blm is this so-called 10 year conservation police to address conservation of the rated landscape and one of the problems with this is blm seems to preservation is the same conservation it's certainly not this playbook is not new form of iron in his nose he will decide their policies are classically atrocious you all the initiative which was rear-ended the number of you find old the proposed conservation rule is by and it fails to even define they consider conservation permissible under a conservation lead while the definition goes so far as will activities this is in itself letting as many members of the access federal land which was short by the addition be excluded as a lifelong hunter and fisherman i'm deeply concerned this will have devastating effects on the door recreation econ which depends on figures and guys. cool space landscape be temporarily close to access yet remains silent on how long these closures collapse being the american people that the blocks from accessing his conservation lease for the majority or entirety of the lease term are from a staff aggravated blm thes

blm is this so-called 10 year conservation police to address conservation of the rated landscape and one of the problems with this is blm seems to preservation is the same conservation it's certainly not this playbook is not new form of iron in his nose he will decide their policies are classically atrocious you all the initiative which was rear-ended the number of you find old the proposed conservation rule is by and it fails to even define they consider conservation permissible under a conservation lead while the definition goes so far as will activities this is in itself letting as many members of the access federal land which was short by the addition be excluded as a lifelong hunter and fisherman i'm deeply concerned this will have devastating effects on the door recreation econ which depends on figures and guys. cool space landscape be temporarily close to access yet remains silent on how long these closures collapse being the american people that the blocks from accessing his conservation lease for the majority or entirety of the lease term are from a staff aggravated blm thes

conservative again. _ always voted conservative and i will vote conservative again.vote conservative again. i'm torn. l always voted conservative and i will vote conservative again. i'm torn. i| vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't _ vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't think— vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't think we _ vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't think we should _ vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't think we should slow- vote conservative again. i'm torn. i don't think we should slow down i vote conservative again. i'm torn. ij don't think we should slow down so i'm not— don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard — don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard over— don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard over on _ don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard over on that— don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard over on that one. - don't think we should slow down so i'm not hard over on that one. it. i'm not hard over on that one. it doesn't — i'm not hard over on that one. it doesn't stop _ i'm n

but it so far has been trying to avoid conservative traps.— conservative traps.tive traps. but they are sticking with the 2030 ban on i conservative traps. but they are - sticking with the 2030 ban on petrol and diesel cars. i sticking with the 2030 ban on petrol and diesel cars.— and diesel cars. i think now they feel as if they _ and diesel cars. i think now they feel as if they actually _ and diesel cars. i think now they feel as if they actually need - and diesel cars. i think now they feel as if they actually need to i feel as if they actually need to come — feel as if they actually need to come out _ feel as if they actually need to come out and look sunak in the eyes and say, _ come out and look sunak in the eyes and say, we — come out and look sunak in the eyes and say, we are happy with our policy — and say, we are happy with our oli . f ., and say, we are happy with our oli . j ., ., , ., policy. they're not that frustrated with labour, _ policy. they're not that frustrated with labour, there _ policy. they're not that frustrated with labour, there 20 _

is conservation. so you can understand why we are concerned about making a separate category for conservation inadvertently makes to compete with other forms of conservation in conjunction with other uses. the multiple use structure has been in place for decades and the worst problem we have in my home is not being able to execute on it and arrogance quite frankly the flat-out arrogance for the administration , for yourselves to promulgate something like this thinking you know better than the people who live on this property and who depend on it and work on it and who have the biggest vested interest in it the biggest investment and to see it prosper for years and years, the arrogance is unbelievable. especially when the majority of the administration i would say probably hasn't even been there. i want to just summarize, i think you get a pretty good feel where we are app i just want to summarize. with this request i'd like to have an hearing in my state. the closest in person hearing in idaho was ren

