when cornwallace went to virginia, it opened the possibility of yorktown conlan and that was something that washington didn't envision so much as the french did. washington, twice, with the french commander in america, met with him in hartford, in september of 1780, and at whethersfield, conn. in may of 1781. in both of those meetings, he asked washington, what do you want to do? both instances, washington said i want to campaign to take new york city. and he argued with washington, we can't succeed, we cannot succeed in an attack on new york city. the british have held it too long. they have had 6 years to prepare their defense, we cannot win. but he had been ordered by louis xvi, they fer to washington, do what he wants. so after that conference, at the weathers field conference, he agreed we will attack new york. washington rode back to west point, thinking that would be the next item on the agenda, but as soon as washington rode back, rode away, wroteshallow root to the admiral of the french fleet in the caribbean asking him to bring his fleet north, not to new york, as washington

talking about next year but 5, 6, 7, 8 years from now, india with strike capabilities and more strength conlanand independence, we can see some divergences that would not create a catastrophe but would be a divergence from what the united states is trying to accomplish in pakistan. >> how much progress is made in the relationship in response to the terrorist problem that india faces when it comes to building a relationship the united states in a corporate level and also in the government to government level? >> what i have seen is a willingness in the industry to look at u.s. technology. it will come down to price for the technology they're looking for. it was mentioned several times that there is an embedded supply chain that they're comfortable working with. they have to earn a seat at the table. >> i had a similar question. george seemed pessimistic about u.s. companies in gauging in the domestic security and defense. they can, and on the result of u.s. companies participating in defense needs. >> i would agree with what susan said, u.s. companies have to prove themselves, this is not a mar

we have learned about fish that only die temporarily and other matters conlan and it is no wonder that this panel has become one of the popular high light features of our conference. we are now going to bring the conference to close. i would like to call judge karen williams. >> i too want to thank each of our panelists today, and also professor howard, for the wonderful job that he did as our moderator. this term included decisions on a variety of subjects, and you all did a masterful job of exploring those decisions providing us with important take aways. there were several other people i would like to thank. chief justice roberts, his willingness to be addressed to the conference. this session added a lot to the discussion. to the most recent supreme court 7. my good colleague, paul newline, i am committed to you for what you did as program chair, this has just been fabulous, it was most informative. and a great success. to my good colleague, judge wilkinson. i might be the chief judge, he is the dean of this court. i also want to thank sam phillips and the staff of the executive's

all of this is important and i will come back to the health research that is at the art of today's conlan. i want to pause because there has been a lot of confusion about how did ministration is going about undergoing health care reform. in addition to addressing regional variation and moving towards a more efficient system, there is a moral imperative to expand coverage and reduce the ranks of the uninsured. to finance that expansion of coverage, we will have a hard offsets. i want to be very clear. the package, the reform plan as a whole will be deficit neutral in over the next 5 to 10 years. there is no ambiguity about that. many people have confused our effort to lead to a more efficient health-care system and address regional variation with the hard offsets that are reductions in payments for medicare and vantage plans, reductions in paymentss for other types of providers. >>>s in medication and additional revenue, with the changes that are necessary to lead to a more efficient health-care system. we need to do both, we need to offset the cost of any changes over the next 5 or 10 yea

sen want to add that i read the transcript when the senate debated conlan how much this situation has affected you personally in your state. the child that swallowed the charm may -- when i read the transcript, it made the law very real because you are right, so many people have died and been injured seriously because we have not been more vigilant entst children's products. you granted 3 exemptions from the lead components, one exemption is the inaccessible parts to certain electronic devices, and the commission can exempt children's toy if forseeable use or abuse, you can document that lead is not a absorb into the body. taose are the 3 areas where it can be exempt. the state enforcement has been issued so the industry can work to see if west's lead is needed in structural integrity. what you just brought up, of the largest issues facing the gairman and the commissioners, shat is how soon we can get clear guidance on these questions and this is not unknown to me. when i was elected state superintendent of education i came into an agency that had been cut, did not have the resources

do you have experienced enough, what are we talking about conlan and does that bring us to a question of whether the large states or small states, the competition is going to be such that both are paying essentially the same thing for that care which we know today is not true. >> if i understand your question correctly, let me answer it this way. it has been underway since the first of medicine reports and after a cooperative effort across the board in health-care to understand how it is that we address the system and quality problems because it is clear we have rollins and there are enormous costs linked to that. the bonet -- the estimate is that 35% of the money that we spend is for every year, for care that doesn't help people. we need to have -- the field knows this and they recognize it. so we are on track to change the way it is done and the way care is paid for to make it based on quality in a way that was never done before. i like to quote something my business colleagues said. we pay for health care like nothing else. we pay the same regardless of whether it is world-class ca