems. just a cross—country road show short of elections is not enough. when you are in the opposition. you need to be hungrier. you need to be bolder. you need to be more imaginative. and above all, you've got to work harder. i think if mr modi is looking like a front runner, i think the full credit for this anomaly has to be given to the congress party. the opposition says they are up against a lot more. multiple raids, several arrests and over 140 opposition mps suspended in the last session of parliament, all being seen as an act of intimidation. rahul gandhi's show of strength is an attempt to reclaim a space for the opposition. but can these crowds turn into votes and can rahul convert this roadshow into his victory lap? so one thing that's really come out of the piece is the fact that really congress hasn't been able to manage the message. but that's certainly not a problem for the ruling bjp part

for generations, his family has voted for the congress.ke shabir feel the party is not doing enough. translation: nothing| will change if they don't raise other issues. rahul gandhi needs to roar, like other politicians. he's a good man, but that's not enough. if he speaks with more conviction, it will be good for him, for the party and for us. since india's independence, the congress party dominated the country's political landscape. from 400 seats in parliament in the 1980s, they were down to 52 in the 2019 elections. to counter the bjp�*s rising popularity, in july last year, opposition partiesjoined hands to form a united front. translation: if this alliance wins, our country will win. . but in less than a year, there are cracks in the alliance. key partners have left, joining the bjp, and others are bickering over seats. you're not worried about these differences? i'm not worried. these are differences. we have to recognise they are differences. | but a divided house isn't... it's not a house divided. we are a house - with multiple vo

, and he does this with the advice of vladimiro monticinus and on april 5th, 1992, he closes the congressand declares a state of emergency. it is in this emergency situation that he starts implement the neoliberal model in the country. in terms of ideology, we must say that fujii morism does not have a great ideology and does not belong to any great discourse, but a completely pragmatic government that tried to create a shock. in addition, the vote itself an authoritarian government allowed the implementation of neoliberal measures and the orders from washington. these measures included the privatization and liquidation of state-owned companies, the national airline such as aeropro and minropro and all the companies that had been created in the previous decades within the framework of developing country's business structure. in addition, policies were adopted in favor of multinational capitals, large capitals entered the mining sector and various industrial sectors in pension funds. the implementation of this neoliberal structure reduce the state to its minimum size, and as we said, and o

so this is a congress for cultural freedom. it a event that he attended just a few years after, the tashkent event here. he is smoking his pipe and he is 1973, except getting his own lotus award at the writers association. meeting in the middle is a vietnam poet. too long and over here is a ish in googie we don't have a picture of him at the 1962 democratic conference. or at least i couldn't find a picture of him there. also, somebody who attended the soviet affiliated afro-asian writers association meetings. so this weight over here is now like a millstone around my neck, and i'm in a blind panic thinking. the whole premise with which i started at least half of this book, is now shot to pieces. what am i going to do? here's the great ghanaian poet, a playwright was sutherland at the first 1958, afro-asian writers association meeting in the audience is w.e.b. dubois, who was, you know, just as hughes had kind of presided it over the mccrory event, w.e.b. dubois was at the the tashkent event. f was sutherland is somebody like se

yes, the members of the congress, it appears that the - the congress, it appears that the court has decided. trump has been indicted criminally for his actions leading up to january six, he has been indicted on other charges but it is very well possible that congress could take further action here. the majority of both houses has a ready voted that he is guilty of incitement of insurrection, that was in his 2021 impeachment trial. we could have additional action taken at the end of 2024, depending on what happens, the republicans have three extra seats in the house of representatives, as it currently stands but we do not know why this is going to go. the court has only said that this is the job of congress and us attorneys acting under authority from congress but the states cannot disqualify donald trump or anyone else from federal office under the 14th amendment section 3/80 pairs right now that donald trump is ineligible to be elected governor of colorado because he has been deemed insurrection list in colorado. . ~' , ., he has been deemed insurrection list in comrade-— there are growing

keep households connected well congress determines the long-term future of the program.w about the program is that it works. families no longer have to drive to a parking lot to connect to school, trying to connect to the wi-fi. it truly gives families the opportunity for kids to be able to do homework at home and for families to be able to work from home in this new environment. with that, i am going to turn it over to the best executive director in the universe, none other then the national league of cities mr. clarence anthony. [applause] >> good morning. are you ready for over 3000 municipal officials throughout america? ause the cities are in town. the administration needs to know the cities are in town. vcongress, we are going to be on the hill on wednesday, talking about the need of cities, towns, ng to make sure that all the issues we spoke of in this press conference, that you hear about, because they are imrtnot just for the national le of cities, but for our residents. that is why for 100 years to 20l league of cities has had an impact on our great nation. and