i do with the conservative party. 0fcom — do with the conservative party. 0fcom is — do with the conservative a _ 0fcom is not strong enough? clearly not. gb news is a challenger - 0fcom is not strong enough? clearly not. gb news is a challenger brand i not. gb news is a challenger brand coming _ not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out — not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out of— not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out of the _ not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out of the right, _ not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out of the right, that - not. gb news is a challenger brand coming out of the right, that is - coming out of the right, that is what _ coming out of the right, that is what the — coming out of the right, that is what the sun— coming out of the right, that is what the sun was _ coming out of the right, that is what the sun was in _ coming out of the right, that is what the sun was in the - coming out of the right, that is what the sun was in the late i coming out of the right, that is i what the sun was in the late 60s. it's what the sun was in the

they conservatives are meant.way is simply to accept it. that is the path of the labour party, sadly, seem to have chosen, lower your site, give up on changing things, make your pitch, nothing more than not as bad as the tories. half—heartedly oppose what the conservatives are doing and shrug your shoulders and say, we would pretty much do the same thing. that is one way of responding to the cynicism but it has not liberal democrat way. applause -- it applause —— it is not the liberal democrat way. our —— it is not the liberal democrat way. 0urambition —— it is not the liberal democrat way. our ambition for our country is so much greater than that. our faith in the british people is much stronger than that. our path, the path we have always chosen, the path we walk today is to confront that cynicism head—on to offer people hope. not with yet more platitudes and promises, not by announcing another nebulous mission and that is eagerly forgotten when this beach is over, no, by fighting for big changes. the changes ne

, most conservative most conservative, most conserv. good the ones. >> the good ones, the bad ones.t know that they want really don't know that with rishi. and that's with rishi. and partly that's because he came in after liz truss just trying the truss just trying to put the fire there fire out. but we're still there and all of his policies, he's just lurching from thing to thing, you know, oh, maybe this week i'm going ban smoking, week i'm going to ban smoking, maybe week going maybe this week i'm going to crack down on people cracking down on car users there's down on car users like there's no theme. they just seem no common theme. they just seem to to to be lurching from crisis to crisis group to focus crisis and focus group to focus group. not going to group. and that's not going to win, right? it's never to win, right? it's never going to win. a lot of win. and i think a lot of conservatives frustrated conservatives are frustrated that what labour conservatives are frustrated thaiin what labour conservatives are frustrated thaiin the what labour conservatives are frustrated t

it seems like they forget that we succeeded because of a conservative agenda not in spite of it. i mean the truth is donald trump along with his imitators often sound like an echo of the progressives they seek to replace and a choice for the american people. for instance they argue that we can only end our crises at home by abandoning our allies abroad. like progressives republican populists insist government should dictate how private businesses operate. matter of fact the governor of florida still justifies using the power of the state to punish a corporation for taking a political sand that he disagreed with. and one of the president's populist proteges actually advocated a 59 percent inheritance tax in his book nation of victims last year. saying that americans should not become wealthy quote just by having rich parents. that's liberal redistributionist thinking. not conservatism. and maybe worst of all republican populists deny the coming debt crisis facing our children and grandchildren. today we have a national debt the size of our nation's economy for the first time since

.— conservatives.ervatives. people have been reticent to put a _ conservatives. people have been reticent to put a number- conservatives. people have been reticent to put a number on - conservatives. people have been reticent to put a number on the i reticent to put a number on the number of seats you are hoping to win, and you talk about the late 90s under paddy ashdown, do you think thatis under paddy ashdown, do you think that is where the lib dems could be again? is that a possibility? irate again? is that a possibility? we will be much stronger after the election— will be much stronger after the election and we will start to rebuild, _ election and we will start to rebuild, we have started already but we will _ rebuild, we have started already but we will he _ rebuild, we have started already but we will be rebuilding towards that kind of— we will be rebuilding towards that kind of strength. i'm not going to put a _ kind of strength. i'm not going to put a number on it because it is impossible _ p

we governed as conservatives. and the american people thrived in those days before the worst in a century pandemic struck our nation. it's really no mystery why we accomplished these things. when donald trump ran for president in 2016, he promised to govern as a conservative, and together we did. but it's important for republicans to know that he and his imitators in this republican primary make no such promise today. it seems like they forgot that we succeeded because of a conservative agenda, not in spite of it. i mean, the truth is donald trump, along with his imitators, often sound like an echo of the progressives they seek to replace. and a choice for the american people. for instance, they argue that we can only end our crises at home by abandoning our allies abroad. like progressives, republican populists insist government should dictate how private businesses operate. matter of fact, the governor of florida still justifies using the power of the state to punish a corporation for taking a political sand tha