it's up to congress. and then in the presidential immunity case, stick with the unanimous bipartisan ruling from the dc circuit, saying, of course, we don't have any kings here. we don't have dictators. know a president cannot assassinate his political opponents and escape any kind of criminal consequences unless he's impeached in the house and convicted in the senate, which was the argument that trump's lawyers actually made before the dc circuit. so i would hope that would happen. unfortunately, there are at least three justices who were appointed for nominated to the court by donald trump, who appear not to be veering very far from what the maga element wants them to do. but let's hope that this is the case where they can vindicate themselves and also rehabilitate the very tarnished image of the supreme court at this point yeah, the grand bargain that's an interesting way to put it. i would say that obviously amy coney barrett was appointed by or sent up by, nominated, i should say, by the former presi

it doesn't say congress. congress shall, congress shall, because it doesn't need to. it's in article one. these are clearly all powers solely for the rights of congress, not of the executive. so the one before about habeas corpus, clearly the responsibility of congress honest abe may maybe playing fast loose here, but let's talk about the part of lincoln's statement. there was an emergency. couldn't congress was not in session at the time. he didn't have them to turn to. and he had get these troops through this difficult corridor and in there to suppress the rebellion. maybe he has a point here, but congress then comes into session two months later, july of 1861 and they start passing a whole bunch of laws to authorize, to raise troops, to pay them, to really finance and construct a war model so that he can suppress rebellion. they don't the writ of habeas corpus. that doesn't happen until 63, two years later. and over those two years, the lincoln administration arrests incarcerates almost 10,000 people, mostly american citizens. and they it again for speaking out aga

we love having mayors in the congress and in the u.s. senate and working in government because they get us and understand us. help us understand and give us advice since you've sat in both seat, how mayors can work more closely to support the problem solvers caucus, whrorn you're from ohio or not, we want to support the work of the caucus and work more closely together. talk about how your experience as a mayor and member of congress can be leveraged in that way. mr. molinaro: i served in a state legislature, a county mayor, representing $1 million budget. number one, humanize your argument. you can sign as many form letters as you want. i'm sure josh reads every one of them. when you personalize the message, i see my friend from the city of poughkeepsie, if you tell me how my decision affects the north side of poughkeepsie, i want to know it. i want to hear how they're going to be impacted by our choices. second, you have to push back on your party interests. i tell people this all the time. as a republican county executive i was told d

help bypassing congress.tagon found 4 billion for ukraine in the presidential fund powers what might be the consequences of procrastination? putin's personal crime. while in russia they are saying goodbye to the murdered oppositionist... the kremlin threatens navalny with responsibility for unauthorized actions. well, until we started such a main conversation, i think today's most vivid event is in moscow, on march 1 they buried russian opposition politician oleksii navalny, who was tortured in a russian prison in february. thousands of people came to say goodbye to him, but only relatives and friends were allowed into the church, about 20 minutes this official farewell was held there, the territory of the church was surrounded by medal fences, the queue of those willing to say goodbye to navalny stretched for more than a kilometer, let's see how it was! with the fact that yesterday, in its resolution, the european parliament expressed concern about the restrictions on the foreign trips of members of the verk

even when the court concedes congress has pow, then they proceed to tell congress how to use that power. in fact, in this one they said it has to be legislation, and that legislation has to specifically say this and that, right? so it's a power grab in every way, and it is deference to congress in name only. the 14th amendment is one of in my mind the most important provision of our constitution of the way we live in our modern lives in this country, our most-civil war lives. and to see this supreme court chip away at it, undermine it, subvert it, take it as their own, the times that happened in the past in the 19th century in the reconstruction period resulted in devastation for our democracy whether it was blessy vs. ferguson, whether it was the civil rights cases in 1883, these are cases in which the supreme court undermined congress' power to issue statutes in accordance with the 14th amendment. and every time they did it, i mean they ushered in jim crow for 60 years in this country. so honestly when we see the supreme court doing this, when we see them subverting a provision of the

and congress can take away. and so to me, again, like the notion that the supreme court has the power of judicial review is not new. the notion that the court might abuse that power in ways that are deeply unpopular is not new. what is missing today are the bricks that actually used to keep the court not completely in line with public, but at least loosely in line with public opinion. and i think that's the real problem, that if we just look at the decisions the courts handed down, we tend to miss. i just want to add an anecdote of my own that supports what you said when chief justice warren got the court together to decide brown versus the board, he said no dissents and it has fit on one newspaper page. none of this flipping to section b column four. i want everyone be able to read it and understand it. same point as early as four. well, and i mean fast forward 1974 in the watergate tapes case, you know, the court rules eight nothing against president nixon in an opinion that is signed by his handpicked chief j