for conservative party under invest in public services.— public services. yom _ public services. for the moment, thank yom we — public services. for the moment, thank you. we have _ public services. for the moment, thank you. we have some - public services. for the moment, i thank you. we have some breaking news for you and that is the scottish schools, the list of scottish schools, the list of scottish schools, the list of scottish schools affected by this concrete crisis have been listed and there are 30 in total. those are the schools, you can go to our website to see the list of those. 30 schools so far have been listed in scotland. there was a big increase, actually a quarter increase, in 2021's budget on these capital project for schools. we had done about 500 over the last ten years. the project is to do another 500. as i've already explained a couple of times, i don't want to keep going back on this for your viewers, but the building schools for the future programme that i know labour are very keen to push this morning only referred to secondary sch

at home and abroad they are not conservative . power over principal.nyone who knows about my background knows i started politics as a democrat. when i heard of the 40th president of the united40 statei joined the reagan revolution and never looked back. i came tore the republican party because of ronald reagan and i remember when i was roughly the age of many students here marveling, economic policies defeated inflation. jimmy carter told us we were a nation in malaise and had to accept new normal, slow economic growth reagan came in and said why not dream great dreams? we are americans. cut taxes, rollbackk regulation and promote economic freedom. the longest peacetime since the end of world war ii. it broke the soviet union eventually. strengthen ourvi military. some of the nomination and the populistn maintain reagan is no longer relevant but they confuse inspiration with imitation. in over four decades have passed from all three since he left this earth and his time and hours after. in his day cold war in the united states to find global politics n

the whole conservative shambles, they all have to go. whole conservative shambles, they all have to 90m out and then aet and our task is to get them out and then get the _ and our task is to get them out and then get the uk _ and our task is to get them out and then get the uk working _ and our task is to get them out and then get the uk working again. - and our task is to get them out and | then get the uk working again. that of course starts with the economy. we need to get our economy growing strongly again. conservative ministers might think 0% growth and 7% inflation are numbers to boast about but the british people certainly do not. inflation is still higher than at any time since black wednesday, worse even than at the height of the financial crisis, food prices up 30% in just two years, energy bills almost doubled, mortgage rates through the roof. and rishi sunak says it shows his plan is working. honestly, the prime minister sounds so complacent and out of touch, sometimes i think you must be knee deep in the upside down. —— he must. if this is what it looks like when your pla

conservatives rather than attracted towards _ conservatives rather than attracted towards you. — conservativesou, that poll lead is a bit| towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer— towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than — towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than it — towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than it would _ towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than it would be _ towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than it would be if- towards you, that poll lead is a bit softer than it would be if they - towards you, that poll lead is a bit| softer than it would be if they were really drawn — softer than it would be if they were really drawn to _ softer than it would be if they were really drawn to a _ softer than it would be if they were really drawn to a labour _ softer than it would be if they were really drawn to a labour vision - softer than it would be if they were really drawn to a labour vision but| really drawn to a labour vision but ithink— really drawn to a labour vision but i think they— really drawn to a labour vision but i think they are _ re

which don't go quite as far as the conservatives' very hard-line.i think labour are probably being quite careful how they play this. they don't want to be seen as quote unquote's soft touch on migration. but on the other hand, they want to ensure that, as far as their poor voters are concerned, progressive voters, if you like, that they are rather extremist. mohammed: ms. braverman also called on world leaders to make changes to the u.n. refugee convention. obviously this is not something she would be able to implement unilaterally. but do you think we will start seeing and hearing more calls for that guest: ? this is the sort of thing from time to time that leaders, usually leaders of relatively rich, stable countries who see relatively few refugees, say. i can see there being any progress. for the great simple reason, as unhcr have explained earlier in this discussion, the reality is that if we were to re-envisage refugee protection in any equitable way that could engage the entire international community, it would be obviously necessary to addres

., , conservatives? we cannot 'ust keep sendina. conservatives? is the answer to the question? my daughter will be | the question? my daughter will be -a in: . .. the question? my daughter will be paying- -- whose — the question? my daughter will be paying... whose responsibility - the question? my daughter will be paying... whose responsibility if l the question? my daughter will be paying... whose responsibility if it is a waste paying. .. whose responsibility if it is a waste of— paying... whose responsibility if it is a waste of money? _ paying... whose responsibility if it is a waste of money? it _ paying. .. whose responsibility if it is a waste of money? it will- paying... whose responsibility if it is a waste of money? it will be - paying... whose responsibility if it| is a waste of money? it will be h52 limited for — is a waste of money? it will be h52 limited for not _ is a waste of money? it will be h52 limited for not managing _ is a waste of money? it will be h52 limited for not managing it - limited for not managing it properly. limi

i was fighting conservatives every day of that. osborne didn't want me to invest in renewables and create the renewable revolution that we had and didn't want liberal democrats to pursue that, that green agenda. but we fought him. and you know what? we won. didn't look like that, did it? it looked like a love—in. from the minute nick clegg and david cameron came up and in a sense, wasn't that the whole point? wasn't this the dream that you, as liberal democrats, had — grown—up partnership, politics, parties working together like they do in large parts of europe and other parts of the world? why do you feel the need now to apologise for it? i'm not apologising. i'm just saying that behind the scenes we were fighting very hard. but let me tell you why i think it looked smoother from the outside, and that was because, and you've alluded to it, we wanted to show that coalitions could work. so we do believe, and you're quite right, we think britain would be a much stronger country, a much healthier country, a much more successful countr

the conservatives won that war. what we are seeing today, the last term of the supreme court, we will see for the foreseeable future, is the spoils, if you will, of that war, which have now gone to the conservatives. so, this supreme court is going to interpret the constitution and the laws of the united states in the ways that the conservative movement have insisted that they ought to be interpreted for these 50 years. with that, i will stop but that is the court that we are discussing today. for the first time in american history. >> i do want to get to the decisions themselves but, one thing that has hung over this term was a year ago, the overturning of roe versus wade, which was monumental not only in substance but also in overturning a long-standing precedent. that decision, roe v. wade was decided when i was three months old and that is how old it is. how has that, do you think, affected, in combination with what you talked about, the fact that precedent does not seem to be as sacred as it used to be, affect

the other issue as conservatives — government. the other issue as conservatives head _ government.ead up to - government. the other issue as - conservatives head up to manchester, or down to manchester, for their annual conference, the other big thing is tax. we have a group today are more than 30 conservative mps, including liz truss, the former prime minister, prime minister only very briefly, but prime minister nonetheless, saying they won't support any tax measures which increase the overall tax burden. that is unlikely to happen, but this is a warning shot to the government ahead of the autumn statement and his spring budget and the election next year. the government says the chancellorjeremy hunt says yes, we want to get taxes down, this isn't the time to cut taxes though, and what we will do is make the public sector more productive by the use of technology, and we will reform the benefit system.— technology, and we will reform the benefit system. thank you for taking us throu~h benefit system. thank you for taking us through that, _ benefit system. thank you for taking us t

where _ conservatives in northern areas. where is — conservatives in northern areas. government is that l those young voters potentially are already— those young voters potentially are already supportive _ those young voters potentially are already supportive of— those young voters potentially are already supportive of labour- those young voters potentially are already supportive of labour and i already supportive of labour and their— already supportive of labour and their green— already supportive of labour and their green policies. _ already supportive of labour and their green policies. so - already supportive of labour and their green policies. so who i already supportive of labour and their green policies. so who are i their green policies. so who are those _ their green policies. so who are those policies _ their green policies. so who are those policies trying _ their green policies. so who are those policies trying to - their green policies. so who are j those policies trying to benefit? their green policies. so who are i those policies trying to benefit? no d