in this congress , 43,000 people registered online and not in person at the country level , of which people from law related fields registered with this congress, more than 900 people attended this congress in person, 16 of the people who participated in person foreign guests from 21 countries are present online today in this congress. from countries like jordan, pakistan, afghanistan, bangladesh, syria, turkey, malaysia, ecuador, qena, bolivia, sahil aj, uae, iraq, there are various countries that are present in this congress . nearly 17 top articles that will be presented by a referee, will be selected today in this congress in 5 specialized panels, although until the end of march. there is an opportunity for our dear lawyers to send their articles again, and all the articles, god willing , those that are submitted, the ones that are selected, and other articles in arabic, english , and farsi, god willing , will be translated and published in the hands of the people of the cross. red and the red crescent of the world should be among the 17 mentioned by you, who will publish their a

congress here in philadelphia wasn't the library of congress as we know it today, but it does begin herehe things that went to washington, dar when washington is burned, the war of 1812. we lose a lot of those early things. so so that's that's one of the challenges with a all things buo make do the best can to to give people that sense they come in to see them of what it lood li when men like james madison, young andrew jackson were sitting in this room as members of the house of representatives. well, they were in the chamber here at congress hall i the roou can see, is quite a bit more grand than the house of representatives would have been. there's there's a couple of reasons fornation go back to whe british. of course, british have a parliament with houses, an upper house, the house of lords, the lower house, the■r house common. and there's definitely parallels with our congress today. the of representatives is very commons and then the senatese of would therefore be to be based on the house of lords. but obviously we're not to have dukes and earls■% and noble tits like that, but whe

congress has not won india since 1984. after that, congress has been in government for 15 years.overnment or in minority government. congress has not been able to win post 1984. why? because there had been a structural problem in the way congress organises itself, the way it functions as an organisation, the way it reaches out to the public, the masses, the way it fights elections, the way they conduct and communicate. 968 million people will be eligible to vote in india's upcoming elections. and to pull that off, you need 15 million election workers. that is almost the combined population of london and new york. it is going to be a busy but exciting time for the world's largest democracy when they set out to the polls in an election that matters not only to the people living in it, but elsewhere in the world. you can watch a special programme all about india's upcoming upcoming elections. �*this is india' is on the bbc news channel over the weekend, and you can watch it any time on the iplayer. dipping into this white house briefing and hear whatjohn terry has to say. figs briefi

on my first day as president i introduced a bill i sent to congress. a comprehensive plan to fix the broken immigration system and to secure the border. but no action was taken. then months ago, my team began a serious negotiation with a bipartisan group of senators, democrats, republicans, it resulted in a compromise bill, the toughest set of border security reforms we have seen in thunt kri. it's pretty basic with this deal we could hire 1,500 additional border security agents. 1,500 additional officers. and between ports of entry, for the last four years, staffing has been roughly that. flat. just flat. agents workingover time. spending lon hours patrolling the border. making major sacrifices. and i know it takes a big toll on them and their families. that's why in december i signed a bill, finally getting border patrol agents, i've been pushed and reminded by congressman, wherever time they pay deserve. finally getting overtime pay. it's ridiculous it took this long. it was long past time. i was proud to do it. but we need to do more. it's time to

so could congress later decide this decision on whether the 14th amendment applies to trump?this decision today through what they would call self-executing legislation. i'm sorry, not self-executing, remedial legislation that congress would pass legislation to basically enact section 3 of the 14th amendment. you may recall, ana, and i think it's lost on a lot of folks, that shortly after january 6th there was a push among congressional democrats to do exactly that, to pass a piece of legislation through the house first and then potentially through the senate that would disqualify donald trump under section 3. it never really caught fire in large part because folks felt that, a, the impeachment process would wrap itself up, right? and so there wouldn't be any need. >> so this was a 9-0 decision, but in the concurring opinion, paul, the liberal supreme court justices called trump an oath breaking insurrectionist. direct quote, oath-breaking insurrectionist. what do you see as the significance of that? >> so that's one reason why justice barrett, a conservative on the court wrot

day congress resolved. i quote that two battalions of marines be raised, that they be distinguished by the names of the first and second battalion of american marines making the 10th in november. the official of the united states marines, which is celebrated by marines, regardless of where they are in the world, regardless of what their circumstances are, they still celebrate the birth of our core today and again, i shared with dr. brooks earlier how i distinctly recall being in a combat situation. we didn't the opportunity to have a full ball, a large birthday cake. so i took one of my my what we call meals ready to eat field rations had pound cake in it, took that little pound cake out, put a match in it and lit it. and we sang happy birthday to the marine corps. that's what marines. so congress directed washington order to form these two battalions of marines to cherry pick soldiers out of his battalions holding the british under siege in boston. and those sailors, soldiers that may have had any type of