the conservatives won that war. what we are seeing today the last term of the supreme court, we will see for the foreseeable future, it's spoils if you will of that war which have now gone to the conservatives. this supreme court is going to interpret the constitution and the laws of the united states in the ways that the conservative movement have insisted that they ought to be interpreted. with that, i will stop but that is the court that we are discussing today. for the first time in american history. >> i want to get to the decisions themselves but one thing that has hung over this term was a year ago, the overturning of roe v. wade which was monumental not only in substance, but also -- >> as secret as it used to be, affect the legitimacy of the court. >> roe v. wade was the target of the conservatives from the day it was decided almost 50 years ago. it came to be symbolic of the war for the supreme court. the war that has been fought out in public for the american people to see has largely been over roe v. wad

kind of conservative. i mean, you've already you know, one of those reasons, which is that i'd have a have a society in which we have certain standards governing transportation and food and drugs and airlines. and so forth, rather than one in which those didn't exist. i think we would agree to that to a degree. but but more than that, or even beyond those seemingly more obvious. and i think these actually are reflection of some things you said in london which is that we have a society and we maybe would debate over the of that, but we have a society increasingly has titanic forms of private globalized forms of private corporate quasi corporate power massive private institutions that cannot be adequately governed or, redressed at fairly local civil society will suffice. state governments, you know, if you like a company like walt disney, which has a valuable piece of real estate in state, you might be able to do something with them if you're a governor. but try that apple or with amazon this gets awfully di

the conservatives are doinu returns deal? the conservatives are doin: the returns deal?g the best they _ returns deal? the conservatives are doing the best they can _ returns deal? the conservatives are doing the best they can to _ returns deal? the conservatives are doing the best they can to conflatel doing the best they can to conflate several different issues and they are desperate to rerun the last election. it is almost like they have become contrary and i think this policy is a good one, sensible, and keir starmer is saying rationally that we need to create a solution to what is a very serious problem, small boats, and we want to work with our european partners to deal with that. keir starmer has been there today hopefully to lay the groundwork for those agreements that will hopefully come into place as and when a labour government takes power. that is the right thing to do and regards the whole brexit question, without getting into a university dissertation as to why we left, it is sensible that we are approaching our allies and working where the criminal activit

it is obviously a conservative held seat, and is it when the conservatives could win back? fascinating about _ back? they might do. what is fascinating about this, - back? they might do. what is fascinating about this, i - back? they might do. what is fascinating about this, i have | back? they might do. what is i fascinating about this, i have to rid the might reveal this, we bumped into each other in the newsroom and you sent me the task of trying to put this in some kind of context and it is really interesting because it is the kind of see the conservatives currently hold with a pretty large majority, labourwould currently hold with a pretty large majority, labour would require something like a 19 or 20% swing to overturn it so if they are winning in places like tamworth and the west midlands, a place that voted more towards brexit in the average —— than the average of the uk, it will tell you of the conservatives lose that they are in the whole world of trouble when it comes to the next general election. find trouble when it comes to the next general election.— general e

across the board, conservative think tanks, you have a very trumpist agenda, national conservatives,ou know, when he's getting in the polls, how what he's doing there, it's also a question that it is his agenda. >> steve bannon, let's talk about that, this coincides of your, bud? right what we have here in what don bacon told me yesterday, what a number of republicans are saying, they're saying what a lot of frustrated conservatives have been saying about the republican party for a while. it's a party that has stopped governing. don bacon said, i don't know if these people win. i don't even know if i can call them the far-right, a far-right would assume is an ideology behind this. this chaos caucus is like pigpen, right? it's a bunch of people with dirt flying around them. it does seem like their only goal is chaos. you've written a book about this, when the republican party stopped governing, this doesn't coincide with project 2025. prouder 2025 feels like a resurgence of a new conservative movement that could succeed over the next two or three presidential cycles. that's not what's

the debate will pay who is right, who should be running the conservative party, should the conservativesthe middle? it is a key debate, debate, a live debate within the governing conservative party. will it flare up before the probably not. most conservatives, whether enthusiastically or not, have realised that they will probably be going into the election with rishi sunak. now, this was no ordinary sunday stroll. sports broadcasterjeff stelling and about 300 others yesterday trekked 26 miles from wembley stadium to the home of wycombe wanderers. they were raising money for prostate cancer research, in memory of one of wycombe's most ardent fans, the former bbc breakfast presenter bill turnbull. graham satchell was with them. three, two, one! cheering they're walking from wembley to wycombe — inspired by bill turnbull, it's a marathon to raise money for prostate cancer uk. it's a year or so since prostate cancer claimed bill's life, you know, so itjust seemed an appropriate tribute to go from wembley — where he enjoyed a couple of great days with wycombe — you know, to wycombe's home at

from that debt deal, you have conservative feel pretty burned by the fact that mccarthy teamed up with democrats to stave off this crisis and that vote required a lot of democratic help. they say the speaker went back on a lot of his promises he made in order to get elected speaker earlier this year. i think we remember how chaotic that process was. you have all of these freedom caucus members who are saying this is our moment to stand our ground and make our demands and not fold on those demands. already, we have seen house republicans dropped spending bills that are below the spending levels negotiated in the debt deal. tens of billions of dollars that could be utilized in many different ways are being left on the table. conservatives are demanding steeper spending cuts then what happened negotiated and ate the republican negotiation bills and you have a number of other demands that have to be met. folks like congressman chip roy who is saying he is not going to vote for any kind of continuing resolution to find the government unless -- to fund the government unless speaker mccarthy

i the conservatives do change it. lets _ the conservatives do change it. lets say— the conservatives set — will find money. what we will do is we will set out in our manifesto and do analysis— we will set out in our manifesto and do analysis as they stand then. there _ do analysis as they stand then. there has— do analysis as they stand then. there has always been cross—party consensus — there has always been cross—party consensus. if they are about to change. — consensus. if they are about to change, they should come out and make _ change, they should come out and make it _ change, they should come out and make it clear. gur change, they should come out and make it clear.— change, they should come out and make it clear. our about a change? this is a complex _ make it clear. our about a change? this is a complex process _ make it clear. our about a change? this is a complex process that i make it clear. our about a change? this is a complex process that the l this is a complex process that the secretary of state will go through. i can't pre—empt the process. it was the conservatives

, conservatives, we believe in lower taxes. >> as conservatives , we believe >> as conservatives, we being on the side of hard working households and families as conservatives, we believe in hope and aspiration . hope and aspiration. >> so what does that look like now? >> that should mean lower taxes. the to start the burden of tax has to start to down. however look at to come down. however look at the cycle that we're in right now more fiscal now. we've got one more fiscal cycle potentially before a general election. how and it's not about being bold or not just about being bold or ambitious. it's about being conservative and ensuring that the public keep more of the money earn rather than money that they earn rather than seeing the size of the state continue which which continue to grow, which which chopper has done. sure chopper it has done. i'm sure you've about this and you've written about this and you've written about this and you've about this before. you've spoken about this before. that's the space that we need to be reduce the of be in. reduce use the size of the state and

we need conservative. the whole premise of the united states self-government and public trust is the key to the american experiment. in everything madison ever said conservative discipline and and self-government in an individual sense and in a collective descent. that sense is what we need. in 1963, at the march on washington, there was not one single lottery in the united states. there hadn't been one since the supreme court finally obliterated the louisiana a serpent, i think, in 1903, setting a constitutional precedent for public laws to govern private behavior in some senses, state behavior. there were no lotteries. the first state lottery was established with great restraint in the state of new hampshire in 1964. in movement led by the manchester union leader. some of you know about the manchester union leader as a met in rallies for three goals. number one avoid having any statewide taxes by establishing a lottery number to oppose the civil rights bill that was then pending and in congress. and numb

so the national lie conservancy decided to do things differently. we will worry about approaching those institutional fund. those funds for trans conservation because and then they will tend to amenities and we wanted to buy a new yeah. a model that is community lead. the vision is i'm the she's the one to create one of the longest wildlife car doors for my sy mara. so are the results and onto the serengeti. people who live in areas like this for a say they wants to be more involved in conservation axis, and that's why it's so important for them to have the community to conservative. and they off thriving job or liberal. nicholas says he signed the set aside land for the protected area. living found that the local, that you'll see, the standards of livings improved. we put aside money for our children's education to with this we fund one times a hard, especially during a drunken community member deep into that contributions to help provide food and other basic commodities. tories often stop over at the village to some pull the traditional way of lif

it is easy to be a conservative that wants to do nothing. i believe america wants to find the conservative that can make government work efficiently, income and accountability. that is what we are doing in our appropriations process. in the wasteful spending, the wokism, most important lead to secure our border. our president who never once talked to any of us during the challenge of the government shutting down. he watches night after night as thousands across the border illegally because of his policies. the largest number ever in the last month. for 50 years he has been elected to office. he has been to more dinners with hunter biden's business partners than he has gone to the border. things have to change. our border has to be secure. we have to end wasteful spending to end inflation that he has created. that is exactly what we will do and exactly what we are doing when we put our commitment to america to work. was it that, let me introduce an amazing team up here from our leader to our whip to our conference chair to all the members tha

it's going to be yet again conservatives jostling for position— again conservatives jostling for position for the liz truss— position in the post sunak world for the liz truss is our manoeuvres, suelta _ the liz truss is our manoeuvres, suella braverman is rolling the pitch — suella braverman is rolling the pitch. watch unfortunate is there is nothing _ pitch. watch unfortunate is there is nothing that the british public are more _ nothing that the british public are more set — nothing that the british public are more set up the sight of seeing in the conservative party to king for power _ the conservative party to king for power among themselves. they are going _ power among themselves. they are going to _ power among themselves. they are going to be doing it at the weekend and next _ going to be doing it at the weekend and next week under it the full glare of— and next week under it the full glare of the public spotlight for power— glare of the public spotlight for power among themselves. they are going _ power among themselves. they are going to _ power among themselves. they are going

and one conservative mp her job.'s conducted herself , in she's conducted herself, in particular that interview particular in that itv interview show absolutely selfish particular in that itv interview shov shameless solutely selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless andtely selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless and not selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless and not fit.fish particular in that itv interview shov shameless and not fit to h and shameless and not fit to stay in office. it's a indictment of rishi and indictment of rishi sunak and the he has appointed the people he has appointed in his cabinet. but for me, actually it was the daily telegraph. steven edgington who expertly summed up why this westminster circus proves the british msm is now broken. >> it's so tiresome defending keegan. but this hot mic scandal is the perfect example of our broken media. this is not a story serving the public interest. it is clickbait for twitter and was very poor form for itv to

that is something conservatives had been asking for. it would give commitments that the 12 appropriations bills would be considered at $1.5 trillion and would include that commission on studying the federal debt and deficit. also, it includes parts of the house gop's border bill, minus a controversial provision. emerging from this closed door meeting a number of republicans said they were supportive, including two holdouts that said they were against the initial resolution. that is ralph norman from south carolina and bob good. they said they would vote for this continuing resolution proposal, but kevin mccarthy is not out of the woods yet. there are three conservative republicans who emerged from that meeting saying they would not support this continuing resolution and we heard from congressman matt gaetz and tim burchett who said they know of seven lawmakers -- including them -- you will never vote for a continuing resolution. it was successful for him because he was able to unlock that pentagon appropriations bill and flip some holdo

and one conservative mp her job.he's conducted herself , in she's conducted herself, in particular that interview particular in that itv interview show absolutely selfish particular in that itv interview shov shameless solutely selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless andtely selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless and not selfish particular in that itv interview shovshameless and not fit.fish particular in that itv interview shov shameless and not fit to h and shameless and not fit to stay in office. it's a indictment of rishi and indictment of rishi sunak and the he has appointed the people he has appointed in his cabinet. but for me, actually it was the daily telegraph. steven edgington who expertly summed up why this westminster circus proves the british msm is now broken. >> it's so tiresome defending keegan. but this hot mic scandal is the perfect example of our broken media. this is not a story serving the public interest. it is clickbait for twitter and was very poor form for itv